How To Answer A Petition Or Complaint: Fill & Download for Free

This answer may contain sensitive images. Click on an image to unblur it.Few of the well-wisher on Quora has advised me on a few aspects and to avoid harassment or false implication; I have decided to quote a source to the information I have posted in my answer here. If you feel any information requires a further quote, let me know, and If I have no quote available and my premises of information is vague without question, i will remove such information.I married at the age of 28. I was Australia return. I returned to India as I couldn't live without the Indian social environment.I had a love marriage, had a great Business, and a substantial income.My wife deserted me at the age of 34 and without my consent took two kids, despite custody of two kids given to me. *(Clause No 3 and 6 Deed Of Divorce Mutual executed)I found her in a kind of relationship with someone that I was never aware of, so, I raised questions, and I couldn't resist her playing hide and seek with me on that. During my matrimonial life, I lent above half a million to her (Bank loans taken, Father sold his property-retirement fund to give money to generate interest) relatives and friends as she asked me for business purposes, and all of a sudden I had no way to recover money as smoothly as I could have in her presence, as she always handled-managed all transactions. I trusted her. Now, I couldn't find the scope of a phone conversation with her. *(Regarding Relationship, Deed Of divorce Mutually Executed and FIR No 48/2017, Surat Umra Police Station) + For Financial issues, monies lent to her friends and relatives and information are covered under phone records, WhatsApp, emails, bank statements. She has also given amount from her saving to the best of my knowledge)When I learned about all the shocking bitter things, I wanted her to accept it and move on with a friendly compromise way, as I have two kids.But, she wanted Divorce, and she kept saying it all the time on WhatsApp and Phone. I gave her what she wanted on mutually decided terms, but after the execution of a deed of Divorce *(28th June 2017), she retracted and refused other settlement and support in recovery. *(Phone conversation)She took two kids without my consent on 07/07/2017, whom I loved and I have been taking care of since their birth. In a formal agreement, she officially submitted kids custody to me under the oath and witness. *(Clause 3 and 6 for Child Custody in the Deed of divorce)Then she filed a false Complaint about Kidnapping and others. *(Phone Recording, MP High Court Order and Order of Session court, Indore) The Complaint was dismissed as she couldn't prove it. I have submitted all evidence to the police during my statement period. I have posted a few pieces of evidence and information to the concerned police department so far. *(24+ Letters with Evidence supplied to concerned police department through DTDC Post)Then one day she called and gave my kids under her new verbal terms, to which I agreed. As soon as I took kids, she filed a kidnapping complaint against me to force me to agree to more terms. She beat the shit out of me. How did she bring the kids in the first place from my home, after giving custody to me was never questioned by the media? That was never investigated by police in the beginning, however, following the high court ruling, they started investigating a case on a merit and fact basis*(MP High Court Order is, attached in this post)She alleged some ladies and one guy for abetting kidnapping with me, who were systematically organized to fabricate me in a false case. However, the High Court of MP made it clear that there was no offense of kidnapping made by me. Gujarat High Court also passed a protection order to protect my child and me against false cases and harm.Everything I created, earned, and made in life was at stake.I couldn't live without kids, my business, life, reputation, and atrocious questions of media and agony caused by police during the Investigation, it was terrible and affected me deep inside.But you know what?My children with me were a constant reason for me to keep walking with my head up, no matter what as long as I stood for truth and as I stood for truth, obstacles were obvious.Police dismissed all kidnapping charges/Refused to take a complaint and even denied that they could not take kids from me based on a settled agreement signed by the wife that says, Children's Custody is given to the father, and Gujarat High Court has given protection order to my daughters and me. *(Clause 3 and 6 of Deed of Divorce)Wife pursued District court Indore; her case was dismissed there too. *(Information given at the end of the answer)Wife filed an appeal before the high court, her case dismissed, and it is proved that all allegations were false and frivolous. *(Information given at the end of an answer)Gujarat high court directs police to provide free protection to my two daughters and me from their mother. *(Information presented at the end of response)As she lost all cases, she changed her stories and statement previously submitted to the police and put new allegations on me, such as; I have used a gun to have sexual intercourse with her. Changing a story to implicate someone is perjury, a crime. I wish my wife would know that; First, we Lie, then we lie to cover the previous lie then we feel like lie protected us, but in the end, Truth alone triumphs and Karma always chases us. *(Based on her statement in courts and Stories published in Newspaper with her and Police officer photos, a reasonable assumption made and the media said her application was a source for them)These all happened between 07/07/2017 to 07/10/2017. And it's on.Wife lost all cases however I filed a Complaint with Surat police on an evidence basis, and police have initiated action and, she made out new stories, and put new criminal charges on me that I used a gun to torture her and police took a bribe to help me. All those charges deemed to be dismissed follow by High court order. (Indore) it is just I don't and won't surrender to her atrocious terms, and now I don't have to.As under the Indian law, once a high court has ruled out, she can challenge it to the supreme court however she went back to police through media and stressed them to file a Kidnapping Complaint which is already dismissed by a high court.When I contacted the media, they gave an apology and changed the news. Few presses don't have contact information at all. They got "masala" so they posted at the cost of my right to live with dignity.I won all cases so far. (Except if she files new complaints, I will add it in Edits) (Over matrimonial issues, Lawyer and your enemies always win, but as a couple, family and kids, it is still like losing everything. Genuine atrocious matrimonial cases are exceptional) However, I can't stop