Office Of The District Attorney - County Of San Bernardino, California: Fill & Download for Free

San Bernardino attack Dec, 2015On December 2, 2015, 14 people were killed and 22 were seriously injured in a terrorist attack at the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino, California, which consisted of a mass shooting and an attempted bombing. The committers, Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik, a married couple living in the city of Redlands, targeted a San Bernardino County Department of Public Health training event and holiday party, of about 80 employees, in a rented banquet room. After the shooting, the couple fled in a rented SUV. Four hours later, police pursued their vehicle and killed them in a shootout.InvestigationThe FBI discovered Farook’s government-issued iPhone 5c on Dec. 3 during a lawful search. Since the iPhone 5c was locked when investigators seized it, the logical next step was to obtain access to iCloud backups for the phone in order to obtain evidence related to the investigation in the days following the attack.ProblemApple was able to give the FBI backups only through October 19, when Farook apparently stopped backing up the phone. That leaves a one-and-a-half month gap in the data between October 19 and December 2, when the massacre occurred. The FBI believes Farook might have intentionally stopped the automatic backups to hide something. The phone is locked with a passcode. The FBI doesn't have the code, and neither does Apple. The passcode is stored only on the device itself. iPhones running 2014's iOS8 software or the newer iOS9 protect their data using 256-bit AES encryption. Because of Apple's built-in security, you can only have 10 tries to enter a passcode. After that, the iPhone wipes itself that is, removes all the data stored on the device.Even if the FBI could disable the auto-wipe function, breaking the passcode could take a long time -- a very long time. The iPhone requires a minimum delay of 80 milliseconds between each passcode entry, and wrong entries can extend the delay by minutes at a time. Assuming Farook used a six-digit passcode, Apple estimates it could take 5.5 years to guess.Apple did help law enforcement officials in the past by allowing them to bypass the lockscreen as long as there was a valid subpoena or a search warrant. It had data extraction technology that let the company's engineers bypass a user's passcode and pull information like contacts, calls and messages. And it did so without having to unlock the phone.But the release of iOS 8 in 2014 changed that. The new software came encrypted by default, which means Apple no longer had the ability to extract data because the files to be extracted are protected by an encryption key that is tied to the user's passcode, which Apple does not possess.Court orderOn 16 February, U.S. Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym ordered Apple to write and digitally sign software called a "Software Image File," that would make it easier for the US government to guess the 4-digit passcode on Farook’s device. The court order asks Apple to create a new, custom version of iOS that runs only on this specific iPhone and that makes three changes to the software. The first two changes would bypass or disable the auto-wipe function and the delay that limits how quickly new passcodes can be entered. The court also asks Apple to add a way to attach a cable or wirelessly connect to the iPhone so the FBI can automatically enter passcodes. That way, the FBI can use a supercomputer to bombard the phone with passcode guesses until it finds the right one.Apple saidApple's CEO Tim Cook said that Apple can't just bypass those protections for a single phone and expect other phones to stay safe and secure. Apple believes that if they made a "master key" for the iPhone, it would be an irresistible prize for hackers, and that its own servers would inevitably be hacked. Apple also worries that employees inside law enforcement, or inside Apple itself, could steal the technology.The U.S. attorney's office replied, in turn, with a motion to compel Apple's compliance with the order. The government said it was not asking Apple to create a “master key” but to create software that opened this particular iPhone. Apple could maintain custody of the software, the government motion said, and destroy it after the phone was unlocked. “It does not mean the end of privacy,” the motion said.NowApple had five business days from February 16 to challenge the court's order, but it asked for a three-day extension. Now it has until February 26 to file. Magistrate Pym has scheduled a hearing for March 22 in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in Riverside. As you'd expect, there will be a lot of legal back and forth, and the case could go through the federal court system all the way up to the US Supreme Court. It's up to Apple and the government to decide how far to take thing, but Apple said it will pursue the case as far as it needs to go, because it's not backing down.

