What Happened To E-Verify -- The Government'S Popular Way To Curb: Fill & Download for Free

No. It's a waste of taxpayer money.If all businesses were required to use E-verify to ensure that every applicant and employee was legally authorized to work in the US and stiff fines imposed per person on the businesses if not, very little tax money would be needed to deport anyone. If the money dried up in all 50 states, people would leave in droves by spending their own cash. Business owners' lobbyists go hard against enforcement of that existing law because they like paying people low wages who cannot call law enforcement to report that or unsafe conditions. Hello profits!Could the President Mandate E-Verify?What happened to E-Verify -- the government's popular way to curb illegal immigration?Mandatory E-Verify: The other border wallPoliticians sidestep talking about it and make big gestures with lots of fanfare once in awhile like this current fanfare. Meanwhile, the same shady game grinds on with businesses not checking work status and no agency forcing them to comply. The public gets distracted every election by the song and dance and rah-rah for the party, so they don't get people into office who are serious about making genuine, realistic changes.It could make sense combined with a changes in temporary work permits that would allow more low skill workers to come pick crops and clean rooms at seaside resorts and the like and then go back to their home country. It would need to be clear that if they don't go home, they will be ending their chances to work in the US. With a legal way to come make money and take it elsewhere, it should cut down on illegal immigration by unskilled people who know that current US immigration policy will not give them a legal path to permanent residency. Even if they immigrate from a dangerous place like Guatemala to a less dangerous country that will take them as residents like Mexico and contribute by paying taxes there, it could be a much better life for them. If they can support and educate their kids with the seasonal or temporary work, the kids could work towards a realistic chance at legal immigration to the US or elsewhere like possibly the EU as they get more education and skills than would be possible otherwise.Working in the U.S.

I do support the Modi government for their work rather than being a fan of Modi. Modi is still popular and people support him, but there are reasons for it. I will state my reasons with an unbiased review of present government. It is essential to know why the masses support the present government.Road and Highway construction: When BJP took over in 2014, the road construction rate stood at 11.67km/day. It rose to 12km/day in fiscal 2014–15, 16.6 km/day in 2015–16, 22.5 km/day in 2016–17. The pace of building highways from April 2017- January 2018 has been 21.46km/day. Also, total construction has been 6439 kms in the first 10 months of FY 2017–18, compared to 5492 km in first 10 months of previous FY[1] . UPA added over 15005 km of highways in its 2011–2014. While NDA added 18432 kms in 2014–2017. [2] WINNER- Clearly NDA.Railway tracks laid: Under NDA railway tracks have been laid 11.5% faster than UPA. In 2009–2014, 10,245 km of tracks have been laid. Average of 2049km/year. While, NDA has laid 8382.75 km till August 17, 2017. [Assuming it to be 3.5 years the average tracks constructed per year has been 2395 km/year]. [3] WINNER- Again NDA.Employment and Social Security: Well known promise. But here NDA is weak. Unemployment rate has increased from 4.9% of labour force [in 2013–14] to 5% of labour force in 2015–16. In 2016–17, Economic Survey also the labour ministry has stated the Employment growth as sluggish. July 2014-December 2016 [not including Jan-Mar 2016], 641,000 jobs have been created in manufacturing, healthcare, transport, IT, trade, construction, education and accommodation. In July 2011- Dec 2013, the same eight sectors added 1.28 million jobs. Lesser jobs, slow job creation hence lesser social security. [4] WINNER- UPA.Swachh Bharat Mission : Started by UPA as Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan. Under this UPA built 95,35,456 toilets fro 2012–2014. [4767728 toilets per year under UPA on average]. NDA repacked it as Swachh Bharat Abhiyan and from 2014–2017, 4,55,81,550 toilets have been Built. [15193850 toilets an year on average].[5] Additionally, now we are really able to see the improvement in cleanliness of Railway stations and many other public places. The awareness about cleanliness has increased drastically under present government. WINNER- NDARural Housing: In 2011–2015, 5430877 units have been approved and 2016–2017, 1 crore units have been approved. Despite tremendous tries there is no precise data about completion of these units.[6] WINNER- NDA, because the units approved in the period 2011–2014 will be less and the average per year approved by UPA is also less.Urban Housing: UPA under Rajiv Awas Yojana approved 1,60,931 units [about 20000 units completed]. NDA approved 21,00,475 units. Again, no precise data on completions.