thinking about my wife whom I loved. I always look for an option to save my family.Indian judiciary system never harassed me, and they delivered justice on a merit basis. But the judiciary is extremely technical, and sometimes it relies too much on its own decisions over evidence and that is where Injustice happens. Sometime.My wife officially given Custody of my children through a deed of divorce and lost (She voluntarily, consciously withdrawn her rights) all her mother rights since then, despite that she took my kids without my consent, for her hidden agenda (I can not disclose it since Law does not allow me and matter are under investigation) and I could have filed a complaint on that. However, I just thought to be a good human at that time. It had then came to my mind, how much more children are vulnerable to matrimonial and custody issues, and further, they are affected by media and judicial process. My complaint issues are much more severe than what i have mentioned here. However, I am not allowed to post any evidence and footage, and those are under investigation.Recently, on 11/10/2017 Surat Police Registered FIR against wife under section 504, 506 to threaten children, parents, and me. And Police also registered FIR against her paramour u/s 497 for extramarital affairs/Adultery. Then I came to know, If married women commit adultery, they can not be punished under the current law. However, only the person who engaged in an extramarital relationship is punished. *(FIR No 336/2017 for u/s 504, 506 and FIR No 48/2017 for u/s 497)I remember once a police officer told me; If the press/media pressurize them, they will file a 498a complaint against me, despite, I am innocent. How strange? Isn't it? I pursued a legal process, and I am fortunate enough, my rights were recognized and no false complaint filed against me. I thank the Gujarat High court for their Direction on protection against false accusation and harm to life to my children and me against my wife.How this incident has pushed me towards a new solution:I realized the child has a different right than adults.This episode gave me an understanding of children's vulnerability, and I started a program under NGO: Dear Cherry Kiwi | JivanamAsteya Cherry and Kiwi are my two daughters. It focuses on Child Rights, Protection, and their best interest including protecting children from domestic violence, child trafficking, sexual abuse.I started learning that families are breakings through misunderstandings, ego, and anger and the pieces of advice of a so-called well-wisher. I wanted to focus on the family, so I started another program here: Live More Family | JivanamAsteyaIn the interest of justice for the most vulnerable, with the support of a volunteer advocate, I boosted PROJECT KARNAV Project Karnav I File Online Complaint with NGO in India - monitoring and implementation of democracy, human rights, and governance. You can file civil, criminal, consumer, cybercrime complaint online. Besides you can file online rti, take action against false cases, government, police, politicians & more in India.To help a husband and their families i have set up one NGO program Live More Family | JivanamAsteya to bring them out of false matrimonial cases and to give the best fight and teach lessons to wrongdoers in collaboration with best local, High Court and Supreme Court Lawyer affiliation including investigators, retired police officers consultation and much more confidential strategies. The cost hence made affordably, and this also includes support for NRIs. So far husbands have been defensive against cases filed by the wife, but rather, we have developed a program to do the opposite in the best interest, to save time and cost. You can also register your case here: Live More Family | JivanamAsteyaKarnav With You: https://www.facebook.com/KarnavWithYou to build happiness, prosperity, and success in the life of individual, couple, group, and Entrepreneurs.I donated all my business/incomes to NGO I am part of, and now diverted full-time focus for a more significant cause. When you see more pain and worse stories, you feel safe, and you've got to do whatever it takes to change their stories.Parent NGO Link: JivanamAsteya - Government Registered NGO in Surat, India.I had two options.To accept and live with the consequences created by wife and cry all the time and beg people for compassion.To come out of whatever it may be for the welfare of my children and to help others come out of a similar situation and keep my mental health adequate and work for the more significant cause.When I help children, families, and people, it gives me immense mental happiness, and that boost my growth.Once I had a successful life, it changed all. But you know what? I say life is always a bitch, but I am not. And that is why I still feel successful because every circumstance that came in my life so far had hidden opportunity and cause for me to work on.Take AwayDon't get disappointed because people love hurting you. You should have your reasons to get frustrated.Anything that you read in print media and news has no legal values in the court of law. Live a transparent life, so you have nothing to hide from anyone, so when something broke out, it doesn't affect you, and no one can ever blackmail you.Your loved one may need one time statement, but no one needs an explanation.Find your cause, find what your life wanted to teach you, and do it. Don't go against that. Your answer to success lies in your situation. Find a mentor who can help you.Suicide is no solution. The solution lies in changing your attitude and thought process about your life. Why blame life, when you have enough control to change it.You are the boss of your success, life, ideas, and thought process. Don't be a slave to it. Once a person called a terrorist by the media is now Prime Minister of India. (Shree Narendra Modi)Wrong time will fade away. When you want to cry, do it. Take a break like a baby so you can cry and repent enough and start again as a hero to move forwards. When you have nothing to lose, what worst can happen?Don't let others decide what you are and what's your success looks like. You don't have to watch 3 Idiots to get inspired. Stories of people can open your mind and windows of opportunities or outlook towards life and situation; however, you get inspiration and motivation from within.Never lie. Hire the best mentor to prepare a defence strategy or to resolve your issues. Mentor generally never charge or take away minor fees. I received help from 8 lawyers including the lawyer of the High Court and Supreme court, who did not cost anything to me (o paid expenses in some matter), but they’d put faith in my case, evidence, and story and just helped me get out of the mud. Those lawyers are my hero, Lord Krishna kind and they want to do something to reform India, and they found their purpose in my