Trust Deed Sample Pakistan: Fill & Download for Free

Disclaimer: I highly suggest not to continue reading if you are at an influential age range.There were some comments and people privately messaging me, asking if I could take this article down with the reason it "generates hatred towards a certain community" (nobody criticized the sources or denied it happened though and according to the person's profiles none of them was a Muslim).As you can see, I didn't, this is why:I totally agree with the argument I received which looked all like: "Given the current demographics and communal sensitivities, such information can be used by some groups to instill vengeance in young minds and lead to comunal disharmony, which can bring no good to the country."But on the other hand I think that denying or censoring it from the general population is also no acceptable solution. History can't be stopped of repeating itself if no one is educated about it.My main argument to myself for letting this post as it was is Germany, I know one can't compare India or Asia per se with central Europe. But look, Nazi-Germany did some very bad things back than, it is not that long since and they did it in a much shorter time. Is there any hatred towards Germany today or even security threats? Maybe some comments in the internet could one make believing it, but the truth is NO, there are no such things in reality. I've never heard of a Jewish person directly attacking uninvolved Germans for what their ancestor did. Now I honestly believe Indian are not that different in this case and smart enough to differ between a Muslim centuries ago and one today. To differ between something happened during a long time span centuries ago and something similar but still totally different happening during a long time span today.Since you are still reading I hope you are mature enough not to forget what tolerance is and how it is very important in combination with knowledge about history. I believe in Humanity, don't prove me wrong, please.The original Post:I don't know how much is taught about the biggest genocide in world history in Indian schools, but at least here in Europe we learn only about the Nazi holocaust. The slaughtering of even dozens of million more victims - which were not killed in a 'manufactory' way like in the Nazi Holocaust - but by sole hand; the Indian holocaust is probably the saddest story in world history.TL;DR:An estimate of 80 million Hindus killed in the total jihad against India. [Koenard Elst, Negationism In India, Voice of India, New Delhi, 2002, pg. 34.] The country of India today is only half the size of ancient India, due to jihad. The mountains near India are called the Hindu Kush, meaning the “funeral pyre of the Hindus.”-The biggest genocide in history - nearly forgottenThe biggest holocaust in World HistoryThe genocide suffered by the Hindus of India at the hands of Arab, Turkish, Mughal and Afghan occupying forces for a period of 800 years is as yet formally unrecognised by the World.The only similar genocide in the recent past was that of the Jewish people at the hands of the Nazis; of the Africans during the slave trade and also the almost total extermination of native populations like the Aboriginal people in Australia and the native Indians, Aztecs, Incas, etc. in North and South America.The holocaust of the Hindus in India was of even greater proportions, the only difference was that it continued for 800 years, till the brutal regimes were effectively overpowered in a life and death struggle by the Sikhs in the Panjab and the Hindu Maratha armies in other parts of India in the late 1700's.We have elaborate literary evidence of the World’s biggest holocaust from existing historical contemporary eyewitness accounts. The historians and biographers of the invading armies and subsequent rulers of India have left quite detailed records of the atrocities they committed in their day-to-day encounters with India’s Hindus.These contemporary records boasted about and glorified the crimes that were committed - and the genocide of tens of millions of Hindus, mass rapes of Hindu women and the destruction of thousands of ancient Hindu / Buddhist temples and libraries have been well documented and provide solid proof of the World's biggest holocaust.Quotes from modern historiansDr. Koenraad Elst in his article “Was There an Islamic Genocide of Hindus?” states:“There is no official estimate of the total death toll of Hindus at the hands of Islam. A first glance at important testimonies by Muslim chroniclers suggests that, over 13 centuries and a territory as vast as the Subcontinent, Muslim Holy Warriors easily killed more Hindus than the 6 million of the Holocaust. Ferishtha lists several occasions when the Bahmani sultans in central India (1347-1528) killed a hundred thousand Hindus, which they set as a minimum goal whenever they felt like punishing the Hindus; and they were only a third-rank provincial dynasty."The biggest slaughters took place during the raids of Mahmud Ghaznavi (ca. 1000 CE); during the actual conquest of North India by Mohammed Ghori and his lieutenants (1192 ff.); and under the Delhi Sultanate (1206-1526)."[NB: Wiki Link: Mahmud of Ghazni]He also writes in his book "Negation in India":"The Muslim conquests, down to the 16th century, were for the Hindus a pure struggle of life and death. Entire cities were burnt down and the populations massacred, with hundreds of thousands killed in every campaign, and similar numbers deported as slaves. Every new invader made (often literally) his hills of Hindus skulls. Thus, the conquest of Afghanistan in the year 1000 was followed by the annihilation of the Hindu population; the region is still called the Hindu Kush, i.e. Hindu slaughter."Will Durant argued in his 1935 book "The Story of Civilisation: Our Oriental Heritage" (page 459):"The Mohammedan conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. The Islamic historians and scholars have recorded with great glee and pride the slaughters of Hindus, forced conversions, abduction of Hindu women and children to slave markets and the destruction of temples carried out by the warriors of Islam during 800 AD to 1700 AD. Millions of Hindus were converted to Islam by sword during this period."Francois Gautier in his book 'Rewriting Indian History' (1996) wrote:"The massacres perpetuated by Muslims in India are unparalleled in history, bigger than the Holocaust of the Jews by the Nazis; or the massacre of the Armenians by the Turks; more extensive even than the slaughter of the South