Dhs 1910: Fill & Download for Free

The so-called baseball “purists” act as though the rules of baseball were handed down from Mt. Sinai. You want the “pure” game? Sure, no gloves, pitching distance 45 feet, underhand pitching, you can get a runner out by “soaking” him with a thrown ball. Pure enough for ya?What is wrong with a game evolving to make it better? Would you rather see the baseball of 1910, with all the 2–1 games, crappy fields, tobacco-soaked balls, and only daytime games?Now, there’s a legitimate argument about whether the DH makes the game better, but please stop acting like baseball was as pure as the driven snow until Ron Blomberg came along and opened up the floodgates of DHs. (And I prefer the DH to watching NL pitchers wave their bat and miss three times or with a runner on first and less than two out, surprise!, bunt.)

*Things in bold are my emphasis.The idea that things were better in the "good old days" is called juvenoia but it's important to think about the differences between then and now. Ellis Island is responsible for about 40% of the current US population. This was during the passing of The Immigration Act of 1924 (The Johnson-Reed Act) and National Origins Act of 1924One important thing to note about one of the first policies on immigration was that "it allows all white males living in the U.S. for two years to become citizens." Ellis Island - Facts & Summary - HISTORY.com Immigration law isn't like that today.The first federal law in U.S. history to limit the immigration of Europeans, the Immigration Act of 1921 reflected the growing American fear that people from southern and eastern European countries not only did not adapt well into American society but also threatened its very existence. The law specified that no more than 3 percent of the total number of immigrants from any specific country already living in the United States in 1910 could migrate to America during any year. Read more @ Immigration Act of 1921The fear that immigrants (nativism) come to a country to mooch off the government and never assimilate to the culture is fear mongering that gets repeated with every wave of immigrants. The idea is that they will not fit into the culture and their cultural differences will RUIN the country.With this in mind I think it's important to bring up a report that was produced by the Dillingham Commission showing the differences between Old Immigrants vs New Immigrants, which you could use today to highlight people's feelings toward immigrants. "Old" immigrants were preferred.This act mainly targeted racial restrictions on Africans, and banned immigration from Asian especially Japanese and Arab countries as a result. The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) was abolished back in 2003. That year the (USCIS) or US Citizenship and Immigration Services took on the responsibility. Now the former INS is broken into three parts within the (DHS) Department of Homeland Security. That is USCIS, ICE (US Immigration and Customs Enforcement), and CBP (US Customs and Border Protection). The nature of immigration has changed. It has become stricter and the nations they come from are now more diverse then before. We are seeing more immigration from the places that have previously barred from immigrating, but the attitudes towards them aren't completely different from the past.What it means to be Americans changes depending on the time period. New music, shows, movies, and culture flows in our conscious constantly. Who our ancestors were in the 50s, is not the same culture that it is today. The people we consider to be "American" today would have been considered immigrants yesterday. In fact, if the immigration laws of today were practiced back in the day, most of the citizens of today wouldn't be here. What it means to be American will continue to change.If people are coming here to get citizenship, then that means they are giving up their old nationality for the new one. In order to gain citizenship people to find work, go through the intense immigration system with patience and zeal, and many have to take the citizenship test. That's a lot to do for someone who doesn't want to be an American. Assimilating to the culture is easier to today then it ever has been. Immigrants from the past would have held tighter their old customs and language. They didn't have the same access to an education and the technology we currently have.

