South Carolina Affidavit Of Correction: Fill & Download for Free

Notary laws vary by state. Many states authorize a notary to make a certified copy of an original document that is not a vital record or a publicly recorded document.According to the National Notary Association, the following states do not allow a notary to make a certified copy: Alabama, Illinois, Michigan, Mississippi, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina and Tennessee.If the notary is not authorized to make a certified copy, the document holder can make a sworn affidavit of certified copy by document custodian. The customer swears under penalty of perjury that the copy is a true and correct copy of the original. The notary does not compare or verify the copy.Or, the customer could drive to a neighboring state where the notary is authorized to make a certified copy.

Quoting a lot from a prior post of mine.I think you haven’t looked at some of the broader evidence. This below is not looking at the individual acts of election fraud, for which others have presented a lot of evidence of such as sighed affidavits of witnesses to individual acts of vote fraud, and mathematical analysis of elections in individual states or counties.I am looking here at the “BIG PICTURE” in all of the USA.The forest — not the Individual trees.Voter turnout in United States presidential elections - Wikipedia2020 is shown as the last election on this graph. The black line is total voter turnout as fraction of US population every election in US history. Skipping early American history with the Federalist, Democratic-Republican and Whig parties, the modern normal line-up is Democrats and Republicans that started ~ 1856.Red is Republican as fraction of total population, Blue is Democrat as faction of total population. Grey at the bottom are lumped third party votes as fraction of population.Historically in American Presidential Elections large jumps in total presidential vote turnout as a fraction of population are associated with expansion of right of suffrage such as dropping the requirement of owning real-estate to vote between 1824 & 1828 (total votes as fraction of population more than doubled).Edit from reply to a comment: I too narrowly constrained the time period - note:Voting rights in the United States - Wikipedi1789: The Constitution grants the states the power to set voting requirements. Generally, states limited this right to property-owning or tax-paying white males (about 6% of the population).[11]1790: The Naturalization Act of 1790allows white men born outside of the United States to become citizens with the right to vote.1792–1838: Free black males lose the right to vote in several Northern states including in Pennsylvania and in New Jersey.1792–1856: Abolition of property qualifications for white men, from 1792 (Kentucky) to 1856 (North Carolina) during the periods of Jeffersonian and Jacksonian democracy. However, tax-paying qualifications remained in five states in 1860—Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Pennsylvania, Delaware and North Carolina. They survived in Pennsylvania and Rhode Island until the 20th century.[16]So it took place gradually state by state from 1792 to 1856. Requirements to be a tax-payer remained till the 20th century.End EditMale former slaves getting to vote circa 1872 to 1876, a drop in vote faction in the 1890s due to Jim Crow laws in the south, then a combination of women’s suffrage and relaxation of restrictions on black votes in the 1920s & 1930s.A drop in total votes in the ‘40s mostly due to WWII and so many voters overseas both during and in the aftermath of WWII.Then a bounce back in 1952 as the effects of WWII and the Korean war were reduced, and then gradual slow fairly stable growth.A bump then dip during the 1990s mostly associated with the Reform party and collapse of it.Where the eff does the monster jump from 2016 to 2020 come from? No voting rights were expanded, we saw no large 3rd party form or collapse.Their simply is no plausible reason to see that big of a jump as a fraction of population.Democrats claim that Trump was so unpopular he mobilized votes against him.Consider American history of unpopular presidents being run out of office after being elected. I am skipping Ford as he was never elected.Four “unpopular” elected presidents have been sent packing by the public in the 20th century;Taft in 1912, his vote total was a massive decline from his 1908 victory.Hoover in 1932, his vote total was a massive decline from his 1928 victory.Jimmy Carter his 1980 vote total was a massive decline from his 1976 victory.Bush41 saw a massive decline in 1992 vote total from his 1988 victory.You do not see big jumps in vote totals as a fraction of population when Americans fired a president.Taft in 1912 & Bush41 in 1992 losses both coincide with a major 3rd party presidential candidate running and getting a large fraction of the vote. Both saw somewhat proportionally larger jumps in total vote as a fraction of population than did the 1932 & 1980 elections.No major 3rd party involvement in 2020 so that is off the table.Trump increased his vote as a fraction of population in 2020 enormously to be almost as high as Obama in 2008, higher than Obama in 2012, higher than Clinton in 2016.In absolute votes he was larger in vote total than any previously elected president in US history — 4.5 million votes more than Obama in 2008, 9 million more than Obama in 2012 or Clinton in 2016.Donald Trump went from winning with a razor thin EC vote margin in 2016 and 63 million votes to “losing” with 