Affidavit For Change In Appearance Sample: Fill & Download for Free

GET FORM

Download the form

How to Edit The Affidavit For Change In Appearance Sample freely Online

Start on editing, signing and sharing your Affidavit For Change In Appearance Sample online refering to these easy steps:

  • Click on the Get Form or Get Form Now button on the current page to make your way to the PDF editor.
  • Give it a little time before the Affidavit For Change In Appearance Sample is loaded
  • Use the tools in the top toolbar to edit the file, and the change will be saved automatically
  • Download your edited file.
Get Form

Download the form

The best-reviewed Tool to Edit and Sign the Affidavit For Change In Appearance Sample

Start editing a Affidavit For Change In Appearance Sample now

Get Form

Download the form

A simple guide on editing Affidavit For Change In Appearance Sample Online

It has become quite easy presently to edit your PDF files online, and CocoDoc is the best web app you have ever used to make a lot of changes to your file and save it. Follow our simple tutorial to start!

  • Click the Get Form or Get Form Now button on the current page to start modifying your PDF
  • Create or modify your content using the editing tools on the top toolbar.
  • Affter changing your content, put the date on and make a signature to finish it.
  • Go over it agian your form before you click the download button

How to add a signature on your Affidavit For Change In Appearance Sample

Though most people are accustomed to signing paper documents with a pen, electronic signatures are becoming more common, follow these steps to eSign PDF!

  • Click the Get Form or Get Form Now button to begin editing on Affidavit For Change In Appearance Sample in CocoDoc PDF editor.
  • Click on Sign in the tools pane on the top
  • A popup will open, click Add new signature button and you'll be given three options—Type, Draw, and Upload. Once you're done, click the Save button.
  • Drag, resize and position the signature inside your PDF file

How to add a textbox on your Affidavit For Change In Appearance Sample

If you have the need to add a text box on your PDF in order to customize your special content, do the following steps to carry it throuth.

  • Open the PDF file in CocoDoc PDF editor.
  • Click Text Box on the top toolbar and move your mouse to drag it wherever you want to put it.
  • Write down the text you need to insert. After you’ve typed in the text, you can actively use the text editing tools to resize, color or bold the text.
  • When you're done, click OK to save it. If you’re not satisfied with the text, click on the trash can icon to delete it and start again.

A simple guide to Edit Your Affidavit For Change In Appearance Sample on G Suite

If you are finding a solution for PDF editing on G suite, CocoDoc PDF editor is a commendable tool that can be used directly from Google Drive to create or edit files.

  • Find CocoDoc PDF editor and set up the add-on for google drive.
  • Right-click on a PDF file in your Google Drive and choose Open With.
  • Select CocoDoc PDF on the popup list to open your file with and give CocoDoc access to your google account.
  • Edit PDF documents, adding text, images, editing existing text, annotate with highlight, retouch on the text up in CocoDoc PDF editor and click the Download button.

PDF Editor FAQ

Is it true that they found no voting fraud in the investigation? Does that mean Donald Trump was wrong?

