Direct Deposit Sign-Up Form (United Kingdom: Fill & Download for Free

Firstly, the short answer is nothing.Secondly there is no such thing as an English citizen. Citizens of the United Kingdom, of which England is part, are known as British Citizens, as indicated on the passports to which they are entitled. This passport is the same for people from throughout the United Kingdom, which also includes Scotland, where I am from, as well as Wales and Northern Ireland.Thirdly, the monarchy, which the Queen is merely the present incarnation of, signed over its right to the last vestiges of executive authority over the affairs of state back in the reign of George IV in the early years of the 19th century.This lack of power of the monarchy lies at the heart of my answer and in my opinion requires an explanation. This comes in the form of a certain amount of historical information about British politics and the monarchy.Previously the monarchy itself was responsible for the finances of the country and needed the assent of parliament to raise taxes. As a practical measure the monarchy devolved certain ad hoc responsibilities to various Ministers and Secretaries of State, some of whom have since been called Prime Ministers. This state of affairs gradually evolved from the old English parliamentary system.Several events in history led to an increase in the concentration of the real power in the land in the hands of the English parliament and later the British parliament and the ruling government formed from among its members. These are too numerous to list here, but they include the deposition of James VII and II in favour of William of Orange in 1688, which increased the English parliament’s influence. Another notable event was the the Hanoverian succession in 1714 which led to an increase in the power of the then fairly new British parliament.In these instances the foreignness of these monarchs meant that they were either less interested or relatively ignorant of British politics and so were happy for more power to be concentrated in the hands of British politicians. Subsequent to these handovers of bits of power the monarchy would make efforts at times to regain some of their former executive authority.The whole argument was finally resolved by the personal, both monetary and otherwise, affairs of King George IV. He had a very flamboyant lifestyle, preferring to eat and drink copious amounts and engage in various other ‘pleasures’ rather than actually take much interest in the affairs of the country. This was at a time when the country itself was not doing very well with high rates of unemployment after soldiers returned from the Napoleonic Wars and the Corn Laws inflated the price of bread, which meant this staple food was not affordable for most people.Thus things were getting desperate for ordinary people. As a result the propertied classes who made up the voters and the politicians were terrified of revolution breaking out as had happened in France over 20 years before. Therefore they would not countenance raising public taxes to fund the King’s lifestyle. The King’s high spending, on the other hand, meant he was running out of money.In the end the deadlock was broken by the resolution to have a new method of governance. The King would give up all executive authority and in return the parliament and government would get a monopoly on control of public finances. Due to this something was created called the Crown Estate. Administered separately from this is the Duchy of Lancaster.Basically these two things mean the lands which the Royal family owned and officially still own and various others aspects of the country, such as the area between the high and low water marks for the coast around the whole of the UK, except Shetland and Orkney.Essentially a set percentage (a minority one) of the profits of these estates has been given to the Royal family since George IV to allow them to live comfortably but not involved in government while the majority of the profits go to the government of the day to use in a way which the government and parliament decide.This means that, if anything, it is the government of the United Kingdom, which is elected by the citizens, which decides what the monarchy does. They can cut or increase the grant given to the monarchy if they wish. The Royal family do of course have personal servants etc. who they employ. I would imagine that they have job contracts like the rest of us and within the remits of these the monarchy can tell their employees what to do.For the ordinary citizen the monarchy has no real power over us. If you were to act in a threatening manner to the Queen or another Royal the security entourage will get you out the way. It being the UK they will be highly unlikely to harm you if at all avoidable. The actions of the security personnel and the citizen suspected of attempting harm to the Queen would be subject to the law of the land.So to reiterate, in answer to your question, nothing would happen.

