Asto (Assistance Service: Fill & Download for Free

Holy Hannah! I see so called ‘proper Answers’ which are Promoting Improper Fractions!I must say:Oh No, not anotherCompleting the Mr. Alfred T. Bonkers Gong in a Hatand/orImpresent Gismometry Example…Why do I always get the Cherry Pits in the Apple Pie?This one had so much potential to be a Good Example too:[math]^{A. (2x+4)(x-1)=2x^2-2x+4x-4=2x^2+2x-4}[/math]Solve for 2x+4=x-1[math]^{B. (2x-4)(x+1)=2x^2+2x-4x-4=2x^2-2x-4}[/math]Solve for 2x-4=x+1[math]^{C. (x+2)(2x-2)=2x^2-2x+4x-4=2x^2+2x-4}[/math]Solve for x+2=2x-2[math]^{D. (x-2)(2x+2)=2x^2+2x-4x-4=2x^2-2x-4}[/math]Solve for x-2=2x+2[math]^{E. (x+4)(2x-1)=2x^2-x+8x-4=2x^2+7x-4}[/math]Solve for x+4=2x-1[math]^{F. (x-4)(2x+1)=2x^2+x-8x-4=2x^2-7x-4}[/math]Solve for x-4=2x+1[math]^{G. (2x+1)(x-4)=2x^2-8x+x-4=2x^2-7x-4}[/math]Solve for 2x+1=x-4[math]^{H. (2x-1)(x+4)=2x^2+8x-x-4=2x^2+7x-4}[/math]Solve for 2x-1=x+4Instead what is it? A.nother B.ad C.omplex D.izzying E.xample F.or G.eometrical H.aphazardliness!Lest, I do not illustrate this:€=Coefficient Symbol(€E+4€C)/€5=(10€x^2+15€x-€20)/€5=2x^2+3x-4(€H+4€C)/€5=(10€x^2+15€x-€20)/€5=2x^2+3x-4Why is this a Misnotation to suggest it is square?I. How does one actually together to a Square:In Fig C. Solve for x+2=2x-2x+4=2xx=4In Fig E. Solve for x+4=2x-1x+5=2xx=5II. How does one actually together to a Square:In Fig C. Solve for x+2=2x-2x+4=2xx=4In Fig H. Solve for x+4=2x-1x+4=2x-1x=5You don’t. Try to Cut out cardboard or paper to that x-based dimension that lacks y.Fig. E and H, both should have used y, as In Conflict to the Value for a ‘Whole Integer Based Solution' which is always more Properly Notated thanRecommendationsEnter the Dean’s Office with 4 quantity One Dollar Bills, and ask him if he can make change for $5When he says: That's not $5Act like you are grabbing a dollar from your wallet.Pass the Professor's Study of x=5=4 to the DeanSay: Gosh! Wow! Such Disheartening News!Leave the Dean's Office.Scientific ExplanationRarely if Ever does a Notation utilize or derive a Fractional Result, except: It was Desymmetrified by an invalid: Proficiency, Deficiency or Coefficiency or was a Misnotation or Substitution forwhich the Latter Associative was placed in x,y terms for being resolved rather than x,yForensical Analyses of Extortions Unlimited[math]^101[/math]You are the Criminal, and need a Resolve for Wage Per Hour/Clients[math]4x^2-13x=76/19^2-39/19[/math]And know[math]4x^2/x-13x/x=y/x [/math]Can and should better notate instead with[math]1444x-247y{=>}37u-T[/math]Where u=Unknowns, which caused an Auditor to even use Algebrae to even try to Figure this Out as the Total Number of Receipts from Billing should Equal:([Addend1]x)+([Addend2]y]=Sum[x OR y]Where: If you werent charging two different rates to your Clients, or Defrauding Waged Hire, or Involved in Illegal Activities, you should have y=x and [x OR y]=xWhere T Equals Off the Record Distributions to a Discriminatory ‘Club’.And Because you should Notate All Revenues from all Sources and any Differences via Discriminatory Rates of Service to say: Burglarize the Black Guy, to Award the Racist, but, as you are Going to Prison if the Auditor Finds this out, you want to derive an example to Lie to your Auditor Whom found you are Evading Taxes, Imposts, Fees, etc...Laundry List a Day Long and a Mile Wide, by Misreporting your Sources of Revenue as From Fewer Clients in Category Y and you need affirm that Category Singular Exists rather than Categories Plural as:3/19=x.1 =x Margin over Cost from 22:19 