Gabes Application: Fill & Download for Free

White privilege doesn't exist. There's no such thing. If this was 50–60 years ago then ok, I'd be able to answer this in several ways, but white privilege just doesn't exist anymore.If there's white privilege then how come white Americans on average have the lowest median household income? If it exists, why are there homeless white people? The dropout rate of white people is pretty significant too. But no they must've dropped their white privilege somewhere, I hope they find it.But you wanna know what does exist? Wealth privilege. Racism too. People who have a lot of money have easier access to things or can use that money to bypass a lot of bullshit. And with racism people have preference of one person over another.EDIT: My apologies. The statistic I was thinking of was entirely different from what I mentioned. The statistic I was thinking of was white American median income vs that of Asian americans, Nigerian americans, Indian Americans etc. I was wrong and didn't mean to misinform.EDIT: 5/20/20 White privilege does indeed exist. I was wrong.

This is a question that my place of employment recently addressed. As an academic library, we decided we wanted to "officially" support a research management application, and Mendeley and Zotero were the only two options considered because they are free and we had no money to spend. After looking closely at both, we decided they were pretty comparable. Both have strengths and weaknesses. Mendeley was seen as more user-friendly in general and better with PDFs, but Zotero superior for collecting and managing sources with basic training.The real deciding factor came in when Mendeley was bought by Elsevier. It really hit home that we could probably better trust that the developers behind Zotero would share our values. As a private company, Mendeley's main objective is to make money. This is not a bad thing in of itself, but the non-profit, academically based Zotero just made more sense, especially given Elsevier's tarnished reputation <The Cost of Knowledge>. Mendeley could take all of the data added to it and its product and put it behind a pay wall tomorrow. They probably won't, and I'm sure the people who founded and continue to develop Mendeley would disagree with such a move, but there is no way to be sure. Elsevier higher-ups could probably make it happen overnight by fiat. Of course Zotero could do the same thing, but they are much less likely to do so given their values as a non-profit.All of that aside, I have used both products extensively. I've done workshops teaching students how to use them. I've seen how they are used in the academic wild. And at this point I am even more convinced that going with Zotero is the right decision. It's a powerful tool with great features. One of the best aspects of it is that it runs as an add-on to Firefox. This is off-putting to some users at first, but once you see how it works within a research management workflow it is far superior to using standalone apps. There are extensions for Chrome and Safari that can be useful too, but they are not as robust as the Firefox add-on.In the end, even if I prefer Zotero, as a librarian I plan to keep my eye on Mendeley as well. These things change all the time and I still use aspects of Mendeley, such as the paper search on their site. It's good to have two robust research management tools out there competing for users as well since it's probably healthy for the development of both products.

Before I get to the answer I’m just gonna state the obvious and say that one thing is never gonna be applicable to every person in a group. I’m black but I don’t like grape juice/soda and I don’t like watermelon either, sue me bitches. I’m also white and don’t call everyone bud. I just call everyone nigga no matter your race or gender. I don’t discriminate. #EqualityI don’t remember how old I was exactly but my mom and psychiatrist actually thought I had high functioning autism. But that just goes back to autism and psychopathy getting mixed up. So the answer is no.