Business Records Affidavit Tx: Fill & Download for Free

What the cases of voter fraud were can be googled. I’ve quoted from the WaPo below but of course it’s a secret ballot so we don’t know which way people voted.One was in a gambling referendum. One was in a school board election. One was in a municipal runoff election (where we’ve a pretty good guess that he was voting for his family). A couple in Presidential Primaries. One a municipal budget election. A few in general elections.May 2014: Ben Hodzic allegedly voted at the polls in the name of his brother in the Catskill School District Board of Education election in Catskill, NY.[1]Nov. 2013: Mark Atlas allegedly voted at the polls in the name of someone else in the municipal election in Worcester, MA.[2]Sep. 2013: At least four, and possibly 20-24, Hasidic voters in the South Williamsburg neighborhood of Brooklyn, NY, allegedly attempted to vote at the polls under others’ names in the municipal primary elections for New York City.[3]Mar. 2013: Kristina Bentrim went to vote at the polls in the Cedar Rapids, IA, special election on a gambling referendum, and was allegedly told that someone had voted in her name.[4] It is not clear whether poll book records were investigated to determine whether the record of voting represented an impersonated signature or a clerical error.Nov. 2012: A vote was apparently cast at the polls in the name of Angela Cooney in the general election in San Diego, CA; there is an Angela Cooney listed as dying 4 years earlier.[5] It is not clear whether the two are the same person, or whether the death reports are accurate, and poll book records do not appear to have been investigated to determine whether the record of voting represented an impersonated signature or a clerical error.Nov. 2012: A vote was apparently cast at the polls in the name of Evan Dixon in the general election in San Diego, CA; there is an Evan Dixon listed as dying 11 years earlier.[6] It is not clear whether the two are the same person, or whether the death reports are accurate, and poll book records do not appear to have been investigated to determine whether the record of voting represented an impersonated signature or a clerical error.Nov. 2012: A vote was apparently cast at the polls in the name of Alejandro Guerrero in the general election in San Diego, CA; there is an Alejandro Guerrero listed as dying 5 years earlier.[7] It is not clear whether the two are the same person, or whether the death reports are accurate, and poll book records do not appear to have been investigated to determine whether the record of voting represented an impersonated signature or a clerical error.2012: According to the North Carolina State Board of Elections, one allegation of impersonation fraud in 2012 was sufficiently credible to refer to the local district attorney.[8] It is not clear whether the alleged fraud was in-person, or if follow-up established whether fraud did or did not likely occur.June 2011: Hazel Brionne Woodard apparently arranged for her son Mark James Jr. to vote at the polls in the name of his father, Mark James Sr., in the municipal runoff elections in Tarrant County, TX.[9]Nov. 2010: Four ballots may have been cast in the general election in South Carolina in the name of voters who had previously died (Ed Louis Johnson, Elbert R. Thompson, Ruth Middleton, and James L. Warnock); election and law enforcement officials had insufficient information to come to a final conclusion, including two pollbook pages that were unavailable. (Law enforcement agents believe that the ballot of Elbert R. Thompson may have been confused with that of his son, Elbert Thompson.) Another 203 allegations of deceased voters in the same election were revealed to be either clerical error or coincidence.[10]May 2009: Lorenzo Antonio Almanza, Jr., after voting himself, apparently cast a ballot at the polls in the name of his incarcerated brother, Orlando Almanza, in the 2009 election for the Progreso Independent School District Board, TX. (His mother, Reyna Almanza, vouched for him, and was separately convicted.)[11]Nov. 2008: A vote was apparently cast at the polls in the name of Forrest Downie in the general election in San Diego, CA; there is a Forrest Downie listed as dying 3 years earlier.[12] It is not clear whether the two are the same person, or whether the death reports are accurate, and poll book records do not appear to have been investigated to determine whether the record of voting represented an impersonated signature or a clerical error.Nov. 2008: A vote was apparently cast at the polls in the name of Scott Hagloch in the general election in San Diego, CA; there is a Scott Hagloch listed as dying 2 years earlier.