Anybody still telling you that they found no evidence of election fraud in the 2020 election is lying to you. Trump is wrong about a lot of things but not this.There is plenty of room for reasonable people to engage in healthy debate on this topic, but anybody saying no fraud took place at all is out of touch with reality. I can blame a historically dishonest media to an extent, but you don’t need to look hard to find the overwhelming evidence that extensive fraud took place.I’m going to try to refrain from using the term “widespread” fraud, because it really was not spread all over the country. In most precincts, Trump’s numbers were at or better than his Republican counterparts downballot. The fraud is isolated to just 8 specific counties in 6 different disputed states.It is also specific as to timelines, as Trump was winning even in those states handily at the end of election day, when suddenly multiple states with Trump well ahead did something they never do: They stopped counting for the night - or they claimed to be stopping. Even in these unique areas Biden only outperformed Trump for a matter of an hour or less, in the middle of the night when few, if any, challengers were around to see it. In those brief moments, Biden suddenly gained tens of thousands of votes as Trump suddenly got none at all or close to none.In those 8 counties for that short time period, statistical insanity is found everywhere, yet not seen anywhere else in the country. Turnout that usually hovers around 15% or so was over 85% to 130% (impossible without fraud) in those counties. Electronic rejection rates were huge, but manual rejection rates suddenly dropped from the usual 5–6% to well less than 1%, despite a high number of mail-ins. Biden got hundreds and even thousands of consecutive votes with no Trump votes or even any downballot votes at all.Statistical anomalies and processing ballots with no poll watchers around are both reasons to investigate VERY closely. Yet neither of these is a reason to change the results of the election without further evidence or a recount of differing results. Despite desperate efforts by cheating election officials in those locations to prevent oversight or investigations and destroy evidence, enormous amounts of evidence has still managed to emerge.Over 7 THOUSAND concerned citizens of all political parties have come forward to testify under oath on affidavits under penalty of perjury. We usually get numbers in the dozens as we did see in other states. Voting logs corroborate this testimony remarkably well, as does, in some case, video evidence. Video from security cameras shows poll workers completing fake ballots as straight Democrat tickets, ballot after ballot, with no oversight and no damaged ballots being copied.GEORGIAVideo evidence in Georgia shows election supervisor Shaye Moss telling the counters, poll watchers and press that it is time to leave since they are shutting down for the night. All stop working and all except 6 workers pack up their belongings and leave. As soon as all eyes are gone, Ms. Moss pulls 4 hidden suitcases full of ballots from under a table she had hauled in many hours earlier. As 4 of the workers start processing the ballots illegally with no GOP challengers left, we can literally watch one poll worker, Ruby Freeman, Moss’ mother, running stacks of ballots through over and over again. Corrupt election official Gabriel Sterling amazingly claimed that what was on the video was “normal” before Freeman’s Instagram video emerged with her bragging about intentionally cheating as she did it.Freeman was arrested, {EDIT: They never did arrest Freeman apparently}, but her cheating was not corrected for one very simple reason: It affects enough votes to give Georgia back to Trump. The only reason we can not say with certainty that Trump won Georgia is because there are enough other problems in Georgia that we really can’t know who won it. Recounts were done, which found thousands of ballots, mostly for Trump, not counted on boxes of ballots and on USB drives. Eyewitnesses complained that few counters were actually counting ballots in the recount, so it was apparently useless. GA Governor Brian Kemp demanded a signature verification check, but election officials refused. The state won’t even get rid of Shaye Moss, Gabriel Sterling or Ruby Freeman to get them out of the January 5th Senate runoff elections, so most people aren’t voting.Eyewitnesses complained that thousands of ballots had the same white “eclipse” in their oval, indicating that the ballots were all Xerox copies of each other. This could explain why 96,600 ballots in GA had no mail-in requests, which is supposed to, by law, invalidate them as fakes. An important note is that ballots come 600 to a box, so exact multiples of 600 are considered an indication of fraud. The 96.600 number was exact, not approximate, just as the 173,400 ballots with no registrant in MI. Of course, the Georgians refuse to seek out these ballots even though GOP poll challengers wrote down the ballot box headers to make it easy to identify. Correcting this obvious fraud would also give the state to Trump, even if you allow the ballot stuffing.As the only one of the 6 disputed states with a Republican Governor, GA was actually the MOST responsive to requests to clean up the mess. The other states were far worse. Georgia’s recount was also rife with complaints, as observers saw counters who didn’t really try that hard to pretend they were counting. Wisconsin did allow a recount but only in 4 counties. Michigan only did a recount in ONE county and that was Antrim County, where they already knew thousands of Trump votes were electronically changed to Biden votes, flipping the county from Trump to Biden.EDIT: As an update, the GA Legislature authorized a deeper investigation, including an examination of randomly selected ballots, a live examination of the January 5th Senate runoff elections and an expert review of voting logs. This was the result:The ballot audit found:Numerous fake ballots, known to be fake due to not having creases despite supposedly being mailed and with printer toner filling in Biden ovals and Biden ovals only.It also found that ballots in primarily Republican counties had a printed alteration to the hashmarks, which forced the ballots to be sent to adjudication. This explains why some counties had a 100% adjudication rate, which allowed a manual change to the vote.A video emerged of disposal bins filled with ballots and other election documents being shredded by A-1 Shredding Company. All ballots and all documents related to an election, even spoiled ballots or duplicate ballots, are