There are three main ways to make money using Clickbank. The first way is to create your own products and list them. The second way is to skip the product creation step and list other people's products while taking a commission from each sale. Vendors can select a commission rate between 1% to 75%.You might've heard great things about it from some marketers.But you've also probably heard people say it's a scam, a rip-off, a waste of time, etc.I've even heard a popular speaker say it's a database of crappy products no one wants to buy.He's right.But he's also wrong.So what exactly is ClickBank, and is it still a viable affiliate platform for marketers like you?That's what this guide is all about.Even if you're a total newbie, don't worry.I'll tell you precisely what ClickBank is, how to make it work for you, and generate a consistent stream of affiliate commissions from it.What is ClickBank? - A Beginner's Intro to Understanding The Top Affiliate Network for Digital MarketersClickBank is among the leading affiliate networks for digital products like eBooks, video tutorials, and software. It has been around since 1998, has more than 200 million customers around the globe, and claims to have created more than 1000 millionaires through its platform.How To Make Money With ClickBank Affiliate MarketingIf you're wondering how to make money with ClickBank affiliate marketing, this detailed guide has all the answers for you.ClickBank has been around for more than two decades in the Affiliate marketingBut it still divides popular opinion like few other affiliate programs.You might've heard great things about it from some marketers.But you've also probably heard people say it's a scam, a rip-off, a waste of time, etc.I've even heard a popular speaker say it's a database of crappy products no one wants to buy.He's right.But he's also wrong.So what exactly is ClickBank, and is it still a viable affiliate platform for marketers like you?That's what this guide is all about.Even if you're a total newbie, don't worry.I'll tell you precisely what ClickBank is, how to make it work for you, and generate a consistent stream of affiliate commissions from it.Sounds interesting?What is ClickBank? - A Beginner's Intro to Understanding The Top Affiliate Network for Digital MarketersClickBank is among the leading affiliate networks for digital products like eBooks, video tutorials, and software. It has been around since 1998, has more than 200 million customers around the globe, and claims to have created more than 1000 millionaires through its platform.In easier words, ClickBank connects digital product creators with affiliate marketers.ClickBank doesn't own the products listed on its marketplace. It only provides a platform for thousands of product owners to connect with affiliate marketers who wish to promote their products.Why product creators use it?To gain access to thousands of influential affiliate marketers who have their dedicated subscribers and followers. It's an easy and quick way to market your product to hundreds of thousands of people even if you have no following of your own.Why do affiliates use ClickBank?To find high-quality products, promote them to their website visitors and subscribers, and earn a commission for every sale.It's classic affiliate marketing just like any other Affiliate program. But unlike Amazon Associates, ClickBank is a platform for digital products only.Can you make money with ClickBank in 2021? Definitely yes!The online education industry (most digital products fall into this category) is booming and is worth well over $100 billion across the globe since people are consuming more digital info content on their smartphones than ever before.Plus, the affiliate marketing industry is also growing steadily. In the U.S alone, affiliate marketing spending will exceed $8 billion by 2022.The Major Pros and Cons of ClickBank for Affiliate MarketersAs I've already mentioned, ClickBank has its share of supporters and haters.It does offer you some significant advantages over other affiliate networks, but it also has several weaknesses that you should know about.Let's quickly look at the major pros and cons of ClickBank.A Reliable Affiliate NetworkClickBank is not a new name in the affiliate marketing space. It has been around for more than two decades and is a proven platform when it comes to connecting product creators with affiliates.As an affiliate marketer on ClickBank, you'll consistently come across high-quality products that you can promote, knowing that you'll get paid for every sale you make.A Wide Range of Products in Every NicheNo matter what niche you're in or what hobbies you have, you'll find relevant products to promote on ClickBank.Just look at the number of product categories they have on their affiliate marketplace.Arts & EntertainmentBusiness/InvestingComputers/InternetCooking & FoodE-BusinessEmploymentFictionGamesHealth & FitnessHome & GardenSoftware & ServicesSelf-Help.......and many other categories with dozens of products.To get an idea of the product variety, let's explore the category "Parenting & Families" and see what's on sale.This isn't the most popular category in the digital product space, but