[13] It is not clear whether the two are the same person, or whether the death reports are accurate, and poll book records do not appear to have been investigated to determine whether the record of voting represented an impersonated signature or a clerical error.Mar. 2008: Jack Carol Crowder III allegedly impersonated his father (Jack Carol Crowder), using his father’s voter registration card at the polls in the March 2008 presidential primary election in Baytown, TX.[14]Aug. 2007: A vote was apparently cast at the polls in the statewide primary in Hattiesburg, MS, in the name of James E. Barnes, who died in 2006. This may (or may not) have been the result of clerical error confusing the man with his son, James W. Barnes; it is not clear whether the pollbooks were reviewed to determine whether fraud or clerical error was the cause.[15]Aug. 2007: A vote was apparently cast at the polls in the statewide primary in Hattiesburg, MS, in the name of Stanley Dwayne Echols, who was at the hospital and did not vote.[16] It is not clear whether poll book records were investigated to determine whether the record of voting represented an impersonated signature or a clerical error.June 2007: The two contending city council candidates in a municipal runoff election in Hoboken, NJ, both reported instances in the election in which someone went to the polls and found out that someone else had voted in their place.[17] It is not clear how many instances there were, or how the candidates learned of them. It is also not clear whether poll book records were investigated to determine whether the records of voting represented impersonated signatures or clerical errors.2007: A vote was apparently cast at the polls in a municipal budget referendum in Stonington, CT, in the name of Jane M. Drury, who died in 2000.[18] It is not clear whether poll book records were investigated to determine whether the record of voting represented an impersonated signature or a clerical error.Nov. 2004: Rosalie B. Simpson died in August 2004, but a vote was apparently recorded at the polls in her name in the general election in Seattle, WA.[19] It is not clear whether poll book records were investigated to determine whether the record of voting represented an impersonated signature or a clerical error.Nov. 2004: Frank Sanchez, in Albuquerque, NM, was told that someone had signed on the line for his name in the pollbook during the general election.[20] It is not clear whether poll book records were investigated to determine whether the record of voting represented an impersonated signature or a clerical error.Nov. 2004: Someone apparently signed on the pollbook line for Rose-Mary G. McGee, in Albuquerque, NM, during the general election.[21]Nov. 2004: Dwight Adkins, in Albuquerque, NM, was told that someone had signed on the line for his name in the pollbook during the general election.[22] It is not clear whether poll book records were investigated to determine whether the record of voting represented an impersonated signature or a clerical error.Nov. 2004: Three people at the polls in Westchester County, NY, were given provisional ballots (in New York, “affidavit ballots”) in the general election because someone had allegedly signed the poll books in their place.[23] It is not clear whether poll book records were investigated to determine whether the records of voting represented impersonated signatures or clerical errors.Nov. 2004: A vote was apparently cast at the polls in the general election in Milwaukee, WI, in the name of an individual who had died several years earlier.[24] It is not clear whether poll book records were investigated to determine whether the records of voting represented impersonated signatures or clerical errors.2004: According to the North Carolina State Board of Elections, one allegation of impersonation fraud in 2004 was sufficiently credible to refer to the local district attorney. [25] It is not clear whether the alleged fraud was in-person, or if follow-up established whether fraud did or did not likely occur.Jan. 2004: Mark Lacasse apparently voted at the polls in the presidential primary in Londonderry, NH, in the name of his father, who was away on business at the time. [26]Nov. 2002: Shasta Nicole Crayton apparently voted in her sister’s name at the polls in the general election in Dadeville, AL.