Removal Personal Representative: Fill & Download for Free

CD Projekt Red removed the gender labels from the body types so players can optionally create non-binary characters without being bothered by above terminology.People have taken this out of context and thought this meant everyone is going to be genderless and you can no longer create normal male or female characters.That however, isn’t true, you can still create strict male and female characters and the game world/NPCs will still address you according to your gender, neither did the interview in question state the opposite.Sources:r/cyberpunkgame - I messaged Cyberpunk 2077 on Facebook due to growing concern via Twitter, Reddit, and Steam discussion forms on the recent character creator changes.r/cyberpunkgame - About the gender "outrage"That and there’s those who are angry with the fact that you even have the option to create a non-binary character in a game with a theme on transhumanism.That doesn’t need to be addressed.Some theorize they “bent the knee” and included non-binary options because of media pressure (like… those 2–3 magazines?), but that’s equal to believing every trans person represents the extreme left or outrage cult.So calm it, here, lighten up and…Nothing’s changed.

With power comes responsibility.With the power of being a spokesperson for a certain Political party in a forum where there are more than a million people from the country a person represents, comes the greater responsibility of being 'politically correct'.The lady is not an apolitcal - she is not an unaffiliated to any person or political party regular Quoran like say, me. I can say things (with responsibility, of course - even I wouldn't call anyone a dog or like one, for that matter) but that's besides the point. I don't have a blue tick against my name owed to me because of my political affiliations.The statement (and image) any which way one looks at it, is highly objectionable coming from a confirmed political account of the BJP - she represents the party here, not the person. As a person, nobody knows her - as a party, she is a tall presence.She, in her capacity, does not have the right to call him that.Let her account remove the blue tick, let her credentials not state BJP spokesperson, then she is on par with others. Free to say what she wishes.Let's for a moment imagine the shoe on the other foot. Let's say, Shashi Tharoor were on Quora and said something similar about a high up BJP leader, would anybody take it?She might consider amending or better still, removing the answer, IMHO.There is an undeniable finality about written words. Especially those that have the edit option.Edit:For the benefit of naysayers who are arguing that she didn't directly call him a dog.It is akin to a silly dog which barks and runs behind cars only when it moves away and is otherwise clueless about the motive when car is in their grasp.Rahul Gandhi is facing a similar situation where he was clueless while still being a passenger in the car but now runs behind it after it is out of reach.Quoted from her answerOf course she meant to call him a human trying to catch a bus he missed. If such was the case, why bring in the dog analogy?P.S. A dog does know what to do when he catches up - especially if the car stops.Let's not get there, it gets tyre-ing - not the number one activity for this answer.Accusing me of being 'dog'ged in my criticism…draw your own conclusions.

A Senator is the personal representative of a member world. To remove the representation means that their membership in the Republic is either revoked or suspended.So could he do it? Probably with the majority vote. Otherwise I say no.