Arrest Affidavit - Florida Attorney General: Fill & Download for Free

Why, YES! Not just one instance. LOTS of prominent Democrat politicians have called for the repeal of the 2nd Amendment, outright banning of guns, and even gun confiscation! Want a civil war? Keep it up. Because this is how you incite civil war. Get a clue — they’re free.Senator Dianne Feinstein (D – CA) does. “Banning guns addresses a fundamental right of all Americans to feel safe.” – Associated Press, 18 November, 1993. “If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them; “Mr. and Mrs. America, turn ‘em all in,” I would have done it.” – 60 Minutes on CBS, 5 February, 1995. …“The National Guard fulfills the militia mentioned in the Second amendment. Citizens no longer need to protect the states or themselves.”Senator Frank Launtenberg (D – NJ) did. “We have other legislation that all of you are aware that I have been so active on, with my colleagues here, and that is to shut down the gun shows.”“I will get the NRA shut down for good if I become president. If we can ban handguns we will do it.”-Hillary Clinton interview with Des Moines Register Aug. 8th, 2015Fmr. Senator Howard Metzenbaum (D – OH) did. “No, we’re not looking at how to control criminals … we’re talking about banning the AK-47 and semi-automatic guns.” – Constitution Subcommittee, 2 February, 1989Vice President Joe “Buckshot” Biden (D – DE) does. “Banning guns is an idea whose time has come.” – Associated Press, 11 November, 1993 Representative Jan Schakowski (D – IL) does. “I believe…..this is my final word……I believe that I’m supporting the Constitution of the United States which does not give the right for any individual to own a handgun….” – Recorded 25 June, 2000 by Matt BeauchampFmr. Representative Major Owens (D – NY) did. “We have to start with a ban on the manufacturing and import of handguns. From there we register the guns which are currently owned, and follow that with additional bans and acquisitions of handguns and rifles with no sporting purpose.”Representative Bobby Rush (D – IL) does. “My staff and I right now are working on a comprehensive gun-control bill. We don’t have all the details, but for instance, regulating the sale and purchase of bullets. Ultimately, I would like to see the manufacture and possession of handguns banned except for military and police use. But that’s the endgame. And in the meantime, there are some specific things that we can do with legislation.”Vermont State Mary Ann Carlson (D) does. “We must be able to arrest people before they commit crimes. By registering guns and knowing who has them we can do that. If they have guns they are pretty likely to commit a crime.”New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo (D) does. ” …confiscation could be an option…” Sarah Brady, fmr. Chairman of Handgun Control Inc. (now The Brady Campaign) does. “…I don’t believe gun owners have rights.” – Hearst Newspapers, October 1997 “The House passage of our bill is a victory for this country! Common sense wins out. I’m just so thrilled and excited. The sale of guns must stop. Halfway measures are not enough.” – 1 July, 1988…“Our main agenda is to have all guns banned. We must use whatever means possible. It doesn’t matter if you have to distort the facts or even lie. Our task of creating a socialist America can only succeed when those who would resist us have been totally disarmed.” – The National Educator, January 1994, pg. 3, to Fmr. Senator Howard MetzenbaumFmr. Chancellor of Boston University John Silber did. “I don’t believe anybody has a right to own any kind of a firearm. I believe in order to obtain a permit to own a firearm, that person should undergo an exhaustive criminal background check. In addition, an applicant should give up his right to privacy and submit his medical records for review to see if the person has ever had a problem with alcohol, drugs or mental illness . . . The Constitution doesn’t count!”Fmr. United States Attorney General Janet “Waco” Reno does. “The most effective means of fighting crime in the United States is to outlaw the possession of any type of firearm by the civilian populace.”-- Written affidavit by Fred Diamond, 1984 B’nai B’rith meeting in Coral Gables, FloridaDeborah Prothrow-Stith, of the Office of Government and Community Programs and the Community Violence Prevention Project at the Harvard School of Public Health, does. “My own view on gun control is simple: I hate guns and I cannot imagine why anybody would want to own one. If I had my way, guns for sport would be registered, and all other guns would be banned.” The ACLU does. “We urge passage of federal legislation … to prohibit … the private ownership and possession of handguns.” ACLU #47.“I now think the only way to control handgun use is to prohibit the guns. And the only way to do that is to change the Constitution. — M. Gartner, then President of NBC News, USA Today, January 16, 1992, pg. A9.Now read the Democrat H.R.4269 - Assault Weapons Ban of 2015 pay particular attention to the SINGLE-SHOTS and BOLT ACTIONS "Assault Weapons"!www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/4269/textALSO: Reading through the 2015 H.R. 4269 (which has been pretty much replicated in the latest proposals for "assault weapons bans"), I noticed something that clearly was meant to obfuscate the total numbers of firearms listed. In contrast to the prohibited listings which include language that essentially bans entire families of firearms in a few lines, the "Exempted" lists designate and list ALL models of a specific firearm. The result is incredibly long lists of "Exempted" firearms (for example 26 variants of the Remington Mod 700 are listed!!). This devious technique creates the illusion that fewer firearms are being specifically banned in the prohibited listings compared to the purposely extensive lists of "Exempted" firearms.Maybe the most important "gun control" graph you'll ever see.

