Colour Work Agreement Definition: Fill & Download for Free

I did this as a piece of what we could call “art” i use it for exhibitions, i hope it helps a little.What is Art?“The Human Agreement”Definition: Under the Human Agreement it says that Art is based on the hierarchy system set up by groups in individual tribal societies around the planet. These tribal societies create their own cultures, which, in turn, produce Artists who create Art based on the cultures around them. It is the Human Agreement that decides what qualifies as Art.Gatekeepers, Curators, Privileged-Space Owners, Governments, and Imperial Empires, as well as individual Humans with high influence and power, who have leading insight into the Man-made Creative industries, derive an ideology based on social economics or capitalism, which defines wealth in its many forms as the success of being human (subjective). In non-developed countries the principle behind this ideology is still the same,but it is unofficially regulated by First World Nations. [Note: The struggle for life, or existence itself, makes those countries unable to relate to Art in the same way as the Developed Nations would. The Human Agreement does not take into account the differences between these cultures, but only how the Artists respond to the reality around them regardless of colour, creed, status or regard for life.]The rest What is an Artist , the whole list you can see online: lordblackart United Arts Confederation, i didn’t want to make it sound like a plug or promo

Definitely not - and for many reasons.They are no longer involved in the work of the RF - their choice. The Queen made it perfectly plain they cannot pick and choose what events they want to attend and be involved in. If they don’t want to be part of the RF, fine - but Harry is not the prodigal son, so she made it known he won’t be welcomed and restored to his old role within the family unless he returns to live in the UK and resumes his responsibilities.If Meghan were to join the family on the balcony at Buckingham Palace, I believe there would be a chorus of boos from the crowd. While aimed at Meghan, it would appear as if the whole of the RF were being boo’d - and you can imagine the headlines going around the world!Meghan is a loose cannon and cannot be trusted. In spite of their promises to do nothing to bring the RF into disrepute, nor sign any contracts without their knowledge and agreement, she has continued on her own, sweet way doing exactly what she wants.The RF are disappointed they have signed with Netflix mainly, of course, because of The Crown - but also because the pair didn’t let the RF lawyers have oversight as to what they have agreed to. Same with Spotify.Meghan tries to upstage the RF at every opportunity, coming out with her own ‘news’ every time there is a royal event in the hope she can overshadow anything they do.And, of course, all the above depends on whether Meghan ever sets foot in the UK again.Because of the way in which she has behaved, I can’t imagine she will be warmly welcomed by any member of the RF - who will all be wary of her and questioning her motives.She is known to record conversations on her phone; she is also known to take photos, uninvited. Who would risk giving her grist to that particular mill? She could then, with that additional information, go back to California and add to her list of goodies and bait for Netflix.But, of course, I could be wildly mistaken and everyone will be so happy to see them both, blissfully happy together and living such a wonderful life in California, that all will be forgiven and they join the RF in all public events!!We will definitely know on June 12th - but we may well have some idea before the 31st March deadline when the result of their review is known!And I believe it is next week that the judge decides whether to award Meghan a Summary Judgement to her case - or if the case is to be held on the postponed date in October.I wonder what the ‘announcement’ was going to be that enabled Meghan to persuade the judge to put the trial back in the first place? We have heard nothing from her, yet we were told we would know in January! Perhaps that, too, will be unveiled next week!

