Ea Is (Sch# 2013072064) Agenda Item No: Fill & Download for Free

I suppose you could apply any alphabet to any language, but you’d have to make some adaptations for sounds that language B has that language A (for which the alphabet was developed) lacked. The Roman alphabet has been used for a large number of languages, but the problem has been that those languages have a variety of sounds that Latin lacked and you need a way to represent those sounds. One solution has been digraphs, the use of two symbols to represent a single sound, as in English ch, sh, th, wh, ie, ee, ea, ai, ay, ou, ow, oo, oe, and oa. German even has a trigraph, sch. Another solution is to add new letters, either by modifying existing letters—ä, ë, ö, ü, ı, İ, ñ, ç, č, š, ð, and ł are good examples—or by borrowing symbols from other writing systems, such as þ in Old English and Icelandic or X, Y, and Z in the Roman alphabet. Yet another solution is to re-purpose an existing letter for a sound that it didn’t originally represent, such as æ in Old English, q in Romanization of Chinese writing, or A in the transition from the Phoenician alphabet to the Greek alphabet.

if you mean the costs of setting up the corporation, the build out, hiring etc, see answer below.if you mean ordinary business expenses, incurred while selling or producing goods or services, and the revenue derived from that, then [in the USA] need to do a Sch C for the income and expenses from the time period.example: you start a business. you buy gizmos and sell them at a markup. you start doing this in march. you buy and sell a LOT of gizmos. now its october and you look at your records and say, hmm, maybe i should incorporate, maybe it will save me tax $$$. you find a fantastic EA/CPA, confer and become a corporation. so now you buy and sell gizmos as John Doe Gizmo Inc instead of John Doe. the income and expenses for feb to oct go on your Sch C. the income and expenses for nov & dec go on your 1120, 1120S, 1065.

One letter does not means one sound. One letter means one letter. CH isn't considered a letter because it's two letters. Likewise for SH. Look at your keyboard. Do you see a CH or an SH key?We have a special name for these in English. They're called digraphs, that is, one sound written with two letters, and in phonics they're distinguished from blends, which are two (or more) sounds written with two (or more) letters.English is full of 'em. There are also trigraphs, and all sorts of other, freakier letter combinations.Here's a very incomplete list of English digraphs:AI as in trainBT as in debtBU as in buy, buildCH as in chick, chimpanzee, and championCH as in champagne and chicCH as in character, architect, and chromeCK as in sickDG as in judgmentEA as in peaEE as in streetEI as in ceiling and receiptER as in spiderEU as in eulogyEY as in monkeyGH as in ghost and ghastlyGH as in through (silent, this one)GN as in gnome and gnarledIE as in believeKN as in knife and knightMB as in lamb and thumbME as in comeNG as in thing, painting, and fingerOO as in book, cookieOO as in food, oopsOU as in out, scoutOW as in now and clownOW as in row or snowPH as in digraph, phone, and phonicsPS as in psychologyPT as in pteradactyl, ptarmiganRW as Norwich (the W is silent)SH as in shore, shipwreck, shark, and sheepSW as in swordTH as in decathlon, tooth, bathtub, and thinTH as in this, there, and thatTW as in twoWH as in whet, and which, especially when pronounced, as most people do, the same as plain WWR as in writeVE as in love, above, every...(for the sake of brevity, I've left out all double consonants from the above list)And here's an incomplete list of English trigraphs:TCH as in watchDGE as in bridgeEAU as in beautyEYE as in eyeUGH as in cough, enoughSTH as in asthmaSCH as in schmaltz, schlep, and schedule (I'm referring to the British pronunciation here, as one sound)...These lists are incomplete. In fact, if I listed every word combination with a unique or unpredictable pronunciation, I'd be here all week. And reading English is really a matter of being able to segment words properly into their individual digraphs, which usually requires some knowledge of their etymologies, and sometimes their context, too. It's easy to know how to spell a word in English (that is, what letters are in its written form) without knowing how to segment it (that is, what longer letter-sound correspondences there are in it), and vice versa.For instance, you don't know how to read slough until you can figure out how it's broken down. Is it s-l-o-ugh (with a final UGH pronounced like F) or ist it s-l-ou-gh (with a final GH which is silent)? If the former, is that O the full one, as in shot or the weak one, as in son? If the latter, is that OU pronounced like about or like caribou? Is awry broken down like aw-ry or like a-wr-y? Is Shepherd broken down like sh-e-ph-er-d or sh-e-p-h-er-d? Is read spelled with the EA of bread or the EA of please?