American native populations by the invading Spanish and Portuguese."Writer Fernand Braudel wrote in A History of Civilisations (1995), that Islamic rule in India as a"colonial experiment" was "extremely violent", and "the Muslims could not rule the country except by systematic terror. Cruelty was the norm – burnings, summary executions, crucifixions or impalements, inventive tortures. Hindu temples were destroyed to make way for mosques. On occasion there were forced conversions. If ever there were an uprising, it was instantly and savagely repressed: houses were burned, the countryside was laid waste, men were slaughtered and women were taken as slaves."Alain Danielou in his book, Histoire de l' Inde writes:"From the time Muslims started arriving, around 632 AD, the history of India becomes a long, monotonous series of murders, massacres, spoliations, and destructions. It is, as usual, in the name of 'a holy war' of their faith, of their sole God, that the barbarians have destroyed civilizations, wiped out entire races."Irfan Husain in his article “Demons from the Past” observes:“While historical events should be judged in the context of their times, it cannot be denied that even in that bloody period of history, no mercy was shown to the Hindus unfortunate enough to be in the path of either the Arab conquerors of Sindh and south Punjab, or the Central Asians who swept in from Afghanistan…The Muslim heroes who figure larger than life in our history books committed some dreadful crimes. Mahmud of Ghazni, Qutb-ud-Din Aibak, Balban, Mohammed bin Qasim, and Sultan Mohammad Tughlak, all have blood-stained hands that the passage of years has not cleansed..Seen through Hindu eyes, the Muslim invasion of their homeland was an unmitigated disaster."Their temples were razed, their idols smashed, their women raped, their men killed or taken slaves. When Mahmud of Ghazni entered Somnath on one of his annual raids, he slaughtered all 50,000 inhabitants. Aibak killed and enslaved hundreds of thousands. The list of horrors is long and painful. These conquerors justified their deeds by claiming it was their religious duty to smite non-believers. Cloaking themselves in the banner of Islam, they claimed they were fighting for their faith when, in reality, they were indulging in straightforward slaughter and pillage...”A sample of contemporary eyewitness accounts of the invaders and rulers, during the Indian conquestsThe Afghan ruler Mahmud al-Ghazni invaded India no less than seventeen times between 1001 - 1026 AD. The book ‘Tarikh-i-Yamini’ - written by his secretary documents several episodes of his bloody military campaigns : "The blood of the infidels flowed so copiously [at the Indian city of Thanesar] that the stream was discoloured, notwithstanding its purity, and people were unable to drink it…the infidels deserted the fort and tried to cross the foaming river...but many of them were slain, taken or drowned... Nearly fifty thousand men were killed."In the contemporary record - ' Taj-ul-Ma’asir' by Hassn Nizam-i-Naishapuri, it is stated that when Qutb-ul- Din Aibak (of Turko - Afghan origin and the First Sultan of Delhi 1194-1210 AD) conquered Meerat, he demolished all the Hindu temples of the city and erected mosques on their sites. In the city of Aligarh, he converted Hindu inhabitants to Islam by the sword and beheaded all those who adhered to their own religion.The Persian historian Wassaf writes in his book 'Tazjiyat-ul-Amsar wa Tajriyat ul Asar' that when the Alaul-Din Khilji (An Afghan of Turkish origin and second ruler of the Khilji Dynasty in India 1295-1316 AD) captured the city of Kambayat at the head of the gulf of Cambay, he killed the adult male Hindu inhabitants for the glory of Islam, set flowing rivers of blood, sent the women of the country with all their gold, silver, and jewels, to his own home, and made about twentv thousand Hindu maidens his private slaves.This ruler once asked his spiritual advisor (or ‘Qazi’) as to what was the Islamic law prescribed for the Hindus. The Qazi replied:“Hindus are like the mud; if silver is demanded from them, they must with the greatest humility offer gold. If a Mohammadan desires to spit into a Hindu’s mouth, the Hindu should open it wide for the purpose. God created the Hindus to be slaves of the Mohammadans. The Prophet hath ordained that, if the Hindus do not accept Islam, they should be imprisoned, tortured, finally put to death, and their property confiscated.”Timur was a Turkic conqueror and founder of the Timurid Dynasty. Timur's Indian campaign (1398 – 1399 AD) was recorded in his memoirs, collectively known as 'Tuzk-i-Timuri.' In them, he vividly described probably the greatest gruesome act in the entire history of the world – where 100,000 Hindu prisoners of war in his camp were executed in a very short space of time. Timur after taking advice from his entourage says in his memoirs :"they said that on the great day of battle these 100,000 prisoners could not be left with the baggage, and that it would be entirely opposed to the rules of war to set these idolaters and foes of Islam at liberty."In fact, no other course remained but that of making them all food for the sword’Timur thereupon resolved to put them to death.During his campaign in India - Timur describes the scene when his army conquered the Indian city of Delhi :"In a short space of time all the people in the [Delhi] fort were put to the sword, and in the course of one hour the heads of 10,000 infidels were cut off. The sword of Islam was washed in the blood of the infidels, and all the goods and effects, the treasure and the grain which for many a long year had been stored in the fort became the spoil of my soldiers."They set fire to the houses and reduced them to ashes, and they razed the buildings and the fort to the ground....All these infidel Hindus were slain, their women and children, and their property and goods became the spoil of the victors. I proclaimed throughout the camp that every man who had infidel prisoners should put them to death, and whoever neglected to do so should himself be executed and his property given to the informer. When this order became known to the ghazis of Islam, they drew their swords and put their prisoners to death."Why we should remember"Holocaust Memorial Day (HMD) is the international day of remembrance for the victims of the Holocaust and of other genocides" (Holocaust Memorial Day Trust)The biggest holocaust in World History has been whitewashed from history.When we hear the word HOLOCAUST most of us think immediately of