26-11-2014.Pdf: Fill & Download for Free

I think there is a lot of misinformation here. As there are a lot of claims in the post, my reply could go long.Celebration on 26/11: AAP was founded 2 years ago on 26/11 and the reason for chosing that date is that it is our National Law Day. Our Constitution was completely drafted on 26/11 1949. So, it is also a birthday for the Aam Aadmi Party. The first post on 26/11 2014 on the official Facebook page of AAP was paying homage to 26/11 martyrs. Then came the donations and other things. Aam Aadmi Party - Timeline Photos | FacebookPrashant Bhushan signed mercy petition for Kasab: This is a bit strange as the pdf in the link shows that petition is for Afzal Guru and not Kasab. Prashant in his opinion is against death penalty for any crime. I don't agree with him as criminals like these don't deserve mercy. The petition was to change Guru's death sentence to life imprisonment and not set him free.Prashant Bhushan was the counsel for Jihadis: The link is incomplete. Yes he was counsel as they were not represented by anyone in the court. Afzal Guru was part of the same group. Ram Jethmalani who was Minister of Law and Justice with Atal Bihari govt. also was counsel for Afzal Guru and wanted him to rot in jails instead of being given death sentence. He has taken several other controversial cases. Check this: Ram Jethmalani One can read about Prashant Bhushan's role in several corruption cases against UPA and other govts., bureaucrats, large corporates, judiciary etc. and his role in several environmental causes.Bhushan in favor of calling Bhagat Singh a terrorist in NCERT textbooks: A completely fake propaganda. Again incomplete link in the post. Here is the complete one: Prashant Bhushan opposed removing references to Bhagat Singh as Terrorist - Delhi High Court Order Please read it. In brief he represented NCERT and point was made by him that the text has already been deleted for the new curriculum.Kejriwal declared Batla house encounter was fake: He didn't declare it as fake. He said it COULD BE fake and govt. agencies should investigate whether the claim made by local residents in the area was true or not. He wasn't witness and if local residents are claiming something, NOTHING WRONG in investigation.Prashant Bhushan wanted referendum on Kashmir: All he means is people who are living there, should be heard. Regarding referandum, he took back his statement. BJP has done nothing but politics in this matter. And it is laughable how they change stances. Here is them having no problem with 370 and asking people what they want. With 370, is Kashmir really integral part of India with a separate flag, separate constitution etc.???No objection to Article 370, says Rajnath SinghThe people will decide whether Article 370 has benefitted them or not: Rajnath SinghIf people want, BJP will retain Article 370BJP never sought abrogation, amendment of article 370: V.K. Singh - Hindustan TimesDuring Kashmir Flood, AAP asked its followers not to donate to PM Relief Fund but to an NGO: How does that matter? By that logic, all the NGOs, state govts, organizations like RSS who help victims during calamities on their own are anti national? Isn't it good that they at least asked to donate for the cause.

Yes, see this list of academic papers using Stack Overflow data (as of now contains 45 references):2014Bogdan Vasilescu, Alexander Serebrenik, Prem Devanbu and Vladimir Filkov. 2014. How social Q&A sites are changing knowledge sharing in open source software communities In 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW 2014)ACM [DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF]Alexander Halavais, K Hazel Kwon, Shannon Havener and Jason Striker. 2014. Badges of Friendship: Social Influence and Badge Acquisition on Stack Overflow. In 47th Hawaii International International Conference on Systems Science (HICSS-47 2014). IEEE [BibTeX] [PDF]2013Shaowei Wang, David Lo and Lingxiao Jiang. 2013. An Empirical Study on Developer Interactions in StackOverflow. In 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. ACM, pages 1019-1024. [DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF]Dennis Schenk and Mircea Lungu. 2013. Geo-Locating the Knowledge Transfer in Stack Overflow. In International Workshop on Social Software Engineering. ACM, pages 21-24. [DOI][BibTeX] [PDF]Bogdan Vasilescu, Andrea Capiluppi and Alexander Serebrenik. 2013. Gender, representation and online participation: A quantitative study Interacting with Computers. Oxford University Press. 1-24 [DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF] [SlideShare] [Gender tool]Bogdan Vasilescu, Vladimir Filkov and Alexander Serebrenik. 2013. StackOverflow and GitHub: Associations between software development and crowdsourced knowledge In 2013 ASE/IEEE International Conference on Social Computing. IEEE, pages 188-195. [BibTeX] [PDF][Slides]Bogdan Vasilescu, Alexander Serebrenik, Mark G.J. van den Brand. 