‘When the war reporter Sean Langan was leaving for Afghanistan in 2008, he left his bosses with a strange request: “If I get kidnapped, don’t let my friend Toby Young try to help me. If he can alienate liberal people in London, God forbid if he starts talking about towelheads and Islamic nutcases. I’ll get beheaded.”It was prescient. Langan was kidnapped by the Taliban and when Channel 4 convened to discuss a rescue plan, Young showed up proposing he fly immediately to Kabul and spearhead negotiations.Impulsive, ambitious, vain and generous, the gesture, which was firmly rebuffed, was Young to a T. Langan was eventually freed after three months with the help of professional negotiators’ - Toby Young: social media self-obsessive still battling with father's shadowNo idea.In retrospect, it was an incredibly cunning move to define Brexit so recursively. The meaning of Brexit is entirely independent of the actual negotiations, as what Brexit is, is whatever Brexit will be, at the end of the Article 50 period. Who among us can doubt that, in retrospect, a Brexit that means Brexit, will be delivered, come what May?As Michael Gove once said, whilst cramming through a load of educational reform that changed national examinations for students who were half-way through studying for the old ones: ‘Coherence comes at the end of the process’.Or in the words of Mark Zuckerburg, when talking about Facebook rather than the governance of a country: ‘Move fast and break things.’Barack Obama might have made a convincing argument that Governments cannot, and should not, be run as if they were a Silicon Valley tech firm …‘But the reason I say this is sometimes we get … the sense of we just have to blow up the system, or create this parallel society and culture because government is inherently wrecked. No, it’s not inherently wrecked; it’s just government has to care for, for example, veterans who come home. That’s not on your balance sheet, that’s on our collective balance sheet, because we have a sacred duty to take care of those veterans. And that’s hard and it’s messy, and we’re building up legacy systems that we can’t just blow up’ - President Obama explains why you can’t run the U.S. like a startup… were it not for Boris Johnson’s column about Obama in The Sun …‘Some said it [ the removal of a bust of Churchill from the Oval Office] was a symbol of the part-Kenyan President’s ancestral dislike of the British empire – of which Churchill had been such a fervent defender’ - Boris Johnson: UK and America can be better friends than ever Mr Obama... if we LEAVE the EU… so we can cheerfully disregard Mr Obama as biased, and Move Fast and Break Things, it is.Given that Brexit means Brexit, and that Theresa May is currently in charge of the Brexit negotiations, we could look at her speeches to try to get a vague idea of vaguely what Brexit might mean, when we finally get round to defining it after we already have one. This will give us a vague idea of how the negotiations are going. Vague being, of course, entirely subject to change, as, indeed, is the identity of the UK Prime Minister before this Brexit thing is done.It is December 2016, and Theresa May puts on record the colour of Brexit we want from the UK-EU negotiations:‘People talk about the sort of Brexit that there is going to be – is it hard or soft, is it grey or white. Actually we want a red, white and blue Brexit: that is the right Brexit for the UK, the right deal for the UK’ - May: We want a red, white and blue BrexitNothing is agreed until everything is agreed, so Brexit could well end up lilac, which would indicate that the Government had done a cracking job with the negotiations. We just haven’t got round to colouring Brexit in yet, and we’re not sure who will be doing the colouring in, but we cannot discount that any successor, who nicks the pencil case from her, might have a particular loathing of the lighter shades of purple.It’s hard to tell how far we are down The Road to a Lilac Brexit.Colour matching aside, we might look at how the negotiations are going, as compared to the objectives stated by Theresa May in her Lancaster House speech of January 2017.Here are some highlights:‘I recognise how important it is to provide business, the public sector, and everybody with as much certainty as possible as we move through the process’‘The same rules and laws will apply on the day after Brexit as they did before. And it will be for the British Parliament to decide on any changes to that law after full scrutiny and proper Parliamentary debate’‘Foreign affairs are of course the responsibility of the UK government, and in dealing with them we act in the interests of all parts of the United Kingdom’‘I should equally be clear that no decisions currently taken by the devolved administrations will be removed from them’‘We cannot forget that, as we leave, the United Kingdom will share a land border with the EU … Nobody wants to return to the borders of the past, so we will make it a priority to deliver a practical solution as soon as we can’‘ … as a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the European Union’‘ … the purpose is clear: we will seek to avoid a disruptive cliff-edge, and we will do everything we can to phase in the new arrangements we require as Britain and the EU move towards our new partnership’‘There may be some specific European programmes in which we might want to participate. If so, and this will be for us to decide, it is reasonable that we should make an appropriate contribution’ - The government's negotiating objectives for exiting the EU: PM speechOffered with no comment.‘The victors have the responsibility to act magnanimously. The losers have the responsibility to respect the legitimacy of the outcome. And the country comes together’ - The government's negotiating objectives for exiting the EU: PM speechThat’s not going particularly well, either.British people are no different to how they ever were. The same people who volunteered for the London Olympics in 2012, and kept the details of the Opening Ceremony to themselves, simply because the director Danny Boyle asked them to, and he trusted them to do it, which they did. The same people, who post-Referendum, turned out to celebrate the wedding of Prince Harry to Meghan Markle in all sincerity, and were actually really pleased for them.Yet, our Government, our politicans, our media, continue to refer to leavers and remainers. The remoaners and brexshitters. Winning and losing, when we are two years down the line. We are being told stories about each other that are not true. The very people, including Theresa May, who talked about the negotiations in terms of the country coming together, are the same ones that are sabotaging any progress, whilst they play at Doing A Brexit.To shake the Brexit Magic 8-Ball to see how the negotiations are going, is to see all 20 possible responses all at once:Magic 8-Ball - WikipediaTo ask it whether Theresa May will be the one still shaking it over the next nine months is to see all 20 possible responses all at once. To ask any single question about any aspect of Brexit, deal or no deal, the Irish border, a cliff edge, customs arrangements, the length of any transition period, is to see all 20 possible responses at once.Should Theresa May make it through right to the bitter end, we can, in retrospect, consider how the Government was doing in negotiating the Brexit they already did.Amongst all the vague is one definite statement - ‘we want a red, white and blue Brexit’ - so if Brexit approximates to #c8a2c8, we will know the Government has done well.If she doesn’t, then we’re looking at anything from a last-minute attempt to do an Opium War - where we leave without a deal, then cunningly steal the EU’s tea and plant in it one of our colonies - to a staying in the Single Market/CU-type BINO. It all depends upon who in House Conservative wins the Game of Thrones, and what their favourite colour is: they have to argue over who gets the most comfie chair before worrying about painting the living room. Which we will all have to live with.Rest assured though, that, whatever interior decoration choice is made, it will be‘ … the right [colour] for the United Kingdom, what is going to be the right [colour] for the UK with the European Union once we’ve left. That’s what we’re about, that’s what we’ll be working on’ - Amanda Harris's answer to What is a "red, white and blue" Brexit?It could be‘… red and yellow and green and brown / And scarlet and black and ocher and peach / And ruby and olive and violet and fawn / And lilac and gold and chocolate and mauve / And cream and crimson and silver and rose / And azure and lemon and russet and/ grey / And purple and white and pink and orange / And red and yellow and green and brown / Scarlet and black and ocher and peach / And ruby and olive and violet and / fawn / And lilac and gold and chocolate and mauve / And cream and crimson / and silver and rose / And azure and lemon and russet and grey / And purple and white and / pink and orange / And blue’ - Joseph's Coat LyricsNot that it matters.Because Brexit means Brexit means Brexit means Brexit.Where the colour it ends up is the colour it was supposed to be, and always was.We are looking for a Brexit coloured Brexit, so if we pull that one off, then we’ll know the negotiations went well. It’s simple logic, really.