the Jewish holocaust. Today, with increased awareness and countless cinema films and television documentaries - many of us are also aware of the Holocaust of the Native American peoples, the genocide of the Armenian peoples in the Ottoman Empire, and the millions of African lives lost during the Atlantic slave trade.The World seems to either ignore or just does not seem to care about the many millions of lives lost during the 800 - year long holocaust of Hindus in India.The Indian historian Professor K.S. Lal estimates that the Hindu population in India decreased by 80 million between 1000 AD and 1525 AD, an extermination unparalleled in World history. This slaughter of millions of people occurred over regular periods during many centuries of Arab, Afghan, Turkish and Mughal rule in India.Many Indian heroes emerged during these dark times – including the 10th Sikh Guru - Guru Gobind Singh and also the Hindu Maratha king – Shivaji Maratha – who led the resistance against this tyranny and eventually led to its defeat by the late 1700s - after centuries of death and destruction.From: The biggest holocaust in World HistorySources:Negationism in India, by Dr Koenrad Elst. (Voice of India, New Delhi.)“Was There an Islamic Genocide of Hindus?” (article) by Dr. Koenraad Elst (Was There an Islamic "Genocide" of Hindus?)Rewriting Indian History by Francois Gautier (Vikas Publishing House, New Delhi 1996)‘‘Aurangzeb, as he was according to Mughal Records’’(An exhibition) by Francois Gautier’s Trust : ‘FACT – India’ URL(Aurangzeb, as he was according to Mughal Records)The Story of Civilization. Vol. 1: Our Oriental Heritage by Will Durant (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1935.)A History of Civilisations by Fernand Braudel (Penguin Books, New York 1995)Histoire de l'Inde, by Jean Danielou. (Editions Fayard, Paris.)Growth of Muslim population in India (A.D. 1000-1800) by K.S. Lal. (Voice of India, New Delhi.)“Demons from the Past” (article in the ‘Daily Times’, Pakistan August 30, 2004) by Irfan Husain (Page on dailytimes.com.pk)The 'Hindu Wisdom' website : Page on thedevil.comStephen Knapp and his books on Spiritual Enlightenment and Vedic Culture website : Islamic Destruction of Hindu TemplesThe Hindu Holocaust Museum website: http://hinduholocaust.com/HinduHolocaustMuseum.htmMore:Muslim conquests on the Indian subcontinent WikipediaWas There an Islamic "Genocide" of Hindus? Dr. Koenraad ElstJim Ashby's answer to How can I learn more about the history of India beyond what is taught in schools? What are some of the best books on the same? (please check the neutrality of the sources on your own, my knowledge about India per se is minim, but Jim Ashby always made a competent, fair and more or less neutral impression to me)Update: when you are Indian, please write in the comments if you already knew about this, if yes from where? Is it widely known or a rather suppressed knowledge and can one talk about it in daily life?

How British Distorted Indian History.The British used history of India as a tool for demoralizing the natives.History of India was twisted, falsified and misinterpreted on a grand scale.In a letter dated December 16, 1868 the famous Indologist Max Muller wroteto the Duke of Argyll, the then Secretary of State of India, 'India has beenconquered once, but India must be conquered again and that second conquestshould be a conquest by education'.. (Ref: 'The Life and Letter of F. MaxMuller, edited by Mrs. Max Muller, 1902, Vol.1, p.357). Prof. Max Muller wasnot just a philosopher, he was also an examiner for the Indian Civil Service(ICS) examination. Teaching of falsified history played a great part in this'second conquest'.Who were these British history writers ?They were mainly army officers and administrators of the East India Company. For example:Major General John Malcolm - A Memoir of the Central India (1824)Captain Grant Duff - History of the Marathas (1826)Gen. Briggs - History of the Rise of Mohammedan Power in India (1829)Lt.Colonel James Todd - Anals and Antiquities of Rajasthan (1829-32)M. Elphinstone (Resident at Peshwa Court, later Governor of Bombay), Historyof India (1841)Joseph Cunningham (brother of Gen.A.Cunningham) History of Sikhs (1849)Lt. R.F.Burton - History of Sindh (1851)For example, How many American Western movies depict the generosity and the bravery of the native Americans ?Do you know of a single British movie depicting the courage, intelligence and skill of the German and Japanese soldiers?Hence we can imagine what kind of 'history' these British officers and administrators must have written or the slant there in.But these very books became standard textbooks in India and were prescribedfor teaching the later day examinees of the Indian Civil service and theIndian army.Effect of British Version of History on Indian Leaders.Since almost all our leaders were educated under the British system thisslanted history had tremendous impact on the psyche of our leaders. Bylearning such history our leaders developed a severe inferiority complex,and suffered from loss of self confidence and self esteem.They started despising their ancestors. They became convinced that unless they followed the West blindly, borrowed ideas, concepts and technology from her India had no salvation. (and till date the trend is being blindly followed).Let us see what our leaders were saying over the years :"These (British) Gurus have been sent by God from far off lands"G.H.Deshmukh alias Lokhitawadi in 1848 CE in Shatapatre no.46."It must indeed be considered our good fortune that when Christianmissionaries set out to spread Christianity in the world, they did not forget India..." Keshavachandra, Brahmo Samaj leader in 1860 CE.Mahatma Phule started Satya Shodhak Samaj (Society for Search of Truth) in 1873 CE. Everyone joining the society had to take an oath of allegiance to the British Crown.This despite the horrors of British administration during the plague outbreak of 1897 and 7 years of suppressive reign of Curzon (1898-1905).'The Hindus' has been a life of continuous defeat. It is a mode forsurvival of which every Hindu will feel ashamed'- Dr.Ambedkar in 1937.Amazing ! What kind of history of India was taught to our leaders ?British Version of Indian HistoryThe history of India, written by British authors was, in a nutshell, as follows:Until the invasion of India by Alexander the Great, there was nothing worth mentioning in India. After Alexander, the Greeks taught civilization to Indians, and gave them the Western ideas. Then came the Shakas, Huns, Kushans etc.They also kept teaching the natives.In the eighth century Mohammed bin Kasim invaded India. It marked the begining of the Muslim rule.Then came the Ghazanvis, Ghoris, Gulams, Turks, Afgans, Khiljis, Tughalaqs, Lodis and Mughals. They were very brave and noble. They carried out reforms after reforms.Lastly came the English. They could not tolerate the prevailing anarchy. 