Notice Of Appeal - Utah Courts: Fill & Download for Free

Original question:If a President that was not born in the US wins the election what will be the response of the Supreme Court?The Constitution allows that only a “natural born citizen” can be POTUS.The true meaning of that clause has been thoroughly analyzed, and the consensus is that being born on foreign soil is no impediment to assuming the office of POTUS.John McCain’s birth in the Panama Canal — a U.S. territory — was raised as a potential issue in 2008, and ultimately mooted.Ted Cruz however was not born on U.S. soil, i.e., Canada, and Donald Trump noticed.A flurry of filings ensued.Booth v Cruz, No. 15-cv-518-PB, New Hampshire on. Jan. 20, 2016; Liberace v Martin, No. 4:16-cv-57-BSM, Arkansas, Feb. 29, 2016; Green v Cruz, No. 5:16-cv-207, Alabama on Feb. 3, 2016; Schwartz v Cruz, No. 4:16-cv-106, Texas on Feb. 3, 2016.On Jan. 22, 2016, a Utah lawyer filed Walter Wagner v Rafael Edward Cruz, challenging Ted Cruz’s eligibility for the Presidency.The Utah judge threw Wagner’s case out based on lack of standing: Plaintiff Wagner suffered no “injury in fact” by the Canada-born Cruz’s pursuit of the highest office in the land. The court noted on page 4, however, that Art. II of the Constitution, Section 1 clause 4 indeed requires POTUS to be a “natural born citizen”.But the Harvard Law Review studied this controversy in 2015, “On the Meaning of ‘Natural Born Citizen’ ” by Paul Clement and Neal Katyal. They wrote:The Constitution limits the presidency to “a natural born Citizen.”All the sources routinely used to interpret the Constitution confirm that the phrase “natural born Citizen” has a specific meaning: namely, someone who was a U.S. citizen at birth with no need to go through a naturalization proceeding at some later time.Clement and Katyal insist there is no doubt as to the meaning of natural born Citizen:Congress has made equally clear from the time of the framing of the Constitution to the current day that, subject to certain residency requirements on the parents, someone born to a U.S. citizen parent generally becomes a U.S. citizen without regard to whether the birth takes place in Canada, the Canal Zone, or the continental United States.With certain exceptions,The Naturalization Act of 1790 provided that “the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens.According to them, Ted Cruz was perfectly eligible to be POTUS.The Wagner case in Utah was dismissed. So Mr. Wagner filed an appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court. SCOTUS declined review in May.A natural born U.S. Citizen can be born anywhere.Neal Katyal and Paul Clement get it. But there are still a lot of people out there who don’t.

I don’t know if Missouri has statutes like these that apply in Utah, but you may want to be aware of this Utah statute as you look for similar provisions in Missouri:78B-5-202. Duration of judgment -- Judgment as a lien upon real property -- Abstract of judgment -- Small claims judgment not a lien -- Appeal of judgment -- Child support orders.(1) Judgments shall continue for eight years from the date of entry in a court unless previously satisfied or unless enforcement of the judgment is stayed in accordance with law.(2) Prior to July 1, 1997, except as limited by Subsections (4) and (5), the entry of judgment by a district court creates a lien upon the real property of the judgment debtor, not exempt from execution, owned or acquired during the existence of the judgment, located in the county in which the judgment is entered.(3) An abstract of judgment issued by the court in which the judgment is entered may be filed in any court of this state and shall have the same force and effect as a judgment entered in that court.(4) Prior to July 1, 1997, and after May 15, 1998, a judgment entered in the small claims division of any court may not qualify as a lien upon real property unless abstracted to the civil division of the district court and recorded in accordance with Subsection (3).(5)(a) If any judgment is appealed, upon deposit with the court where the notice of appeal is filed of cash or other security in a form and amount considered sufficient by the court that rendered the judgment to secure the full amount of the judgment, together with ongoing interest and any other anticipated damages or costs, including attorney fees and costs on appeal, the lien created by the judgment shall be terminated as provided in Subsection (5)(b).(b) Upon the deposit of sufficient security as provided in Subsection (5)(a), the court shall enter an order terminating the lien created by the judgment and granting the judgment creditor a perfected lien in the deposited security as of the date of the original judgment.(6)(a) A child support order or a sum certain judgment for past due support may be enforced:(i) within four years after the date the youngest child reaches majority; or(ii) eight years from the date of entry of the sum certain judgment entered by a tribunal.(b) The longer period of duration shall apply in every order.And here’s another code section that may be of interest:15-2-1. Period of minority.The period of minority extends in males and females to the age of 18 years; but all minors obtain their majority by marriage. It is further provided that courts in divorce actions may order support to age 21.