The problem with your question, as it is posed, is that the term “illegal immigrant” is a racist catch-all term, originally used only against Asian immigrants who came to the west coast for the California Gold Rush after 1849. - that term is does not specifically refer to a particular legal status for any individual person or groups of persons, to make a general answer.There were federal laws passed against Asian immigration starting in the 1890’s. and that term “illegal immigrants” was applied to Chinese migrants. However those laws were also blatantly racist when they were passed, and discriminated against people based on race and national origin.All those episodes of the “Kung Fu” TV show in the 1970’s and yet nobody got the point. Did anyone ever ask to see Kwai Chang Caine’s (Keith Carradine) ‘papers’ before he kicked their collective asses? No.Here’s some old-timey ‘deplorables’ looking for a whuppin’.The term “illegal immigrant” has never lost it’s racist connotation. It was never “cleaned up’. The term was often used to describe a particular group of people based upon their skin color, religion, and country of origin, and usually disregarded whether any particular person actually had legally entered the United States, and ignored that the people (often) actually were United States citizens or legal residents.U.S. citizens have visa-free access to 174 countries across the globe, including such far-flung destinations as Brunei and Kyrgyzstan. U.S citizens can even get a visa on arrival for many countries, including Azerbaijan, Indonesia, Bahrain, Cambodia, Djibouti, Ethiopia, Kuwait, Laos, Lebanon, Nepal, Rwanda, and others.- Citizens of 39 foreign nations and territories are eligible for visa-free entry into the United States under the same Visa Waiver Program.Visa Waiver Program - Wikipedia (Visa Waiver Program - Wikipedia)The Transportation Security Agency accepts a variety of forms of documentation. Notably for many foreign nationals, passports issued by their home country, or else US issued permanent resident cards and employment authorization cards are all acceptable forms of documentation for domestic flights.Very often if any other foreign citizen is in the United States as a tourist, or attending a conference or convention, giving a seminar, conducting business, or any other legitimate reason to be in the United States, they are neither “illegal” nor “immigrants”. They are able to travel domestically inside the USA using their passport identification.However the idea that any person’s (or group of peoples’) work history is closely monitored by the the United States government and would be “on-file” for the Transportation Security Agency Personnel at domestic airports to monitor and detain people for performing whatever jobs they had; …is a weird conspiracy theory that feeds into right wing/left wing fears that the intrusive big government is watching us all; and/or that the big government is supposed to be watching all the brown people who threaten them.This is a big “Red Herring” logical fallacy baked into the OP. The idea that work history is a barrier to free travel inside the United States is a distraction which really has no relevance, or basis in fact.Over the years, the target of the term “illegal immigrants” has expanded and changed to include people of other skin colors and nations, but usually does not include, for example, Eastern European fashion models in New York who entered the United States on a “tourist” visa, but are actually ‘working’ in the U.S.If they were not actually involved in a ‘white slavery’ operation, where their ‘employers’ have confiscated their passports and locked them in New York apartment buildings under guard, …they would be able to travel domestically in the US on their foreign passports.Accepting employment in the United States is NOT a criminal act.If any person came to the USA as a tourist, a student, or a worker, but had been performing an activity that did not match up exactly with the terms of a visa or entry waiver (limited to only that activity), … which was issued by the United States; That would only be a civil violation of US law, not a criminal violation. It does not affect their freedom of movement.For example, if a French tourist travels into the United States declaring that he entered the USA for “pleasure”, but he also takes a long term job as a waiter in a French restaurant in Schenectady, New York (hypothetically), that may be a civil violation of his entry Visa or waiver thereof. (The French restaurant may have committed a criminal act under US law by hiring a French waiter.) The French ‘tourist’ is not barred from travelling on a domestic airline flights within the USA, and nowadays is usually not referred to as an “illegal immigrant”, based on race and national origin.The United States also issues a “Golden” Visa - the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Visa Program, created in 1990 by the Immigration Act of 1990, provides a method for eligible Immigrant Investors to become lawful permanent residents—informally known as “green card” holders—by investing at least $900,000 in the United States. The EB-5 and other business visa programs allow foreign citizens to live and travel in the US if they ‘pay their way’.So if, for example, a particular Australian citizen who was a permanent legal resident in the United States and also a billionaire, runs a Cable News Network which profits directly by promoting conspiracy theories, presenting ‘alternate facts’, inciting a riot, encouraging insurrection against the United States government, and operating a racketeering scheme; then ALSO indulges in a personal sexual fetish for collecting dozens and dozens