'We rule India' they said. Some kings accepted their protection. Those who resisted, collapsed like a deck of cards.The British taught peace (like the once demonstrated at Jalliawala bagh) and prosperity to this troubled land. Under them everyone ishappy. They introduced rule of law which Indians never knew before.Thus the history of India (according to the British) is as dark as coaltar. There is nothing in it to be proud of. It is natural that onlyforeigners should rule India. The best the natives can do is to serve theBritish by becoming their obedient servants.Why could Indians not counter them with our own version of history ?It must be admitted in all fairness, that it was the British who first wrotethe history of India. The Hindus probably are the only race, who despitehaving such intelligence, bravery and tremendous capacity for successive revivals, have showed such pathetic neglect of history.Lokamany Tilak writes '.. Even if we read the whole of Harsha-Charita by Banabhatta, we cannot make out when did this famous king rule or what was the extent of his kingdom ? Had it not been for the Chinese traveller Hsuen Tsang (and the English scholars who translated his memoirs from Chinese into English) we would have never knownthe history of Harsha '.Records were not properly kept and where they were kept they were notpreserved. Even today very important documents are getting rotten anddestroyed by insects, in many families, but the owners will not give them to historical societies.History as a subject did not always have a place in education.For example, Maharaja of Jaipur, JaiSingh I never learned about the history of Bappa raval, Prithvi raj Chuhan, Mahmud of Ghazni, Mohammed Ghori and others.During the upbringing of Peshwa Bajirao I, he learnt nothing about the East India Comapny and its resistance to Shivaji at Surat, the history of the Mughals or the history of Maratha-Mughal struggle. Far reaching consequences of such neglect were never realized.A true historian should have the ability to -Analyze the evidence critically and establish the facts based on commonsense, reason and logic.All this was cleverly disallowed by the British. Historical research wasreduced the drab work of compiling data and translation of documents. The faculty of interpretation was strongly discouraged.It is therefore essential that Indian history be rewritten.Rewriting Does Not Mean FabricationIt must be emphasized that rewriting of Indian history does not meanfabrication, as was done by the Nazis or the Communists.Savarkar wrote in 1937 : ' To praise one's ancestors out of affection forthem may be foolish, but humane. However to tolerate deliberate denunciation of the ancestors without challenging the allegations is disgraceful. Because such falsehoods, if repeated often will make us lose self respect and confidence'.'When writing history the writer must write the events as they happened. Heshould not concern himself about the effect of that writing on presentsituation. .. It is natural to write about glorious deeds of ourforefathers, but we are reluctant to describe disgraceful event ordisasters, defeats. A historian must avoid such hiding of facts. Whateverhappened in the past it should be described as it happened...'Late AwakeningThere were some scholars during the British Raj who realised the importanceof history in nation-building. They were furious at the state of affairs.Rajwade, Vasudevshastri Khare and others started work around 1900 CE. Theformidable task of collecting and compiling evidence was so immense thatRajwade could not foresee the starting of writing of the History of theMarathas, in his life time.In 1907 Savarkar came to London. After studying the contemporary Britishbooks in India Office Library he concluded that he had to reject thetraditional view of the Great Revolt of 1857. It was not a Sepoy Mutiny ascommonly believed. The British authors themselves do not use the term SepoyMutiny, instead they call it Indian Mutiny. Savarkar Proclaimed that it wasa War of Independence in which everyone from the Maharajas to the roadsweepers took part. His book was promptly proscribed even before itspublication ! Savarkar protested on September 17, 1909 'If my book isseditious, why does not the Government show courage to take me to court ?'The British Authorities did not prosecute Savarkar for his book. Such is theimportance of true history.In 1991 Bharat Itihas Sanshodhak Mandal (Indian Society for Historical Research) was formed.In 1918 Mr.N.C.Kelkar, one of Lokamanya Tilak's lieutenants, published a book "Marathas and the English' which dismissed the traditional theory that Marathas lost due to internal dissensions, lack of unity and lack offoresight.In 1923 Major B.D.Basu wrote 'The Story of Satara' exposing the barbaric behavior of the British to Maharaja Pratapsingh of Satara who was falsely accused and dethroned in 1839.G.S.Sardesai's 'New History of Marathas' came out in 1946 exactly 120 years after Grant Duff's History of the Marathas. Incalculable damage had been done in 120 years.Appeasement of Muslims By Congress LeadersThe reason why Indian history was not rewritten much after 1947, is to foundin our freedom struggle.Gandhi himself had shamelessly supported the British during the British -Boer war, British-Zulu war (also known as Kaffir Wars) and the World War I. In fact, Gandhi volunteered to organize a brigade of Indians to put down the Zulu uprising.Sergeant-Major Gandhi, the deputy commander of his cops - himself carried the stretcher of the mortally wounded British commanding officer from the Zulu war battle field for miles over the sun-baked veldt. Thence he was awarded Victoria's coveted War Medal for valor under fire. However by the time of his return to India Gandhi was so obsessed with Ahimsa (non-violence) that he condemned Rana Pratap, Shivaji and Guru Govind Singh for their armed struggle.Savarkar proclaimed 'We Hindus on our own can win our freedom from the British'. Gandhi lacked Savarkar's confidence and conviction. This led to his perpetual capitulation to Muslim demands and finally culminated in the horrors of partition.After the horrible Mopla riots in 1921 when over 5000 Hindus were