struggle.No matter what, you should never hate your decisions and, revenge, anger, and ego lead you nowhere. Don't change your goal and focus because somebody else's wants you to do so.Don’t ever assume, what has happened to me, won’t happen to you. Everybody will face some challenges in their life when they make decisions. Only stories, characters, and situations will be different.There is no pain, no happiness, no north, no south or east or west. There are only two things. Inner and Outer. You can't control external things, but you can control internal things.Despite severe pain, I can see the light coming into my life. My Children are my energy and everything I need to live my life. I can't forget my wife but what I can do is that she will be in my good memories, and Justice will be served on a merit basis {(if she files a new complaint ;)}, but I don't think any more about it as that emotional bombs blast within my body when I think about t her. I have to work on a solution, based on the facts of my present life.All things and episodes have now put me back on steady life, fruitful and progressive path. I am working hard to make myself, mentally fit too. You need your body and mind fit for any hardship.A few months ago, I answered on Quora; I feel so proud to have a wife like her. And I am not going to change that answer because what she did to me can't change my original feeling to her.After all of this, I am unable to hate her as I can't erase the memories and affection I have developed for her, however, the more you respond emotionally to a person who wants you to go hell for personal gain, you need a mentor who can control your emotions. I want to cry a hell out of me; I am weak when I become emotional. *(Based on the fact she filed a kidnapping complaint before a high court of MP and it was disposed of)I believe children need both parents. I might be helpless but not hopeless.Putting the child’s interests above all, I am now awaiting what they would police do next and what happens next? (EDIT: Gujarat high court has passed another order directing Police to provide protection to minor children and to ensure no harm occurs to them. My children and I receive full support from Indore and Surat Police, in the best interest of justice. Gujarat HC also passed FIR direction against Police Inspector, and further proceedings are now undertaken in the matter.)If you are In pain, have a Complaint, or have any trouble, get in touch with me at [email protected] since the police has intervened and initiated legal Investigation, I am getting money recovered bit by bit. I am not sure if anything changes in the future.One of her friends is genuine and stood up for what is right, and he is against Divorce, and he never defaulted so far. I admire him for his honesty.I don't hate my wife, and I don't know why, but just the emotional bond, I made with her, just saying to me again and again, even if she wants to see me in hell, I wish to see her in my life.In response to newspaper stories published by Dainik Bhaskar, they have also posted a story against me, then they revised the story, and All I can say is that, including Dainikbhaskar, with other media organ, I am not happy with the story without verification, photos of wife, mine or children to be posted without consent. At Least i was able to convince Dainik Bhaskar Group, Surat to blur pictures of wife and children. They didn’t spare me though.मेरे किसी से शारीरिक संबंध हैं, पति को घर में बंद कर पत्नी फरारपत्नी बोली पुलिस से मिलकर पति ने किया बेटियों का किडनैप, पति ने बताई चौंकाने वाला बातAfter I shared FIR registered in Surat and Gujarat and MP to Dainikbhaskar regarding Gun and Sexual allegation, coverage, They have revised their article again. However, I am still not contented with their photo things and using a few names that unverified.दो धाराओं में दर्ज हुआ लड़की पर केस,पति पर लगाए थे ये आरोप (if they had verified news earlier, they could have posted one neutral story. What they posted, was taken by other leading media too.)And press news is never reliable. That the same newspaper has published two different stories And one is right, and another should be wrong. I blame it on media who want more circulations, and they care less about the individual’s rights.I have a phone recording with the leading media organization who tried to say in the first place; they were under the impression that women are always right, so they published a story without verification. It is just, my lawyer who does not want me to a public that recording for apparent reasons.The fake stories posted by Dainikbhaskar is here: ‘My Husband Used A Gun To Have Sex With Me’; Indore Woman Reveals About The IT Expert She Married In 2012Why this is a fake story because MP high court has ruled it out that said allegations are bogus. (means daughter are not in illegal detention of father hence no kidnapping charges are attracted) I am attaching that order here, which was not disclosed to the media and police.However, I am ready to talk with any media person on an evidence basis. The first page is the wife's submission to the high court followed by a court order. When I got a certified copy, I got all these three pages. She never used GUN word anywhere to the high court, a lower court in the first place, and all of a sudden her storyline changed.You will also see more orders as you scroll down.In response to manipulated CCTV of 15/07/2017, here is the footage of 07/07/2017 where my parents and I was locked in a room and my wife without consent, all of a sudden took the kids. And this happened in the first place: Shweta Shah Indore CCTV Video Footage - YouTube By this time, I already received legal Custody of kids through a mutually signed deed of divorce that we signed, and that means taking them without my consent can be kidnapping. However, it was none of my interest to file any Complaint at that time. The media was never interested in verifying my facts, and they are a business organization, and they need a story that sells, so police, sex, fantasies since those are most selling digital news. However, the media has brought the facts now. However, I believe media should never post a story merely at face value, either it is from the complainant or accused, however, they should verify it. The press has a right to freedom, but that comes with restriction, so others do enjoy their rights.Gujarat High Court has passed an order for police protection to me and my kids against the wife for false Complaints and physical threats. In the MP high court copy, it is also referred to by court order.I have much more to say but all that is under investigation and Quora is a platform to share knowledge, etc., and through my stories, I have shared stories backing with relevant evidence.Thanks to Quora to repost my answer after verification, based on the merit of the solution.Sign the Petition to help me