The last statistic from the Census I read, there were or are 390 million people in the U.S.According to the NRA, there are half of those household that have guns. And some of them have more than one, in multiples. Like 5 or more.So half of 390 is 195 millionso there should be at least 400 million if not more guns in the US. Those are classified as Long-guns (rifles and shotguns) and handguns.That’s taking 195 million roundings off to 200, and doubling it, if I wanted to times 5, that would be 1,000,000,000 or 1 Billion guns in the U.S.Let's Do some simple math.Los Angeles has a population of about 11–12 million according to the 2010 census and has grown A LOT in 9 years so maybe 14 million now.Half of those have guns so that’s 5.5 million (using the conservative lower number, not the 14 million). some have more than one. like 2 or 3 or 4 or 5. so let's make that bump back up conservatively to 10 million guns.IN LA there are bout 9–10 thousand LA Sheriff Deputies, and 9–10 thousand LAPD cops. Those are the TWO BIGGEST Police / Deputies that work and patrol the Greater LA City and LA County. You also have some small surrounding cities with their own police departments, (like Long Beach, Torrance, Beverly Hills, wealthy cities with enough tax revenue can have their own Private Police agencies, those that are smaller and don’t have the funds Contract it police work out to the LA County Sheriff’s Deputies, but those two are the biggest.Of those half of each do patrols. so 5 thousand of each, 5k + 5k = 10,000 cops and deputies combined that go out in the field and do patrols. And at any given time, they rotate in 10 hours (4 days work with 3 days off) or 12 hours shifts (3 days work with 4 days off).So at any given moment HALF to 1/3 of those 10k cops are out on patrol either day or night shift. Unless they call them all up for some RIOT Gear RIOT suppression, like the Rodney King riots back in the 1980s or something like that.So the battle would be 3k to 5k cops, deputies vs. 550,000 civilian citizens (mind you all law-abiding citizens, right up to the call to have GUN CONFISCATION, which NOW CRIMINALIZES gun ownership) all armed to the teeth.Now, 5% of let's say 12 million population is what? 550,000 gunfight versus 3,000 to 5,000 cops all armed to the teeth.Now here is a hypothetical. Those cops are ALL LOCAL and live in surrounding cities. So do you think those Cops and Deputies can make it home to their families to protect them while people retaliate and attack those Families of the LAPD Cops and LASD Deputies for violating their LAW ABIDING rights?The COPS and DEPUTIES can’t be at both places at once. Those Cops also have to do grocery shopping, go to the doctors, take the children to school and drop off their kids in the same or nearby communities where they live and work. Maybe they commute from the next county over. I see them on the freeway frequently passing me or next to me and I know they’re either commuting home in the evening or to work in the mornings. So if those Cops and Deputies confiscate guns from people in the surrounding communities who haven’t committed any crimes. Their only crime is to “own” a gun. What do you think would happen to them?Not to mention the “Taking” of the gun, is a valuable property and Violates the “Takings Clause” of the US Constitution. Guns are expensive, they are not cheap. Good quality ones can start at $300, $400, $500 and $1000 and more. Times multiples of 4 or 5, you’re talking $2,000, $3,000, of some citizens valuable property.The “Takings Clause” of the US Constitution says, the Gov’t may not take someone's possession without compensating them for value, which would be market value for their property.That’s why when you see or hear about these so-called “GUN-BUY-BACKS” BY THE LOCAL Gov’ts, they pay you and destroy your guns. AND IT’S FULLY VOLUNTARY.ONLY A MORON would turn over their weapons in any voluntary buy-back. Police are ALWAYS RETROACTIVE. They only show up AFTER-THE-FACT to make a statement of the crime and make out a report.What are you going to do when a robber, bad guy, or burglar shows up to do harm to you and your wife, family, daughter? Use harsh language and cuss them out? LOLYou ladies, What are you going to do when a serial murder or serial rapist shows up and you have no defense? Scream, use harsh language, and curse them out? LOLThe point is there is more than one way to get those cops AND their Families. If they want to kill you and your family? Then they and their families are fair game also in a GUN CONFISCATION, breaking down LAW ABIDING CIVILIANS front door and making LAW ABIDING CITIZENS hand over your guns? Really?