killed by the Moplas of Malbar. But Gandhi had no hesitation calling them 'My brave Mopla brothers!'In December 1926 when a fanatic Muslim Abdul Rashid killedSwami Shraddhananda who had converted thousands of Muslims to Hinduism, Gandhi immediately pleaded that Brother Abdul Rashid's life be spared.But he refused to plead for life of Bhagat Singh and others only six months later (such a bastard).In the zeal for retaining the power, true history has become the first victim.Effect of Appeasement of MuslimsEncyclopedia of Britannica says "Hindu Architecture .. It should be notedthat there exists in India a vast technical literature known as ShilpaShastra.. dating back to Gupta period perhaps much earlier, the medievalcompilations are still in use by Indian Architecture."The first victim of appeasement is Hindu architecture which is not taught at all in the Architecture and engineering schools. What ever insignificant part is taught is taught with Greek or Roman titles under 'Indo-Sarcenic architecture'.Veer Savarkar delivered lectures in 1950-51 exposing how the Indian history is written with a strong anti-Hindu slant. These later appeared innewspapers.However no publisher dare publish his book 'Six Glorious Epochs of Indian History' (This book destroys the myth that Hindus suffered defeat upon defeat, and asserts that Hindus survived aggressions because they fought tooth and nail to preserve their religion and culture. A MUST READ BOOK FOR ALL INDIANS - you have read British and Muslim Version of your history, why not read your own side of it.) foreign invaders.A school in Bombay used to teach Gita as the part of studies. It was notobjected to by the British. But in 1963 Education Department of Maharashtra threatened to stop the Government grant until Gita teaching is stopped. Of course the government provides grants to Madrsas and convents without hesitation.Nehru even wanted to remove word 'Hindu' out of Benaras Hindu University, but not the word 'Muslim' from Aligarh Muslim University.When Abdul Reheman Antulay was chief minister of Maharashtra, a deputation of Muslims demanded following:Urdu should be a compulsory subject in schools 25 % of seats in Police and Civil Service be reserved for Muslims Government land be given to build mosques.After this, an Urdu Academy was started in Maharashtra. Government newspaper Lokrajya is now published in Urdu and Marathi. There are no prizes for guessing how many people in Maharashtra speak Urdu (If you consider Muslims from Miraj as Urdu speakers, you must be calling Bombay Hindi as the best Hindi ever spoken).Urdu was made second state language in Bihar in December 1980 even though the regional language Maithily spoken by 5 times more people was denied the status. In U.P. Urdu was made a second language in February 1982.In December 1981, Indira Gandhi recognized the Moplas as patriots, freedom fighters despite their barbaric atrocities on Hindus in 1921.July 18, 1982 issue of 'Shree' a Marathi weekly from Mumbai carried anarticle by Mr.D.B.Pradhan entitled 'Pre-Islamic Vedic Religion in the Gulf States'. Government of Maharashtra immediately banned the issue under the pretext that it hurt sentiments of Muslims. Mumbai High Court later declared the ban illegal.The most flagrant and unashamed example of Muslim appeasement came under V.P.Singh who declared Prophet Mohammed's birthday an Indian national holiday. In his obsession for Muslim appeasement he did not realize that the birth and death of Prophet Mohammed fall on the same day. That day, Id-e-Milad was already a national holiday!Appeasement of Muslims Leads to Falsification of History by GOI.It is well known that in 1318, Harpaldev of Devagiri was skinned alive by Kutb-uddin Khilji of Delhi. This fact is hidden and the history books tell us that he was simply arrested.Sambhaji, the brave Maratha king was also tortured to death by Aurungzeb. But history books say that he too was simply arrested. How shameless can they be!"The practice of perverting history continues. Here are some more examples:In the medieval times the main source of government income was the land revenue. Under Hindu rulers its used to be 16 %. Under Akbar it became 33 %. It stayed same under Jehangir.Under the 'Golden' rule of Shah Jahan it was raised to 50 % and it stayed the same during Aurungzeb who added Jizya tax on Hindus. Under Allauddin Khilji the land revenue also was 50 %. This information is kept out of history books.We are taught that in 1303 CE Allauddin Khilji defeated Rajputs and captured Chittod Fort. But we are never told that Hamer Singh, a Rajput prince defeated and recaptured the fort 10 years later.It is well known that Prophet Mohammed fled from Mecca to Medina in 622 CE.Muslims all over the world accept the fact. But in 1982 under pressure from Muslims Maharashtra government ordered that word 'fled' must be deleted. So now it reads that Prophet Mohammed went from mecca to Medina in 622 CE. Even Nehru would have been amazed by this because in his book 'Some Glimpses of World History' he does say that Prophet Mohammed fled from mecca to Medina.In 1982 the Central Ministry of Education issued guidelines for writing and teaching of Indian history which among other things forbid describing the medieval period as a period of conflict between Hindus and Muslims.In short, Shivaji's virtues should not be glorified and Aurungzeb's bigotry and despotic nature must not be described !In 1982 Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) in their publication 'TajMuseum' admitted that on the site of Taj Mahal stood the mansion (manzil) of Raja Man Singh which was at the time of in possession of his grand son Raja Jai Singh. So what happened to the mansion ? The answer is simple. It is the same as Taj mahal. But that much ASI official would not concede.In 1984 Prof.Marvin Mills wrote Director General of Archaeological Survey of India that the Taj dispute be settled by scientific tests on brick samples taken on 20 locations. The Director General replied "The Taj is well dated on documentary evidence. BARC, Bombay and PRL, Ahmedabad are also seized of the problem. (this was a lie. Both the labs did not receive any samples for testing) and IT IS NOT CONSIDERED DESIRABLE TO HAVE ANY FURTHER INVESTIGATION AT THIS STAGE.Such has been Government of India. What about the historians ?In 1984 , the discovery of so called Hitler's diaries by Stern Magazinecreated an international sensation. Initially the British historian Prof.H.T.Roper said the diaries were authentic. Later when the diaries were found to