protect and restore the rights of my two daughters. Click Here via Change. org (The petition is won, and police registered a case.)A person calls himself Binoy Shah who has been referred first by my wife’s friend on WhatsApp, has raised questions to me in the comments section, who says he didn't know his wife but based on the depth of his problems, I have informed he is wife’s friend. However, then I read about him in the news here: दो धाराओं में दर्ज हुआ लड़की पर केस,पति पर लगाए थे ये आरोप , where he has been called his brother. To my surprise, during my marital life, I never met him not his wife introduced to him. That when i asked a newspaper person, he said he introduced himself as an elder brother and made a statement of a deed signed in the name of business agreement. It’s all confusing. Brother, Elder Brother, Cousin, and Far Far Away Cousins, that all are a different thing. However, I have expressed my views and a few severe concern to him over Quora.Regarding money Related an FIR is registered, I found news published on it here by Times of India Man alleges cheating by wife of Rs 61 lakh in Surat - Times of India, however, I have some dissatisfactions, how media report stories, but I can't control them, as they depend on their source.References/Quotes: (I am not able to post few documents, you can explore it on the Indore or Gujarat Court website or obtain FIR through RTI) (I have no intention to hurt anyone and One of my American friends said, Positive Energy will help me survive from everything wrong)Deed of Divorce Executed on 28/06/2017 (Including Custody Settlement)Complaint u/s 294, 323, 506, 366 and Search Warrant Dismissed by Session Court Indore, Registration Number: 3595/2017Private Complaint against me (Should be dismissed followed by High Court MP Order) u/s 361, 294, 323, 506, 363, Registration Number 3595/2017 (It seems the duplicate case)Free Police Protection Order from Gujarat High Court to Children and Me, SCA 3595/2017Claim Disposed of by High court of MP, MCRC/8048/2017FIR against Wife u/s 504, 506, Fir No. 336/2017Adultery FIR against wife’s Paramour u/s 497, FIR No. 48/2017My wife has filed a DV case against my father and me under section 12 of the Domestic violence Act. (Supreme Coury has Stayed this case)Update: Indore Police in its recent report of 21 pages revealed how 61 Lakh rupees in a conspiracy manner taken from me by 13 people and so force me to withdraw the complaint and forget money, numerous 27+ false police complaint, and 10+ court complaint being filed against me in MP and Gujarat, however, police on merit disposed of. (5/3/2018)Indore district court disposed of the charge of kidnapping against me and other false sections.Gujarat High Court considering an increased threat to my daughter's passed second-time protection order in the interest of my daughters.In the Domestic Violence case, the court in Indore didn't grant custody of my daughters and visitation to my wife. I was not aware that she filed such a lawsuit and the court didn't allow her prayers. I however believe, my child deserves the love of a mother like any other child. The feeling I have been going through is mix and weird, as i only see and feel the views of my children.Wife filed appeal u/s 29 of DV for child custody and visitation rights, but the court denied and her petition disposed of as rejected.More than 60+ complaint filed in Indore, Surat, Patan, and Vadodara against my family friends and me to harass to extort money, forcing me to surrender their demands, however, Following Two Gujarat High Court protection order and no merit in complaint police disposed of her Complaint, moreover, Indore police submitted in their report that she and her friend's intentions were criminal and to harass me, a false complaint is being filed. Few complaints are closed by police without pursuing by law enforcement due to repeat Complaint, and few Complaint is non-traceable, as stated by Police.Since police, court, and other options failed, they started an attack on me; even one was made in the presence of my daughter Cherry. Despite the High Court order, the police failed to protect us. However, police registered an immediate FIR against the culprits.As apparently false complaint u/s 125 and DV filed against me and family member in other states. The honorable Supreme Court of India passed a stay order on all her court cases in Indore. (Edit/Update: matter are now being fought) That has been great relief and Justice to my minor daughters and parents, as I can now focus on them better than going here and there — the decision made by the three-judge bench in Supreme Court. It was a threat to my daughters and me to go Indore from Surat, which the supreme court of India has recognized.Surat police have revealed in RTI that she has filed 12+ Complaint against me, my family members, and even HDFC bank and their manager, and the complaint found frivolous. They already released information that she files a complaint, and a person named Binoy Shah does all the rest of things and they want by one or another chance FIR to be registered against me, however, police have registered an FIR considering no offenses ever committed by me. I have also presented 25+ false cases filed and disposed against me from many locations from India to Honorable MP High Court, and the court has pleased to issue a notice to 6+ high-rank police officers and department including wife, and the matter is pending adjudication. This is the big relief from MP High Court, followed by the Supreme Court of India, who stayed frevilous maintenance and domestic violence Complaint against me and family members.After all of these things she has caused to me, my children, and my family, now she has filed RCR (2019, Family Court, Surat) petition in family court and prayed that she wishes to return with me.I have numerous judgments involved in my case, however, if anyone looking for a specific petition or judgment or order in any of the above matter, please reach out to me, I would be happy to share necessary documentation. Due to space limits, I refrain from adding all documents. (Its 3000+ pages and electronic evidence)Gujarat High Court Passed Order to Register FIR against Police officer and others if the cognizable offense is found against me, and the same matter is taken further through court, along with another complaint against CID for vindictive investigation and harassment against me. Copy of the orders is below.Honorable Gujarat High Court please provide further police protection to my minor daughters, after some police began harassment, and political influence came in place. The order is below:The second police protection above came after the violation apprehension expressed on earlier police protection order given by the honorable Gujarat high court. Despite the police protection order given by the court, the same was allegedly violated by the