Because a gun ban, perhaps even forcible confiscation, is exactly what gun control advocates up to the then US Attorney General or President of the United States say they want. Sometimes publicly. Anyone who says otherwise is poorly informed or a deliberate liar. Forcible confiscation is not possible without violation of other Constitutional freedoms like the Fourth Amendment.New: Kevin Baker's answer to Why does the issue of gun control in American engender such passionate discourse?TL;DR:Quotes by Gun-grabbers - whatreallyhappened [dot] com:Waiting periods are only a step. Registration is only a step. The prohibition of private firearms is the goal. [Edit: Snopes reports this statement never happened. But more below.]Janet Reno (US Attorney General), 1993-12-10. . . . .The goal is an ultimate ban on all guns, but we also have to take step at a time and go for limited access first.Joyner Sims (Deputy Commissioner, Florida State Health Dept.); Chicago Tribune, 1993-11-07And we should - then every community in the country could then start doing major weapon sweeps and then destroying the weapons, not selling them.Bill Clinton (US President)More:Saulius Muliolis's answer to Do some gun owners really believe in the conspiracy that the government is planning to take away all the guns?"In fact, the assault weapons ban will have no significant effect either on the crime rate or on personal security. Nonetheless, it is a good idea ... Passing a law like the assault weapons ban is a symbolic - purely symbolic - move in that direction. Its only real justification is not to reduce crime but to desensitize the public to the regulation of weapons in preparation for their ultimate confiscation." Charles Krauthammer, columnist, 4/5/96 Washington Post. . . . ."I don't care about crime, I just want to get the guns." Senator Howard Metzenbaum, 1994Seriously, No One Wants to Take Your Guns - The Truth About GunsThe following was posted as a comment by Excedrine under yesterday’s post, Don’t Worry, No One Wants to Take Your Guns.I laugh when they trot out that old, tired line. I really do. Right in their faces. Then, I point out all the people who do. Branford, Connecticut Police Officer Joseph Peterson does. “I [would] give my left nut to bang down your door and come for your gun.” Those are his exact words to a long-time “friend” of his . . .Senator Dianne Feinstein (D – CA) does.“Banning guns addresses a fundamental right of all Americans to feel safe.” – Associated Press, 18 November, 1993.“If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them; “Mr. and Mrs. America, turn ‘em all in,” I would have done it.” – 60 Minutes on CBS, 5 February, 1995.“The National Guard fulfills the militia mentioned in the Second amendment. Citizens no longer need to protect the states or themselves.”Senator Frank Launtenberg (D – NJ) did.“We have other legislation that all of you are aware that I have been so active on, with my colleagues here, and that is to shut down the gunshows.”He died last year.Fmr. Senator Howard Metzenbaum (D – OH) did.“No, we’re not looking at how to control criminals … we’re talking about banning the AK-47 and semi-automatic guns.” – Constitution Subcommittee, 2 February, 1989He died in 2008.Fmr. Representative Charles Pashayan (R – CA) does.“All of this has to be understood as part of a process leading ultimately to a treaty that will give an international body power over our domestic laws.” – United Nations Small Arms Conference, 2001Fmr. Senator John Chafee (R – RI) did.“I shortly will introduce legislation banning the sale, manufacture or possession of handguns (with exceptions for law enforcement and licensed target clubs)… . It is time to act. We cannot go on like this. Ban them!” – Minneapolis Star Tribune pg. 31A, 15 June, 1992.He died back in 1999.Then-Senator Joe “Buckshot” Biden (D – DE) does.“Banning guns is an idea whose time has come.” – Associated Press, 11 November, 1993Representative Jan Schakowski (D – IL) does.“I believe…..this is my final word……I believe that I’m supporting the Constitution of the United States which does not give the right for any individual to own a handgun….” – Recorded 25 June, 2000 by Matt BeauchampFmr. Representative Major Owens (D – NY) did.“We have to start with a ban on the manufacturing and import of handguns. From there we register the guns which are currently owned, and follow that with additional bans and acquisitions of handguns and rifleswith no sporting purpose.”He died last year.Representative Bobby Rush (D – IL) does.