Sample Response Letter To Child Support Summons: Fill & Download for Free

#CantBlockRepublic trends as Shiv Sena threatens cable networks to block Republic TV.Amid their reportage on the Sushant Singh Rajput's death and Rhea Chakraborty's alleged involvement in the case, Republic TV said that the state's ruling party Shiv Sena has made "shocking and brazen attempt" to block the right to report as the party has issued threats to cable networks in Maharashtra to block the channel from people's TV.The Shiv Cable Sena which is part of Shiv Sena, recently issued an order, signed by Sanjay Raut's brother Sunil Raut, who heads the organisation.This comes after the network's reporter Anuj Kumar, video journalist Yashpaljit Singh and Ola cab driver Pradeep Dilip Dhanavade were taken into "illegal police custody" and sent to 4 days of custody.The network said its reporting team was "following a journalistic lead in an investigative assignment" in Karjat in Raigad."In what is the biggest clampdown on the right to report, the Republic team was apprehended and thrown into jail for 4 days after making an enquiry with a security guard of a certain residence. We are shocked that the Republic team was denied any legal representation before being sent to 4 days of custody," it said.Now, Arnab issued a statement over the release of the journalists and the threat issued to cable networks."Uddhav Thackeray, release my journalists. You have broken the law and we will not allow this illegality. You didn't write the Constitution and you have no right to turn it upside down. Your party has sent letters to cable operators to illegally blackout Republic. You are allowing and approving a series of illegalities. Release my journalists immediately and perform your constitutional duty by arresting your party leaders who have been caught red-handed sending threats to cable operators.I am a Mumbaikar. I have built Republic with hard work and effort. You cannot touch our network. The people of Mumbai, Maharashtra and India are with us. Uddhav Thackeray, release my journalists immediately. And arrest your party leaders who are issuing threats to blackout the distribution of Republic Bharat. If you don’t, I will fight you in both the courts of public opinion and our country’s highest courts," Arnab Goswami said.Amid the debacle, the channel even sent out a #CantBlockRepublic petition "appealing to the people of India to come forward and join the fight for the right to report in a free democratic country."Well, netizens are now backing Arnab Goswami and his team and soon #CantBlockRepublic was trending on Twitter.Hope this helps😊Image Source - Twitter[1]Footnotes[1] #CantBlockRepublic trends as Shiv Sena threatens cable networks to block Republic TV

A2A:Short Answer: Legally speaking No.Long Answer: Custodial torture or assault in police/judicial custody is illegal and a grave violation of fundamental rights. But the question is who cares ?If a suspect is poor or not rich, law-enforcement officials in India don’t mind torturing such suspects in custody.I have already answered a similar question on Quora before, see this - Shiv Shanker Khan's answer to Do police have a legal authority to perform 3rd degree torture in India? If yes, then under which clause?Remedies against custodial violence by Law enforcement officials in India :1. A Writ petition can be filed in High Court by a victim of custodial violence for violation of his/her fundamental rights. (read: Article 21 of the Constitution of India)2. A complaint can be filed through post or fax by the victim of custodial violence with National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.3. The matter can be highlighted in public domain with help of print media or electronic media like newspapers or news channels.PS: Indian democracy can never be like Western Democracy, I say it with deep regret as an Indian!

The terms were never made public.However, a leak by Charles's former personal financial advisor in 2004 said that she received:Joint custody and equal access to their children.£17.5 million as a lump sum.The right to live in Kensington Palace.She did not receive regular alimony payments; the lump sum took their place. She also gave up the title 'Her Royal Highness', but continued to be the Princess of Wales. Kensington Palace is royal property; Diana lived there with the Queen's permission rather than being given it. It is also reported that the Queen lent the money to her son for the lump sum settlement, and he is still paying her back.The Queen cannot be sued in her personal capacity, as an individual, unless she gives permission. (Such permission would be obtained by asking the Home Secretary for a ‘petition of right’.) Since 1947 it has been possible to sue the Crown in the normal courts.This protection does not extend to any other members of the royal family, such as Prince Charles. They can be sued just like any other individual. In practical terms, a private settlement would almost certainly be offered rather than taking the matter to court, in order to avoid publicity.