2013. The Babel of software development: Linguistic diversity in Open Source In 5th International Conference on Social Informatics. Springer LNCS 8238, pages 391-404. [DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF]Yuan Yao, Hanghang Tong, Tao Xie, Leman Akoglu, Feng Xu and Jian Lu. 2013. Want a Good Answer? Ask a Good Question First! [arXiv] [non-technical overview] [BbTeX]Denzil Correa and Ashish Sureka. 2013. Fit or Unfit: Analysis and Prediction of 'Closed Questions' on Stack Overflow. In 2013 ACM Conference on Online Social Networks. ACM, pages 201-212. [DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF]Luca Ponzanelli, Alberto Bacchelli and Michele Lanza. 2013. Seahawk: Stack Overflow in the IDEIn 2013 International Conference on Software Engineering. IEEE, pages 1295-1298. [DOI] [BibTeX][PDF]Ashton Anderson, Dan Huttenlocher, Jon Kleinberg, and Jure Leskovec. 2013. Steering User Behavior With Badges In 22nd International World Wide Web Conference (WWW’13). ACM, pages 95-106. [DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF]Miltiadis Allamanis and Charles Sutton. 2013. Why, When and What: Analyzing Stack Overflow Questions by Topic, Type & Code In 10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories. Mining Challenge. IEEE, pages 53-56. [DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF]Muhammad Asaduzzaman, Ahmed Mashiyat, Chanchal Roy and Kevin Schneider. 2013. Answering Questions About Unanswered Questions of Stack Overflow In 10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories. Mining Challenge. IEEE, pages 97-100. [DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF]Amiangshu Bosu, Christopher Corley, Dustin Heaton, Debarshi Chatterji, Jeffrey Carver and Nicholas Kraft. 2013. Building Reputation in StackOverflow: An Empirical Investigation In10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories. Mining Challenge. IEEE, pages 89-92.[DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF]Joshua Campbell, Chenlei Zhang, Zhen Xu, Abram Hindle and James Miller. 2013. Deficient Documentation Detection: A Methodology to Locate Deficient Project Documentation using Topic Analysis In 10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories. Mining Challenge. IEEE, pages 57-60. [DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF] [SlideShare]Carlos Gomez, Brendan Cleary and Leif Singer. 2013. A Study of Innovation Diffusion Through Link Sharing on Stack Overflow In 10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories. Mining Challenge. IEEE, pages 81-84. [DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF]Scott Grant and Buddy Betts. 2013. Encouraging User Behaviour With Achievements: An Empirical Study In 10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories. Mining Challenge. IEEE, pages 65-68. [DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF]Mario Linares-Vásquez, Bogdan Dit and Denys Poshyvanyk. 2013. An Exploratory Analysis of Mobile Development Issues Using Stack Overflow In 10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories. Mining Challenge. IEEE, pages 93-96. [DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF]Patrick Morrison and Emerson Murphy-Hill. 2013. Is Programming Knowledge Related To Age? - An Exploration of Stack Overflow In 10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories. Mining Challenge. IEEE, pages 69-72. [DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF]Avigit K. Saha, Ripon K. Saha and Kevin A. Schneider. 2013. A Discriminative Model Approach for Suggesting Tags Automatically for Stack Overflow Questions In 10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories. Mining Challenge. IEEE, pages 73-76. [DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF]Vibha Singhal Sinha, Senthil Mani and Monika Gupta. 2013. Exploring Activeness of Users in Q&A Forums In 10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories. Mining Challenge. IEEE, pages 77-80. [DOI] [BibTeX]Siddharth Subramanian and Reid Holmes. 2013. Making Sense of Online Code Snippets In 10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories. Mining Challenge. IEEE, pages 85-88. [DOI][BibTeX] [PDF] [SlideShare] [Demo]Wei Wang and Michael Godfrey. 2013. Detecting API Usage Obstacles: A Study of iOS and Android Developer Questions In 10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories. Mining Challenge. IEEE, pages 61-64. [DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF]2012Leman Akoglu, Duen Horng Chau, U. Kang, Danai Koutra and Christos Faloutsos. 2012. OPAvion: mining and visualization in large graphs. In 2012 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD'12). ACM, pages 717-720. [DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF]Ashton Anderson, Daniel Huttenlocher, Jon Kleinberg and Jure Leskovec. 2012. Discovering value from community activity on focused question answering sites: a case study of Stack Overflow. In ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining[DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF]Alberto Bacchelli, Luca Ponzanelli and Michele Lanza. 