2-7 Optical Illusion Base Graph Paper: Fill & Download for Free

Yes, evidence. But the overwhelming relevant evidence is that anthropogenic or human caused global warming is NOT realistic. It is a fiction based on shoddy science from the United Nations IPCC distorting its mission for political ends. There is also considerable evidence of blatant unethical behaviour with data manipulation erasing key historical data and fudging other data by early IPCC scientist: James Hansen and Mike Mann. The exposures from the of the scandalous climate-gate emails show climate scientists out of control using heavy jack boot action against their colleagues who failed to support their contrived consensus.Wigley and Trenberth suggested in another e-mail to Mann: “If you think that [Yale professor James] Saiers is in the greenhouse skeptics camp, then, if we can find documentary evidence of this, we could go through official [American Geophysical Union] channels to get him ousted [as editor-in-chief of the Geophysical Research Letters journal].”This dark side of IPCC scientists willing to destroy Yale professor James Saiers because he is “in the greenhouse skeptics camp” is unethical, despicable and possibly criminal behaviour. It must explain the manufactured and unquestioned support of many science organizations. It is reminiscent of Orwell’s 1984 if you didn’t follow the party line of human warming you were removed. Judith Christy had this kind of attack for her honest and very scientific doubt about the too narrow view of climate science by the alarmists. More fraudulent manipulation of science exposed here -A July 2004 communication from Phil Jones to Michael Mann referred to two papers recently published in Climate Research with a “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” subject line observed: “I can’t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin [Trenberth] and I will keep them out somehow---even if we have to redefine what the peer review literature is."Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/lar...The third shocking revelation of these [climate gate] documents is the ruthless way in which these academics have been determined to silence any expert questioning of the findings they have arrived at by such dubious methods "“ not just by refusing to disclose their basic data but by discrediting and freezing out any scientific journal which dares to publish their critics' work. It seems they are prepared to stop at nothing to stifle scientific debate in this way, not least by ensuring that no dissenting research should find its way into the pages of IPCC reports.Pretty Good Climategate SummaryNovember 29, 2009, 9:09 amFrom Christopher Booker at the Telegraph via Anthony WattsSource: GISS | Coyote BlogSHADOW ECONOMIC AGENDA TO CHANGE OUR ECONOMIC SYSTEMThe IPCC and the alarmists have a shadow agenda to use climate policy as a lever to change our free market (but imperfect) economic system. The father of climate change by human emissions of Co2 is Maurice Strong and like they admit publicly to their real Trojan Horse agenda.Source: "Environmentalism: Ideology and Power". Book by Donald Gibson, 2002.Ottmar Edenhofer, lead author of the IPCC’s fourth summary report released in 2007 candidly expressed the priority. Speaking in 2010, he advised -Fundamentally, it is a big mistake to discuss climate politics separately from the big issues of globalization. The climate summit in Cancún at end of the month is not a climate conference, but one of the largest economic conferences since the Second World War. Why? Because we have 11,000 gigatons of carbon in the coal reserves under our feet – and we can only add 400 gigatons more to the atmosphere if we want to stay within the 2 °C target. 11,000 to 400 – we have to face the fact that a large part of the fossil reserves must remain in the ground.De facto, this is the expropriation of the countries with these natural resources. This leads to an entirely different development than the one that has been initiated with development policy.First of all, we as industrialized countries have quasi expropriated the atmosphere of the world community. But one must explicitly say: We de facto redistribute the world’s wealth due to climate politics. That the owners of coal and oil are not enthusiastic about this is obvious. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate politics is environmental politics. This has almost nothing to do any more with environmental politics, [as is was with] with problems such as deforestation or the ozone hole.Source: Ottmar Edenhofer in 2010 on international climate politics and redistribution of wealthSource: "UN IPCC Official Admits 'We Redistribute World's Wealth By Climate Policy' 15 Shares". NewsBusters. November 18, 2010.What is tragic about this analysis is it skips over the real issue as though it is determined that trace amounts of human emissions of Co2 at only 0.1% of the atmosphere are the new control knob of the earth’s climate. GARBAGE.The Costs of Ideology Masquerading as Science:As Greenpeace co-founder Peter Moore observed on Fox Business News in January 2011: "We do not have any scientific proof that we are the