[7] WINNER- NDA, although there is no precise data on completions, one thing is sure that getting approvals for houses is much easier than before[In case of both rural and urban]. That’s why there is tremendous increase in the number of approved houses.Sensex: At start of Modi’s tenure, sensex was at 24717. After 3 years, 25.5% jump, sensex after completion of 3 years Modi government it was at 31,028. Under UPA-I, there was 182.1% change in sensex [5123 to 14454]. While under UPA- II, the change in first 3 years was only 15.4%[13887 to 16026]. Net-change/year in sensex under 10 years of UPA= 1959.4 [(24717–5123)/10]. Net change/ year under NDA= 2103(approx.).[8] WINNER- NDA.Performance of forces against extremism- 2014–2018, 990 civilians,700 security force personnel martyred and 1809 terrorists have been killed. 2005–2013, 6813 civilians, 2934 soldiers martyred and 8386 terrorists martyred. Average number of civilian and security force fatalities, NDA= 422.5/year, UPA= 1083/year. While number of terrorists killed/year, NDA= 452.25/year, UPA= 931.77/year. Left wing extremism has been handled better by NDA while UPA did better in Kashmir.[9]NDA not killing terrorists rapidly but bloodshed is less. UPA killed rapidly, but fatalities were much more. These stats can be manipulated and presumed in many ways and anyone can be called winner, some will call UPA as winner[for killing more terrorists] and some will call NDA as winner[for lesser fatalities] .Considering efforts of both governments trying to curb extremism I will give it as a TIE.Implementation of Aadhaar Card, Digitization-Aadhaar was a mere card like the other cards. There was no clear vision since it was introduced. The implementation of Aadhaar number, linking it with mobile number, PAN and other government services. Under UPA there was never a push to link it to various services, hence it was taken for granted. Here things actually don’t work till the ass is set on fire. The scheme can be successful and its benefits can be reaped only if most of the people are brought under it. Unless there is no severe push Aadhaar would just remain another card. The NDA government has really pushed and things are happening rapidly than ever before. Although, SC interfering in such things is a bit awkward, it only hinders the expansion of a great chain to various services. The Aadhaar Act by UPA and NDA also has some differences. For digitization, digital certificates and other documents verified by e-sign, DigiLocker - Wikipedia, was launched in 2015, e-signed documents were almost invisible before that [hoping that soon better authentication systems will be developed, and digital documents are accepted for all required purposes, still digital documents are seen like they were made in some other planet]. As per the UIDAI, NDA’s Aadhaar act is stronger than the one passed under UPA. [10] WINNER- NDA. I could not find sources for claims in this issue, many things are based on personal experiences.Rural Electrification- As of May 25, 2017 [3 years], 13523 villages have been electrified by the NDA government on an average 4507 villages/year. Now I don’t want see arguments in the comments box regarding the definition of electrification. Let me tell you, a village is considered as electrified only if 10% of its households have electricity and this is since October 1997 [Modi government did not change the definition].[11] Under UPA, 2004–2014, 108280 villages electrified [average 10828 villages/year], definition still same. [12] WINNER- UPAPetrol and diesel prices- Petrol prices and diesel prices have been high under the present government as compared to previous one. But it would not be fair to attack Modi government on petrol prices because they have strong reasons to do so. In 2013, UPA initiated going towards a low fiscal deficit path. Modi government is only continuing the same. High Fiscal deficit, higher prices. So continuing the policy will be good in the long term.[13] WINNER- UPA, prices were low at their times and they initiated this policy.Food inflation- Food inflation is much less than what it used to be under UPA [You can see tall bars close to or even more than 10%]. Present government has maintained it better.[14] WINNER - NDA.Economic growth is also back on track now. But still some people saying Modi messed up the economy etc, may be under-informed or they are doing this purposely and crying as if ,we are on the verge of bankruptcy, or there is an economic crisis across the country. Inflation of two digits and growth rates like 4.7, 5.5 % etc in some quarters prevailed under UPA. But we are able to grow now at 7% with a single digit inflation [Isn’t that much better than a two digit inflation and an average growth of 7.8% under 10 years of UPA?]Optical Fibre network- Between 2011–2014, the project did not take off as only 350km of cable was laid [planned was 3,00,000]. But the current government achieved the target in 2014–2017 of laying 3,00,000 km of cable. [15]Vision- Present