2012. Harnessing Stack Overflow for the IDE. In 2012 Third International Workshop on Recommendation Systems for Software Engineering (RSSE). IEEE, pages 26-30. [DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF]Anton Barua, Stephen W. Thomas and Ahmed E. Hassan. 2012. What are developers talking about? An analysis of topics and trends in Stack Overflow. In Empirical Software Engineering[BibTeX] [PDF]Benjamin V. Hanrahan, Gregorio Convertino, and Les Nelson. 2012. Modeling problem difficulty and expertise in stackoverflow. In ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Companion (CSCW '12). ACM, pages 91-94. [DOI] [BibTeX]Hewijin Jiau, and Feng-Pu Yang. 2012. Facing up to the inequality of crowdsourced API documentation. In ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes. 37 (1): 1-9. [DOI] [BibTeX]Rafael Lotufo, Leonardo Passos and Krzysztof Czarnecki. 2012. Towards improving bug tracking systems with game mechanisms. In Mining Software Repositories [DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF]Seyed Mehdi Nasehi, Jonathan Sillito, Frank Maurer and Chris Burns. 2012. What Makes a Good Code Example? A Study of Programming Q&A in StackOverflow. In IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM 2012). IEEE. [DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF]Aditya Pal, F. Maxwell Harper and Joseph A. Konstan. 2012. Exploring Question Selection Bias to Identify Experts and Potential Experts in Community Question Answering. In ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., vol.30, no.2, pages 10. [DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF]Aditya Pal, Shuo Chang, and Joseph A. Konstan. 2012. Evolution of Experts in Question Answering Communities. In 6th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.[DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF]Chris Parnin, Christoph Treude, Lars Grammel, and Margaret-Anne Storey. 2012. Crowd documentation: Exploring the coverage and the dynamics of API discussions on Stack Overflow. Georgia Tech Technical Report GIT-CS-12-05. [PDF]Daryl Posnett, Eric Warburg, Premkumar Devanbu and Vladimir Filkov. 2012. Mining Stack Exchange: Expertise is Evident From Initial Contributions. In 2012 ASE International Conference on Social Informatics.Fatemeh Riahi. 2012. Finding expert users in community question answering services using topic models, Master's Thesis, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia. [PDF]Leif Singer, Fernando Figueira Filho, Brendan Cleary, Christoph Treude, Margaret-Anne Storey, and Kurt Schneider. 2012. Mutual assessment in the social programmer ecosystem: an empirical investigation of developer profile aggregators. Technical report, University of Hannover, Germany. [PDF]Christoph Treude, Fernando Figueira Filho, Brendan Cleary, and Margaret-Anne Storey. 2012.Programming in a socially networked world: the evolution of the social programmer. InFuture of Collaborative Software Development Workshop. [PDF]Bogdan Vasilescu, Andrea Capiluppi and Alexander Serebrenik. 2012. Gender, representation and online participation: A quantitative study of StackOverflow. In 2012 ASE/IEEE International Conference on Social Informatics. IEEE, pages 332-338. [DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF]Jakob Voß. 2012. Linking Folksonomies to Knowledge Organization Systems. In 6th Conference on Metadata and Semantics Research (MTSR '12). Springer, pages 89-97. [DOI][HTML] [PDF] [Slides]2011Lena Mamykina, Bella Manoim, Manas Mittal, George Hripcsak, and Björn Hartmann. 2011. Design lessons from the fastest q&a site in the west. In 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, pages 2857-2866. [DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF]Toby Osbourn. 2011. Getting the most out of the web. IEEE Software, vol.28, no.1, pages 96.[DOI] [BibTeX]Aditya Pal, Rosta Farzan, Joseph A. Konstan and Robert E. Kraut. 2011. Early detection of potential experts in question answering communities. In 19th International Conference on User Modeling, Adaption and Personalization (UMAP'11). Springer, pages 231-242. [DOI] [BibTeX][PDF]Chris Parnin, and Christoph Treude. Measuring API documentation on the web. 2011. In 2nd International Workshop on Web 2.0 for Software Engineering (Web2SE’11), ACM, pages 25–30.[DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF]Nidhi Raj, Lipika Dey, and Bhakti Gaonkar. 2011. Expertise prediction for social network platforms to encourage knowledge sharing. In 2011 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, Vol. 1. IEEE, pages 380-383. [DOI] [BibTeX]Daniel Schall and Florian Skopik: An analysis of the structure and dynamics of large-scale Q/A communities. ADBIS'11 15th International Conference on Advances in Databases and Information Systems. [DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF]Christoph Treude, Ohad Barzilay, and Margaret-Anne D. Storey. 