cause of the global warming that has occurred in the last 200 years...The alarmism is driving us through scare tactics to adopt energy policies that are going to create a huge amount of energy poverty among the poor people. It's not good for people and it’s not good for the environment...In a warmer world we can produce more food."When Moore was asked who is responsible for promoting unwarranted climate fear and what their motives are, he said: "A powerful convergence of interests. Scientists seeking grant money, media seeking headlines, universities seeking huge grants from major institutions, foundations, environmental groups, politicians wanting to make it look like they are saving future generations. And all of these people have converged on this issue."Paul Ehrlich, best known for his 1968 doom and gloom book, “The Population Bomb”, reported in a March 2010 Nature editorial that a barrage of challenges countering the notion of a looming global warming catastrophe has his alarmist colleagues in big sweats: “Everyone is scared s***less [fecally void], but they don't know what to do.”Yes, and it should, because consequences of subordinating climate science to ideology, however well intentioned, have proven to be incredibly costly.The U.S. Government Accounting Office (GAO) reports that federal climate spending has increased from $4.6 billion in 2003 to $8.8 billion in 2010 (a total $106.7 billion over that period). This doesn’t include $79 billion more spent for climate change technology research, tax breaks for “green energy”, foreign aid to help other countries address “climate problems”; another $16.1 billion since 1993 in federal revenue losses due to green energy subsidies; or still another $26 billion earmarked for climate change programs and related activities in the 2009 “Stimulus Bill”.Virtually all of this is based upon unfounded representations that we are experiencing a known human-caused climate crisis, a claim based upon speculative theories, contrived data and totally unproven modeling predictions. And what redemptive solutions are urgently implored? We must give lots of money to the U.N. to redistribute; abandon fossil fuel use in favor of heavily subsidized but assuredly abundant, “free”, and “renewable” alternatives; and expand federal government growth, regulatory powers, and crony capitalist-enriched political campaign coffers.It is way past time to realize that none of this is really about protecting the planet from man-made climate change. It never was.Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/lar...WHAT CAUSES CLIMATE CHANGE?On the most basic of all issues what causes climate change the IPCC is dishonest and uses a obviously fudged and deceitful summary of the research of their own scientists.In the 1995 2nd Assessment Report of the UN IPCC the scientists included these three statements in the draft:1. “None of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed (climate) changes to the specific cause of increases in greenhouse gases.”2. “No study to date has positively attributed all or part (of observed climate change) to anthropogenic (i.e. man-made) causes.”3. “Any claims of positive detection of significant climate change are likely to remain controversial until uncertainties in the natural variability of the climate system are reduced.”IPCC politicians wrote the final report and the “Summary”. The rules force the ‘scientists’ to change their reports to match the politicians’ final ‘Summary’. Those three statements by ‘scientists’ above were replaced with this:“The balance of evidence suggests a discernable human influence on global climate.”This summary is dishonest and shows the bias and shadow agenda of the IPCC.Please reread the three statements above from the IPCC scientists again and weep. We are being badly duped at the terrible cost of to the undeveloped peoples > 2 billion living off grid and needing cheap fossil fuels like coal and natural gas. The statements mean the alarmist IPCC leadership know they are lying and they ignore their own science research because they believe the end justifies foul means.The evidence is shoddy because the hypothesis is unproven and unimaginable - that trace amounts of plant food Co2 at near zero % of the atmosphere could have such a large effect.It is very relevant to upsetting the scare mongering from Al Gore and other alarmists about unprecedented global warming to look at this chart of the human contribution.GREENHOUSE GASES COMPOSITIONHere is a key graph of all Greenhouse gases that shows detailed percentages of where the source of C02 in the atmosphere and human emissions are miniscule at only 0.117%. Human activities contribute slightly to greenhouse gas concentrations through farming, manufacturing, power generation, and transportation. However, these emissions are so dwarfed in comparison to emissions from other natural sources it is foolish to think humans make any difference. Even the most costly efforts to limit human Co2 emissions if they succeeded would have a very small-- undetectable-- effect on global climate.Source: http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossil...It may be a little hard to picture