be forgeries, Prof.Roper candidly admitted "If I am wrong, I am wrong. .. even experts can err". Indian historians lack such intellectual honesty. Let us look at following examples.In December 1963, the 'Hazarat Baal'(supposedly Prophet Mohammed's hair) disappeared from the shrine in Srinagar. It was 'found' a few days later.Firstly, no Indian historian has bothered to ask that if even Mecca andMedina do NOT contain any relics of the Prophet, where did this hair come from 700 YEARS AFTER THE PROPHET'S DEATH ? Also no Indian historian has asked that since the Hazrat Baal, the hair disappeared in 1963 and reappeared a few days later, is it the same hair ? Suddenly all the historians consider it an authentic historical relic.Second of course is the case of Taj mahal. Shah Jahan's 'Badshahnama' which is the only major Mughal document the British did NOT translate (perhaps intentionally) categorically states that it was Raja ManSingh's palace that was taken over by Shah Jahan. In 1968 when P.N. Oak published his theory based on his translation of Badshahnama, suddenly those very pages were declared irrelevant and out of context by Indian historians. If Mr. Oak's translation is wrong then why do the Indian historians have courage to publish word to word translation of the Badshahnama as Mr. Oak has done or accept his translation.Two letters exposing falsity of Taj Mahal legend by Mr Oak werepublished in the internationally renowned 'Royal Institute of BritishArchitects (RIBA) Journal in June and September 1980. No architect orhistorian has challenged these letters. Indian historians have of coursekept quiet.The most glaring intentional scientific fraud by historians under government payroll, came after December 6, 1992. During the destruction of Babri structure various remnants of the pre-existing temple surfaced. These included a shila-lekh describing the origin and scale of a magnificent temple at the very site of Ram Janma Bhumi, several intricate carvings and an image of Shri Ram. Instead of verifying or falsifying the historicity of the evidence in the field, 70 of these 'eminent' historians and archaeologists (from JNU) took at out full page advertisements in national newspapers the very next day proclaiming 'the evidence was planted'. Of course they did not want to perform scientific tests on the evidence. What if the truth is revealed ?Reasons for the attitude of Indian historiansWhat kind of a job would a history professor get if he is branded a Hindureactionary and sacked ? Also what will happen to their historical societiesif the government patronage were stopped. ALL THIS IS UNDERSTANDABLE. but then they should at least admit that their work has limitations, theirfreedom is restricted and that they do have to bow to political pressure.But THEY PRETEND OTHERWISE and mislead the people.Let us look at another example of how the government pressurizes historians to conform to its 'party line'.B.M. Purandare's predicament:Mr. B.M.Purandare has to his credit "Raja Shiv Chhatrapati".But he alsomaintains silence on subjects like Padmini and Taj Mahal.Here is how the Congress government made him silent.Mr. Purandare raises money for many charitable causes, from his lectures on Shivaji. An institution (a school, orphanage, a trust etc) would arrange his lectures. The money raised by ticket sales would be given to Mr.Purandare, which he would promptly donate to the relevant charity. A noble act indeed !But the 'secular' government officials did not see it that way. Income taxofficials said that the money thus raised was given to Mr.Purandare. So itis his income and as such he must pay tax on it ! While the MaharashtraGovernment officers maintained that by delivering lectures on Shivaji,Mr.Purandare was entertaining people. As such he must pay entertainment tax! (So telling relatively true history is entertainment).Isn't it amazing that Maharashtra Government considers movies on Gandhi and Ambedkar exempt from entertainment tax, but lectures on Shivaji for a charitable organization are not exempt ?(Other examples of historians maintaining silence despite evidence to thecontrary are Mr.D.V.Potdar, Dr.G.H.Khare, Mr.Setu Madhavrao Pagdi and Prof.Ram Nath.)ConclusionSo dear reader, neither the Government of India nor the Indian historiansare going to write the true history of India. Not only that, Government ofIndia is perverting Indian history in the name of national integration ! Ifyou feel uneasy and annoyed at the state of affairs and are concerned aboutthe fate of the nation it is for you to help us. Remember the teaching offalsified history affects us all, whether we stay in India or abroad. Itmolds our mentality. It determines how we behave with one another and withnon-Indians and what is more important, how non-Indians treat us.And why is it that this was possible in India?Can you imagine the situation in reverse in Pakistan? That is, if a Hindu mob massacred 58 unarmed Muslim pilgrims, would the life of a single Hindu in Pakistan (of the handful that apparently live there, a rapidly decreasing number as their women are kidnapped and converted to Islam regularly) be in the least bit safe?The problem in India is not the Muslims or Christians, it is the brownsahibs, Marxists and fellow-travelers in the media and the self proclaimed 'intelligentsia.' These are the self-aggrandising monsters, spawned by the Jawaharlal Nehru University and sustained by shameless cronyism, who have hijacked the discourse in India to Orwellian Stalinist levels of bizarreness.War is peace. Murder is love. Pilgrims are terrorists.Terrorists who murder pilgrims are poor, oppressed, misunderstood,downtrodden minorities.There is a concept of 'dhimmitude:' an extension of the Oslo syndrome where a hostage develops an unreasoning attachment to the captors, much like what happened to Patty Hearst some years ago. See Bat Ye'or's book at www.dhimmi.org or Sohail Ahmad Banglori's article.I tell you, I have had it with all these morally superior people: the 'secular' 'progressives' who pontificate at length get on my nerves. They need the injunction: "Why dost thou see the mote in thy brother's eye, but not the beam in thine own?"But soon a wonder came to light,That showed the rogues they lied:The man recovered from the bite,The dog it was that died.The mad dog analogy may be especially appropriate here in the case ofIndia's Ugly Journalists. Educated as well as they are, morally upright asthey claim to be, their judgment has been so clouded by their dhimmitude andtheir Marxist dogma that they can no longer recognise their own lies. Theyare secure in the certainty of their utterly wrong convictions. It is timethey saw the writing on the wall: they are a liability to the nation.Just few examples. Hope it helps.For more - Ajit Vadakayilwww.agniveer.com