Ventures to Black Clients6/72=x.2 = y Margin Over Cost from 78:72 Services to White ClientsWhich is an Estimate the Auditor Gathered from 2 Clients, whom as Friends, Recieved Two Different Charges for the Same Job, and When Discussing this Together, decided to Both Report this as ‘a Strange Observance’ to Police.Yet, as you want to Elude Justice, you need arrange a Consolidated x that Means:[math]^{(Black Guy Rate/a€x)+(Racist Reduced Rate/b€x)/2=1/€}[/math]To suggest you are not following a Script theredure Testimony of: ‘Both Paid Same One Dollahs’ while you are Acting Very Very Dumb about Anything Especially ‘Too Mathy', and May also need an Interpreter to a Mixed Language Unknown and plausibly Migrant Tongue: Hispangloenglitaliaportuparigueciatexan Amwasticarabalcticatonesian to Assist you with a Better Understanding of the Auditor's Interrogations.So to avoid going to a Turkish Prison for 65y Years, wherey=Cents Associable the Amounts you Intentionally Defraud the Tax Collector and Burglarize the Black GuysYou conjure instead an ‘Acceptible Discriminatory Hire Wage Service Differential Not See Tax Not Paid Tax Pay Nonstandard Reserve Club Ticket’ which is:Acceptible by Underinforming Tax Collectors whom fee alot less than they should.Redeemed by Differentials, and Tax Frauds, as: budgeting a Backing for these Tickets.Usually Rendered to a Club of ‘Like Minded' Persons, whom ‘Gather’ in ‘Assemblies'.And rather than notate properly:[math]1444x-247y{=>}37u-T[/math]x=3/19=(22/19)-(19/19)y=6/72=(78/72)-(72/72)u=Any Percentiles you Overcharge Homosexuals to Make this Reasonibly Balanced with Tickets FeesT=Ticket Contributions and ValuesSo you know what Rates to Print on Falsified Receipts, You notate instead[math]4x^2-13x=76/19^2-39/19[/math]To derive x, and totally deny existency of Category Y, and Category U Peoples and Clients, and also deny existency of the Discriminatory Cult and Tickets.SummaryEven in a Simple Example whereat: 3/19=9/57=x in something alike 19x+57x=12 or 3/x+9/y=76 should have instead used the Appropriate Notation:x=3 with y=9 to NotateA. €1[x/19 + y/57]=19x+57y=12B. €2[x/19 + y/57]=3/x+9/y=76By the Information Provided in Figure A and B, deduce the Values for x=y÷(3/3) with €1 and €2.Meaning in English, Please?I. Whenever you get a Decimal or Fractional Partiality as the Result for either of x or y, it was no Longer a Proper Algebraic Notation, but instead: Dynamic Physics Notation, which needs verify the Traits, etc Entirety of that Specific Entirety, as was Conjunct Superimpositionally to a Set II Variable and thus not even an x-based or y-based equation but instead was something more alike:[math]37Q^2-22n+3t=59u(OM[-/+])+3=57.083868985[/math]but for purpose of Associative Property became instead:[math]37x^2-22y+3=57.08386895[/math]Which in an Associable Entry Exam:31. [math]^{37Q^2-22n+3t=59u(OM[-/+])+3=57.083868985}[/math]By reasonings inclusive in Vaccuosity Method which prove that the t=1 by Sum=Sum(t), atwhich you need not devote that letter to the Thermality Present Constant but reserve that for t=Triangles in A/24 nor need Utilize that Form which is associable (n+Q)=y+(x/y) and also[math]n+b^2=SP[/math]To instead utilize and Integrate a Tool of Actuary Transferrency via Superimpositional to Improper but Like x-form to thus resolve the Entire Unified Posilution of OM (+/-) which is essential to Mutate the Operation away from the Downward Curve of Exit, to an Upward Curve that Impairs the Exit and Results:[math]37Q^2+22n=59u=□[/math]Resolve Truth of