respective police authority, for which the matter is escalated. Refer first police protection order below;Precisely police were supposed to protect me and my daughters, and the same orders were given by the honorable Gujarat high court. however, due to increasing power and influence, I was being harassed by the police itself. hence, the honorable Gujarat high court passed second police protection orders, and directions to the commission of police to ensure no untoward incident happened with my daughters. Both the orders are shared above for reference. I am more than grateful to lawyers who have been great protectors of my daughters in these events.The primary reason that I have provided more details and insights into my case is to advocate the rights of fathers, Right and Best Interest of children and to support those families and victims who are being blackmailed, defamed using negative digital marketing, media contacts, and whose lives are made like hell by culprits. The matrimonial disputes can always be managed through counseling, but when anger, revenge, and getting things done through abuse types of act prevails, the issue becomes serious. I can only feel political and famine pressure on the judiciary, despite that, they are working best in the interest of equal justice.It all started in 2016–17, now we are in 2019, I thought to share a few photos with cherry and kiwi.With GrandfatherWith GrandmotherWith Best Friend, Motherly Carer and LoverGod Bless all the children.I now run NGO, to help those who need me most, and to put sincere efforts to change or better their life, rather than let someone destroying it. I decided to Participate in the RECOGNITION, PROTECTION, PROMOTION, ADVOCACY, ENFORCEMENT and REGULATION of Rights of citizen regardless of sex, race, religion, gender. There is nothing peaceful than helping another being.Live More Family | JivanamAsteya (thanks to a lawyer for helping on an honorarium basis, and donors) India’s only unbiased, and gender equality NGO monitor and act to prevent domestic violence and injustice to women, and prevent false, fakes cases against men, women, and family members. Moreover, it addresses child custody, maintenance, Counseling and, critical matrimonial issues.Dear Cherry Kiwi | JivanamAsteya: Putting Child Rights, Welfare & Best Interests on the top priorities, Protection children from domestic violence, abuse, and parental Alienation. Helping Juveniles, conflict with the law, and addressing issues such as child labour, child trafficking, child prostitution & pornography, and promoting child awareness and education.Project Karnav I File Online Complaint with NGO in India to help consumer citizen to redress their serious grievances, including filings of FIR, Cybercrime complaint, and complaint against government, police, and much more.My life and work are now dedicated to my cause. To learn more about the various projects of NGO I run visit JivanamAsteya - Government Registered NGO in Surat, India.

MEDICAL COLLEGE BRIBERY CASESeptember 28, 2017New Delhi:A FIR was filed by CBI in this case naming following persons for indulging in Corruption1. Justice (retired) Ishrat Masroor Quddusi2. B P Yadav3. Palash Yadav4. Biswanath Agrawala5. Ms Bhawana Pandey, A native of Kumaun Region and6. Sudhir GiriA Delhi Court has reportedly granted bail to former Judge of Orissa High Court, Justice I.M. Quddusi in a corruption case.Mr. Quddusi was granted bail by Special Judge Manoj Jain on a personal bond of Rs. 1 lakh and a surety of a like amount. Another accused, Mr. Bhawna Pandey has also been granted interim bail for one week. The Bail pleas of Mr. B.P. Yadav and Mr. Palash Yadav, who manage the affairs of PRASAD INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, have, however, been kept pending. These will be decided on 6 October. The arrests were made in furtherance of an FIR according to which Mr. Quddusi allegedly conspired with Ms. Pandey to ‘settle’ the matter concerning debarment of Prasad Institute of Medical Science, Lucknow, which is one of the 46 colleges barred by the Government. These colleges have been prohibited from admitting medical students for the forthcoming 1 or 2 years because of substandard facilities and non-fulfillment of requisite criteria.The retired judge of the Orissa High Court along five others have been arrested by the CBI in an alleged corruption case of taking bribe to Settle a case of debarment against a Medical collegeJustice (retired) Ishrat Masroor Quddusi has been booked on corruption charges, along with B P Yadav and Palash Yadav of THE PRASAD EDUCATIONAL TRUST which runs a medical college in Lucknow, Biswanath Agrawala a middleman and two others Ms Bhawana Pandey and Sudhir Giri, according to a CBI spokesperson.The concerned medical college is Prasad Institute of Medical Science in Lucknow, which is run by Prasad Educational Trust. The said medical college had been de-barred by the central government for a period of two years from admitting new students because of shortcomings in infrastructure. The government had also directed MCI to confiscate its Rs 2 crore Bank GuaranteeHowever, as per the FIR of CBI, a copy of which is with Medical Dialogues team, Mr. Quddusi allegedly conspired with one Ms. Bhawana Pandey to “settle” the matter concerning debarment of Prasad Institute of Medical Science, Lucknow. The FIR further states that the said retd judge, who had met with Mr Yadav, through Sudhir Giri of Venkateshwara Medical College, Meerut who is the founder of the Venkateshwara Group of Institutions, allegedly advised the him to withdraw his challenge to the debarment from the Apex Court and approach the Allahabad High Court instead. The High Court had then granted an interim stay against the debarment.Further, when MCI challenged the said order in the Apex Court, the said judge along with his co-conspirator Ms Bhawana Pandey assured Yadav that they will “get the matter settled in the Apex Court through their contacts.”It is alleged in the FIR that Biswanath Agrawala, a so-called a middleman with very close contact with senior relevant public functionaries was then engaged to get the matter favourable settled. The middleman had demanded huge gratification for the sameCBI sleuths till now have recovered Rs 1.91 crore during the raids, including at Quddusis’ residence in south Delhis’ Greater Kailash as well as some money from a hawala operator Ram Dev Saraswat .The Central Bureau of Investigation has registered a case against retired Judge of the High Court of Odisha; five private persons and other unknown public servants & private persons u/s 120-B IPC and section 8 of Prevention of Corruption Act 1988.