I don't know how much is taught about the biggest genocide in world history in Indian schools, but at least here in Europe we learn only about the Nazi holocaust. The slaughtering of even dozens of million more victims - which were not killed in a 'manufactory' way like in the Nazi Holocaust - but by sole hand; the Indian holocaust is probably the saddest story in world history.An estimate of 80 million Hindus killed in the total jihad against India. [Koenard Elst, , Voice of India, New Delhi, 2002, pg. 34.] The country of India today is only half the size of ancient India, due to jihad. The mountains near India are called the Hindu Kush, meaning the “funeral pyre of the Hindus.”-The biggest holocaust in World HistoryThe genocide suffered by the Hindus of India at the hands of Arab, Turkish, Mughal and Afghan occupying forces for a period of 800 years is as yet formally unrecognised by the World.The only similar genocide in the recent past was that of the Jewish people at the hands of the Nazis; of the Africans during the slave trade and also the almost total extermination of native populations like the Aboriginal people in Australia and the native Indians, Aztecs, Incas, etc. in North and South America.The holocaust of the Hindus in India was of even greater proportions, the only difference was that it continued for 800 years, till the brutal regimes were effectively overpowered in a life and death struggle by the Sikhs in the Panjab and the Hindu Maratha armies in other parts of India in the late 1700's.We have elaborate literary evidence of the World’s biggest holocaust from existing historical contemporary eyewitness accounts. The historians and biographers of the invading armies and subsequent rulers of India have left quite detailed records of the atrocities they committed in their day-to-day encounters with India’s Hindus.These contemporary records boasted about and glorified the crimes that were committed - and the genocide of tens of millions of Hindus, mass rapes of Hindu women and the destruction of thousands of ancient Hindu / Buddhist temples and libraries have been well documented and provide solid proof of the World's biggest holocaust.Quotes from modern historiansDr. Koenraad Elst in his article “Was There an Islamic Genocide of Hindus?” states:“There is no official estimate of the total death toll of Hindus at the hands of Islam. A first glance at important testimonies by Muslim chroniclers suggests that, over 13 centuries and a territory as vast as the Subcontinent, Muslim Holy Warriors easily killed more Hindus than the 6 million of the Holocaust. Ferishtha lists several occasions when the Bahmani sultans in central India (1347-1528) killed a hundred thousand Hindus, which they set as a minimum goal whenever they felt like punishing the Hindus; and they were only a third-rank provincial dynasty."The biggest slaughters took place during the raids of Mahmud Ghaznavi (ca. 1000 CE); during the actual conquest of North India by Mohammed Ghori and his lieutenants (1192 ff.); and under the Delhi Sultanate (1206-1526)."He also writes in his book "Negation in India":"The Muslim conquests, down to the 16th century, were for the Hindus a pure struggle of life and death. Entire cities were burnt down and the populations massacred, with hundreds of thousands killed in every campaign, and similar numbers deported as slaves. Every new invader made (often literally) his hills of Hindus skulls. Thus, the conquest of Afghanistan in the year 1000 was followed by the annihilation of the Hindu population; the region is still called the Hindu Kush, i.e. Hindu slaughter."Will Durant argued in his 1935 book "The Story of Civilisation: Our Oriental Heritage" (page 459):"The Mohammedan conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. The Islamic historians and scholars have recorded with great glee and pride the slaughters of Hindus, forced conversions, abduction of Hindu women and children to slave markets and the destruction of temples carried out by the warriors of Islam during 800 AD to 1700 AD. Millions of Hindus were converted to Islam by sword during this period."Francois Gautier in his book 'Rewriting Indian History' (1996) wrote:"The massacres perpetuated by Muslims in India are unparalleled in history, bigger than the Holocaust of the Jews by the Nazis; or the massacre of the Armenians by the Turks; more extensive even than the slaughter of the South American native populations by the invading Spanish and Portuguese."Writer Fernand Braudel wrote in A History of Civilisations (1995), that Islamic rule in India as a"colonial experiment" was "extremely violent", and "the Muslims could not rule the country except by systematic terror. Cruelty was the norm – burnings, summary executions, crucifixions or impalements, inventive tortures. Hindu temples were destroyed to make way for mosques. On occasion there were forced conversions. If ever there were an uprising, it was instantly and savagely repressed: houses were burned, the countryside was laid waste, men were slaughtered and women were taken as slaves."Alain Danielou in his book, Histoire de l' Inde writes:"From the time Muslims started arriving, around 632 AD, the history of India becomes a long, monotonous series of murders, massacres, spoliations, and destructions. It is, as usual, in the name of 'a holy war' of their faith, of their sole God, that the barbarians have destroyed civilizations, wiped out entire races."Irfan Husain in his article “Demons from the Past” observes:“While historical events should be judged in the context of their times, it cannot be denied that even in that bloody period of history, no mercy was shown to the Hindus unfortunate enough to be in the path of either the Arab conquerors of Sindh and south Punjab, or the Central Asians who swept in from Afghanistan…The Muslim heroes who figure larger than life in our history books committed some dreadful crimes. Mahmud of Ghazni, Qutb-ud-Din Aibak, Balban, Mohammed bin Qasim, and Sultan Mohammad Tughlak, all have blood-stained hands that the passage of years has not cleansed..Seen through Hindu eyes, the Muslim invasion of their homeland was an unmitigated disaster."Their temples were razed, their idols smashed, their women raped, their men killed or taken slaves. When Mahmud of Ghazni entered Somnath on one