[27]In several municipal, primary, and general elections in 2006, 2007, 2008, 2010, and 2011, votes were cast in-person in Philadephia, PA, by an individual named Joseph Cheeseboro and by an individual named Joseph J. Cheeseborough. There is apparently some doubt about where one or both names represent real identities.[28]In elections from October 2008 through June 2011, 44 individuals with names, dates of birth, and Social Security numbers matching the information of individuals listed as incarcerated were recorded as having cast ballots in person in Michigan.[29] It is not clear whether records were further investigated to determine whether the matches represent fraudulent votes or clerical errors in either the incarceration records or the voting records.In elections from October 2008 through June 2011, 145 individuals with names, dates of birth, and addresses matching the information of individuals listed as deceased were recorded as having cast ballots in person in Michigan.[30] It is not clear whether records were further investigated to determine whether the matches represent fraudulent votes or clerical errors in either the death records or the voting records.According to Texas Director of Elections Keith Ingram, the names, birth dates, and Social Security numbers of four “recent” voters allegedly matched the corresponding information on earlier death certificates, indicating that the votes were cast after the individuals’ deaths. It is not clear at which elections these votes were cast, or how many, if any, of these votes were cast at the polls (rather than absentee). It is also not clear whether poll book records were investigated to determine whether the record of voting represented an impersonated signature or a clerical error.[31]

Thank you for asking. I have a few examples. Let me start with my son who needed to get a copy of his birth certificate when he was going to get his permit and Driver's License for the first time at 15/16 years old. He was born in Kansas City, MO, due to my health insurance at the time. He only remembered getting healthcare at the University of Kansas City Medical Center in Kansas City, KS, so he quite reasonably thought that he was born in Kansas when we began the process of getting his birth certificate. We were living in a completely different state by this time. My health insurance at the same job had changed providers accepted when he was a baby. To get a birth certificate, you have to know what state you were born in AND what county. In some states you need to know your parent's birthplace to get a copy of YOUR birth certificate.To complicate matters, my son's initial birth certificate was submitted with the wrong last name. The hospital put my professional last name on his birth certificate initially, although they were instructed to put my son's father's last name on the birth certificate. I got that corrected within a couple months after he was born, but it was still a problem when we were attempting to get a copy. They also wanted to know what county we lived in at the time of his birth and what county the hospital he was born in was in. He obviously did not know and I had to figure it out. It was expensive and time consuming. What if I would have been dead?Why did I not have his birth certificate in the first place? Due to the usury interest rate on student loans, I could not afford to purchase a house and we moved a lot when my son was small. One of those moving times, I went to the hospital for an outpatient minor surgical biopsy that should have had me home in time for dinner. Instead, I ended up in a coma for a couple weeks and my family, friends, and coworkers packed up my house, as I was due to move at the end of the month. They put my stuff in storage, not knowing what was going to happen. I very much appreciated the gesture, and I never thought about his birth certificate again until he needed it to drive. Maybe his birth certificate was thrown out, maybe I will discover it in an old box or file when I'm 85 or 90 and have time to look. Contrary to what some have asserted, all a child needs to enroll in public school are their vaccination records, not a birth certificate — at least at that time. Once enrolled, when you change schools, all you need is prior school records — which I assume include vaccination records — which actually are easy to get.When my son was in college and he got a notice saying his Driver's license was up for renewal, we both thought it would be a good idea for him to get a “Real ID,” ($50) so that he would be ready for domestic flights. He brought his birth certificate, Social Security card, checkbook, 3 credit cards, and his utility