government has ended the policy paralysis which came to haunt the UPA in 2014. The vision is very clear and government is concentrated much on infrastructure [Sagar Mala project - Wikipedia, Bharatmala - Wikipedia] and many other infrastructure projects]ease of doing business and liberalisation. [16] Steps were taken to curb black money, SIT formation, push on bank account opening, Demonetisation [failed step, but no adverse effect or signs of it], crackdown on shell companies[17] and now GST has been rolled out after many years of debates and discussion. None of the previous government dared to take bold steps, but I believe an effort should be admired. So, clearly putting an end to policy paralysis.External Debt-External Debt increased very less as compared to UPA [See the steep slopes of UPA].Foreign policy - Modi is the first Indian PM, to visit both Israel and Palestine and maintain good friendship with rivals, same goes with USA and Russia. Probably most delicate balances in the history of foreign policies. For the first time we are eye-to-eye with China. No Indian residing outside India, and the people over there are fools to come to attend his interaction with them.A man who struggled- I always have inclination towards those who struggle, he wasn’t born with a silver spoon. He has reached to this position by immense struggles, not by any dynastic influence. There is absolutely no need to elaborate his childhood, early life and struggles.My inclination to right wing- BJP is the only right wing party at national level. Hence being a right winger and conservative the chances of supporting any other party is forbidding.My views on allegations of corruption on Rafale deal- I believe that the deal which NDA offered is much more comprehensible, than the UPA one. In the UPA deal, 18 jets were being given ready-made and 108 to be made, now we are getting 36 jets ready-made [provided the number of squadrons are decreasing], also we are getting some extra ammunition. Greater number of ammunition and ready-made jets will help in providing the much necessary boost to our Air-Force. NDA’s deal saved around Rs. 12,600 k crores. [Under UPA cost of each jet was over 100 million, and NDA’s deal offers one jet under 90 million]. [18]Last reason- No better person to support! If you get one please tell me with some concrete reasons.There may be plenty of reasons stated by different people to not vote for BJP in 2019. But I have reasons to vote for them. If this much work is less in 4 years, tell me how much has to be done in 4 years? Probably, no government in the past was able to do this much in 4 years. Maybe, UPA-I or NDA under Atalji in the past did so. But the present government is nowhere less in performance. Don’t fall prey of news calling Modi communal, anti-Muslim, etc, if he was really anti-Muslim today Gujarat would have been a riot state famous for riots only, rather than a development example.Footnotes[1] Road construction pace up in April-January at 21.46 km a day[2] NDA beats UPA, rolls out roads faster - Times of India ►[3] Under NDA, railways laid tracks 11.5% faster in first three years than UPA[4] Three years of Modi govt: Job-creation promise falls short as unemployment rate up[5] Modi May Have Repackaged 23 UPA Schemes, But Most Are Working Better Now - The Wire[6] Modi May Have Repackaged 23 UPA Schemes, But Most Are Working Better Now - The Wire[7] Modi May Have Repackaged 23 UPA Schemes, But Most Are Working Better Now - The Wire[8] 3 years of Modi govt: NDA betters UPA-2 in market returns[9] http://satp.org/Datasheets.aspx?countries=india[10] NDA’s Aadhaar Bill stronger than UPA’s on privacy: Nandan Nilekani[11] In 2 Years, BJP Govt Electrified 13,523 Villages; Of These, Only 8% Were Completely Electrified[12] RTI reply says only 12,297 villages electrified in last four years - Janta Ka Reporter 2.0[13] Opinion: Wrong To Attack Modi On High Petrol Prices[14] India Food Inflation | 2012-2018 | Data | Chart | Calendar | Forecast[15] Bharat Broadband Network - Wikipedia[16] Modi has put an end to policy paralysis that marred UPA regime[17] http://www.livemint.com/Politics/QezF00YdFhnQiv4Nb4l0wN/Shell-companies-crackdown-Govt-to-deregister-120-lakh-more.html[18] NDA govt saved over Rs 12,600 crore in Rafale deal - Times of India ►

