Work Order Request Form: Fill & Download for Free

You are referring to the Strategic National Stockpile, a collection of eight warehouses positioned carefully around the country designed to hold medical equipment, medicine, and PPE in the event of an epidemic.Bill Clinton began the program back in the ’90s and George Bush expanded it. Obama leveraged it and kept the machines in working order while trying to buy a whole new fleet of ventilators.But the Obama administration had three epidemics to fight: Swine Flu. Ebola, and Zika. And the strategic national stockpile did, in fact, send out 70% of the n95 masks we had accumulated, to the states, by the time Trump took over.Trump’s incoming team was extensively briefed on the strategic national stockpile. He simply ignored it. He let the maintenance contract expire on the ventilators and cancelled the project to replace them. He directed Secretary Azar to ignore the stockpile and focus only on immigrants. In February, Trump sent 17 tons of donated PPE to China even though we desperately needed it here.Then, a month ago, he got stuck on the idea that hydroxychloroquine would be a panacea. So he ordered FEMA to buy up millions of doses of HCQ, just in time to find out that it has no positive effect on existing patients. (It actually appears to kill them.)It’s definitely not Obama’s fault.edits:I’ve had a number of requests for citations. I will find and edit this section with links to articles from reliable sources.Clinton forms the medical stockpile — The Surprising Origins of the U.S. Strategic National StockpileBush expands the stockpilehttps://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2018/04/24/inside-the-secret-u-s-stockpile-meant-to-save-us-all-in-a-bioterror-attack/?outputType=ampObama did not completely replenish masksFact check: Did the Obama administration deplete the federal stockpile of N95 masks?Obama attempts to update ventilators in stockpileThe U.S. Tried to Build a New Fleet of Ventilators. The Mission Failed.Trump ignores low inventory of masksReport: The Trump administration didn’t order ventilators or masks until mid-MarchTrump delays maintenance contractA Ventilator Stockpile, With One Hitch: Thousands Do Not WorkTrump donates 17 tons of PPE to China in February 2020Trump administration sent protective medical gear to China while he minimized the virus threat to USTrump buys huge supply of HCQLarge number of HCQ doses bought by US have come from India: Donald Trump

Your instinct is absolutely correct: locksmiths are required to collect your signature and address and Driver's license or ID number before opening the lock. Interestingly, the text below does not explicitly say anything about providing proof of residence, although you would think that would be covered via the driver's license or ID.Per the business and professions code of California:6980.55. (a) Any locksmith who knowingly and willfully opens any residence, or commercial establishment for another by any method involving an on-site inspection of a door or entrance, whether or not for compensation, shall obtain the street address of the residence or commercial establishment, and the signature of the person for whom the residence or commercial establishment was opened on a work order form. The following information regarding the person requesting entry to the residence or commercial property shall be recorded on a work order form: (1) Name. (2) Address. (3) Telephone Number. (4) Date of Birth. (5) Driver's license or identification number.http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=bpc&group=06001-07000&file=6980.53-6980.69

They are still with the Harry Walker Agency, according to several publications yesterday.Apparently, there’s a 4-page “Virtual Event Request Form” from the agency that lists their demands that need to be met before they will agree to be booked. This is the request form that they will submit to any company who wants to have them speak at their events.Various articles stated that H & M can get up to £750k pounds/$1M per speech. Think about that for a minute.Here’s the list of requests:Fee must be requested in advanceFee must be paid directly from contracting organizer’s accountModerator will be chosen at the speaker’s discretionProvide detailed list of all sponsorsDisclose fee that sponsors are receivingThe event must have a “connectivity contingency plan” due to virtual technologyProvide full audience listSpeakers attire must be clearly specifiedProvide list of additional speakers invited to eventDisclose if there will be any branding incorporatedDisclose if there will be any live or prerecorded elements running concurrentlyDisclose anticipated number of attendees, and who they areDisclose if event is to be public, or if access restrictedDisclose if there are costs associated with attending, such as ticket sales or registrations feesDisclose if it will be publicly advertised; if so, whereProvide list of past speakersNow, this may be a perfectly standard list for speakers to use - I have no idea. So if anyone does know, please feel free to comment.Having worked in entertainment, I’m used to some really out there requests, usually for dressing rooms - all white rose scented candles; white tulips and animal throw rug; fried chicken with cayenne pepper; no one can speak to or make eye contact with talent; Evian water at room temperature only; only animal free materials (cottons, denims, velour, etc.) and don’t even think about furniture made of any animal skin or print.But those are for the A-list heavy hitters, so this list of H&M’s seems sort of standard.The bigger concern is what they’re going to talk about. So far, their Zoom speeches have failed to impress.We’ve seen Megs talking over Harry and pushing him out of frame. We’ve seen Harry looking a little sleepy or high and disheveled, better known as the “POW” speeches.Whatever these two talk about will be very political, on-trend, and woke, with lots of word salads. They’ll be using a lot of buzzwords and talking about what’s going on in society today.But $1,000,000???They’ve both done some speaking, but as I’ve said before, they don’t do their due diligence in order to be informed on their topic. This makes for a very unsatisfying speech, with people leaving and probably thinking, “What did she say?”Meghan has hopped on the feminist bandwagon, so she’ll talk a great deal about that. Ironically she has only gotten to where she is because of who she’s married. Without Harry, we wouldn’t even be having this discussion. Nobody would know who the hell she is. A role model for feminism she is decidedly not.In the beginning, there may be a few takers, just for the sake of curiosity. After that, I think their speaking engagements will fizzle out.And should they be allowed to use their titles of Duke and Duchess while speaking about political and controversial topics? NO.A poll was recently taken in Britain asking people whether H & M should keep their titles, and 98% said ‘no’. People are requesting an act of Parliament to strip them of their royal titles of Duke and Duchess.Meghan uses Duchess every single time she gets the chance. I’m surprised she’s not walking around with a tiara perched on her head. She would be so angry to lose that little touch of nobility. Harry as well.Perhaps they should have thought of that before they tried to “modernize” the monarchy by being half in and half out. They wanted to be celebrities as well as royals; wanted to make billions and still serve the public.Actually, they’re perfectly matched. They deserve each other.