it still has 57 products that you can promote as an affiliate right now.The more popular categories like E-Business, Health & Fitness, Self-Help, etc. have hundreds of products at any given time.All this means you'll never be short of products to promote as a ClickBank affiliate.Attractive Commission Structure for AffiliatesMost ClickBank products offer generous commission rates ranging from 50% to 75% and even 100% in some cases.To make it even better, there are tons of recurring commission programs on offer as well, which means you sell them once but keep earning monthly commissions as long as your referral is an active customer.As the screenshot shows, you can find recurring commission programs using the search filter on the affiliate marketplace page.Although recurring commissions sound more attractive, one-time commission programs are also worth exploring if they offer a healthy commission rate.Easy To Get StartedGetting started on ClickBank as an affiliate is pretty simple.There's no complex documentation or upfront fee required. You need to be from an eligible country, have cookies enabled in your browser, and have a valid tax id if you're in the U.S.Here's the list of countries from where ClickBank accepts affiliates.The United States of AmericaCanadaBritainAustraliaFranceGermanySpainMexicoAlbaniaAndorraAnguillaAntarcticaAntigua & BarbudaArgentinaArmeniaArubaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBahrainBarbadosBelgiumBelizeBermudaBhutanBoliviaBotswanaBrazilBruneiBulgariaCambodiaCanadaCape VerdeCayman IslandsChileChinaColombiaComorosCosta RicaCroatiaCyprusCzech RepublicDenmarkDiego GarciaDominicaEgyptEl SalvadorEstoniaFijiFinlandFranceFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaFrench Southern TerrThe GambiaGeorgian RepublicGermanyGhanaGibraltarGreeceGreenlandGrenadaGuadeloupeGuamGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIcelandIndiaIndonesiaIrelandIsle Of ManIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKiribatiKorea, SouthKuwaitKyrgyzstanLatviaLesothoLiechtensteinLithuaniaLuxembourgMacaoMacedoniaMalaysiaMaldivesMaliMaltaMartiniqueMauritiusMayotteMexicoMicronesiaMonacoMontenegroMontserratMoroccoNamibiaNauruNetherlandsNetherlands AntillesNew CaledoniaNew ZealandNicaraguaNiueNorwayOmanPakistanPalauPanamaParaguayPeruPhilippinesPitcairn IsPolandPortugalPuerto RicoQatarReunion IslandsRomaniaRussian FederationSamoa, EastSamoa, WestSan MarinoSao Tome & PrincipeSaudi ArabiaSeychellesSingaporeSlovak RepublicSloveniaSouth AfricaSpainSri LankaSt HelenaSt Kitts & NevisSt LuciaSt Pierre & MiquelonSt Vincent & GrenadinesSurinameSwazilandSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandTokelauTongaTrinidad & TobagoTunisiaTurkeyTuvaluUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomUnited StatesUruguayUzbekistanVanuatuVaticanVenezuelaVietnamWestern SaharaYemenSteps To Sign-Up As A ClickBank AffiliateClickBank has recently changed its account creation process and made it much simpler and faster.Click on the "Create Account" link on the top of your screen to go to the sign-up page.There's nothing fancy on this page, just a simple sign-up form that you can fill in less than a minute.Before you can submit the form, you also need to accept the terms and conditions agreement.Next up, ClickBank will ask you if you're interested in their training content.This is a pitch for their paid ClickBank University program. You can watch the free videos if you want, but I don't recommend spending on the paid program just yet.This completes the basic account setup.But before you get started, you need to complete your profile and payment information.Again, you'll be taken to a basic information form where you need to submit your full address, payee name, etc.Ways To Get Paid on ClickBankClickBank supports four different payment modes.Check: ClickBank mails a paper check to your mailing address to the payee name you've entered in your account.Direct Deposit: ClickBank deposits the payment directly to your bank account (not available for all countries)Wire Transfer: For countries where payment via direct deposit isn't available, ClickBank offers wire transfer payments.Payoneer: Payoneer is an international payment service that gives you a virtual US or EU bank account where you can receive ACH transfer payments. You can also directly link your Payoneer account with ClickBank to receive funds. You can configure your payment settings in the Account Settings tab on your main dashboard page.To set up payment by direct deposit, wire transfer, or Payoneer, you need to enter your bank account details.Check, as I've already mentioned, are delivered to the mailing address you entered at the time of sign up.ClickBank Affiliate Program - How Does It Work?Once you sign up as an affiliate on ClickBank, you can immediately start promoting products to your audience.But to identify the right products, you need to understand the different terminologies used on the platform.Let me start with some basic terminologies.Initial/Front-End Offer: This is the product offer that you originally promote to a customer. It is usually a low priced product designed to turn a stranger into a customer so that more products can be