of identical, skinny, white, blonde, American girls who are displayed openly on his Network; AND fosters a work environment for sexually harassing and molesting those identical, white, blonde American girls; …He is not commonly referred to as an “illegal immigrant”. (SMH)Foreign citizen collects trophies. Uhnm…not creepy?Ironically the (hypothetical) Cable News Network has seized upon the racist term “illegal immigrants” (formerly used against the incursions of people from other foreign lands) to apply commonly to the Spanish speaking descendants of the Indian / Aztec people which were enslaved by the Spanish Conquistadors in the 1500’s, but those people actually lived in the United States. Those people worked as ‘peasants’ in the territories of the Spanish Empire before the white European people of the United States moved west in the 1800’s.The United States took the lands of the Spanish Empire by encroachment and homesteading, by land purchase, and finally by conquest starting in the early 1800’s under President Thomas Jefferson. The Spanish Empire was finally defeated by the United States at the end of the 1890’s under President William McKinley. The United States took over Spanish lands and drew boundary lines that were not finalized until the 1910’s and 1920’s. These boundaries essentially cut Mexico in half and divided the land between the United States and ‘foreigners’.On a number of occasions, for example, during the Herbert Hoover Administration after the Economic Crash of 1929, when white “nativists” attempted to drive Hispanic communities out of the United States, where the actual citizenship status of the Hispanic people had no meaning.The Spanish speaking ‘peasants’ inside the United States have not been treated as equal citizens, they were not automatically given birthright citizenship, and did not have a legal remedy to fight for their rights as US citizens until the voting rights act of 1965.The United States had long recognized that seasonal migrant workers have travelled north and south through the divided former Spanish territories for cultivation and harvesting of crops. For the migrant workers, with a simple work permit card, the United States was open from the beginning of World War II in the early 1940’s, when workers were encouraged to come, until 1965 when THE DEMOCRATS closed the migrant worker program and imposed first time quotas upon nations in the western hemisphere.YES THE DEMOCRATS CLOSED THE “OPEN BORDER” in 1965!After the Democrats closed the US Southern border to traditional / seasonal / temporary Hispanic migrant workers in 1965, then millions of those same workers came north and became “legal”.In response to an increasingly ‘militarized’ border, the Hispanic migrant workers moved to the United States and became permanent residents over the last half century.Compared to the overall immigrant population, Hispanic immigrants are more likely to have arrived nearly a decade or more ago. The largest share, approximately 60 percent, arrived prior to 2000, followed by 29 percent between 2000 and 2009, and 11 percent in 2010 or later.With green cards, Hispanic migrant workers can also travel domestically in the United States, or else with their national passports, just like “white folks”.GREEN CARD HOLDERS (LEGAL IMMIGRATION)* Legal permanent residents ("green card" recipients).Latin America includes Mexico, the Caribbean, Central America, and South America.DHS GOV-Immigration-statistics-2011 (http://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/immigration-statistics/yearbook/2011/ois_yb_2011.pdf)Why Border Enforcement Backfired (Why Border Enforcement Backfired)In summary:The term “illegal immigrants” is a vague catch-all term that does not actually recognize the citizenship rights and civil rights of other people who live, work, and travel in the United States. The term is historically racist in usage, and was never “cleaned up”.The “illegal actions” performed by people that the OP refers to, are actually ‘civil violations” and not “criminal violations”. The term “illegal” is applied to make a false implication of criminal action that does not exist.The Transportation Security Agency is not charged with monitoring the work history of all travelers inside the United States, and does not limit Freedom of movement. The idea that the TSAThe term “illegal immigrants” is not commonly applied to white foreign citizens who might have committed “civil” violations by accepting work in the USA. This reinforces the racist use of the term. However US employers who hire immigrant labor without proper US authorization may be committing a criminal act.Foreign immigrants to the US may obtain permanent legal status in the United States, and, as long as they are white, whatever reprehensible and criminal actions they may commit, even subversive actions against the USA, all unrelated to their work history, are not called “illegal immigrants”, and continue to have freedom of movement in the USA.While Hispanic-Americans are commonly understood to be “illegal immigrants” based on false characterizations by Faux News Network, - Historically this is racist because white ‘nativist’ American movements disregarded the civil and constitutional rights of Hispanic-American citizens.The actual number of Hispanic people in the USA who have civil violations of US immigration law do not really exist an large numbers. This is because many Hispanic Americans are not from “someplace else”; Also because, after the Democrats closed the “open border policy” in 1965, many Hispanic seasonal migrant workers became permanent legal residents inside the USA when they were able to do so.And this does not affect their freedom to travel.