Circumstance:[math]^{[/math][math]37Q^2-22n+3t=59u(OM[-/+])+3=57.083868985}[/math]To Enable derivation of the Actual n+Q associable to y+(x/y) for the Actual values for u, x, y, n, Q, b, €A, OM, and a as resident in that Dimensionality of:[math] ^{[(€A/[(n+Q)-(x/y)]=(x/y)]^e}[/math]II. Whenever you have a Dual Result for an Algebra the Usual Cause of that Duality is that: The Positivity is a Presumed Positivity, (usually False) thereby due to a Resident ‘Mispresentation of Tense’ whereby:A said Positivity was not Matured, but instead Truncated and Premature, involving a BipolarityWhich Results of Tense with Two Different Degrees of Discretions pertaining Speeds or Directions [derived as Associable of cx/y exitting] on a Particular Slope° of the [math]x^2[/math] Spherex-((c.1x/y))= Result 1=x.1x-((c.2)x/y)=Result 2=x.2Bywhich:The two results differ because: One is Future Tense, Post-Decay, the other is Past Tense, but also because: When c=y it is no longer placed in the middle of a Ramp with Slope° but rather: Falling Parallel to the Cliff.Slope is best envisioned as A Hinged Ramp with adjustible Poles for Adjusting the Hinge Height, atwhich the Angle can be 1° to 180° reliant on the Actual Height of the Hinges to the Floor which Discerns the Trajectory of the Ball Placed at the Conjunct ofDiagonal Measure of the Hinge to the Outermost Point via a Slope of 67.5°WithHalf the Ramp Parallel to the FloorAsto: the Percent of the [math]x^2[/math] Ball Within the observation area, and outside that area, and the speed atwhich it exits, vairigated by the Slope° onwhich the Ball is Placed in Terrestrial Gravity as Associable to Circumstance bywhich t=1, proven by the H2O boiling at 100°C rather than 22°C by PSI.Which is to say:When you arrive that Duality to the Physicist, and Ask he to Make a Slingshot, which Shoots Marbles at that Unified c related to Speed% Essential asto Create 2 Speeds, and Directions, he may Affirm: ‘You’ll Shoot yer eye out Kid…’ because sometimes you are Holding that slingshot backwards like Wile E Coyote, due to Facts:[x-(cx/y)]/[y-c]=Tense.(Present+1)[x+(cx/y)]/(y+c)=Tense.(Present-1)x/y=Tense.Present€A/[(n+Q)-(x/y)]=DimensionalityDimensionality Has 3 Tenses toox/y=[x-[(y-1)(x/y)]](x/y)=[x-[(y-1)(x/y)]] Is Tense.B.Numerator when y-1=c(x/y)=[x-[(y-1)(x/y)]] Is Tense.A.Numerator when y-1=-c OR 1-y=cSummary in English?You just cannot Permeate an Association and Suggest it is ‘Physically Proven by Science’, but rather instead:You must use those Values derived by Substitutions with x,y Substantially in the Circumstance that You Utilized x,y to Substitute to a Realism of: Whatever it was to be, from the x,y it assuredly wasn't.x,y it assuredly wasn't, readily applies to:Multiple Responses for either or bothMultipolar or Bipolar ResponsesFractional Responses which Intersect OM alike(3x+4y)OM[(y/x OR 1)]=12y=OM=(×/+)=12/7Resolve x and y by the information providedFractional Responses which only align OM5/8=OM[÷/+]rResolve (5/8)/[OM[÷/+]] For r=Addition ProblemFractional or Decimal Based Misconstruences that imply Large Scale=Small ScaleFractional Responses which Merit a complete Renotation using a Common Denominator associable to a Coefficiency Symbol=€Moronic Suggestion that x=0 is Notation rather thanx-(cx/y) with y=c notates a swift exit and is directly associable 1-(c/y) as a Factor to x, that Must be Notated and Consistent Throughout.Moronic suggestion y=0 rather thany-c with y=c is associable the selfsame swift exit, associable a factor of 1-(c/y) as a Factor to y, that must be Notated and Consistent Throughout.