“My staff and I right now are working on a comprehensive gun-control bill. We don’t have all the details, but for instance, regulating the sale and purchase of bullets. Ultimately, I would like to see the manufacture and possession of handguns banned except for military and police use. But that’s the endgame. And in the meantime, there are some specific things that we can do with legislation.”Vermont State Mary Ann Carlson (D) does.“We must be able to arrest people before they commit crimes. By registering guns and knowing who has them we can do that. If they have guns they are pretty likely to commit a crime.”New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo (D) does.” …confiscation could be an option…”Sarah Brady, fmr. Chairman of Handgun Control Inc. (now The Brady Campaign) does.“…I don’t believe gun owners have rights.” – Hearst Newspapers, October 1997“The House passage of our bill is a victory for this country! Common sense wins out. I’m just so thrilled and excited. The sale of guns must stop. Halfway measures are not enough.” – 1 July, 1988Fmr. Chancellor of Boston University John Silber did.“I don’t believe anybody has a right to own any kind of a firearm. I believe in order to obtain a permit to own a firearm, that person should undergo an exhaustive criminal background check. In addition, an applicant should give up his right to privacy and submit his medical records for review to see if the person has ever had a problem with alcohol, drugs or mental illness . . . The Constitution doesn’t count!”He died in 2012.Fmr. United States Attorney General Janet “Waco” Reno does.“The most effective means of fighting crime in the United States is to outlaw the possession of any type of firearm by the civilian populace.” – Written affidavit by Fred Diamond, 1984 B’nai B’rith meeting in Coral Gables, FloridaDeborah Prothrow-Stith, of the Office of Government and Community Programs and the Community Violence Prevention Project at the Harvard School of Public Health, does.“My own view on gun control is simple: I hate guns and I cannot imagine why anybody would want to own one. If I had my way, guns for sport would be registered, and all other guns would be banned.”Rosie O’Donnell does.“I think there should be a law — and I know this is extreme — that no one can have a gun in the U.S. If you have a gun, you go to jail. Only the police should have guns.” – Ottawa Sun, 29 April, 1999“I don’t care if you want to hunt, I don’t care if you think it’s your right. I say, sorry, you are not allowed to own a gun, and if you do own a gun I think you should go to prison.” – The Rosie O’Donnell Show, 19 April, 1999.The American Civil Liberties Union does.“We urge passage of federal legislation … to prohibit … the private ownership and possession of handguns.” – National ACLU Policy #47I could go on literally for days and days, listing pages upon pages of people saying exactly how and why they’re coming for our guns. Not a single bit of it could ever be supported, defended, or refuted by them, either.More:Quotes by Gun-grabbers - whatreallyhappened [dot] comThe NRA is bound and determined not to allow the Brady Bill to be enacted. And they're a fearsome opponent. They see this as `threshold' legislation. Because they realize if we get the Brady Bill to President Clinton and he signs it into law, then the door will be wide open for further gun control legislation. Of course, we hope that's true because, as you know, our campaign to enact a National Gun Policy to combat gun violence doesn't end with the Brady Bill - it just begins.Sarah Brady; HCI Newsletter, Handgun Control Inc., 1993-03. . . . .[All firearms] ... should be outlawed. Our organization will probably take this stand in time but we are not anxious to rouse the opposition before we get the other legislation passed.Elliot Corbett (National Council for a Responsible Firearms Policy, secretary); Washington Evening Star, 1969-09-19I think you have to do it a step at a time and I think that is what the NRA is most concerned about, is that it will happen one very small step at a time, so that by the time people have "woken up" - quote - to what's happened, it's gone farther than what they feel the consensus of American citizens would be. But it does have to go one step at a time and the beginning of the banning of semi-assault military weapons, that are military weapons, not "household" weapons, is the