__________________________Without any shred of proof, in a case filed in the Supreme Court, the petitioner Ms Kamini Jaiswal, has in Petition said that accused have told to Police that on a future date the Judges in Supreme Court are going to the bribed by the accused in the case and get favourable Judgement.But no Petition can be filed on assumptions in future this will happen and hence the unknown Judges should be punished or prevented from indulging in corruption.Which Judges nobody knows; on which date such thing will happen, nobody knows; how much money they will take, nobody knows; there are too many unknowns, invisibles in the Petition. There is no clarity in the Petition.Criminal cases are filed on solid proof of wrong doing because STANDARD OF PROOF in a criminal case required is BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT, which is the most demanding standard. If you have a doubt that in sometime in future someone can take bribe, you cannot file a prosecutable case. Here, 100% proof is necessary.Yes, an INFORMATORY PETITION under CrPC Section 39 can be filed in anticipation of a crime and to prevent it from ocuuring, before a Criminal Court having proper jurisdiction.__________________________Can an FIR be filed against sitting judges, even the Chief Justice of India? What about conflict of Interest of CJI in this regard.It is not the first time that we met such a situation, in the past also such situation have cropped up.विद्या ददाति विनयम, If we are knowledgeable, we should have some patience and decency, we should know at which forum such subject should be brought about and we should demand that. We should not become the laughing stock before the world that we do not know how to handle such situation.At the present scheme of things, only Parliament can discuss such things.____________________Only FIR has been filed, investigation is on.You did not have any prosecutable evidence against anybody at present stage. Only hearsay is available. No details available. Situation is nebulous, not anything has crystallized. It is premature to have any opinion on this.You want to discuss about the Chief Justice of India, it means you want to discuss the future behavior of the Court, not the individual, but an institution, let the other institution which is actually the right forum discuss it.______________________Can the police or any investigating agency file a first information report (FIR) against a sitting High Court or a Supreme Court judge and even the Chief Justice of India?The answer is found in the majority judgment delivered by a five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in the K. Veeraswami case.No criminal case shall be filed unless the government first consults the CJI, whose assent is imperativeThe Veeraswami case specifically dealt with the Prevention of Corruption Act in judiciary, but the majority judgment had extended its ambit to any criminal case.STIPULATED GUIDELINESThe majority held that no criminal case shall be registered under Section 154 of the Criminal Procedure Code (an FIR) against a judge of the High Court, Chief Justice of the High Court or a judge of the Supreme Court unless the government first consults the Chief Justice of India. The justification given was that the CJI’s assent was imperative as he was a participatory functionary in the appointment of judges.Due regard must be given by the government to the opinion expressed by the Chief Justice. If the Chief Justice is of opinion that it is not a fit case for proceeding under the Act, the case shall not be registered, the majority judgment held.The verdict held that if the Chief Justice of India himself is the person against whom the allegations of criminal misconduct are received, the government shall consult any other judge or judges of the Supreme Court.If the CJI allows the FIR to be registered, the government shall, for the second time, consult him on the question of granting sanction for prosecution.The Veeraswami judgment holds that it shall be necessary and appropriate that the question of sanction be guided by and in accordance with the advice of the Chief Justice of India. The majority in the Constitution Bench classifies a judge as a public servant.Consultation with the CJI while registering a criminal case against a judge, whether of the High Court or the Supreme Court, has been made mandatory to protect the independence of judiciary.Similarly, the Supreme Court has also laid down guidelines for the arrest of a judicial officer of the subordinate judiciary.ONLY A FORMAL ARRESTThe Delhi Judicial Service Association versus State of Gujarat judgment of the Supreme Court was the product of the notorious treatment meted out to the Nadiad Chief Judicial Magistrate by a few Gujarat police officials. It had the countrys’ legal and judicial bodies in an uproar, compelling the Supreme Court to issue directions of the procedure to be followed while arresting a judicial officer. Primarily, the court held that a judicial officer should be arrested for any offence under intimation to the District Judge or the High Court.The immediate arrest shall only be a technical or formal arrest, after which it should be immediately communicated to the District and Sessions Judge of the district concerned and the Chief Justice of the High Court.The arrested judicial officer shall not be taken to a police station without the prior orders of the District Judge and no statements shall be recorded from him or her except in the presence of a counsel. He or she will not be handcuffed.Section 3 of the Judges (Protection) Act of 1985 protects judges and former judges of the Supreme Court and the High Courts from any civil or criminal proceedings for any act, thing or word committed, done or spoken by him in the course of their judicial duty or function. No court shall entertain such complaints.IPC SEC. 77. ACT OF JUDGE WHEN ACTING JUDICIALLYNothing is an offence which is done by a Judge when acting judicially in the exercise of any power which is, or which in good faith he believes to be, given to him by law.Section 77 of the Indian Penal Code exempts judges from criminal proceedings for something said or done during judicial duties.However, the government can initiate criminal proceedings against a sitting or former judge of a superior court under sub section (2) of Section 3 of Judges (Protection) Act, 1985 if it can produce material evidence to show that a judgment was passed after taking a bribe. It can start Impeachment process.

