Windsor High School: Fill & Download for Free

Oh man, I'm only going to answer regarding students in the year group I was in. If I extend it to the whole school, I'll be here an awfully long time.In my secondary school, in the first term three girls gave three guys blowjobs in the back of a bus on a school trip. All parties were suspended. One of the girls was the headmaster's daughter; he had to suspend his own 13 year old daughter for sucking off a 13 year old boy on a bus.Speaking of teachers with badly behaving children, two years later it turned out the deputy headmisstress's son had been supplying students throughout the school with cocaine. The papers got wind of this one, and he was expelled and, by default, banned from school property. However, this was a boarding school so most of the teachers lived on the property, including his mother and therefore him. Eventually a compromise was reached where he was not allowed to enter or exit through the front gates and was only permitted to use the ones right to the back of the campus.Of course there were several other incidences of students discovered in carnal situations, and drugs were constant, but those were the real biggies of my year. The last situation that occurred in my time was a half-mad student throwing a Windsor chair at her housemistress and calling her a cunt. That may have been me. I may have been expelled. I absolutely deserved that expulsion.In my sixth form (another co-ed boarding school) I won't bore you with more sex and drug stories because those get tiresome, plentiful and mundane past the age of consent. The event that truly shocked everyone in the year was a fair amount of child pornography being found on one boy's laptop. I'm fairly sure he was also expelled and arrested, but no one ever really wanted to even gossip about it, it was too gross.Another student was expelled for a rather horrifying suicide attempt in her boarding house bathroom that ended up requiring blood transfusions. That was also me. Whilst the school absolutely should not have had to continue shouldering responsibility in loco parentis for me, expulsion was not really the best way to end things.

**Disclaimer: I write in bold text for medical reasons, Optic Neuritis/Multiple Sclerosis. Comments, if negative, are best not left.**Long past history was defined by the winners, the survivors. The Bible was printed for man but not for every man. Some copies stories left out and hidden, news and book presses added understood languages. And then the book burning began. Libraries and books. The loss of past knowledge might have aided a society today don’t you think? We lost minds and knowledge to a pettiness of control.Did The Catcher in the Rye mess you up? Me either. The question cannot be logically answered by gaps.The Catcher in the Rye, by JD Salinger.Banned & Challenged Books-Banned Books Week is an annual event celebrating the freedom to read. Typically held during the last week of September, it spotlights current and historical attempts to censor books in libraries and schools. Banned Books Week brings together the entire book community — librarians, booksellers, publishers, journalists, teachers, and readers — in shared support of the freedom to seek and express ideas, even those some consider unorthodox or unpopular.http://www.ala.org/advocacy/bbooksSince its publication, this title has been a favorite target of censors.In 1960, a teacher in Tulsa, OK was fired for assigning the book to an eleventh grade English class. The teacher appealed and was reinstated by the school board, but the book was removed from use in the school.In 1963, a delegation of parents of high school students in Columbus, OH, asked the school board to ban the novel for being "anti-white" and "obscene." The school board refused the request.Removed from the Selinsgrove, PA suggested reading list (1975). Based on parents' objections to the language and content of the book, the school board voted 5-4 to ban the book. The book was later reinstated in the curriculum when the board learned that the vote was illegal because they needed a two-thirds vote for removal of the text.Challenged as an assignment in an American literature class in Pittsgrove, NJ (1977). After months of controversy, the board ruled that the novel could be read in the Advanced Placement class, but they gave parents the right to decide whether or not their children would read it.Removed from the Issaquah, WA optional High School reading list (1978).Removed from the required reading list in Middleville, MI (1979).Removed from the Jackson Milton school libraries in North Jackson, OH (1980).Removed from two Anniston, AL High school libraries (1982), but later reinstated on a restrictive basis.Removed from the school libraries in Morris, Manitoba (1982) along with two other books because they violate the committee's guidelines covering "excess vulgar language, sexual scenes, things concerning moral issues, excessive violence, and anything dealing with the occult."Challenged at the Libby, MT High School (1983) due to the "book's contents."Banned from English classes at the Freeport High School in De Funiak Springs, FL (1985) because it is "unacceptable" and "obscene."Removed from the required reading list of a Medicine Bow, WY Senior High School English class (1986) because of sexual references and profanity in the book.Banned from a required sophomore English reading list at the Napoleon, ND High School (1987) after parents and the local Knights of Columbus chapter complained about its profanity and sexual references.Challenged at the Linton-Stockton, IN High School (1988) because the book is "blasphemous and undermines morality."Banned from the classrooms in Boron, CA High School (1989) because the book contains profanity. Challenged at the Grayslake, IL Community High School (1991).Challenged at the Jamaica High School in Sidell, IL (1992) because the book contains profanities and depicts premarital sex, alcohol abuse, and prostitution.Challenged in the Waterloo, IA schools (1992) and Duval County, FL public school libraries (1992) because of profanity, lurid passages about sex, and statements defamatory to minorities, God, women, and the disabled.Challenged at the Cumberland Valley High School in Carlisle, PA (1992) because of a parent's objections that it contains profanity and is immoral.Challenged, but retained, at the New Richmond, WI High School (1994) for use in some English classes.Challenged as required reading in the Corona Norco, CA Unified School District (1993) because it is "centered around negative activity." The book was retained and teachers selected alternatives if students object to Salinger's novel.Challenged as mandatory reading in the Goffstown, NH schools (1994) because of the vulgar words used and the sexual exploits experienced in the book.Challenged at the St. Johns County Schools in St. Augustine, FL (1995).Challenged at the Oxford Hills High School in Paris, ME (1996). A parent objected to the use of the 'F' word.Challenged, but retained, at the Glynn Academy High School in Brunswick, GA (1997). A student objected to the novel's profanity and sexual references.Removed because of profanity and sexual situations from the required reading curriculum of the Marysville, CA Joint Unified School District (1997). The school superintendent removed it to get it "out of the way so that we didn't have that polarization over a book."Challenged, but retained on the shelves of Limestone County, AL school district (2000) despite objections about the book's foul language.Banned, but later reinstated after community protests at the Windsor Forest High School in Savannah, GA (2000). The controversy began in early 1999 when a parent complained about sex, violence, and profanity in the book that was part of an Advanced Placement English class.Removed by a Dorchester District 2 school board member in Summerville, SC (2001) because it "is a filthy, filthy book."Challenged by a Glynn County, GA (2001) school board member because of profanity. The novel was retained.Challenged in the Big Sky High School in Missoula, MT (2009).

Whether I did something yesterday or thirty years before I transitioned, I did it. I am named Katie. I am a woman.However, using the appropriate pronouns for someone’s current gender identity is not being retroactive. It is speaking accurately about what is true now.Saying that “Katie was a nerd in high school” is appropriate, because Katie is the name of the person who was a nerd in high school.Saying that “Katie used to love wearing her hair long even before her transition” is appropriate, because the person who loved to wear her hair long even before her transition is a woman. “Her” is the appropriate pronoun in the sentence.We do this all the time.“Queen Elizabeth was born Elizabeth Alexandra Mary of the royal House of Windsor.”“President Trump was accused of violating the civil rights of African-American tenants when he was managing his father’s rental properties.”“Mrs. Obama made fun of the former President’s ears when they were first dating.”“Pope Francis is the first Pope who was born in the Americas.”“Sting was once a public school teacher.”“Grandma Katie Holton’s father disappeared when she was a child.”Trans people are not asking for anything special. Just treat us like the Queen of England, US presidents, first ladies, popes, rock stars, and my sainted Grandma Katie, and we’ll be just fine.