74 million votes in 2020.HUH??Him “losing” given all that is VERY, VERY FISHY.YOU SAYING PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE JUMP IN TOTAL VOTES FROM 2016 to 2020 is BS. It is ignoring the Elephant in the room.WHERE DID ALL THE EXTRA VOTES COME FROM?WHY ARE DEMOCRATS RESISTING AN INVESTIGATION?If I take the total % of US population that voted in 2008 which was 43.21% and the previous largest vote as % of population ever, add 2% for grins & giggles, that is 45.21% multiply by the US current population 331 million. That is 149.64 million.Ignore that we actually have evidence of Trump ballots being illegally not counted. Assume the vote counts for Trump & 3rd Party candidates are correct.2020 United States presidential election - WikipediaTrump total 74.2 millionThird party total 2.89 million149.64 - (74.2 + 2.89)=72.54 for Biden — after handing him 2% of the US Population over the “historic“ 2008 election.This is why I can believe the election was stolen.Edit: Steve Johnson commented:Couldn't the change in how we voted because of Covid off sufficient explanation?I replied:Because of ILLEGAL ways voting methods were changed yes EXACTLY.That is a central explanation as to why the turnout was so very much higher when normally an epidemic like this ought to depress turnout.The issue of state officials in the defendant states illegally & unconstitutionally changing voting procedures grossly to the advantage of Democrats (and anyone willing to cheat) was what the Texas state lawsuit that was joined by 17 other states and President Trump was all about.Among many other violations, the most central and deeply unconstitutional change was letting various state executive branch officials (mostly Democrats) change procedures without the approval of the state legislature in question. That violates the electors clause of the US Constitution. Per that — ONLY the state legislature has the authority to set proceeders for federal elections in a given state.So yes that is the reason — and it was cheating.Had they run the changes through the state legislature, it would be legal, but Republican legislators would never have agreed to remove proper identification safeguards from mail-in ballots - that makes it way too easy to cheat. Nor would they agree to mailing ballots to people who did not ask for them, again making it way too easy to cheat.Another Edit: Time magazine essentially proves by admission that Democrats engaged in a massive conspiracy to “fortify” (🤪🤓🧐🤪🤓🧐) the election.The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 ElectionThe extraordinary effort was dedicated to ensuring the election would be free and fair, credible and uncorrupted. Here's how it was donehttps://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/There was a conspiracy unfolding behind the scenes, one that both curtailed the protests and coordinated the resistance from CEOs. Both surprises were the result of an informal alliance between left-wing activists and business titans. The pact was formalized in a terse, little-noticed joint statement of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and AFL-CIO published on Election Day.( . . . )Their work touched every aspect of the election. They got states to change voting systems and laws and helped secure hundreds of millions in public and private funding. They fended off voter-suppression lawsuits, recruited armies of poll workers and got millions of people to vote by mail for the first time. They successfully pressured social media companies to take a harder line against disinformation and used data-driven strategies to fight viral smears.( . . . )That’s why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream–a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information. They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it.( . . . )THE ARCHITECTSometime in the fall of 2019, Mike Podhorzer became convinced the election was headed for disaster–and determined to protect it.This was not his usual purview. For nearly a quarter-century, Podhorzer, senior adviser to the president of the AFL-CIO, the nation’s largest union federation, has marshaled the latest tactics and data to help its favored candidates win elections.The AFL-CIO “fortified” the 2020 Presidential Election , ,Crime and Corruption - Union FactsNearly fifty years after John F. Kennedy first condemned corrupt leadership in the American labor movement, it is still plagued by rampant corruption, embezzlement, racketeering and influence from numerous organized crime organizations. From penny-ante theft to multi-million dollar embezzlement schemes, labor leaders continue to violate the trust of the members they claim to represent. The …https://www.unionfacts.com/article/crime-and-corruption/KEY FINDINGS:The Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act’s (LMRDA) reliance on self-government, public disclosure, and ultimately deterrence has failed;The Department of Labor’s (DOL) Office of Labor-Management Standards (OLMS) has investigated and prosecuted union leaders for embezzling more than $100 million in union dues since 2001;Investigations by the DOL’s Office of Inspector General, which investigates labor racketeering and organized crime’s influence within the labor movement, has resulted in more than $1 billion in fines, restitutions, and forfeitures;Fewer than 5 percent of unions audited by the DOL received unqualified passes.The American people ought to trust an election “fortified” by the AFL- CIO who has less than one in 20 unions associated with it that are not corrupt?