History is shaped by path breaking cataclysmic events which alter the course of Future. “The study of history is important because it allows one to make more sense of the current world. One can look at past economic and cultural trends and be able to offer reasonable predictions of what will happen next in today's world”. Let us evaluate each one of these on these parameters. I will deal with Demonetisation in detail because it impacted GST, Terror Funding, Corruption and Role of Black Money in the Economy. You will realise clear pattern in interlinkages of each acts of the Modi Govt from Demonetisation to GST to Cross Border Strikes and finally Revocation of Article 370. One thing has led to another. Demonetisation identified black money hoarders and non tax payers. GST Data identified dishonest money laundering black money generating businesses. Cross Border strikes exposed the nuclear blackmail of Pakistan and comprehensively isolated it as a terrorist state. Revocation of Article 370 also was a surgical strike on the corrupt political system that had held India to ransom. Today the enemies of India stand exposed, isolated and defeated. Here is the cascade of history from demonetisation downwards.DemonetisationWhat is Demonetization?Demonetization is the act of stripping a currency unit of its status as legal tender. It occurs whenever there is a change of national currency: The current form or forms of money is pulled from circulation and retired, often to be replaced with new notes or coins. Sometimes, a country completely replaces the old currency with new currency. The opposite of demonetization is remonetization, in which a form of payment is restored as legal tender.[1]History of Demonetisation: From 1946 to 2016Demonetisation has been implemented twice -1946 and 1978 – in the past.In 1946, the currency note of Rs 1,000 and Rs 10,000 were removed from circulation. The ban really did not have much impact, as the currency of such higher denomination was not accessible to the common people. However, both the notes were reintroduced in 1954 with an additional introduction of Rs 5,000 currency.In 1978 the then Prime Minister of India Morarji Desai announced the currency ban taking Rs 1000, Rs 5000 and Rs 10,000 out of circulation. The sole aim of the ban was to curb black money generation in the country.Similarities of 2016 Demonetisation in 1978 and 2016 (Both Gujarati PMs)The note ban by Morarji Desai also aimed to drive away black money out of circulation in the economy. Hence, The High Denomination Bank Notes (Demonestisation) Act was implemented.Narendra Modi announced the currency ban is an address that was broadcasted across all news channels. Similarly, Desai announced the ban over the radio after which the banks were closed the following day.Both the affairs were kept confidential.DifferencesUnlike Modi, Desai didn’t have the backing of the RBI Governor. The Governor I.G. Patel believed that the ban was implemented simply to immobilize the funds of the opposition party. Patel also believed that people never store black money in the form of currency for too long.It didn’t have much effect on the people and affected only the privilege few. While the recent ban had shaken the whole country. While announcing demonetisation on November 8 in 2016, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had outlined three broad objectives to fight black money, corruption and terror funding. These objectives have always been debatable for the lack of accurate verifiable data.Economic rationale behind the move is generally attributed to three factors - controlling hyperinflation, removing counterfeit currency, and widening the tax base. It was also expected that demonetisation would help in reducing interest rates in the banking system amid the flush of huge funds and possibility of pass-on effect of fall in interest rates to the investment in the country . It was believed that demonetisation would foster the use of bank accounts and digital payments, making the Indian economy less cash-dependent and improve efficiency and productivity.[2]Impact of Latest demonetisationReserve Bank of India (RBI) has come out with its annual report giving a balance-sheet of demonetisation implemented 21 months ago. Of Rs 15.41 lakh crore demonetised currency notes of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 denominations, only Rs 10,720 crore did not reach to the banks or the RBI.This means only 0.7 per cent of demonetised currency notes were junked in the exercise. The government had initially expected that approximately Rs 3 lakh crore of demonetised currency notes would not come back to the banking system, thus shedding the substantial weight of black money.[3]Demonetisation hit India’s economic activity in the period following the November 8, 2016, event but the impact had dissipated by the summer of 2017, said a working paper by the US-based National Bureau of Economic Research. India’s economic activity declined 3 percentage points or more in November and December 2016 even though its effects were dispelled over the next few months.The study, which focused on the short-term consequences, noted that longer-term consequences may include higher tax revenue and a shift to digital modes of payment. [4]Reasons for Lack of Visible Impact hidden in Macroeconomic DataThe major chunk of black money was invested in business, stocks, real estate, jewellery, or “benami” assets – assets which were bought in someone else’s name. India depends primarily on cash based transactions and only 10-15 percent of the population are non-cash users compared to 40 percent in countries like Brazil and China. Also, the ratio of currency in circulation outside of banks to GDP is 11.1 percent, higher than the other emerging economies like Russia, Mexico, and Brazil.