bill — ALL in his name. First, the DMV person said the documents had to be in paper form (what business is it of the government what is in his bank account or on his credit card statement?) He is paperless, of course, so we went to the print shop to make paper copies. When we returned, the clerk said because his utility bill had his university address on it and it did not match the address on the other documents, no “Real ID” for him. He got a regular Driver's license and we both said “F*ck this. Get a passport.” — for $145 and/or a passport and passport ID card for $210.Some states (e.g., Kentucky) are changing to ONLY offering “Real ID.” This Real ID law was passed in 2005, and had so much pushback from businesses whose employees did not have the required documents that the deadline has been pushed back again and again and again. Now, SIXTEEN YEARS later, the FINAL deadline is October 1, 2021 — and you have to apply by June 15, 2021 to be ready Oct 1, 2021. Get a passport. Much easier, though more expensive. Kentucky residents are going to need Real ID Driver's license, too, as a DL is required to drive. Real ID is one of the most ill-considered, ill-advised, nonsensical laws ever passed. Not everybody in a household has their name on a utility bill or other requirements that are sort of ridiculous (e.g., you can use a car title, but ONLY if issued in the last 12 months.)Case Two is my friend who was literally born in a barn in TX without a birth certificate. When he registered to vote, he brought his school records, Social Security card, bank account info, pay stubs from work where he had been working 25 years, hospital records as he has a prosthetic leg from a childhood accident, and two friends who had known him at least three years to swear an affidavit under penalty of perjury that he was who he said he was. Thus, he was registered to vote. He still could not get a Driver's license, because no birth certificate — no Driver's license. He has hired an attorney to help him get his Driver's license, but he would not be able to vote under Republican Photo ID voter suppression laws.Case Three is my elderly neighbor who had a Driver's license for years when she was working 50+ years, but has not driven for years due to her age. Until about three years ago, she did not need a DL for anything. Then three years ago, an absurd failed “war on drugs" law was passed that required a Photo ID for one of her medications. I use my ID to pick up her prescription, but she would NOT be able to vote under Republican Photo ID voter suppression laws. MANY elderly voters will be disenfranchised if these voter suppression laws are allowed to stand.A 2016 Brennan Center for Justice — NY School of Law study found that 25% of Black Americans DO NOT have a government issued Photo ID, and only 8% of Whites. A nonpartisan study by Project Vote in 2015 found that overall the percent of citizens of voting age population without a Driver's License or passport was 12% including a breakdown of 8% White and 27% Black.If you look within specific groups of those without a passport or DL you find 20% of White Americans between the ages of 17 and 20 and 36% of Black Americans between 17 and 20 do not have a DL or passport. For Black Americans earning less than $25,000 per year, 39% do not have a DL or passport. Before 2006, NO state required a Photo ID to vote. Nobody has been able to articulate just how Photo ID reduces non-existent voter fraud. That is because Photo ID does NOT decrease voter fraud, which is so rare, it is virtually nonexistent.The ONLY purpose of restrictive Photo ID laws is to disenfranchise voters unlikely to vote Republican. Republicans have come right out and said “We don't want every citizen voting" and “College students shouldn't be voting" and “If we let all citizens vote, Republicans won't win elections.” Well, Republicans, why don't you come up with some policies people want to vote for?Perhaps the worst thing about these Republican voter suppression laws being introduced with wild abandon is that nearly all of them would be ILLEGAL if the Republican SCOTUS had not gutted the Voting Rights Act of 1965 in Shelby in 2013. All of these voter suppression laws are based on Trump's Big Lie of [nonexistent] voter fraud. Laws based on lies.Republican voter suppression laws target Black Americans, urban Americans, young Americans, poor Americans, disabled Americans, and elderly Americans. Unsurprisingly, many of these people are unlikely to vote Republican. Stop the Republican voter suppression laws. All citizens have a RIGHT to VOTE.

