Critical Dates Calculator: Fill & Download for Free

This is a really good question, and it's not uncommon for folks to confuse Ruby with Rails, or think that Rails is all that Ruby is good for... I'm amused, and a bit frustrated, that people don't have the same confusion between Python and, say, Django.Actually, Ruby is every bit the powerful, general purpose programming language as Python (or Perl, or Java, or C or Pascal for that matter). Which means that you can use it to program anything, any tool, any application, that you could using one of the others for... yes, anything.As just a few examples, I've used (am using) Ruby to code:Command line tools (scripts) for Linux (could be used for VMS, Windows, Unix, or any other platform that Ruby's available for). I've created tools to: display and (optionally) kill runaway processes; list file directories in a format that I prefer; calculate dates (number of days between two dates, or a date some number of days before/since another); to adopt (set file ownerships & permissions) a group of files; to mount remote file systems; to compare and display file differences; to display bash function definitions and environment variables; to merge or concatenate multiple Ogg or MP3 audio files into one single file (so that a piano sonata's movements don't get played in randomized order). The possibilities are limited only by your imagination, not by what Ruby "cannot" do. A great resource for this is David Copeland's book Build Awesome Command-Line Applications in Ruby: Control Your Computer, Simplify Your Life: David Copeland B.: 9781934356913 which I heartily recommend!Simulations, explorations and general R&D. I've used Ruby for programs which: develop 12-tone (dodecaphonic) rows for music composition; calculate the total number of chords (vertical sound structures) which can be played/produced on a piano's 88 keys (turns out to be around 309-septillion or so); play with and explore the results of regex (regular expression) pattern matching; evaluate various methods of producing random-but-memorable-and-strong passwords. Another great resource along these lines of explorations is Sau Sheong Chang's interesting book Exploring Everyday Things with R and Ruby: Learning About Everyday Things: Sau Sheong Chang: 9781449315153Developing programming support packages (e.g., Gems) and other general or specific enhancements to make applications easier. I've built enhancement packages for string and file handling, for displaying results using ANSI escape sequences (in a terminal), for date calculations, and for getting user input/responses. There are hundreds of Ruby Gems available (see RubyGems.org), but there's always room for more well-thought-out contributions.Although the overwhelming success of Rails has made it seem like it is the only thing that's ever been written in Ruby, there's actually so many more: Puppet and Chef are two open-source configuration management tool suites written in Ruby, as is Radiant, a content management package. The powerful and useful Rake (Ruby make) quickly becomes an essential tool in any software developer's kit. RSpec and Cucumber (among others) are also essential software tools which support test- &/or behavior-driven development, again written in Ruby; also: Metasploit (a system security analysis project and framework); Starling (a light-weight persistent message queue server); Shapado (an open-source question-and-answer system); and Typo (an open-source blogging engine) ...all written in Ruby! And there's much, much more...Ruby has been, and will continue to be, used to develop application programs and systems, both customer/user-facing and for internal/private use, in any and all areas of business and commerce, science, engineering and technology where powerful, quick-to-implement computing solutions are needed.And actually (this must be labelled as my own, personal opinion), the most truly profound and powerful Ruby applications have yet to be written. Although there are some really smart Ruby coders out there, I don't think we've yet reached the critical mass or level of use which will effectively employ and exploit the foundational elegance, beauty and power of the Ruby programming language, especially as regards its abilities for metaprogramming, dynamacism and reflection. So hang onto your hat -- there's more to come!

If the birth time is incorrect, then palmistry. If you have a birth chart by traditional astrologer, then only there is proof of your correct date of birth. All other case are based on erratic date of birth just to fill the application at the time of joining the school. In most of the case, while reading the chart, we can see many critical deviations and that deviation is purely due to wrong birth time and or wrong birth date. For analysing next critical dates, only through astrology it can be done. For that date of birth certified by astrologer is a must, otherwise it will be waste exercise to read or calculate unnecessary to derive some information. For reading of palm or astro you can contact through [email protected]

Yes, but this "claim" is not just among Christians, but among all three major religious groups: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.Christians from the second century through the first millenium dated the creation event at around 5500 BC (~7500 years ago). This date was based upon the historical records of ancestors going back to the alleged first man Adam.After the Jews published the Masoretic text of the Bible, it became more popular to base calculations upon the genealogies contained in it. The ages of the earliest patriarchs are different in this version, so the dates turned out to be little more recent. From the 10th century to the 18th century, the calculations ranged from about 4200 BC to 3600 BC (~6200 to 5600 years ago). The Jewish calendar continues to date the years from creation, this year being 5774 (so a little less than 6000 years). In the 17th century, a Christian Archbishop named James Ussher published a widely publicized and criticized date for creation which was in the year 4004 BC (6018 years ago).All these dates were based upon history, specifically upon ancestral records. They were not based upon science. The most basic assumption is that the genealogies are accurate records going back to time of the first human and a creation event.The claim of modern science for the date of origin is based mostly upon radiometric dating. Most Christians prefer the scientific approach over the dates arrived at historically. The ones who still adhere to the recent time of creation are called Young Earth Creationists (YEC). The YEC disagree with basic assumptions necessary in radiometric dating. The YEC also point out empirical evidence such as polystrate fossils which make radiometric dating questionable. They also refer to other empirical clocks that do not agree with the dates arrived at through radiometric dating. Their approach basically seeks to find consistency between historical records and empirical investigation. The YEC and their journals are shunned by modern science because of their usual assumption of a Creator being involved. In recent times, the YEC theories have been censored from public education by the federal courts which have ruled it illegal to teach these ideas in public schools.