Application Unlawful: Fill & Download for Free

Probably not. The only groups affected would be primarily African American, Hispanic/Latino American, and Native American/Pacific Islander. There would be a small uptick on Asian American percentage, but Caucasian Americans would benefit the most under no affirmative action. If discrimination really does exist in admissions, you would still be able to discriminate against Asian applicants in favor of White or other applicants without affirmative action. Banning affirmative action isn’t going to help Asian applicants overall, just a select few who would get the spots that would have gone to minority applicants. Unlawful discrimination is what really needs to get thoroughly investigated.

I want to say something, but I already feel…Because of…That’s what turns me off.A lot of people are being disingenuous.I’m being told that the map is inaccurate because Morocco doesn’t have the death penalty for apostasy. What they forget to add is “anymore.” The map was made in 2013. Apostasy was only redefined in Morocco as political (allying oneself with a foreign power to make war on Morocco) as opposed to individual in 2017![1]I’m being told that Yemen has no death penalty for apostasy.The seven codified hudûd are: revolt (baghy), apostasy from Islam (ridda), armed robbery (hirâba), theft (sariqa), unlawful intercourse (zinâ), false accusation of unlawful intercourse (qadhf), and alcohol beverage (shurb al-khamr) (Art. 12). The punishments vary from lashes (for alcohol beverage and unlawful intercourse between unmarried persons), amputation of a hand (theft, armed robbery) or foot (repeated theft, armed robbery), to capital punishment (apostasy), stoning to death (unlawful intercourse for married persons), or crucifixion (robbery with killing) (Arts. 259ff, 282ff, 306ff).[2][2][2][2]The Library of Congress also mentions the same thing.[3][3][3][3]Pakistan is a trickier case. It is true that there is no statute that applies the death penalty to apostasy. But there is a legal principle that allows the application of Islamic law in cases where statutory law is silent. Apostasy is such a case.[4] This, of course, is not pure speculation. Here’s an actual case: Pakistan has sentenced a man to death for 'blasphemy' on Facebook“I've never heard of any law regarding apostasy in Syria, and even if it was true, it is not in practice.” This is not a good defense.If you’re Muslim, you have nothing to fear from such laws.If you’re an atheist, you will shut up about it, which is the whole point of my answer. There won’t be very many people willing to take the risk to their life.Even if the law is not often applied in practice, it remains on the book precisely because a lot of people still want such laws on the books.Syria is not only controlled by Al Assad. Much of the country is in the hands of extremist groups. And the death penalty for apostasy has been enforced by such groups.[5]Regarding Indonesia, there is no death penalty, but you can still be imprisoned for up to 5 years for blasphemy.In April 2010, the Constitutional Court upheld the 1965 Blasphemy Law, holding that the government maintains the power to impose limitations on religious freedoms based upon security considerations. The law provides for a maximum sentence of five years’ imprisonment for blasphemy.[6][6][6][6]This isn’t to say that I can guarantee that the map above is 100% accurate. I can’t. I didn’t make the map. It appears that Egypt doesn’t actually have the death penalty for apostasy. This is why the Grand Imam of Al-Azhar University,, one of Sunni Islam’s oldest and most prestigious centers of learning, felt compelled to make the case for the application of the death penalty in 2016![7][7][7][7]Regardless, my point that most of these societies are highly illiberal, and that non believers don’t feel safe to voice their non belief openly, still stands. Will anyone dispute that?Footnotes[1] Morocco’s High Religious Committee Says Apostates Should Not Be Killed[2] http://www.hiil.org/data/sitemanagement/media/QuickScan_Yemen_311012_zonderCover.pdf[2] http://www.hiil.org/data/sitemanagement/media/QuickScan_Yemen_311012_zonderCover.pdf[2] http://www.hiil.org/data/sitemanagement/media/QuickScan_Yemen_311012_zonderCover.pdf[2] http://www.hiil.org/data/sitemanagement/media/QuickScan_Yemen_311012_zonderCover.pdf[3] Laws Criminalizing Apostasy[3] Laws Criminalizing Apostasy[3] Laws Criminalizing Apostasy[3] Laws Criminalizing Apostasy[4] https://books.google.com/books?id=Yy2dPvefMHcC&pg=PA137&lpg=PA137&dq=a+lacuna+in+the+statute+law+was+to+be+filled+with+reference+to+Islamic+law&source=bl&ots=viR-xR4yLn&sig=WFosH4jt2B1fAyRBTxtF7ZFvRac&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj93sfuhufaAhUIxYMKHaL5AVMQ6AEINjAB#v=onepage&q=a%20lacuna%20in%20the%20statute%20law%20was%20to%20be%20filled%20with%20reference%20to%20Islamic%20law&f=false[5] Al-Qaeda cuts off head of rebel battalion in Syria[6] https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/208444.pdf[6] https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/208444.pdf[6] https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/208444.pdf[6] https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/208444.pdf[7] Al-Azhar: to leave Islam is ‘treason’[7] Al-Azhar: to leave Islam is ‘treason’[7] Al-Azhar: to leave Islam is ‘treason’[7] Al-Azhar: to leave Islam is ‘treason’

I suppose it depends on a number of factors:General attitude towards employing applicants with criminal records is wary at best. People don’t really want to take the risk of the hire turning out badly for them.Whether if it is the applicant’s potential to reoffend after being hired; or clients possibly hesitant to do business because of mistrust towards such applicants should knowledge of a criminal record be discovered.That is not to say no one is willing to take the chance; the benefit of the doubt can prove beneficial in some cases.However, on a practical level, there are other, less risky options. The damage caused by a single bad decision can destroy any company; choice of candidate included.Other factors include the actual crime committed by the applicant (unlawful assembly may be tolerable) and the job applied for (some jobs strictly call for political neutrality or a clean record.)The company or organization that is hiring is also a factor. Employers such as the diner chain that bars Mandarin Chinese speakers may actually prioritize applicants who have been involved in the demonstrations.Others have expressed no desire whatsoever to hire applicants with such involvement given the movement’s divisiveness.You remember what happened with Yoshinoya?Someone there posted an advert mocking the police. Police/police supporters responded by demanding the advert be taken down.It was taken down and staff apologized. Demonstrators/demonstrator supporters responded by trashing most of the local branches.