first step.Barbara Fass (Mayor of Stockton, California); ABC News Special: Guns, hosted by Peter Jennings, 1991-04-11. . . . .We have to start with a ban on the manufacturing and import of handguns. From there we register the guns which are currently owned, and follow that with additional bans and acquisitions of handguns and rifles with no sporting purpose.Major Owens (US Representative, D-NY, Brooklyn), 1993-11-10. . . . .We're going to have to take one step at a time, and the first step is necessarily - given the political realities - going to be very modest. Of course, it's true that politicians will then go home and say, "This is a great law. The problem is solved." And it's also true that such statements will tend to defuse the gun-control issue for a time. So then we'll have to strengthen that law, and then again to strengthen the next law, and maybe again and again. Right now, though, we'd be satisfied not with a half a loaf but with a slice. Our ultimate goal - total control of handguns in the United States - is going to take time. My estimate is from seven to ten years. The problem is to slow down the increasing number of handguns sold in this country. The second problem is to get them all registered. And the final problem is to make the possession of all handguns and all handgun ammunition - except for the military, policemen, licensed security guards, licensed sporting clubs, and licensed gun collectors - totally illegal.Nelson T. "Pete" Shields (Handgun Control Inc., chairman); "A Reporter at Large: Handguns", The New Yorker, pp. 53, 58, 1976-07-26

Yes, voter fraud exists. It isn’t a matter of whether or not voter fraud exists or not, the question really should be how prevalent is voter fraud in the United States. If asked appropriately, then the answer is, no one knows.Confessions of a voter fraud: I was a master at fixing mail-in ballotsIsn’t that the point, though? Do those who want to commit voter fraud ever really want to be caught? Do criminals who rob houses ever intend to be caught? Of course, there are. Unfortunately, it is very difficult to identify, prove, and convict people based on crimes that “seemingly” hurt no one.With that said, let me back up my thesis. We could always start with the Heritage Foundation’s 4-year old election fraud database (started in 2016) that documents almost 1,300 PROVEN cases of voter fraud.Database Swells to 1,285 Proven Cases of Voter Fraud in AmericaWe could also start in Ilhan Omar’s congressional district where voter fraud is rampant and the Omar campaign pays and intimidates the Somali people to vote for Ilhan while the MN AG Ellison does nothing.Ilhan Omar connected Ballot Harvester in cash-for-ballots scheme: "Car is full" of absentee ballotsOmar Connected Harvester SEEN Exchanging $200 for General Election Ballot."We don't care illegal."We could shift to San Antonio, TX where a single ballot harvester, Raquel Rodriguez, names various politicians who pay her to complete (or help complete) 5,000 - 7,000 mail-in / absentee ballots — and ensure they are delivered/mailed. She names republican and democrat politicians: Judges, Councilmen, Congresspeople, Senators, the president-elect Joe Biden. She takes money from anyone and everyone willing to pay for her “ballot harvesting” activities (which is illegal in TX).Texas AG to investigate ‘shocking’ election-fraud scheme in Project Veritas sting‘Ballot Chaser’ Raquel Rodriguez Boasts Judges, Legislators ‘In My Pocket’ … ‘I'm Getting the Biden Vote Out, But I Mean, I'm Not Going To Do It For Free’… Some Texas Republicans Secretly Working For Democrats!But I’m sure the response is going to be, so what. That’s small potatoes. Maybe it is. However, these are the instances that are caught on UNDERCOVER VIDEOTAPE. Undeniable evidence that voter fraud exists, regardless of which candidate or party benefits. There is not an American who should discount these attempts to undermine our republican form of government.What people need to realize is that it doesn’t take a national effort to change the outcome of a presidential race. All those who intend to coordinate voter fraud need to do is identify “swing-state” counties where voter turn-out is historically low. At that point, putting / finding / recruiting “ballot chasers” like Raquel Rodriguez into those districts is pretty simple. Among the many other ways they could affect the result includes just finding/collecting/salvaging/etc and turning in lost/stolen/discarded