New York State Association For Solid Waste: Fill & Download for Free

First, no one goes to jail when they are sued by someone else. Duhhhh. I’m not even going to attempt to explain to a Trump supporter the difference between civil and criminal court. Underneath that is a snarky way of saying, “Trump loves you so much.”Second, the Republican party conducted at least 13 investigations into Hillary and the Clinton Foundation. They did more after 13, but I lost track and I think they ended up at 17.They spent more than $100 million of taxpayer money on those investigations.They found ZERO charges to file against Hillary, or Bill, or the entire Clinton Foundation.They found ZERO charges to file against any Clinton lawyer, or advisor, or campaign manager—not any associate at all.Compare that to the jailbirds in Trump’s inner circle and New York State has just gotten started on the Trump Foundation.BLIND JEALOUSNESS BACKFIRED ON THE GOPI was not a fan of Hillary Clinton at all before the GOP really laid into her with the $100 million worth of investigations. I was not happy that I’d probably have to vote for her merely as a lesser of two evils.But then the GOP did me a YUGE favor.At the end of all of their investigations, they made me realize that the Clintons are possibly the most squeaky clean couple in America.Who else in public life could come out with not a single charge against them—nor their non-profit foundation, nor any associates with whom they work—after having $100 million spent on at least 13 federal investigations—conducted by angry, angry men hell bent on destroying them—into every aspect of their life?So, in my mind, the $100 million was not a total waste because on election day 2016 I was proud and pleased to vote for Hillary. And if you’d told me that before their investigations, I’d have said you were nuts, but the Republicans, weirdly and ironically, made me regard Hillary as a solid and honest choice.And if you’re a Republican who is choking on that statement right now, I gotta say, please tell me what else I should have concluded after ZERO charges from $100 million in investigations?EVIDENCE, CHARGE, TRIAL, GUILTY VERDICT, SENTENCINGYou do know, I hope, that before we put people in jail in America, there is a five-step process:Investigators must find evidence of a crime.Prosecutors then must decide to file criminal charges.Then a trial is conducted with the prosecution presenting evidence and the accused mounting a defense.A jury must then deliberate and unanimously agree to a guilty verdict.A judge must then sentence the guilty person.You know all that, right? I mean, maybe not because I know that Trump loves “the poorly educated.”So, I’ll help you out here: People in America don’t go to jail because their political opponent leads poorly educated people in rallies with chants of “lock her up.”And are you so incapable of self-reflection that you don’t notice the absurd irony of Michael Flynn leading the “lock her up” chants, when he will soon be the one locked up?THE ANSWERSo, in case you’ve missed it, my answer to your question is that Hillary is not in jail because the Republicans spent more than $100 million of your money and mine and yet were never able to complete Step 1 in that process.YOU COULD GET OUTRAGEDYou could open your mind and become enraged at your party for wasting so much taxpayer money on fruitless investigations.The agencies that were locking up all the children last summer ran out of money, so they stole around $20 million to $30 million from FEMA—money targeted for hurricane response—to use to build facilities for the children.As a practical matter I’d think you would wish that your party had kept the $100 million they wasted on failed Clinton investigations because, well, think of how many more children they could have locked up with that money! And we’d still have money for the hurricane responses.

“NOT TRUE!” is the answer to this question. The question is ludicrous and an absolute falsehood!!ONLY 12 of the 50 US states mandate their communities offer recycling mechanisms such as bins, and to offer facilities to recycle solid waste, containers and the like.Of the 38 without such mandates, TEXAS and NEW YORK STATE are the largest populated. CALIFORNIA and FLORIDA the largest that act on those mandates.My professional friends at The National Waste and Recycling Association and The Container Recycling Institute keeps constant tabs on these matters.

A VIEW (ANSWER, bottom-most paragraph below): Depends on each City’s SIZE MEASUREMENTS and TYPE of POLLUTION (Air, Water, Land) “suffered.”In 2018. NEW YORK CITY had an estimated 8 MILLION PERSONS living within a 302 SQUARE MILES BOUNDARY, with a DENSITY of 27,000 persons per square mile; non-landed WATER making up 166 square miles of its boundary.At same time period, SHANGHAI had an estimated 24 MILLION PERSONS living within a 2,448 SQUARE MILES BOUNDARY, but a DENSITY of only 3,854 persons per square mile; non-landed WATER making up only 47 square miles of its jurisdictional “boundary.”PRE-ANSWER OBSERVATIONS: Publications have remarked about Earth’s most outwardly Polluted Nations and Cities.[Nation-wise, The World Bank and other sources remarked that INDIA, then CHINA, suffer the greatest seen-volumes of Air, Water and Air Pollution on the planet, be the location urban or rural.For the UNITED STATES, on the matter of STATE Land Pollution, The American State Litter Scorecard has noted Texas, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Louisiana, Georgia, Nevada, Michigan tops for great volumes of untreated solid waste littering or dumped along public spaces. For UNITED STATES CITIES Land Pollution, New York City has been top rated “America’s Dirtiest City” by Busy Bee Cleaning Services, TRAVEL+LEISURE, Forbes and Readers Digest.For the UNITED STATES, on the matter of CITY Air Pollution, Farmington NM was ranked for uber-high particulate/ozone concentrations, as well as Los Angeles, Houston, New York City and Philadelphia—by researchers from the US EPA and American Lung Association.For the UNITED STATES, on the matter of CITY Water Pollution, multiple recent sources (US EPA, Environmental Working Group, Simple Water, Best Life) have concurred that Miami, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, New Orleans, Modesto, Houston and New York City suffer compromised tap water outcomes. Additionally, Forbes berated New York City, for “...high levels of ozone, sulfur, airborne particulates and tap water so polluted you can't (or shouldn't) drink it."]MY VIEW/AN ANSWER: For Urban Land Pollution, New York’s the USA Winner. However, Shanghai covers a larger land area, and China is known for wider-spread, unchecked solid waste pollution . Based on square mile boundary, its quite possible the volumes of putridness in Shanghai could be much larger than New York City, so I vote SHANGHAI for most Land Polluted (in comparison to New York).For Urban Air Pollution, I support SHANGHAI’s being more Polluted. Measurements show New York not as particulate/ozone air polluted as Los Angeles and Houston, which also have bigger square miles than NYC, and “anything goes” China does not has US EPA style air pollution regulations “with teeth” that looks out for human health and well-being.For Urban Water Pollution, New York was not deemed having the worst water quality, though having more water availability in its total square mile boundary than Shanghai. But like air, both “anything goes: China and SHANGHAI has NO US EPA style, water pollution prevention laws.*****MOST POLLUTED WINNER (Air, Water, Land): Shanghai