=======================================================A lot of those cops and deputies own guns on the side also besides their service weapon on the job. Would they also have to turn those in? Sure you bet. Those personal weapons are not work-related. They would also have to turn those in.Those extra handguns and rifles, and shotguns that Cops and Deputies would be “in-scope” for any “gun-confiscation” also. Failure to enforce would make that an arrest-able crime for those corrupt cops who want to enforce that.See cops have to qualify on the weapon that they carry, E.g. Handgun if they don’t “Qualify” with those weapons they don’t get to carry it. And there is no provision that allows them to carry their personally owned shotgun or rifle or handgun. It’s just not permitted. So COPS & DEPUTIES would have to hand them over also.What about when they retire or leave the force. Those cops & deputies don’t get to take those privileges with them. Nope the privilege to carry a firearm is OVER. Those cops would be in-scope for “Gun Confiscation” also or be arrested like any other swinging Joe. THOSE COPS & DEPUTIES WHO RETIRE ARE NOW CIVILIANS AFTER THEY RETIRE and would have to comply and hand over their weapons also.And that’s not just them, the Cops or Deputies. If they enforce any “GUN CONFISCATION” it must be done fairly and evenly. What do I mean? The Family and extended families of those Cops and Deputies, Sons, Daughters, Dads, Moms, Cousins, Uncles, Grandfathers, they are all in-scope for the Gun Confiscation. Failure to evenly enforce the law would be a criminal offense. Aiding and abetting evasion of the law; conspiracy, obstruction of justice would be only the beginning charges.======================================================And It’s also a “taking” by the Gov’t. The Gov’t “cannot” take something from you without compensating you. It’s called the “Taking’s Clause of the Constitution” And it’s “ILLEGAL”.What do you think would happen?Now take that Scenario and MULTIPLY THAT across the entire U.S. in every biggest major Cities and County. Washington DC and Chicago are no gun zone cities yet they have the HIGHEST Gun crime rates like Homicide.Here are the TOP 18 COUNTIES IN THE US BY POPULATIONYou see 6 of those largest counties are in the California2010 Census - Populations: (rounding off) These numbers are low, way low.1 Los Angeles California 9,818,605 (10 Million) more like 14 million by now2 Chicago Cook Illinois 5,211,263 (5.2 Million)3 Houston Harris Texas 4,652,980 (4.6 Million)4 Phoenix Maricopa Arizona 4,307,033 (4.3 Million)5 San Diego California 3,337,685 (3.3 Million)6 Santa Ana-Orange California 3,190,400 (3.2 Million)7 Miami-Dade Florida 2,751,796 (2.8 Million)8 Brooklyn-Kings New York 2,648,771 (2.7 Million)9 Dallas Texas 2,618,148 (2.7 Million)10 Riverside California 2,423,266 (2.5 Million)11 Queens New York 2,358,582 (2.4 Million)12 Las Vegas Clark Nevada 2,204,079 (2.2 Million)13 Seattle King Washington 2,188,649 (2.2 Million)14 San Bernardino California 2,157,404 (2.2 Million)15 Fort Worth Tarrant-Texas 2,054,475 (2.0 Million)16 San Antonio Bexar-Texas 1,958,578 (2.0 Million)17 San Jose/Santa Clara-California 1,938,153 (2.0 Million)18 Ft Lauderdale-Broward-Florida 1,935,878 (2.0 Million)And here this is for you.Just the latest. In WASHINGTON STATE they passed very strict gun laws and 12 Sheriffs have “REFUSED TO ENFORCE THEM” Saying the new laws violate the US Constitution AND only take guns away from Law abiding citizens.Rural Sheriffs Are Refusing to Enforce Washington's New Gun LawIn Washington State, Sheriffs Refuse to Enforce New Gun-Control LawIn Washington State, Sheriffs Refuse to Enforce New Gun-Control Law12 Washington Sheriffs Refuse To Enforce State's New Gun LawsSeveral sheriffs in Washington state counties refuse to enforce new gun-law measureThe same thing is Happening in another State NEW MEXICO.https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/new-mexico/articles/2019-03-01/new-mexico-sheriffs-gun-laws-protest-follows-other-statesSheriffs in New Mexico Vow Not to Enforce 6 Absolutely OUTRAGEOUS New Gun Control BillsSheriffs in New Mexico Vow Not to Enforce 6 Absolutely OUTRAGEOUS New Gun Control BillsSHERIFFS' RESOLUTIONSSheriffs began presenting the draft resolutions for "Second Amendment Sanctuaries" to their county commissioners more than two weeks ago.The same thing is Happening in another State COLORADO.Six years ago, Colorado sheriffs joined a lawsuit in protest of two gun-control laws. One restricted the size of ammunition magazines. Another expanded background checks on firearms purchases.What do you think would happen?Your guess is as good as mine.===========================================================April 6th, 2019 UPDATE: Here’s a case in point. A Federal judge in Southern District; ruled the California ban on high-capacity magazines “Unconstitutional”; THAT lasted about 4 days then the ban was back in as the California AG asked for a “Stay” of the ruling so they could review it.Federal Judge Rules High Capacity Magazine Ban Unconstitutional - Here's What Happens NowFederal Judge: California's 'High-Capacity' Magazine Ban UnconstitutionalJudge reinstates ban on high-capacity gun magazine purchases during the appealSAN DIEGO —A San Diego federal judge last week knocked down a state law banning high-capacity gun magazines, but in a new ruling, Thursday held that sales and manufacturing of such parts will remain against the law until the case has exhausted all appeals.U.S. District Court Judge Roger Benitez’s latest order essentially returns the situation surrounding magazines holding more than 10 bullets to the status quo that has been in place since the summer of 2017, when the judge granted a preliminary injunction. According to the terms, gun owners can’t acquire new magazines, but they aren’t barred from owning them.The state Attorney General’s Office petitioned the judge for a stay to his final decision on the lawsuit, Duncan v. Beccera, until the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal can weigh in.