2011. How do programmers ask and answer questions on the web?: NIER track. In 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'11), IEEE, pages 804-807. [DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF]Zainab Zolaktaf, Fatemeh Riahi, Mahdi Shafiei, and Evangelos Milios. Modeling community question-answering archives. Technical report, Faculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, Canada. [PDF]2010Barthélémy Dagenais and Martin P. Robillard. 2010, Creating and evolving developer documentation: understanding the decisions of open source contributors In 18th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE '10), ACM, pages 127-136. [DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF]Ravi Kumar, Yury Lifshits, and Andrew Tomkins. 2010. Evolution of two-sided markets. In 3rd ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM '10). ACM, pages 311-320.[DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF] [Slides]Hüseyin Oktay, Brian J. Taylor, and David D. Jensen. 2010. Causal discovery in social media using quasi-experimental designs. In First Workshop on Social Media Analytics (SOMA '10). ACM, pages 1-9. [DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF]Matthew J.H. Rattigan and David Jensen. 2010. Leveraging D-Separation for Relational Data Sets. In 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM '10). IEEE, pages 989-994.[DOI] [BibTeX] [PDF]

I had an employee do this - €47,000! My company turnover was around US$6m, around 25 employees at the time.The thief was Mary, a highly trusted employee, had been with the company for five years. She started in mid-level management, and was promoted for her excellent work to General Manager, salary of €90k (about US$120k in 2014). When I took long absences from work (eg, six months), she ran the company, and did well.1.5 years into Mary’s tenure, we relocated the business from Australia to the Netherlands, and Mary was instrumental to making such a complicated move work well.Three years in to her tenure, our Financial Controller was diagnosed with cancer, and after a year, succumbed to it. He left behind a bookkeeper subordinate, whose supervision passed to the Mary as General Manager.Mary did not know much about accounting, but we had a lot of procedures in place, and Mary was good at working with staff to follow procedures, and over a few months, Mary learned a lot about bookkeeping.After a year, I became aware of the mess in the accounting department. I had never liked accounting, mainly because I did not understand much of it (a big danger for any small business owner!).After I found out from our corporate accountants that the bookkeeper had booked dividend payments as director loans (and the tax return had been submitted with that fact, so it was basically irreversible), I started looking deeper into the accounting department, and it was a huge mess. Some examples;Not all items were being entered into the software. Sometimes, bulk amounts - all expenses for the first week of July, for example, were booked as one line item, €85,634 for example. *eye twich*We were using an Australian administration software (MYOB), but under Mary’s direction, we had recently purchased very expensive new accounting software. Some transactions were entered in the new software, some in the old. *shudder*We had a strict rule, one piece-of-paper for each transaction made, so we have records. That was being ignored, so there were many un-traceable transactions. Mmmm.In Holland, it’s typical for small companies to outsource payroll services to a third party, so we were doing this too, but paying twice as much, because we provided them poor data. Shit.Lots more things like this. Really bad stuff.So, I decided, with no Financial Controller, a largely incompetent bookkeeper, a General Manager who did not know much about accounting, and my long-standing ignoring of the department, that I would learn about accounting, clean up the processes to be correct, and re-enter data into one software system. This was in June 2014.The Dutch financial year was a normal calendar year, January to December (Australia is July to June, and the Dutch company is owned by the Australian company, so there’s some friction there) I decided to go back to Jan 2014, and move forward day-by-day.I tasked the bookkeeper to find a piece of paper for every transaction, on every bank statement (for various reasons, we have about 10 bank accounts) - she should have had this done already as part of her job, but had not. I made a specification of the software we’d need to suit the business. I made a very tight end-of-month process. I deleted all transactions that had been entered in the 2014 year. I got clearance from the corporate accountants to make retro-active VAT adjustments. I got some training in the software I decided to use (all online in a web browser, terrible UI, but excellent functionality, designed for the Dutch tax system).With my wife, I started doing data entry, month by month, and following the end-of-month process