supposed to be saved for 22 months by federal law. The GA Bureau of Investigations determined that the shreds did indeed include ballots being destroyed.The Senate runoff audit found:Jovan Pulitzer, in the presence of shocked GA Legislators, hacked into the GA electoral system, proving that it was on the internet and that it was easily hackable.Other hackers were online as well, including one from China.The voting log audit found:That there were numerous examples of Trump LOSING votes in small decrements. There is no explanation for total votes for any candidate to go down instead of up or maybe staying the same. This is a feature of Dominion voting systems used for cheating.Altogether, the entire state of Georgia had a 94% adjudication rate, whereas the normal percentage is less than one percent.During the hours that the poll counting was supposed to be shut down for the night and no poll watchers were there, a total of about 40k votes were tabulated, even though the 4 cases of ballots counted could only hold a maximum of 24k votes. This was not news since we already saw the poll workers on video running through the ballots multiple times, but now we know how many votes were added fraudulently that hour in GA,In one incident in Bibb County, about 12k votes were suddenly subtracted from Trump (remember he only “lost” by 10k votes). At the same exact time, Biden’s totals were raised by the EXACT same number.MICHIGANHow could a voting system be so flawed that it actually takes legally cast votes and changes them to the opponent of the person voted for?The first reason given for the 6k vote swing in Antrim County MI, an 18k vote county, was that it was a random “computer glitch”. The incident is still called “the glitch”. We were just really lucky that one alert poll worker who lived in Antrim County knew it couldn’t be right.The revised excuse, once they realized that a computer glitch would necessitate a full-state recount, was that it was a “clerical error”. This became an uncomfortable answer after Michigan also got caught adding 138000 votes all at once for Biden. This was called a “typo” and it was corrected, but then replaced with an even larger total of fake votes.The next story was a software problem, as supposedly the Dominion machine was on the wrong software update, so it was set to automatically transfer votes from one candidate to another at a high rate. This answer came from the MI Secretary of State Benson. Left unclear is why we are using a system that swaps votes at all, let alone as a default setting.Dominion Voting Systems rejected this answer and claimed that the election was secure and accurate, thus the hand count must be wrong but the computer system has no problem at all.A MI Trump supporter won a court case for a forensic analysis of Antrim County Dominion machines. (This was not a single machine, which also rendered the above explanations hard to accept.) An Internet Security agency led by Richard Ramsland determined that the Dominion Voting System was used to intentionally defraud the election results. The paid experts found other disturbing problems:They found a troubling 68% of the ballots were rejected by the voting machine and sent to a folder for electronic adjudication. This means that 68% of the votes were manually determined by a clerk with nobody double-checking. {EDIT: It is now considered likely that a foreign hacker, not a local clerk, switched the votes.} The maximum allowed rejection rate is 0.0008% so the 68% rate is hundreds of thousands of times higher than allowed for unchecked human manipulation of adjudicated ballots.To be clear, the experts used the word “intentional” because not only is the programming designed to cause perfectly good ballots to be sent to adjudication based on quota settings, but an actual human was seeing votes for Trump and clicking “Biden” and “complete” thousands of times. This can only be done by cheating. Other experts determined that the Detroit TFC voting system was connected to the internet, so the cheating could have been done from another country.Voting logs were missing from the entire 2020 election until November 5th, including on election day when the big vote swap happened, yet all logs for previous elections were intact. Fortunately the Security Logs would tell us who deleted the Voting Logs.Except the Security Logs were also missing. Plus, there was a successful hack of the system on November 21st.The researchers also warned that the same conditions are probably present in more counties, since the majority of the 87 counties of Michigan have the same software. The Smartmatic software is in most states and in all of the disputed states.Ousted DHS cybersecurity leader Krebs testified before the Senate HS Committee that the voting systems were indeed on the internet, which is illegal. He had some vague derogatory statements regarding the forensic analysis, but rather than contest any of it, just put a more positive spin on the findings.Election Officials could not refute that Voting Logs were missing, since they were unable to provide them, but they deny doing the deleting. Essentially, the MI Election Officials have clammed up and are fighting transparency and investigations, asking to delete evidence with no explanations. They had a similar issue on a downballot election in which the wrong winner was announced and they had to tell the guy who they said lost that he actually won.Detroit is the place where they placed cardboard over the windows to avoid being seen although it is supposed to be observed by law. Eyewitnesses attest to GOP poll challengers being systematically pushed out as Democrat partisans literally cheered the illegal cover-up. Still, many poll challengers came forward that were Independents, honest Democrats or GOP challengers who were of color but without badges. They asserted that, late at night after they thought all Republicans were gone, thousands of ballots came in through the back door from vans with out-of-state vans (which raises further chain-of-custody issues). Suddenly virtually all ballots were for Biden, with no Trump votes whatsoever. Other oddities emerged on these ballots:They were pristine, with no creases, despite supposedly having been mailed.The ID numbers on the ballots were numerically consecutive, which would be impossible with ballots actually returned by mail.The ballots all selected Biden only, with no down-ballots at all.The ovals filled in for Biden appeared to be perfect computer generated printer toner, not irregular ball point pen as is required.None of the ballots had an actual registrant, so the registrant was listed as “0” (zero).All