just how minute the fossil fuel emissions across the globe are. Please take 3 minutes to view this helpful Australian Rice video that helped Australia’s public decide to axe the futile carbon tax.AXE THE TAX AUSTRALIA THE RICE VIDEO 85880 32 CO2 1 HUMAN CO2The Rice Video - Carbon Dioxide in perspective by The Galileo MovementIt is hard to imagine, but essential to realize they have no effect on the climate, just how small the Co2 emissions from fossil fuels are. Co2 so small drawn to scale it is invisible.The facts are there are too few molecules The amount of Co2 today at just 400 ppm. Co2 today pales in comparison with the past when there was more than 5000 ppm which is > 10 X as much! [ Remember with breath out we exhale > 35,000ppm of Co2 into the atmosphere.]Here is other evidence is their that the AGW demonizing life giving Co2 plant food is a fiction from deliberate misleading science.More Evidence Atmospheric CO2 is NOT Earth's Temperature Control KnobPaper ReviewedBarral, A., Gomez, B., Fourel, F., Daviero-Gomez, V. and Lécuyer, C. 2017. CO2 and temperature decoupling at the million-year scale during the Cretaceous Greenhouse. Scientific Reports 7: 8310, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-08234-0.Writing as background for their work, Barral et al. (2017) say that "CO2 is considered the main greenhouse gas involved in the current global warming and the primary driver of temperature throughout Earth's history." However, they continue, "the soundness of this relationship across time scales and during different climate states of the Earth remains uncertain." …Indeed, and considering all the many other examples that exist in the peer-reviewed scientific literature of a decoupling of atmospheric CO2 and temperature (see CO2-Temperature Correlations in our Subject Index), there is ample reason to conclude that CO2 is but a bit player among the many factors influencing climate change.http://www.co2science.org/articles/V21/sep/a3.phpA new scientific paper contends the entire foundation of the man-made global-warming theory – the assumption that greenhouse gases warm the atmosphere by trapping heat – is wrong.If confirmed, the study’s findings would crush the entire “climate change” movement to restrict CO2 emissions, the authors assertSome experts contacted by WND criticized the paper, while others advised caution.Still others suggested that the claimed discovery represents a massive leap forward in human understanding – a “new paradigm.”The paper argues that concentrations of CO2 and other supposed “greenhouse gases” in the atmosphere have virtually no effect on the earth’s temperature.They conclude the entire greenhouse gas theory is incorrect.Instead, the earth’s “greenhouse” effect is a function of the sun and atmospheric pressure, which results from gravity and the mass of the atmosphere, rather than the amount of greenhouse gases such as CO2 and water vapor in the atmosphere.The same is true for other planets and moons with a hard surface, the authors contend, pointing to the temperature and atmospheric data of various celestial bodies collected by NASA.So precise is the formula, the authors of the paper told WND, that, by using it, they were able to correctly predict the temperature of other celestial bodies not included in their original analysis.The paperThe paper, published recently in the journal “Environment Pollution and Climate Change,” was written by Ned Nikolov, a Ph.D. in physical science, and Karl Zeller, retired Ph.D. research meteorologist.The prevailing theory on the earth’s temperature is that heat from the sun enters the atmosphere, and then greenhouse gases such as CO2, methane and water vapor trap part of that energy by preventing it from escaping back into space.That theory, which underpins the anthropogenic global-warming hypothesis and the climate models used by the United Nations, was first proposed and developed in the 19th century.However, the experiments on which it was based involved glass boxes that retain heat by preventing the mixing of air inside the box with air outside the box.The truth about global warming is no further than the WND Superstore, where “Climategate,” “The Greatest Hoax,” and more publications are available.The experiment is not analogous to what occurs in the real atmosphere, which does not have walls or a lid, according to Nikolov and Zeller.The new paper, headlined “New Insights on the Physical Nature of the Atmospheric Greenhouse Effect Deduced from an Empirical Planetary Temperature Model,” argues that greenhouse theory is incorrect.“This was not a pre-conceived conclusion, but a result from an objective analysis of vetted NASA observations,” Nikolov told WND.The real mechanisms that control the temperature of the planet, they say, are the sun’s energy and the air pressure of the atmosphere. The same applies to other celestial bodies, according to the scientists behind the paper.To understand the phenomena, the authors used three planets – Venus, Earth and Mars – as well as three natural satellites: the Moon of Earth, Titan of Saturn and Triton of Neptune.They chose the celestial bodies based on three criteria: having a solid surface, representation of a broad range of environments, and the existence of reliable data on temperature, atmospheric composition and air pressure.