=============================================I just found this statistic or fact so let me add this. See below.Police Agencies in the U.S. own about 1.5 million guns.Americans own about 400 million guns. U.S. Population is about 330–350 million.Now I would say 1/4 to 1/3 maybe 1/2 of those are Anti-gun, or pacifists peaceniks (who bought into the brainwash that guns can develop hands and feet on their own and walk away and by themselves shoot innocent people/BTW criminals want you to believe that) -who also don’t believe in the 2nd Amendment or owning a gun for self-defense.so let's use 1/3 that would leave about 220 million.so 1/3 of the U.S. population of that 220 million would be about 70 million. And since there are 400 million firearms in the hands of civilians? that would mean each gun owner owns about (4) firearms TOTAL or in the AGGREGATE. E.g., sidearm (short-arms) revolver or semi-auto; shotguns; and long guns like rifles.The military owns about 1.8 million guns.So do the math; Absent the military violate their oath to the constitution and commit “posse comitatus”; Where it’s illegal for US troops to occupy civilian land. And bring out the heavy artillery vs. civilians (tanks, mortars, Apache helicopters, bombers and fighters against their own population.It’s a no-contest in a conventional war “Armed militia of Americans civilians would win”. Versus the police and military. AND, AND, AND a lot of states, in a lot of states civilians have almost identical firearms (absent fully automatic selection) as the police and military.And just as I stated “above”? “The COPS and DEPUTIES can’t be at both places at once.” And neither can the U.S. military if they decide to open fire on American civilians on US Soil like they did at Kent University during a peaceful protest. The fall out from that was tremendous OUTRAGE in the entire U.S.“University students protest the Vietnam War and the Kent State University shooting, Chicago, Illinois, May 5, 1970”The problem was the students were unarmed peaceful protestors.Now FLIP that and make them armed like the AMERICAN BLACK PANTHERS. NOBODY F’s with them.I’ll tell you a little secret nobody ever discusses or realizes. Ready?The US Constitution has the Bill of Rights; aka 24 Amendments.the 1st and more most is the 1st Amendment; Right to Freedom of speech, Freedom of Religion, Freedom to Travel, Freedom to raise your own family; Freedom to Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness basically.RIGHT AFTER that is the 2nd Amendment. Right for a militia to bear arms.You where this RIGHT is? The 2nd Amendment comes right after the 1st Amendment. It’s not the 3rd, or 4th, or the 5th or the 6th Amendment; The right to bear arms is right after the initial freedoms of (Speech, Travel, Life, Liberty, Gather peacefully, etc, etc, etc):Why is that?it’s because the creators of this Great country the USA; and the creators of the US Constitution KNEW that it was IMPORTANT to be able to ENFORCE and DEFEND those FREEDOMS with Arms; tough language or yelling or tough words just won’t do it; just won’t work versus the other side using FIREARMS; it’s like the saying; “don’t bring a knife to a gunfight”.During those times King George and his Sheriff’s and his Red Coat British soldiers had arms, and the only thing they understood was lead from the 2nd Amendment to enforce the Rights and Civil Liberties of the 1st Amendment.Now do you understand? Why the creators of the US Constitution put the 2nd Amendment right after the 1st Amendment?; they didn’t put it 3rd, or 4th or 5th which they could have done.Todays politicians have forgotten that lesson. And are trying to do away with and whittle down little-by-little the 2nd Amendment.if you like this answer please give me an upvote below - Thanks

It would appear so, but this is going to be a big problem to enforce, as it applies only to residents of San Bernardino County. If I live in Orange County, I can drive to SB and the law doesn’t apply to me. I can walk up to the Health Officer without a mask and it would be totally legal, since the ordinance only applies to residents of SB County.Also, is SB giving masks to their residents? I don’t know. There’s nothing in the article saying that SB will be providing these mandatory masks. If I’m broke and don’t know how to sew, am I not allowed to leave wherever I am? Or, I’m on my was to buy a mask. Or, I went to the store to get a mask and they were sold out. Until/Unless Governor Newsome makes it a requirement, the only hitch I might have is if the County District Attorney is an idiot or a wannabe tyrant.The Health Officer is a complete moron. If it were me, I’d ignore the requirement and wear a mask if I want to. Unless you’re engaging in some other criminal conduct, I don’t envision the police taking people to jail while simultaneously releasing 'non-violent' offenders in an effort to slow the spread.If you antagonize the police, boasting about not wearing a mask, the result will be some unpleasantness that you’ll later have to address in court, but why would anyone antagonize the police in the first place? Those that do deliberately are even dumber than your Health Officer.