The Occupational Questionnaire Form: Fill & Download for Free

In a single sentence, because Mexico is not a separatist country and never was.A big part of Mexico’s self-image is predicated on the fact that we are already mixed, and part of breaking with Europe (in this case Spain, but with the European attitude in general) was, since independence, to break with the tradition that pre-judged you based on race.Not only that, as a country that already had been mixing for 300 years before its independence, there was no calculating system that could possibly make sense of all the mixing (because, back to the initial point, Mexico is not a separatist country).So it was deemed to be to the detriment of the country to know the exact race of people (other than to know indigenous origin, which is tracked by whether you speak a native language).Because we don’t “separate” the population, there is nothing to gain from racial statistics.This is, I have always thought, a fantastically great historical move.It leaves racists without a lot of their reasons to worry and to go be violent towards minorities. Sure, you anecdotally know where they may live, and you can use “proxy questions” in the census, but you don’t know how fast or if their communities are growing, and it takes an educated person to coax the question out with proxy questions.Even with that, it hasn’t completely stopped mistrust and racism.But it really has put a lid on nagging worries of people.The only thing that could be used as “proxy” of this question for race is place of birth, nationality and the cleverly named “birth language” (the first appearance in the 1900 census explains the options as “Spanish, French, English, Zapotec, Otomí” etc). Then again, a German scholar of Náhuatl would show up as a Nahuatl speaker.Here are the census tabulated questionnaires directly from INEGI (you can go see all the data at Serie histórica censal e intercensal (1990-2010) - it’s super interesting and I love the fact that there’s all kinds of open data on this you can just download and poke around in).I find the occupational/economic data most interesting, but of personal data, you’ll notice they get more detailed as the government is able and interested to track more, and some were indeed used as “proxy” for racial origin as I’ve said, but none of them ask you point blank what your race is.Here is the list of basic census questionnaires as PDFs, along with a bit of comment for historical context1895 - First population census.1900 - first iteration with “origin” questions -place of birth, language of birth, religion.1910 - missing PDF but there is data. Mexican revolution started this year.1921 - First census after the revolution. No change on origin questions from 1900 so it is assumed the 1910 questionnaire would have been nearly identical.1930 - No change on origin questions.1940 - this one is interesting. They are interested in whether you eat wheat bread, use sandals, and what kind of dress - perhaps native people who shunned European ways used “calzón” (i.e. wore underwear in warm climates), and ask what you call your sleeping arrangement (“tapexco”, “bed”, “Hammock”). All these seem proxy for pinpointing origin when put together, but again, only trying to pinpoint European/Native cultural base. Note they still avoid the actual question. This form was designed during the big debates on “white supremacy” going on in Europe, as WW2 had started, so it is interesting on its own.1950 - This one is even more interesting, for the opposite reason. It’s right after WW2 and is the first census after Mexico’s strong reaction to racist ideologies coming out of Germany. This particular census has exactly zero questions that could identify someone by their race, and even completely removes interest in native origin. All questions on dress, national origin, language and religion are gone. And it’s a beautiful form for people whose interest in Mexican census is economic-based - it’s very detailed on that.1960 - The wheat question is back, along with other food questions.1970 - Birth place, language and religion are back. There is for the first time an self-identifying “Indigenous language spoken?”, along with “is also Spanish bilingual?”After 1970, the questionnaires become more complex, but they all look like the 1970 one on identifiable questions - see 1980, 1990.After that, we have tabulated data but no PDF questionnaires.There is talk about adding an (also self-reporting) AfroMexican origin to the questions for 2020, in order to justify special funding for those communities.But talk of race specifically in Mexico is nonsensical. Most Mexicans are very mixed, and of those who come from other places, they tend to mix in the first or second generation. So it really tells us nothing that language at birth doesn’t already say.

Military questions and therefore military success questions about the nations fighting are often asked in isolation of geography and geo political realityFor example how would Russia versus China do but then the questionnaire will say no nukes or it only last a month or some other arbitrary thing that restricts us from what will actually happenI invite the OP to remember that North Korea has a long border with China and it is close enough to RussiaThat any giant military operation against North Korea holds dangerous border problems from the beginningAnd I remind the OP that South Korea at least a very large portion of the population is immediately under artillery threatThat is the civilian casualties on both sides will be very very largeUltimately in the modern war if one's ever allowed to fight a modern warAir Supremacy and when I called to ‘ stand off’ war of cruise missiles and very effective artillery from long-distances and aerial bombing campaign from Navy carriers and Air force mean that North Korea could be defeated that is at least for a successful invasionAs the United States learns over and over and overThat does not mean the occupation is going to go well eitherThe problem is again it is very difficult to separate North Korea from its borders with China and Russia

Since there are several instruments with similar titles, be certain you have the exact title you are searching for. Then go to Google Scholar search portal, and enter the title. If it has been researched, you’ll find it there with a link to the instrument. Alternatively, if you know the publisher’s name, go to that website first.