for each month. Around 300 transactions per month. I think I recall Peter Baskerville’s Quora posts on accounting started appearing around this time (or at least, I noticed them then), and they were very helpful. I also did many 4-hour Skype sessions with our previous Financial Controller in Australia, and she talked me through tricky things, and helped refine the processes I was documenting.It took about four weeks to process each month, especially at the start. I felt like a fine-tooth comb untangling messy hair. Slowly, we made progress, and it was very satisfying. Every so often I vented to Mary - who was focusing on other aspects of the business, while I did this - that the bookkeeper was hopeless, and was making terrible mistakes. Mary defended the bookkeeper, said it was not that bad really (it was much worse!).Being busy, I did not realise she was waving me off from proceeding my project - Mary did not realise how driven I was to see this completed up to “now”, get rid of the bookkeeper, and employ an accountant to maintain it. In hindsight, I realise that with alarming frequency since I started on this project, Mary had also been suggesting she resign to save the company money (sales were down, and we were considering other staffing cuts). I said she was essential to the running of the company, and my strong preference was for her to stay.The bookkeeper worked hard (with clear direction, often repeated) to source a piece of paper for every transaction. Sometimes, where an “official” document was not possible, I accepted printing the transaction from the internet banking software, but only for transactions I knew to be correct.One day, I found something weird, and investigated it further. Here’s the email I sent to our lawyers.Hi Joost,Today I became aware of what seems to be employee Mary stealing around €47.000 from the company in Jan and Feb 2014. This is shocking news for me, as she has been a highly trusted employee for more than five years.Attached, the supporting "evidence":(1) Filter of our bank account statement, showing all payments to Mary’s bank account - note how they are "covered" as legitimate invoices, including a VAT payment.(2) SMS messages between Mary and I last night and todayBecoming awareThe sequence of events how I found this is as follows.(1) I am working on accounting duties, since [old Financial Controller’s] passing, and "tightening up" all our accounting procedures. This involves checking off each invoice paid against a bank statement, and entries in our accounting software.(2) On Friday afternoon, 26 July 2014, I found a payment that seemed to be a double-payment on an invoice from March 2013, paid again in Feb 2014.(3) I called the supplier to understand why they gave us two invoices for the same thing almost a year apart.(4) Supplier brought my attention to the fact that the second invoice, that had been prepared for me by my bookkeeper, was a actually colour photocopy of the March 2013 invoice.He and I double checked the bank account number we had sent the payment to, and found, while the name matched his company, the account number was not his.(5) I wanted to question Mary about it directly, as she had prepared most of the paperwork I was working on, but she had left early on Friday July 26 for an appointment.(6) Around 1730 Friday 25 July, I called our Bookkeeper to my office to ask her about this invoice and payment. She said “someone” had given her the invoice in Feb 2014 saying it had not been paid, and was well overdue, that it must be paid immediately. I questioned her on who specifically, she said maybe Mark or Anthony (the invoice is for antivirus software, so logically would come from our IT person, James).I asked her to look into it on Monday, that we'd like to get our money back, she agreed.(7) At 2226 Friday evening, I received a text message from Mary (very unusually late for her to message regarding what I thought was a routine error), asking to meet at the office on Saturday morning to discuss the invoice. Being so late, I chose not to reply, thinking we'd just discuss it on Monday.It seems the bookkeeper had contacted Mary about the invoice which is VERY unusual - I presented it to the bookkeeper as a routine matter (we had uncovered a lot of similar errors, that turned out not to be suspicious over the last few months, and I assumed this was a similar issue).(8) Saturday afternoon, I chose to reply to Mary's text message, saying that I was at work until 1600, she's welcome to come in to chat (she often does come in to work on Saturday afternoons).(9) Mary wrote back a convoluted message, saying she was not able to come in to work, that the invoice was part of a test payment, and that it was not meant to be authorised, that it was accidentally authorised by Anthony (who was in Australia at the time), it's not the bookkeeper’s mistake it's Mary's, and that I can "fire her on Monday" (presumably joking, as she often does in text messages).