1. Lal Bihari, The Undead Indian​In 1976, when a teenager named Lal Bihari approached a bank to approve a loan, he was informed that he was actually dead. It took Lal Bihari 18 years to get his life and his land back. During that time, he added the word Mritak or Dead, to his name and to prove that he was alive sought arrest, tried to run for parliament, kidnapped the son of his uncle, who had stolen his property, threatened murder, insulted judges, threw leaflets listing his complaints at legislators in the state assembly and demanded a widow’s pension for his wife. Each time he was either beaten up by police or rebuked for wasting officials’ time. Unable to make headway, Lal Bihari, The Dead sought the company of other ghosts in Uttar Pradesh and found an entire underworld of the deceased and dispossessed. It was only in 1994, 18 years after being declared dead, that Azamgarh district magistrate, a Hausla Prasad Verma, declared Lal Bihari finally alive once again and also returned his land to him.2. K. M. Nanavati vs State of Maharashtra, 1959​This was a high-profile upper class crime of passion, where Kawas Manekshaw Nanavati, a Naval Commander, was tried for the murder of Prem Ahuja, his wife’s lover. The incident received unprecedented media coverage and Nanavati was at the receiving end of a huge amount of public and community support. Nanavati was initially declared not guilty 8-1 by a jury, but the verdict was dismissed by the Bombay High Court on referral and the case was retried as a bench trial. Nanavati was convicted of culpable homicide and sentenced to life imprisonment. This case was the last to be heard as a jury trial in India, as the government abolished jury trials as a result of the case. Many see this as a progressive step in our justice system as decisions of juries are often colored by societal values and norms. On the side note, Ram Jethmalani, now a prominent lawyer and BJP politician, conducted the prosecution in what was one of his first high-profile cases.3. Kesavananda Bharati vs State of Kerala, 1973​This case is now known as the case that saved the Indian democracy. On April 24, 1973, Chief Justice Sikri and 12 judges of the Supreme Court assembled to deliver the most important judgment in its history. The hard work that had gone into the preparation of this case was breathtaking. Literally hundreds of cases had been cited and the then Attorney-General had made a comparative chart analyzing the provisions of the Constitutions of 71 different countries. All this effort was to answer just one main question: “was the power of Parliament to amend the Constitution unlimited?” In other words, could Parliament alter, amend, abrogate any part of the Constitution even to the extent of taking away all fundamental rights? The judgment revealed a sharply divided court and, by a wafer-thin majority of 7-6, it was held that Parliament could amend any part of the Constitution so long as it did not alter or amend “the basic structure or essential features of the Constitution.” This was the inherent and implied limitation on the amending power of Parliament. This basic structure doctrine, as future events showed (Indira Gandhi attempting to hijack Indian democracy), saved Indian democracy and Kesavananda Bharati will always occupy a hallowed place in our constitutional history.4. State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Raj Narain, 1975​Ruling on the case that had been filed by the defeated opposition candidate Raj Narain, Justice Jagmohanlal Sinha declared then-PM Indira Gandhi guilty of electoral malpractices, invalidated her win from Rae Bareilly and barred her from holding elected office for six years. The decision caused a political storm in India that led to the imposition of a state of emergency by Indira’s government from 1975 to 1977. The decision had galvanized opposition parties and strikes by labour and trade unions, student unions and government unions swept across the country. Protests led by Jayaprakash Narayan and Morarji Desai flooded the streets of Delhi close to the Parliament building and the Prime Minister’s residence. The government argued that the political disorder was a threat to national security. Using the sweeping powers granted by the Emergency decree, thousands of opposition leaders and activists were arrested, press censorship was introduced and elections were postponed. During this period, Indira Gandhi’s Congress (R) used its parliamentary majority to amend the Indian Constitution and overwrite the law that she was later found guilty of violating.5. The Shah Bano Case, 1985​Shah Bano, a 62 year old woman from Indore was divorced by her husband in 1978. Unable to support herself and her five children, she moved to courts to be granted maintenance from her ex-husband. Seven years and several judgments later, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of granting Shah Bano alimony. Largely seen as a threat to Sharia law by some Muslims, what followed a debate over the constitutionality of including different marriage and personal laws for different religion, and resulted in the passing of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, by the government.The case was significant for several reasons. In giving its judgment, the Court ordered maintenance with an upper limit of Rs. 500 monthly, under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which applies to all citizens regardless of caste or religion. Although seen by many as a secular judgment, it invoked a strong reaction from the Muslim community, which felt that the judgment was an encroachment on Muslim Sharia law. The backlash from the Muslim community prompted the government to begin parliamentary procedures that, in essence, overturned the Supreme Court’s decision. The Muslim Women Act, 1986, was passed amidst great controversy and debate. Many argued that it was a way to appease the minority group that was threatening agitation.Shah Bano’s case brought the need for a secular Uniform Civil Code into the limelight again. To date, however, individual Personal Laws based on religion are still in effect. The case remains a ground-breaking one in Indian divorce law and is often used as a benchmark by the courts.6. Himmat Lal Shah v. Commissioner of Police, 1973​This case was recently referenced in the Anna Hazare anti-corruption movement when Section 144 of the IPC (unlawful assembly) was imposed by the Delhi Police and the lawyer team of Shanti and Prashant Bhushan argued successfully in the Supreme Court over the unconstitutional nature of thisaction. The original case dealt with a common citizen’s right to hold public meetings on streets and the extent to which the state could regulate this right. Freedom of expression and assembly is an essential element of democratic system. At the root of this system lies the citizens’ right to meet face to face to discuss problems social, religious or political. This right was upheld in this case.7. ADM Jabalpur v Shivakant Shukla Case, 1976​ADM Jabalpur V Shivkant Shukla is one of the landmark cases in Indian constitutional history. Its judgment came on 28th April 1976. This day is known to be the blackest day of India’s constitutional history. Right to move to any court for enforcement of any right conferred by Articles 14, 21 and 22 was suspended during the emergency of 1975 by a presidential order. The maintainability of this order was challenged in this case. Several high courts held it not