Original question: What is the most likely significance of the tagline The greatest Snow on Earth?I would say there are two significances.The Ringling corporation sued Utah regarding the tagline (see Part I below).The tagline is on the State of Utah license plate which features the first live human and first woman ever to be featured on a United States license plate (see Part II below).I have hyperlinked the sources.Part IThe Ringling corporation sued Utah regarding the tagline:RINGLING BROS.-BARNUM & BAILEY COMBINED SHOWS, INC., Plaintiff, v. UTAH DIVISION OF TRAVEL DEVELOPMENT, Defendant. Civil Action No. 96-788-A. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division.February 27, 1997.This is a trademark dilution suit in which plaintiff, Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. ("Ringling") contends that the use of the mark THE GREATEST SNOW ON EARTH by defendant, Utah Division of Travel Development ("Utah"), has diluted Ringling's famous mark, THE GREATEST SHOW ON EARTH, in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c).Merits of the suit:The State of Utah used the slogan THE GREATEST SNOW ON EARTH as early as 1962 to advertise its winter skiing facilities.Prior to the time that Utah adopted the mark THE GREATEST SNOW ON EARTH, Ringling advertised and promoted its mark in Utah in connection with the Circus.Ringling was a Delaware corporation, and its principal place of business was in Vienna, Virginia. Since the 1870's Ringling and its predecessors in interest have used and been associated with the mark THE GREATEST SHOW ON EARTH.Ringling was the owner of the service mark THE GREATEST SHOW ON EARTH which bore United States Registration No. 724,946. This trademark issued on December 5, 1961, for entertainment services in the nature of a circus. Ringling went defunct on May 21, 2017.The Utah Attorney General issued a legal opinion in 1965 concluding that the mark "Utah for the Greatest Snow on Earth" does not impair or violate Ringling's mark THE GREATEST SHOW ON EARTH.Utah registered its mark with the State of Utah in 1975, renewed its registration in 1985 and 1995, and its registration is current.Utah submitted an application to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to register its mark THE GREATEST SNOW ON EARTH in 1988. Ringling filed a formal opposition to Utah's right to register its mark. A three-member panel of the U.S. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board rendered a unanimous 16-page decision on December 13, 1995, granting Utah the right to register its mark and dismissing Ringling's opposition. This decision specifically states that dilution is not a valid basis for opposing a trademark application. Ringling filed a notice of appeal of the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, but later voluntarily dismissed its appeal. Utah was granted federal registration for its mark THE GREATEST SNOW ON EARTH on January 21, 1997.Part IIThe Utah 'Ski' license plate was first instituted in 1985. The ski plate features the majestic Wasatch Mountains with the figure of a skier in front of them. The skier is Utah resident and three-time Olympian, Heidi Voelker. Voelker's image will be both the first live human and first woman ever to be featured on a United States license plate. "I have been anticipating the launch of this plate for a long time," said Voelker, "I can't wait to stop at a red light and notice that I am the skier on the plate in front of me." Voelker also commented that she plans on buying a new vehicle in the spring and will definitely get the new ski plate at that time.