(10) I said that we need to know which account it went to, so we can get our money back. Mary agreed, and said she would look into it Monday, that she was sorry, said she felt bad for stressing out the bookkeeper.(11) At this stage I started having suspicions - the last four digits of the bank account seemed familiar to me, though I could not recall why? I asked her directly - by SMS - if she knew which bank account it was transferred to.(12) Mary responded "Yes I think so, I need to check the account". I did not respond.(13) I found Mary's personal bank account number (that we use for monthly salary payments), and saw that it matched the account number the funds had been sent to (despite the payee's name on the transaction being the supplier, the name on the duplicated invoice).(14) I spoke about the matter with my wife. It seemed that:- The Bookkeeper knew about the payment to Mary's personal account, and contacted Mary immediately on Friday evening- If this really was part of a training exercise, it's pretty weird - an invoice from March 2013, used as a test in Feb 2014, photocopied, entered again into the accounting software, paid to Mary's personal bank account, not transferred back to the company.- Mary “did not notice” the additional deposit to her bank account- The bookkeeper, who prepared some of the paperwork, did not recall this was a "test" transaction that accidentally went through- A training exercise could easily be done with REAL invoices that ACTUALLY had to be paid, no need to use one from 2013.(15) I decided to call a friend in Australia, a fellow employer and mentor. We discussed the issue, and we agreed it did not look good - the employee had clearly deliberately stolen money.(16) My friend suggested I look for any OTHER transfers to her personal account - I had not thought of that possibility yet!A search for Mary's bank account number returned a total of three transactions - the one I had just found, another one for €33k for the Tax office on 14 Jan 2014, and another duplicated invoice from Dec 2013 (9 Jan 2014, though for a different amount) - all paid to her personal bank account. There is no evidence of the payments being returned. The total is €47.749.32.(17) I searched for other employees bank accounts, and found no other suspicious transactions, though there is room for more advanced searching.Please advise how I should proceed.gI located the pieces of paper the bookkeeper had been presented (in a sheaf of 200 other docs). Here’s what one looked like, I have omitted some personal data and added to reference points, (1) and (2):Note at point (1), the invoice is dated March 8, 2013, but payment was made on Feb 2014 (Payment was also made in mid-March, 2013)! Mary had made a photocopy of the original invoice, but at point (2), had covered the bank details for KNS in the footer. We later found, she had destroyed the original invoice. When I sent this to our contact at KNS, he was pretty surprised to see this invoice with his logo, but his bank account details removed. Fair enough, too!On Monday morning, per advice from our lawyer, I met with Mary. Here are my notes from that difficult meeting.0915am, Jul 28, Garion met with Mary, with [Garion's wife] present;* I asked about the KNS transaction, Mary advised it was a trainingexercise, as she had texted to Garion on Saturday* She had not done payment transfers before, so did this as a test with[bookkeeper], before [bookkeeper] went on leave. Not intended to beapproved, but seems it was anyway.* Mary checked on in the last few days, and found that the KNS amount was inher account, she had missed it when it occured* I asked specifically, she said she was not aware of any other transactionsto her account* The KNS invoice was used in this training as it was assumed to be unpaid,was in a "random" folder on Steve's desk.* Not aware of any other transactions to her bank account, apart from this oneI asked her to look, and let me know. She said she would.* Mary said that it must look like she had been stealing money, but that'snot the case!* Mary said that if she were in our position, she'd fire the person* I said that it did looks suspicious. So, I have to place her onadministrative leave, effective immediately. She must not talk to any staff.She can collect her personal items from her desk now, and I will escort herto the elevator.* I asked if she had any questions, or any other ideas about where the moneyis. She asked what "administrative leave" was, I said, it's "gardeningleave" - she gets paid, but does not work.* We left my office to go downstairs. She did not say anything during thewalk.* She quickly gathered her personal items on her desk, logged into hercomputer (to log out of her gmail, I think?). Other staff were arriving, butshe made no comments. I engaged them in casual conversation.* I walked Mary to the elevator, and said that I'd contact her as soon as Iknew what was going on. She seemed to be in shock.--End.Directly after she left, I followed up with an email to Mary:Mary,Have you had a chance to check your bank account for the amounts we discussed?