ballots — like is reported and confirmed by postal work affidavits (in the past few days).Las Vegas Mailman Agrees To Pass On ‘A Nice Handful’ Of Unclaimed Ballots To Project Veritas Undercover Journalist: ‘If It’s In There—I Didn’t Do It.’It really isn’t that hard. It made even less complicated when states decide to illegally and unconstitutionally change election rules mid-election season. If you don’t know what I’m referring to, you might want to look up Article I, Section 4 of the US Constitution that only gives state legislatures the right to change election “manners” — not governors and not courts. It’s pretty simple and straight forward.Gov. Newsom rebuked by Sutter County court for use of executive power amid COVID-19 pandemicPennsylvania court rules to extend mail-in ballot deadlines by 3 daysSo what, you might say, mail-in ballots happen all the time and that every state offers them. Of course, you would only about partially correct, and you know it. There are only 5 states that do true Mail-In ballots (Colorado, Hawaii, Oregon, Washington and Utah). These states (theoretically) constantly clean their voter rolls of dead people and others who move. All other states, like in CA — pre-covid and all the unconstitutional covid changes from Gov Gavin Newsom — offered Absentee Ballots, ONLY.The difference you may ask is that an absentee ballot is requested (read: solicited) by a voter where a mail-in ballot is completely 100% unsolicited — meaning voters did not request or did not qualify for absentee status according to the laws of said state. In CA, pre-covid, requesting absentee status was nearly 100% guaranteed if you simply signed up for the service.But that is neither here, nor there. I guess one might need more evidence because I’m sure there are those who will read all the “MSM” outlets who disregard the undercover investigative reporting of Project Veritas, despite the fact they have never lost a lawsuit (where appeals have been exhausted) and have several hundred forced retractions from major newspapers around the country, with said news outlets admitting their negative reporting on PV was erroneous.So with that said, I provide additional documented undercover video evidence of election fraud for people who are truly curious about the state of things. I will let those who are open-minded actually look at the documented anecdotal evidence and ask themselves if it is possible for voter fraud to exist?It is also important to remember that every individual in these videos, at the time of their taping, is innocent until proven guilty. The purpose of these videos is to highlight the problem and prove beyond a reasonable doubt this is not simply anecdotal evidence of a rampant problem.Spoiled Bucks County Ballots Found in Trash; Top County Election Official: ‘The Judge of Elections Didn’t Do It Correctly;’ Pennsylvania Law: Hold Spoiled Ballots for 22 MonthsUPDATE: PA-based USPS Whistleblower Richard Hopkins Comes Forward & Agrees to Testify; Whistleblower Testifies Late Ballots Back-Dated for Nov. 3, Election Day; Whistleblower: Other Employees Feel the Same…Contacted Me: ‘That Was Badass’BREAKING: Another One! Erie, Pa. USPS Insider Exposes ‘Nov. 3’ Postmark Voter Fraud Scheme: ‘All These Ballots That Were Coming In--Today, Tomorrow, Yesterday—Are All Supposed To Be Postmarked the Third’UPDATE: Postal Service Inspectors Interview Erie, Pa. USPS ‘Postmark’ Whistleblower; Whistleblower to O’Keefe: ‘I Told Them What I Told You’; Third Post Office Whistleblower: USPS Sorts Late-Ballots to Special Bins For Future CountingNH Attorney General ARRESTS Double-Voter Exposed By Project VeritasNew Hampshire Voter Admits Voter Fraud? Cast Second Ballot Out-of-StateFaces Of Voter Fraud #1: NY Republican Votes Twice in 2018 Elections, Casts Mail Ballot in FloridaTIP OF THE ICEBERG: Florida Voters Upset People in NY Voting in Their Name - Faces Of Voter Fraud #2Undercover PV Journalist in Full Burka Is Offered Huma Abedin’s BallotHIDDEN CAMERA: NYC Democratic Election Commissioner “I Think There Is A lot of Voter Fraud”MI #10: Undercover Journalist Offered Michigan Senator’s BallotCaught on video: Voter Fraud in NY PrimaryCaught on Tape: Battleground Texas Violating Election Laws Again?Yonkers Mayor Condemns Teachers Union Officials Project Veritas Caught on CameraSen. Ellis Undercover Video Part II: Ellis in his own words: “The video speaks for Itself”Sen. Mike Ellis (R-WI) Caught on Tape Plotting Potential Felony