of his annual raids, he slaughtered all 50,000 inhabitants. Aibak killed and enslaved hundreds of thousands. The list of horrors is long and painful. These conquerors justified their deeds by claiming it was their religious duty to smite non-believers. Cloaking themselves in the banner of Islam, they claimed they were fighting for their faith when, in reality, they were indulging in straightforward slaughter and pillage...”A sample of contemporary eyewitness accounts of the invaders and rulers, during the Indian conquestsThe Afghan ruler Mahmud al-Ghazni invaded India no less than seventeen times between 1001 - 1026 AD. The book ‘Tarikh-i-Yamini’ - written by his secretary documents several episodes of his bloody military campaigns : "The blood of the infidels flowed so copiously [at the Indian city of Thanesar] that the stream was discoloured, notwithstanding its purity, and people were unable to drink it…the infidels deserted the fort and tried to cross the foaming river...but many of them were slain, taken or drowned... Nearly fifty thousand men were killed."In the contemporary record - ' Taj-ul-Ma’asir' by Hassn Nizam-i-Naishapuri, it is stated that when Qutb-ul- Din Aibak (of Turko - Afghan origin and the First Sultan of Delhi 1194-1210 AD) conquered Meerat, he demolished all the Hindu temples of the city and erected mosques on their sites. In the city of Aligarh, he converted Hindu inhabitants to Islam by the sword and beheaded all those who adhered to their own religion.The Persian historian Wassaf writes in his book 'Tazjiyat-ul-Amsar wa Tajriyat ul Asar' that when the Alaul-Din Khilji (An Afghan of Turkish origin and second ruler of the Khilji Dynasty in India 1295-1316 AD) captured the city of Kambayat at the head of the gulf of Cambay, he killed the adult male Hindu inhabitants for the glory of Islam, set flowing rivers of blood, sent the women of the country with all their gold, silver, and jewels, to his own home, and made about twentv thousand Hindu maidens his private slaves.This ruler once asked his spiritual advisor (or ‘Qazi’) as to what was the Islamic law prescribed for the Hindus. The Qazi replied:“Hindus are like the mud; if silver is demanded from them, they must with the greatest humility offer gold. If a Mohammadan desires to spit into a Hindu’s mouth, the Hindu should open it wide for the purpose. God created the Hindus to be slaves of the Mohammadans. The Prophet hath ordained that, if the Hindus do not accept Islam, they should be imprisoned, tortured, finally put to death, and their property confiscated.”Timur was a Turkic conqueror and founder of the Timurid Dynasty. Timur's Indian campaign (1398 – 1399 AD) was recorded in his memoirs, collectively known as 'Tuzk-i-Timuri.' In them, he vividly described probably the greatest gruesome act in the entire history of the world – where 100,000 Hindu prisoners of war in his camp were executed in a very short space of time. Timur after taking advice from his entourage says in his memoirs :"they said that on the great day of battle these 100,000 prisoners could not be left with the baggage, and that it would be entirely opposed to the rules of war to set these idolaters and foes of Islam at liberty."In fact, no other course remained but that of making them all food for the sword’Timur thereupon resolved to put them to death.During his campaign in India - Timur describes the scene when his army conquered the Indian city of Delhi :"In a short space of time all the people in the [Delhi] fort were put to the sword, and in the course of one hour the heads of 10,000 infidels were cut off. The sword of Islam was washed in the blood of the infidels, and all the goods and effects, the treasure and the grain which for many a long year had been stored in the fort became the spoil of my soldiers."They set fire to the houses and reduced them to ashes, and they razed the buildings and the fort to the ground....All these infidel Hindus were slain, their women and children, and their property and goods became the spoil of the victors. I proclaimed throughout the camp that every man who had infidel prisoners should put them to death, and whoever neglected to do so should himself be executed and his property given to the informer. When this order became known to the ghazis of Islam, they drew their swords and put their prisoners to death."Why we should remember"Holocaust Memorial Day (HMD) is the international day of remembrance for the victims of the Holocaust and of other genocides" (Holocaust Memorial Day Trust)The biggest holocaust in World History has been whitewashed from history.When we hear the word HOLOCAUST most of us think immediately of the Jewish holocaust. Today, with increased awareness and countless cinema films and television documentaries - many of us are also aware of the Holocaust of the Native American peoples, the genocide of the Armenian peoples in the Ottoman Empire, and the millions of African lives lost during the Atlantic slave trade.The World seems to either ignore or just does not seem to care about the many millions of lives lost during the 800 - year long holocaust of Hindus in India.The Indian historian Professor K.S. Lal estimates that the Hindu population in India decreased by 80 million between 1000 AD and 1525 AD, an extermination unparalleled in World history. This slaughter of millions of people occurred over regular periods during many centuries of Arab, Afghan, Turkish and Mughal rule in India.Many Indian heroes emerged during these dark times – including the 10th Sikh Guru - Guru Gobind Singh and also the Hindu Maratha king – Shivaji Maratha – who led the resistance against this tyranny and eventually led to its defeat by the late 1700s - after centuries of death and destruction.Sources:Negationism in India, by Dr Koenrad Elst. (Voice of India, New Delhi.)“Was There an Islamic Genocide of Hindus?” (article) by Dr. Koenraad Elst ()Rewriting Indian History by Francois Gautier (Vikas Publishing House, New Delhi 1996)‘‘Aurangzeb, as he was according to Mughal Records’’(An exhibition) by Francois Gautier’s Trust : ‘FACT – India’ URL()The Story of Civilization. Vol. 1: Our Oriental Heritage by Will Durant (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1935.)A History of Civilisations by Fernand Braudel (Penguin Books, New York 1995)Histoire de l'Inde, by Jean Danielou. (Editions Fayard, Paris.)Growth of Muslim population in India (A.D. 1000-1800) by K.S. Lal. (Voice of India, New Delhi.)“Demons from the Past” (article in the ‘Daily Times’, Pakistan August 30, 2004) by Irfan Husain ()