To the best of my knowledge, every state requires some form of ID to register to vote, and no states allow unregistered voters to cast a ballot, so the notion that voter IDs are needed in order to prevent non-citizens from voting is not supported.Seven states have strict laws requiring providing an ID with a photo at the time of voting: Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Wisconsin.Ten states have “non-strict” requirements for photo ID: Arkansas, Alabama, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Louisiana, Michigan, Rhode Island, South Dakota, and Texas. In those states, alternative forms of validation are allowed. For example, if the voter is known to a poll worker or election official who can vouch for the voter’s identity, if the voter signs an affidavit, or if the voter returns an inquiry mailed to their address within an allotted time, or if the voter returns with ID within an allowed time, their vote will be counted. (The precise details vary from state to state.)Arizona, North Dakota, and Ohio have strict requirements for IDs at the time of voting, but the ID does not need to have a photograph.Fourteen states have “non-strict,” non-photo ID requirements for in-person voting: Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Iowa, Missouri, Montana, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, Washington, and West Virginia.Well over half of the states do require some form of ID for people who vote in person, not just “a few,” as suggested in the question, so you may wish to revise that part of the question.But as to the reason why some states do not, several states have recently transitioned, or are in the process of transitioning, to all mail in ballots. In those states, providing a photo, or non-photo ID is impractical. If you send your Driver’s License in with your ballot, you would be without a license to drive until after the election when they can send it back.Instead, those states have a copy of the registered voter’s signature on file, so the voter signs the envelope, the signature is compared to the one on file, and if they match, the vote is considered valid.As to the reasons people might oppose requiring ID, there are a few.Many people don’t have ID. An elderly or disabled person who cannot drive has no particular use for a driver’s license. S/he may have a relative do the driving, picking up groceries, etc., so maintaining a valid driver’s license is not worth the effort.Many people are poor and cannot afford the added expense of getting a driver’s license or other ID. (I recently renewed mine, and it cost me almost $60. If I had to choose between renewing my license or feeding my children, the children would get priority.) It would be pretty unpatriotic to suggest that poor people don’t have the right to vote simply because they don’t have an extra $60 to spare. And that’s for a renewal. If I did not already have the license, I would need to request a copy of my birth certificate and other documents, which would add to the cost.The 24th Amendment explicitly prohibits the government from requiring payment of any “poll tax” for any voter. Prior to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, some states imposed tax liabilities on citizens, prior to allowing them to vote. In many states, these poll taxes were part of a larger set of regulations known as “Jim Crow” laws, which were restrictions on the rights of Black and African American citizens that were not applicable to white citizens. While those “Jim Crow” laws were often superficially “neutral” with respect to race, in practice, they were only enforced against Black citizens.The recognition, in the 1960s, that those Jim Crow laws were discriminatory led to them being overturned at the Federal level.In principle, a national voter ID law might pass Constitutional muster, but only if it was available to all citizens, free of cost. Otherwise, it would be an unconstitutional poll tax that disenfranchises a portion of the electorate, in violation of the 24th Amendment.One might argue that there are very few people who can’t get an ID, and that’s correct. But those few are citizens too, so disenfranchising them is inappropriate.Besides, if there are so few people who can’t get IDs that we could justify such a rule because it “wouldn’t affect too many people,” then that is an inherent admission that the requirement for voter IDs is not necessary in the first place, because it wouldn’t affect very many people.Hope that helps.