pitched to them.Upsell: This is the higher-priced product that is pitched after a customer purchases your front-end offer.One-Time Commission: This is a commission tye in which the affiliate is paid only once when the initial sale is made.Recurring/Rebilling: This is a commission type in which an affiliate keeps getting monthly or quarterly commissions for selling a membership product.Pretty simple, right?Let's move to the product listings now.For example, here's an affiliate product from the ClickBank marketplace.Different sections within this listing will help you determine the potential of this offer.Let me quickly describe them to you.Initial $/sale: This is the average commission amount an affiliate earns for selling a ClickBank product. This also includes payments for any upsells that result from the initial sale. But it does NOT include recurring commission amount.Avg Rebill Total: This is the average amount an affiliate makes from recurring commissions of a product. In the ClickBank affiliate marketplace, this amount is only displayed for subscription products.Avg $/sale: This is the average amount of commission an affiliate earns for promoting a ClickBank product (initial+recurring commissions).Avg %/sale: This is the average commission percentage an affiliate earns for a product, including initial and recurring commissions, plus any upsells.Avg %/Rebill: This is the average recurring commission earned only on rebills.Grav: This particular stat is essential. Grav is the short form of Gravity, which is a unique ClickBank score that shows you the sales potential of a product by taking into account the number of affiliates who've earned a commission in the last 12 weeks promoting a product. A high Gravity score means the product is selling well, but it also means lots of affiliates are promoting it.Cat: This is the industry category of a product on ClickBankAffiliate Page: This is the URL of the affiliate page of the product, where you'll find the affiliate recruitment details plus promotional material for the product.Affiliate Support Contact: The email to contact the product ownerThat's a lot to digest and can be a bit confusing, I know.The two main things to look in a product are it's Ave $/sale and Grav score, plus if it offers one-time or recurring commissions.My favorite free traffic Platform is Pinterest

Who's 'we'?It's not the electorate.We voted.It's not Parliament.They voted to trigger Article 50 - or more correctly to give the Prime Minister the power to do so - in the full knowledge that it handed autonomy during Brexit to the Government.There is no parliamentary constraint upon the progress of negotiations.It's not the article 50 process.The UK could walk out of talks , if it felt that they were no longer useful, and trade on WTO terms. If the talks were considered to be ‘delay’ then the Government could have removed that ‘delay’ by not participating in them - and still has that option. It is entirely their choice to continue.The EU aren't delaying Brexit.No matter how badly anyone could think the EU are behaving towards the UK, what they are not doing is delaying Brexit. They want Brexit done and dusted, and, again, the UK could walk.The Conservative Party in Government has taken full control of Brexit. Or, more accurately, a very small number of them have. ‘Delaying’ means ‘is taking longer than it should do’ - and any ‘delay’ is a function of Government choice.Imagine that the Government hadn’t challenged the court case - and triggered article 50 through Parliament asap. Imagine that May had not called the snap election. Imagine that the UK had walked out of negotiations with the EU - or done its homework - and was actually committed to the phase one result, rather than flying blind.Imagine that they were not seeking extensive prerogative powers and had instead, openly, scheduled all the legislation to be altered (simply as Brexit compliant, with no other changes) for the Commons. That legislation, before and after, could easily have been posted online for the public to see - if there’s nothing to hide, there’s nothing to fear, right?Had they all backed May, I think she would have delivered Brexit in a far more straightforward manner, and with less delay. She does not trust her own, and she is right not to.We’d be in a different, and happier, place now.They say they agree on Brexit, their actions say otherwise.I agree with the premise of the question, though - it does feel like Brexit is being delayed, by accident or design, or even to achieve a particular outcome or to serve a particular purpose.If there was one word to sum up Brexit, it would be uncertainty.Furthermore, that uncertainty has been protracted and 18 months post-Referendum that uncertainty still shows no sign of ending.To the point where it is beyond all reasonableness, or understanding.The electorate wants certainty.Business wants certainty.Government does not - either because they don’t want to be held to any promises, or face opposition to a defined course of action, in Parliament or in the country. Even though any objection would be no real barrier to leaving the EU - leaving was assured when Article 50 was triggered.Our interests are