“Our analysis revealed a poor relationship between global mean annual temperature] and the amount of greenhouse gases in planetary atmospheres across a broad range of environments in the Solar System,” the paper explains.“This is a surprising result from the standpoint of the current Greenhouse theory, which assumes that an atmosphere warms the surface of a planet (or moon) via trapping of radiant heat by certain gases controlling the atmospheric infrared optical depth,” the study continues.image:The paper outlines four possible explanations for those observations, and concludes that the most plausible was that air pressure is responsible for the greenhouse effect on a celestial body.In essence, what is commonly known as the atmospheric “greenhouse” effect is in fact a form of compression heating caused by total air pressure, the authors told WND in a series of e-mails and phone interviews, comparing the mechanics of it to the compression in a diesel engine that ignites the fuel.”And that effect is completely independent of the so-called “greenhouse gases” and the chemical composition of the atmosphere, they added.“Hence, there are no greenhouse gases in reality – as in, gases that can cause warming,” Nikolov said when asked to explain the paper in layman’s terms.“Humans cannot in principle affect the global climate through industrial emissions of CO2, methane and other similar gases or via changes in land use,” he added. “All observed climatic changes have natural causes that are completely outside of human control.”For the first time, Nikolov said, there is now empirical evidence from NASA data that the greenhouse effect of the atmosphere is not caused by the trapping of heat, but by the force of atmospheric pressure.The pressure is the weight of the atmosphere, he added.And the combination of gravity and the mass of the atmosphere explains why the Earth, for example, is warmer than the moon.“The moon receives about the same amount of heat from the sun as Earth, yet it is 90 degrees [Celsius] colder than the Earth, because it has no atmosphere,” Nikolov explained.Source: Study blows ‘greenhouse theory out of the water’ - WNDMany of us in our dotage have the ability to research first hand the sea level rise fear mongering. I recently returned to Waikiki and stood on the same beach from > 50 years ago when I was only 21 and there was obviously no change in the sea coast, or if a a change it was imperceptible as a few mm. just as the photos above from the Sydney harbour over 100 years of history show no change.Sea level rise exaggerations.NASA Confirms Falling Sea Levels For Two Years Amidst Media BlackoutJul 27, 2017 3:25 PMMost media outlets cannot be bothered to report something that dramatically deflates their narrative. So it goes without saying that when NASA confirmed that ocean levels have actually been falling for the past few years, the media would be more than silent.As the global warming narrative quickly unravels, and leftists scramble to throw accusations at those who dare question the false data, the media brushes facts under the rug. Amidst revelations of scientific fraud, data alteration and faked “hockey stick” data models, the fake news media remains suspiciously silent over the fact that NASA now confirms ocean levels have been falling for nearly two years.On a NASA page intended to spread climate alarmism (https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/sea-level/), NASA’s own data reveal that worldwide ocean levels have been falling for nearly two years, dropping from a variation of roughly 87.5mm to below 85mm. This data clearly contradicts the false narrative of rapid, never-ending rising ocean levels that flood continents and drown cities. The narrative is climate alarmists key element of the climate change fear mongering fiction that’s used to scare gullible youth into making Al Gore rich.Global warming alarmists might say this is only a “pause” in the rising ocean levels, and that the long-term trend is clearly in the direction of rising oceans. However, these people wildly exaggerate the degree of ocean level increases to the point of absurdity and have been caught red-handed completely fabricating data to continue scaring the public into supporting a non-issue.Even in a worse case scenario, sea levels will rise only about a foot over the next 100 years. That amount is far short of what climate alarmists would need to create an apocalyptic event based solely on the weather. Looking at current events right now, we’d say that Armageddon would be created by a world war or a global economic collapse.NASA Confirms Falling Sea Levels For Two Years Amidst Media BlackoutSource: NASA Confirms Falling Sea Levels For Two Years Amidst Media BlackoutWhy does the media ignore this most relevant development?I submit the answer is simple - "This data clearly contradicts the false narrative of rapid, never-ending rising ocean levels that flood continents and drown cities. The narrative is climate alarmists key element of the climate change fear mongering