No. An officer is supposed to follow the letter of the warrant. If conducting a search on a residence they believe to be correct, any material found in this search is subject to prosecution. Only in case of misconduct by someone in the chain does material from a search become fruits of a poisonous tree.A common refrain I hear from people at the range I shoot at is that if police come to their door to serve a warrant they have special ammunition to take out as many as they can to teach them a lesson, but the fact is neither the owner of the house nor the police can, outside of court, question a warrant. Now, I have had a search warrant with an error - the subject was no longer at the address in question, so I called in a correction and was told serve it anyway because probable cause was based on the contents of the house and the person listed on the warrant, even if they no longer lived there, had been present to generate that probable cause.The main idea though is that there cannot be a question of the warrant as written in the field by either side. If you know it is wrong or suspect the warrant is problematic, you call it in and ask permission to modify it or confirm service is still required. If you get a warrant in your hand you think is wrong you must comply unless and until your lawyer quashes the document.In some cases, when an error is serious a search can be squashed after the fact, and thus no information will be presented to the jury from it. Again, that happens in court.Because so many people are so massively ignorant on this subject, let’s show a valid warrant. Please note - if you start your comment with a lie I will simply delete it, so you might want to make it accurate if you want anyone to read it.Search WarrantUnited States District Court Western District of TexasSEARCH WARRANT W93-15MIn the Matter of the Search of residence of Vernon Wayne Howell, and others, Rt . 7, Box 471-B, AKA: Mount Carmel Center, McLennan County, TX, its appurtenances, vehicles, underground structures located on entire premises of the 77 acre compound. See attached photos & property description Attachments A, B and C.To: Special Agent Davy Aguilera and any Authorized Officer of the United StatesAffidavit(s) having been made before me by S/A Davy Aguilera who has reason to believe that on the premises known as the residence of Vernon Wayne Howell and others, Rt 7 Box 471-B, AKA: Mount Carmel Center, Waco, McLennan County, Texas, its appurtenances, vehicles underground structures located on entire premises of the 77 acre compound. See attached photographs and property description in the Western District of Texas there is now concealed a certain person or property, namely (describe the person or property): SEE ATTACHED SHEET FOR CONCEALED PROPERTY (ATTACHMENT D)I am satisfied that the affidavit(s) and any recorded testimony establish probable cause to believe that the person or property so described is now concealed on the person or promises above-described and establish grounds for the issuance of this warrant.YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to search on or before February 28,1993 (not to exceed ten days) the person or place named above for the person or property specified, serving this warrant and making the search in the daytime -6:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M./ (at any time in the day or night — removed by judge) as I find resonable (sic) cause has been established and if the person or property be found there to seize same, leaving a copy of this warrant and receipt for the person or property taken, and prepare a written inventory of the person or property seized and promptly return this warrant to Dennis G. Green (U.S. Judge or Magistrate) as required by law.February 25, 1993 8:43 p.m at Waco, TexasNote how many people blather on and on about warrants and then use the David Koresh / Branch Davidian case as proof, and how few, if any, bother to pull the warrant and read it. The Judge is not giving us the right to simply arrest David Koresh. The idea we can grab him from the street is a lie created by law enforcement haters to make their own bellies warm with hate. Instead, as in many warrants, we have the right to search a house, and then if material supposed is found, arrest Mr. Koresh and others found in possession.The warrant defines were we can search, how we can search, what time we can search, when the search ends. Since a search may result in the arrest of a person, the judge has used the term person or property, although the search is for property the intent of that search is to create further probable cause for an arrest.When I had a search warrant that listed the house as property of person X, but my check showed that this person merely did business there and there was no evidence of domicile, I called the judge and told his so, and he said to continue the warrant as the probably cause was developed on the property and the person was known to reside there. I had to delete a rather long bleating about how evil this was and how it violated everyone from Ayatollah Komheni to Jesus Christ’s civil rights, this verbal assurance from a judge is simply part of making sure we get the warrant right.Note that there is a mistake in the above warrant;. For years the Davidian survivors have pointed out that they would have come out shooting if issued this warrant because it contains an error. There is a misspelling in the third paragraph. Other arguments made against it is that Vernon Wayne Howell did not allow this name to be used, he insisted on David Koresh which is not listed as an alias, that the property was actually 76.54 acres when later measured, and special agent Aguilera’s middle name is not listed. The argument made by Davidians also is that a judge did not have “temporal” authority to authorize a warrant.All of which is bullshit. The warrant, as written, is sufficient to conduct the search contemplated. It cannot authorize the capture of David Koresh on the street, so the assumption is that the officers would conduct the search with Mr. Koresh present, however if they tried this and he was missing they could still conduct the search.