not aligned - we want certainty, and they don’t.Perhaps it’s because the Prime Minister is being thoroughly undermined by members of her own Government. She is constantly having to put out small fires manufactured by her colleagues.There are prominent Brexiteers, such as Boris and Gove, who could not win a leadership first round within the parliamentary party because of their own behaviour and attitude. Boris’ initial leadership bid with Gove - that he later withdrew from - was not well supported, even by Tory leavers - even by the ones aligned to Vote Leave.Considering how they behaved towards Cameron - who, for all his faults, had been loyal to the party - hardly any Tory MPs would trust them not to throw them under a bus, should it suit them. They certainly wouldn’t listen to their colleagues.Decisions by May - such as the snap election - seem to be prompted by plotting within the party. Tory MPs will be seeing and hearing far more than we will, through the medium of the media.We also want minimal instability in our economy during Brexit - uncertainty is counter to that interest, yet uncertainty, we have.Are there apolitical interests in the UK who prefer uncertainty? I think there are. Would, say, a hedge fund manager prefer a stable economy with minimal movements in the markets, or a fluctuating market, reacting to our uncertain political climate - with greater potential gains to be made?If so, then their interest runs counter to the country’s interest, economically. They can make more money from our country’s markets when conditions are detrimental to the financial security of our citizens.Government management of Brexit.Some features since the referendum result -A vacuum of information, punctuated by a speech, or similar, every couple of months, where major decisions - such as leaving the single market - are stated as intention, but without firm commitment.That sporadic information is immediately undermined by a prominent Brexiteer - say, Boris Johnson’s Brexit ‘vision’ as a newspaper column round about the same time as May’s Florence speech. Or David Davis’ comments after the phase one ‘agreement’ - that the ‘agreement’ is intention, rather than commitment.Organised ‘letters’ from groups of prominent Brexiteers to the Prime Minister, that happen to be ‘leaked’ to the media.Contradictory statements from Ministers - who speaks for the UK during Brexit? - this is a problem because May is so vulnerable, well, she appears to be vulnerable to outsiders - there’s the constant feeling that, at any time, a completely new set of people might be managing Brexit.There seems to be on-going activity from a subset of Tory MPs to weaken their own PM - which is contrary to the country’s interest.May has lost her Chief Whip, Gavin Williamson, through Michael Fallon’s resignation, and Damian Green - all stemming from the ‘leaked’ spreadsheet of harassment allegations. These were supposedly from an informal chat group amongst young researchers - they don’t read like that. Add in that Damian Green was never out of the media since that ‘leak’ - though all the others were - and the net effect has been the isolation of May.Where, more usually, the weakening of a Prime Minister would be the precursor to a coup by colleagues, there is no replacement pending. They are actively choosing to keep her in position, but weak, for their own ends - for later opportunity, should conditions change.Every time it looks like there have been decisions made - and that Brexit is on track - something happens to quickly reset it back to uncertainty again. There have been some staggering about turns - unpredictable and, seemingly, out of nowhereA constant attempt to bypass Parliament - firstly the prerogative to trigger Article 50, now the extensive statutory powers sought in legislation. Should these statutory powers get through intact, then there’s the capability for abrupt changes in law and the direction of Brexit. It becomes more uncertain, rather than less - and more unpredictable.The whole ‘cards close to the chest’ thing has been disastrous. We’ve been vague where there should be certainty, say, over the NI/Irish border - whilst shouting about leaving the EU with a Free Trade Deal. The result being delay - and alienation of many in the UK electorate, and the Irish Government - whilst weakening our hand in the negotiations by being obvious about the outcome the Government seeks.The TL;DR is that any delay is a function of the Conservative Party and a small sub-set of them are responsible for the constant infighting and game-playing. They are intentionally weakening May, and intentionally maintaining the uncertainty around the terms and conditions of Brexit.May put them in a position where the leave vote could not be thwarted in Parliament. Yet they continue to cause trouble whilst claiming it is the interest of delivering the-already-delivered leave, throwing blame at Tory Remainers, other parties and remain voters in the electorate.Unless that hardcore are held to account for undermining our Prime Minister, they will continue to delay Brexit to the detriment of the country, economically and socially.Some unwanted advice, in the spirit of Christmas …Set