Before I talk about the episode, I want to stress that this all my opinion and so naturally, may not align with your own. Which is totally fine we’re allowed to have our own opinions, even if they are not the same as yours.Ok the, The Tsuranga Conundrum….So the episode starts with the gang looking around a junkyard planet with metal detectors, for…um…something. Honestly what are they actually looking for? Not that it really matters because its never brought up again (but would probably made for a more entertaining episode). Anyway they end up accidentally detonating a landmine.Fortunately an ambulance ship just so happens to be passing over head. So they’re all beamed up. The Doctor actually seems to be affected by her injury, at least to begin with anyway. This makes her very vulnerable (not a bad idea) and our monster of the week is draining the ship’s systems, including the life support, which adds real tension for our characters. So like Arachnids in the UK before it, a pretty good setup.But unfortunately, once again it comes off feeling like the first draft of the script. So we have a tried and tested formal, in the classic base-under-siege storyline (a staple of the Troughton era) and a monster that is draining an ambulance ship’s power supply, whilst full of patients needing attention. All pretty promising stuff so far. But the monster, the Pting is a little, adorable, pudgy creature that survives by consuming energy (a fact the Doctor takes practically the whole episode to figure out). So essentially Nibbler from Futurama then. This for me severely ruined any sort of tension I was feeling up to this point, as I couldn’t take it seriously.As usual, each episode is populated with its own characters, which the gang interacts with. So not only do you have to give our guest cast their own character development, you also have to our gang something to contribute to the story. This is a tough challenge in itself. But when you have a full quartet as your TARDIS team, quite often someone is going to be underserved, and for the 5th time this series, Yaz is that someone. Mandip Gill always gives a good performance but she really isn’t given anything to do, outside of asking questions and generally being a sponge for the Doctor’s rambling info-dumps. Graham and Ryan, on the other hand are given more great development. Graham becomes even more endearing to the audience, when he assists in the birth of the pregnant bloke (I’ll talk about him in a moment), even though he has no idea what he’s doing but will give it a go because, and I quote has “seen call the midwife” and Ryan gives more explanation as to why he was raised by his gran (Grace) and why his dad was absent from her funeral at the end of The Woman Who Fell to Earth. This is all good to stuff but it could have been written better and was also not the time to discuss to bring it up, as it really ruins the momentum.Now obviously, the reason why Ryan’s dad is shoehorned it this scene was clearly so Ryan can relate to the pregnant man subplot. So I suppose I should discuss the guest cast. We have,Yoss (pregnant man) - I didn’t mind him, although he could have looked a bit more alien. But it’s interesting to explore different alien physiology.Eve (the general) - I like the fact that she knew of the Doctor, or has at least heard the legends of her. I also liked the aspect of her having this “pilot’s heart” syndrome where she had to keep her adrenaline up, even although it meant she was going to die at the end.Durkas (the engineer) - I liked the inferiority complex he has with his sister, Eve who is a renowned pilot and warhero, while he being an engineer, is always overshadowed by her.Ronan (the android) - A nice addition and could’ve actually contributed something to the story, as no living organism is able to touch the Pting but, he, being synthetic could have. Of course the Pting would also try to eat him because of this as well. But didn’t so he ended up being useless.Mabli (female nurse) - I liked the idea of the inexperienced nurse, that needs to find her courage and prove herself. But I don’t know if it’s the actress, Lois Chimimba, or the way she was written but I found her really annoying.Astos (male nurse) - He served his purpose as the experienced medical professional that informs the Doctor (and us) of what’s going on then promptly dies in the most stupid of horror clichés. He does share good chemistry with Jodie and are genuinely interesting.Chibnall is capable of writing good one-off characters, as demonstrated in The Woman Who Fell to Earth, the security guard getting a tiny bit of development before his death was a lovely touch. And again here, he is able to craft likeable characters, who while certainly couldn’t hold a two-parter together, confined to this one episode are perfectly serviceable.And while I get what Chibnall was trying to go for, by making the Pting this weird, adorable little creature that is just absentmindedly putting everyone in harms way as opposed to the stereotypical deadly creature we initially think it’s going to be. It just doesn’t work for me. We could have had a far better episode had he stuck with this premise, perhaps implementing a Weeping Angel, Vashta Nerada or a brand new terrifying monster that would raise the stakes and would truly emphasise the Doctor’s warning at the end of the last episode about “not being able to guarantee that they’ll be safe”.One thing I think this episode does do pretty well, is that it has a pretty good sense of humour. Particularly with Graham helping in the birth. However the juxtaposition of the Pting’s design and the race against time is where this episode suffers the most.Wait there’s a race against time? Yeah, so there’s this self destruct mechanism that if a message isn’t responded to from the hospital space station HQ thingy, said self destruct mechanism will start a countdown. Yeah it felt pretty last minute in the episode too. So of course it goes into the coutdown after the Doctor essentially pulls a Solo.Reading through this review, you’d think I hated this episode. But honestly I don’t. As it stands, I was still entertained enough by it. Which considering the sole purpose of any film or tv show is to do exactly that, I think its fair to say it’s not that bad. But that’s the problem, it wasn’t that bad. When you’ve only got 10 episodes, you really can’t afford to have many “meh” episodes. We’re now half way through the series and so far the only episodes that truly stand out are The Woman Who Fell to Earth and Rosa. This is not a good sign, however thankfully things do start to pick back up towards the end.