of the ballots had the same or very similar signatures in any given box of 600 ballots, with little variety for length of names.All of the ballots used the same address on Goddard Street in Detroit, and a birth date of 1/1/1900, even though no known living person is that age.Some poll workers, shocked at these sudden oddities looked around to see that all other tables were experiencing the exact same thing. There does appear to have been at least one table with regular ballots mixed in the time frame, but altogether the votes in that period of time were 97% Biden.Although any such votes without a voter are supposed to be thrown out automatically, anyone raising an objection was told to submit the ballots to the tabulators as no objections would be considered.These affidavits not only confirmed each other, but voting logs showed that at around that time 173,400 ballots were suddenly entered with registrants listed as “0”. Election officials claim that they are using the birth date 1/1/1900 as a placeholder until they can get the actual information, but with no name or address, the only way they could contact a voter would be to go find people randomly off of voter registration lists.By all legal precedent and common sense, these 173,400 fake ballots should be discarded. So why aren’t they thrown out? Because the separation from Trump to Biden is only 154k, to correct this blatant fraud would require flipping the state to Trump, so the Democrat Governor refuses to give up her state.The Board of Canvassers refused to certify the results, noting that the added fake ballots create an “imbalance”, which means there are more votes than voters. The two Democrats certified but the two Republicans refused. They finally agreed to certify only on the promise to investigate the matter further. Yet when they saw only more desperate cover-ups they tried to rescind their certification, so the matter went to court. One of the two GOP canvassers agreed under pressure to certify but the other never did certify, so they considered their state certified anyway.ARIZONAA Democrat whistleblower came forward amid death threats to admit that he was a part of a successful election meddling in which 35k votes were added to every Democrat candidate in Pima County. Voting logs verify his numbers.Although most elections have just a few voters selected “U” for gender, usually numbers in single digits or none at all in the whole state, this election there were 130k voters who selected “U” for gender. These were remarkably all Biden voters and had a perfect bell curve for downballot candidates. These, too, are almost certainly fake ballots, plenty enough to flip the state to Trump, as would be the 35k from admittedly manually added votes.EDIT: Currently, the Arizona Legislature is in a heated battle with local Maricopa County election officials to try to examine the evidence to either confirm or deny the extensive allegations. Why on earth they would try to hide OUR voting systems and ballots from us is a mystery. Why is this even a fight?They allowed investigators to audit 100 randomly picked ballots, with the agreement being that if there was 2% of the ballots (2 ballots) then they would allow further investigation. There were exactly 2 with a problem, but further examination has not been allowed. FYI, 2% easily flips the state to Trump.An Arizonan organization called Election Integrity Group has been canvassing voters off of the voter registration logs. Literally every volunteer has found that roughly one out of 5 voters registered in Maricopa County is not an actual person living at the listed address, including many cases where the address does not even exist as a residence.Arizona was “won” by just over 10k votes.NEVADAAmong well over a hundred thousand invalid votes are 42 thousand voters who voting logs show voted more than once. Since most of these were in Democrat heavy Las Vegas, merely correcting one vote - one voter would flip Nevada to Trump.All in all, we could ignore vast amounts of allegations and software and mail-in problems and merely restrict all voters who appear as voting more than once and reduce them down to one vote only per voter, which everyone SHOULD agree to do. Yet to do so would turn NV, GA, MI, WI, PA and AZ all back to Trump who legitimately won the election.And I haven’t even gotten to the worst state for cheating by far: Pennsylvania.EDIT: I am getting a lot of pushback from people who say they haven’t seen evidence, most of whom want to talk about “court cases” where supposedly Trump lost based on lack of evidence. The Constitution clearly puts the burden on the LEGISLATURE, and NOT THE COURTS to determine election fraud, which is why none of the evidence has ever been seen in a courtroom. However, there is almost too much evidence amply provided to the Legislatures, both state and federal, as per the Constitution.If any so-called news source is talking to you about court cases or saying there is no evidence, then they are trying to deceive you.Accordingly, here is a sampling of some video recordings of some of the many many hours of Legislative Hearings that attempted to hear all of the evidence. Watch them when you have the time to sit and listen as they are mostly several hours long with each eyewitness being allowed typically 3 minutes. Expert witnesses get more time.WATCH: Republican senators push baseless claims of widespread voter fraud in election security hearing | PBS NewsHourWatch: Arizona State Legislature Holds Public Hearing on 2020 Election With Giuliani | Video | RealClearPoliticsShocking Highlights of 12/30/2020 Georgia Senate Hearings on Election "Irregularities" (AKA, Scam) - Bing videoGA State Senate Hearings on 2020 Presidential Election Fraud. - Bing videoREPLAY IT AGAIN: LIVE: Michigan Senate Committee holds hearing on election issues (Dec.1) | NTD - Bing videoREPLAY IT AGAIN: LIVE: Michigan Senate Committee holds hearing on election issues (Dec.1) | NTD - Bing videoCampaign 2020-Pennsylvania Republican Hearing on 2020 Election - Bing videoThe current status in most states is that the Legislatures are still investigating and very concerned. Election officials in most of the affected locations are still fighting against any researchers viewing any evidence. Why they are so determined not to let anyone see the evidence is also a concern. Biden will be inaugurated, but there is no excuse to stand in the way of a full investigation of all ballots and voting systems.

Comments from Our Customers

The ease of use. I've gotten great feedback from customers on how easy the process has been for them to open up and sign the documents needed.

Justin Miller