the columnists in the cabinet a load of essays. Hamilton, I believe, wrote 52 of the essays in the Federalist Papers - beat that Boris and Gove, and Jacob Rees-Mogg, why not?Enjoy the silence, and crack on with Brexit, undisturbed. Offer the occasional certificate or glittery sticker as appropriate.Further DiscussionThe EU Referendum resultThe majority of the electorate vote that ‘the United Kingdom should Leave the European Union’. They put their cross as per the ballot paper below, on June 23rd, 2016.The Conservative Party in Government has promised to implement the Referendum result, under David Cameron, as Prime Minister.David Cameron resigns on 24th June 2016 triggering a Conservative Leadership contest. He stays as PM until a successor is chosen.Theresa May wins the leadership contest on 11th July, 2016 and assumes office as Prime Minister on 13th July 2016.David Cameron had said that he would trigger article 50 - the process of leaving the EU - immediately after the vote, but instead stands down.‘Although Cameron stated during the campaign that he would invoke Article 50 straight away in the event of a leave victory, he refused to allow the Civil Service to make any contingency plans, something the Foreign Affairs Select Committee later described as "an act of gross negligence."’ - United Kingdom invocation of Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union - WikipediaIt seems reasonable that his successor should do that instead. Around three weeks have passed post-result - delaying Brexit - due to his resignation. There has been no civil service preparation for the event of a leave vote under Cameron.The Triggering of Article 50The view that prerogative power could be used by Government to trigger Article 50 dates from the Cameron Government. It seems reasonable to assume that he believed he could use it when he committed to triggering it the day after the vote, as PM.Oliver Letwin reveals on July 5th 2016 that the Government believes it can use the prerogative and bypass Parliament.Letwin reveals govt lawyers have advised Article 50 is a prerogative power so triggered by PM not parliament.— Patrick Wintour (@patrickwintour) July 5, 2016The Conservative Government has a history of being found to have behaved unlawfully in the courts. Either all the lawyers they consult are incompetent - that is, they consult a wide range of lawyers and get a consistent answer, that is legally incorrect and non-representative (as compared to the whole range of legal opinion they’d get from surveying all the lawyers in the country).Or they shop around until they find a legal opinion that suits them better, and decide that retrospectively that’s the only person they asked.They pursue the prerogative to the bitter end, only to win a parliamentary vote anyway.The final ruling is seven months post-result.Wasted.It’s not like they were more prepared for Brexit in January 2017, or March 2017 - when Article 50 is triggered - as compared to July 2016.Gina Miller CasePrecursor case filed on 19th July 2016‘The first of the parties to lodge a complaint in the proceedings against the government's intention to trigger Article 50 without a parliamentary vote was Deir Dos Santos, who launched his action four days after the referendum of 23 June. Miller's claim form was served on 29 July 2016′ - R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union - WikipediaTheresa May gives a speech at the Conservative Party conference on 2nd October 2016, indicating that she will use prerogative power to trigger Article 50. About our relationship with the EU post-Brexit -‘Mrs May announced at the Conservative Party conference that she intended giving an Article 50 notification by the end of March 2017 using the royal prerogative.Her opponents argue this would unlawfully remove statutory rights granted to UK citizens under the European Communities Act 1972, which made EU law part of UK law’ - May 'doesn't need MPs' consent for Brexit'On 13th October 2016, the High Court starting to hear arguments in the Miller case, which centred upon whether a Parliamentary vote was required to trigger Article 50.‘The Constitution of the United Kingdom is unwritten and it operates on convention and legal precedent: this question is without precedent and so the legal position was thought to be unclear. The Government argued that the use of prerogative powers to enact the referendum result was constitutionally proper and consistent with domestic law, whereas the opposing view was that prerogative powers could not be used to set aside rights previously established by Parliament’ - United Kingdom invocation of Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union - WikipediaIt was widely known that the use of prerogative was not legal. The threat to May was not in her remainers, but in a small group of leave MPs, who might have used the parliamentary vote as an opportunity to destabilise her. The eventual vote passed with no difficulty.Devolved Governments of Scotland, Wales and Northern IrelandCannot delay Brexit - the Miller case included depositions from the devolved administrations, and it was found that meaningful consultation with them was a matter of convention, rather than a statutory responsibility.Leaving the Single Market2nd October 2016 at the Conservative Party Conference.