maintainable while Supreme Court’s 4 judges out of 5 declared otherwise and concluded it to be maintainable and valid exercise under emergency provisions of Indian constitution. Anybody who was sought to be a political threat was detained without trial and sent to prison under the MISA, a preventive detention act on the ground of maintaining the internal security in the country. This was case where an attorney general of India wrote, Even if life was taken away illegally, courts are helpless. For the disagreeing opinion, H. R. Khanna J lost his possibility of becoming the C.J. of India when he was the senior most person eligible for it. His Junior Beg J. became instead. P.N. Bhagwati J pleads guilty for the judgement of this case after 30 years. Now you see how politics influence the lives of common people devastatingly. This case has many strange, tempestuous facts and statements of judges. It was distrustful judgement, a holocaust to the fundamental rights of people in disguise.8. Bhawal case – The Princely Imposter​The Bhawal Sanyasi case has been one of the strangest among judicial cases in British India. In the Hindu way of life, a Sanyasi is a person who has taken ‘Sanyas’, or entered the final stage of his life in which he is to seek the Truth and turn his back upon the material word. In more popular parlance, any garden-variety sadhu or mendicant may be called a sanyasi. Bhawal was a large zamindari near Dacca (now Dhaka, Bangladesh). It was, as with the case of many similar Zamindaries, closely supervised by the British bureaucracy. It had an Englishman as a manager. After the Zamindar died, it passed to his three sons. All led lives of ease. The second son, Ramendra, died in Darjeeling in 1905, apparently due to syphilis, and was believed to have been cremated. He left his widow, Bibhavati, behind him. Several years later, in 1921, a Sadhu appeared in Dacca. Soon people noticed many resemblances between him and the supposedly dead Ramendra. Jyotirmayee, one of his sisters was convinced that the sadhu was indeed her brother. Several educated Indians too were convinced of his identity. The British official world, on the other hand, looked upon him as a pretender. Bibhavati refused to accept him as her husband. The claimant (sadhu) claimed his 1/3rd share from the revenues of the zamindari. The Court of Wards which was administering the zamindari refused the claim and the matter went to the court. From the very beginning there was a clear division between the British officialdom and the Bengali elite, the latter siding with the claimant. The claimant filed a suit in 1930.The judgment in the first trial went in favor of the claimant. The Court of Wards appealed to the Calcutta High Wards. After some delay caused by the Second World War, which kept one of assigned judges stranded in London, the High Court too found in favor of the claimant in 1940. Bibhavati appealed to the Privy Council in London. The Privy Council ruled in favor of the claimant on July 30, 1946. The judgment was telegraphed to Calcutta the next day.That very day the winner/claimant went to the Kali temple to offer prayers upon his victory and suffered a stroke there. He died two days later, which, according to Bibhavti, was the divinely ordained punishment for the imposter.9. The Ayodhya Cases​One of the most controversial cases in Indian constitutional history is the Ayodhya case. In fact in one of the cases related to Ayodhya, one party was Shri Ram himself. Any way there are four principal title suits pendingbefore the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court over the disputed land at Ayodhya. The legal battle over the 80 feet by 40 feet land far predates the VHP movement to construct the Ram temple.The first case was filed in January 1885 by Mahant Raghubir Das seeking permission to construct a temple on the chabutara (a raised platform) outside the Babri Masjid was dismissed. The mandir-masjid issue then remained in suspended animation until the night of December 22, 1949, when trespassers broke into the Babri Masjid and installed an idol of Ram. Subsequently, the city magistrate attached the premises. In the next 12 years, four title suits followed (all still pending before the courts). These include the one filed in December 1950 by Mahant Ramchandra Das Paramhans, who is now the chairman of the Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas and another by the Sunni Central Boards of Waqfs, UP, in December 1961. All the four suits were clubbed together and broughtbefore the Allahabad High Court, which began recording oral evidence in July 1996.The case has always moved at a snail’s pace. Out of the 100 witnesses, only 23 have testified till now. On an average, the examination of a witness takes a fortnight. Says former Delhi High Court chief justice Rajinder Sachar: “It is really impossible to find whether Ram was born on that exact piece of land. The matter will go on and on for years.”The Union government on March 5 filed a petition before the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court to expedite the case by holding daily hearings. Further, it suggested that the court appoint a commissioner or a judge to record the statements of the witnesses. But all this does not necessarily mean a speedy settlement of the issue. The case, fear legal experts, could be a long-drawn one.10. INA trials​Not many Indians are acquainted with this case, which had a profound impact on India’s freedom struggle. INA (Indian National Army) was a force that comprised of Indian Prisoners of War abroad, and was formed by Subhash Chandra Bose – to secure India’s independence from the British. When it was disbanded, INA’s top officers were tried by the British on charges of Sedition etc. Seeing that that there was a wave of sympathy throughout the country for these brave officers, the Indian National Congress decided to form a team of legal stalwarts to prepare a thorough legal defense for the officers. Such was the impact of this move, that Lord Wavell India’s then Viceroy, promulgated an ordinance with retrospective effect to confer jurisdiction on court-martials in cases related to PoW’s.The pinnacle of this trial was the legal ingenuity demonstrated by Bhulabhai Desai. Desai’s primary argument was that Bose had formed a provisional government of India, and since the Axis powers had recognized that government, the officers of the INA were representing their country, and not a rebel force. Thus, Desai argued, the municipal law in this case, the Indian Penal Code was not applicable and they ought to be tried under International Law. He placed enormous evidence on record to establish that the INA was representing the Indian State; and thus, the officers were acting in furtherance of their duty as India and Great Britain were at war. Even though he lost the case, he earned his place in the pantheon of legends.