fiction that’s used to scare gullible youth into making Al Gore rich.Global warming alarmists might say this is only a “pause” in the rising ocean levels, and that the long-term trend is clearly in the direction of rising oceans. However, these people wildly exaggerate the degree of ocean level increases to the point of absurdity and have been caught red-handed completely fabricating data to continue scaring the public into supporting a non-issue."Source: zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-27/nasa-confirms-falling-sea-levels-two-years-amidst-media-blackout?page=1SEA-LEVEL RISE SANITYDr Judith Curry …“Sea level has been rising for the last ten thousand years, since the last Ice Age…the question is whether sea level rise is accelerating owing to human caused emissions. It doesn’t look like there is any great acceleration, so far, of sea level rise associated with human warming. These predictions of alarming sea level rise depend on massive melting of the big continental glaciers — Greenland and Antarctica. The Antarctic ice sheet is actually growing. Greenland shows large multi-decadal variability. …. There is no evidence so far that humans are increasing sea level rise in any kind of a worrying way.” — Dr. Judith Curry, video interview published 9 August 2017“Observed sea level rise over the last century has averaged about 8 inches, although local values may be substantially more or less based on local vertical land motion, land use, regional ocean circulations and tidal variations.“(Climatism bolds)Source: https://judithcurry.com/2016/02/23/is-sea-level-rise-accelerating/New paper shows sea levels dropped along west coast of North & South America from 1993-2013 [link] …I live in Vancouver on the Western coast of Canada and the closest SLT is Campbell River on Vancouver Island and the data clearly rebuts any theory of accelerating sea rise.Relative Sea Level Trend 822-027 Campbell River, CanadaThe relative sea level trend is -1.64 millimeters/year with a 95% confidenceinterval of +/- 0.72 mm/yr based on monthly mean sea level data from1965 to 2016 which is equivalent to a change of -0.54 feet in 100 years.What about sea levels in Eastern Canada?Relative Sea Level Trend 970-141 Churchill, CanadaThe relative sea level trend is -9.35 millimeters/year with a 95% confidenceinterval of +/- 0.5 mm/yr based on monthly mean sea level data from1940 to 2016 which is equivalent to a change of -3.07 feet in 100 years.Source: NOAA Tides & CurrentsVancouver like other large coastal cities will see no fear from sea levels over the next 100 hundred years as coastal levels are falling not rising! A FORTIORI are the coasts in Eastern Canada. See the data from NOAA Tides and Currents about for Churchill where the polar bears romp around the seas are falling over 3 feet in 100 years!Coastal planning should be based on proven sea level data, by Parker and OllierHighlights:§ The network of tide gauges provides the only information of value for costal planning.§ The worldwide naïve average of sea level is +0.24 mm/year with no acceleration.§ The climate models have crucial flaws making them useless.§ Planning schemes must only reflect the proven local and global historical data.JC reflectionsThe multivariate ENSO index, abbreviated as MEI, is a method used to characterize the intensity of an El Niño Southern Oscillation event.WikipediaIs sea level rise accelerating?“Chart indicates deceleration.”Further still, humans build lots of impermeable surfaces. That means that some rainfall that would otherwise seep into groundwater is now running off into the oceans instead.Sea level is rising, but not very much and exaggerating it represents confirming the bias of expectNASA has confirmed that sea levels have been falling for the past two years.https://judithcurry.com/2016/02/23/is-sea-level-rise-accelerating/New paper shows sea levels dropped along west coast of North & South America from 1993-2013 [link] …Coastal planning should be based on proven sea level data, by Parker and OllierHighlights:§The network of tide gauges provides the only information of value for costal planning.§The worldwide naïve average of sea level is +0.24 mm/year with no acceleration.§The climate models have crucial flaws making them useless.§Planning schemes must only reflect the proven local and global historical data.JC reflectionsThe multivariate ENSO index, abbreviated as MEI, is a method used to characterize the intensity of an El Niño Southern Oscillation event.WikipediaIs sea level rise accelerating?“Chart indicates deceleration.”Further still, humans build lots of impermeable surfaces. That means that some rainfall that would otherwise seep into groundwater is now running off into the oceans instead.Sea level is rising, but not very much and exaggerating it represents confirmation bias.https://curryja.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/document.pdfWhat other evidence of the UN climate farce?Glaciers are expanding and not melting as predicted.Islands are not sinking but growing not as predicted.Massive snow fall and bitter cold winters everywhere, not moderate with snow as the IPCC predicted in its 2001 Report.There is much more.