‘I want it to give British companies the maximum freedom to trade with and operate within the Single Market – and let European businesses do the same here.But let’s state one thing loud and clear: we are not leaving the European Union only to give up control of immigration all over again. And we are not leaving only to return to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. That’s not going to happen’ - Read Theresa May's keynote speech to the Conservative conference in full17th January, 2017 - long awaited speech by Theresa May.‘"But I want to be clear: what I am proposing cannot mean membership of the single market."It would, to all intents and purposes, mean not leaving the EU at all’ - May: UK must leave EU single marketSo, big information vacuum between October 2016 and January 2017 - and still no absolute commitment to leaving the Single Market, even now.Snap General ElectionAnnounced 19th AprilIn a sign of the tone she is likely to adopt during the seven-week campaign, May quickly focused on her opponents in her address to the nation, saying: “The country is coming together but Westminster is not.”She added: “In recent weeks Labour have threatened to vote against the final agreement we reach with the European Union, the Liberal Democrats have said they want to grind the business of government to a standstill, the SNP say they will vote against the legislation that formally repeals Britain’s membership of the European Union, and unelected members of the House of Lords have vowed to fight us every step of the way.” - - Theresa May calls for general election to secure Brexit mandateTheresa May says she is holding a snap election because -The main opposition party might not vote with her majority Government. An opposition party? Shocking.A very minor party, the Lib Dems, with eight seats ( - to be nine with Sarah Olney) ‘have said’ they want to ‘grind the business of Government to a standstill’. Scary!The SNP have ‘said’ they will vote against Government legislation. As if she was ever going to get their votes!A General Election will really show the unelected House of Lords!These are terrible reasons.These reasons do not affect the Government’s ability to deliver on Brexit one bit. They have, or had, a majority Government. The only roadblock - the Article 50 Bill - had been passed by that majority, they didn’t need the votes of other parties.The only good reason for the snap election, from her perspective, was for internal party discipline. She was encouraged by positive polling, including particularly that of Prof. Michael Thrasher, an analyst for Sky News, who predicted a 140 seat majority - Why did Theresa May call an early election?The snap election campaignDespite her current majority of 17 MPs, May calls the election to give herself a mandate of her own before the Brexit talks that start on 19th June 2017.She publishes the Conservative Party manifesto on the 18th May - What's in the Conservative manifesto? All you need to know about the Tories’ election pledgesWithin a few days, her polling tanks. Like Cameron, she has had a small group of people writing the manifesto, has ruled out appearing in TV debates, has controversial policy and employs Lynton Crosby - but she is constantly criticised - personally criticised - by the same media who supported Cameron in 2015, and supported Brexit.That the polls turn so abruptly at the first opportunity for external factors - media coverage - to have an effect is interesting.Change in polling - Labour cuts Tory lead to just three points in new poll, with one week to goHow UK prime minister Theresa May fumbled her own electionElection polls tracker 2017: Survation has Labour almost level with ToriesThe net result of the polls turning is a vulnerable Prime Minister, a more uncertain Brexit - and further delay. I don’t think she had any reason to suspect what would actually happened to her predicted majority. Nor do I think she had much control over it.Imagine how different the last six months would have been if she had won a strong mandate. Grant Shapps was outed as being behind a plot to oust her by the start of October 2017, thanks to Gavin Williamson, the chief whip who had been so successful driving the Commons votes for her.Five former Cabinet ministers are calling for May to go, plot ringleader saysThree weeks later, the Westminster Harassment scandal hits the press.Westminster Harassment ScandalDamian Green: timeline of how a leak led to a downfallResults in the loss of Gavin Williamson, through promotion. And now, Damian Green - but, nothing in the way of actually making researchers in Westminster safer.EU Withdrawal BillAll you need to know about the Brexit bill's Amendment 7 and why it has just humiliated Theresa MayCould have been avoided had concessions to the Tory rebels - whose concerns were legitimate - been made earlier, rather than last minute, having refused to discuss and compromise. Regardless, does not delay the Brexit process.The same will likely happen again, if the extensive prerogative powers in the Bill are not addressed. Rightly.