(1) 09 Jan 2014 €8.682,57(2) 14 Jan 2014 €33.773,00(3) 14 Feb 2014 €5.293,75Perhaps there are also other amounts that we have not found yet.If the money is there, you could transfer it back to [company bank account number]. If the money is not there, perhaps you could supply a PDF that indicates same? (between Jan 5 2014 and Feb 28 2014).Can you please get back to me in the next hour and let me know?ThanksgAndg, here’s the email I sent to the lawyer to keep him updated:Hi Joost,As discussed, at 11.10am today I emailed Mary and asked her to return the funds if she had found them, or provide a PDF of her bank statement if for the relevant period if not. I asked her to get back to in within an hour, 1.5 hours ago now, 12.45pm.I spoke again with ING Bank who confirmed the payments were deposited into the listed account (however, mainly because the amounts did not bounce back). They can do an investigation that will involve ING bank sending a letter to the account holder asking them to return the "accidentally" transferred money, and provide us with the recipient's contact details in case they do not comply. I said not to bother about that. He suggested I contact the police.[My wife] worked with our bookkeeper, who also does the filing, to find the original KNS invoice from March 2013, and it was not in the expected place, or any logical mis-filing places (eg, under "K" for a different company we operate). So, it's possible it has been maliciously removed… or just poorly filed somewhere.I Skpyed with Anthony to see if he was aware of the payments. He was in Australia and USA at the time of transfers. He said that he probably approved at least one of them, possibly all of them (which was part of his job at the time). He was not provided with the PDF invoices for each approval (as our company process dictates), but was swayed by Mary's argument that the payments were urgent, and that she'd send the invoices later (turns out, she never did, and he forgot to ask). However, he also recalled some payment approvals around the same time he was provided with invoices for (possibly, the legit ones).He admitted that, when approving payments, while he checks the invoice for the company name, amount and currency when approving, he does not check the bank account numbers or dates on invoices (honestly, I do not either!). Overall, I believe it's unlikely Anthony was involved, other than as an unwitting participant.After discussing with the bookkeeper - a sub-standard employee at the best of times - my wife and I believe she is also not involved, other than, again, an unwitting participant. [The bookkeeper] definitely loaded some of the payments into the ING bank, but they were invoices that appeared legitimate to her. Frankly, we do not think she is smart or brave enough to do this, but there seems no way to prove it either way.I'd like to wait another few hours for Mary to respond, I'll SMS her asking to respond to my email, if no response I will call and remind her that it a criminal matter. If she does not respond favourably, I'd like to move ahead with the seizure approach you outlined.regards,gTwo hours later, I got an email from Mary, on July 28:GarionI did take the three amounts you listed below (total €47.749,32). I acted alone, no one else was involved.I have transferred €5.293,75 to [company bank account number].I will transfer another €15K during the week. I suggest you keep any annual leave (I think about 20 days) that would be paid out as part payment.I will need some time to raise the other €20K, when I am back in Australia, but can commit to having it paid back to you by the end of the year or sooner, if this is agreeable to you.I am very sorry.MaryTurns out, she was also in a romantic relationship with another employee, a web developer. A stoic and quiet man, incredibly competent, lead architect for our various software projects. He was scheduled for a day off on Monday (which I forgot at the time, and which had me scared for a while on Monday when all this was going down!).The next day, he was in my office crying, incredibly upset at what his partner had done. He resigned a few months later - Mary had moved back to Australia, and he went as well. I suspect they are still together, but I have not asked. He’s done some contract work for us as well. I am sure he was not involved.Mary did pay all the money back, six months later. I did not go to the police, but in hindsight, I wish I had.Now, I check every transaction made, and always check the bank account numbers match the invoice. The new accountant also provides detailed end-of-month reports, meaning there are many checks-and-balances built in to the processes. I have learnt a lot about bookkeeping, accounting, and higher-level finance matters. It was incredibly stressful at the time, but I’m glad I learnt about accounting.Another employee approves payments regularly now, too. I trust her.Trust, but verify, right?[All names changed]