[5]After examining statistics related to income tax, it was concluded that the number of persons filing income tax returns as well as income tax has increased substantially. Moreover, about 1.8 million bank accounts with the unusual’ cash deposits of approximately Rs 1.7 lakh crores during demonetisation period are under the lens of the Government.Prior to demonetisation, the Indian public held cash equal to 62 percent of India’s M1 money supply as compared to less than 0.1 percent in the United States. The ratio of public currency to narrow money (M1) had declined to 40 percent by the end of December, 2016, after that the ratio increased but still the value was much lower in the month of May, 2017. It can be inferred that demonetisation has helped in reducing the cash in hands and improved the deposits base which may be fruitful for the banking sector to maintain capital requirements amid the new accord of Basel III.It can be concluded that demonetisation appears to have resulted in increase in digital transactions, which however, could not be sustained.In the quarter following demonetisation, the growth has fell down drastically but later revived and stood well above 10 percent in the first three quarters of 2017-18. These statistics indicate that demonetisation did not have much adverse impact on India’s trade performance.However, there is a marginal increase in unemployment rate since mid-2017 in India and that may be attributed to slowdown in the industrial pace amid indirect tax reform of GST.Buying real estate in the names of proxies and depositing demonetized cash in bank accounts of multiple employees were among the ways tax evaders laundered unaccounted wealth after the November 2016 demonetisation of high-value banknotes, the income tax department said on Thursday.Intensive efforts have led to the provisional attachment in more than 900 cases of properties including land, flats, shops, jewellery, vehicles and deposits in bank accounts worth more than Rs3,500 crore, the tax department said in a statement. Immovable property accounted for the lion’s share of Rs2,900 crore. The government is on a drive to crack down on benami properties, or assets held by proxies, invoking the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act (the ‘Benami Act’), that came into force on 1 November 2016.[6]In the second phase of the government’s Operation Clean Money, more than 60,000 persons, including 1,300 high risk persons, have been identified for investigation into claims of excessive cash sales during the demonetisation period, while more than 6,000 transactions of high value property purchase and 6,600 cases of outward remittances shall be subjected to detailed investigations.[7]Demonetisation of higher denomination currency notes by the government seems to have dealt a body blow to funding of terror in Jammu & Kashmir as well as Left-wing extremist violence across several states. [8] [9]Former Independent MLA in Jammu and Kashmir Sheikh Abdul Rashid, popularly known as Rashid Engineer, was arrested by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) on Friday in connection with a case related to the funding of terror activities in Kashmir, officials said. He was earlier questioned in the case in SpacesSpaces 2017 and again summoned earlier this week.[10]Kashmiri separatists Shabir Shah, Asiya Andrabi and Masarat Alam Bhat were arrested on Tuesday in connection with a terror funding case and produced before a Delhi court which allowed NIA their 10-day custodial interrogation. The case relates to alleged terror funding in the Valley and involves Jama’at-ud-Da’wah (JuD) chief Hafiz Saeed, the 2008 Mumbai terror attack mastermind based in Pakistan.[11]Continuing crackdown on terror financers, security agencies have identified 13 people, including Hizbul Mujahideen founder Syed Salahuddin, Hurriyat leaders and businessmen, who are allegedly providing funds to terrorists and stone pelters at the behest of Pakistan spy agency ISI, officials said Sunday. The Centre has belonging to terror financiers in a big way. Thirteen individuals and their properties have been identified by the National Investigation Agency.[12]On June 10 2019, National Investigation Agency (NIA) arrested an accused in Pakistan-based Falah-i-Insaniyat Foundation (FIF) terror funding case. The individual was arrested on his arrival from Dubai at Delhi’s Indira Gandhi International Airport.[13]The National Investigation Agency (NIA) has arrested a Jharkhand-based transporter for allegedly providing funds to a Maoist organisation, according to an official statement issued Monday.[14]Goods and Services Tax (GST) and its Impact on IndiaGST the biggest tax reform in India founded on the notion of “one nation, one market, one tax”. Fundamentally, the $2.4-trillion economy is attempting to transform itself by doing away with the internal tariff barriers and subsuming central, state and local taxes into a unified GST. The rollout has renewed the hope of India’s fiscal reform program regaining momentum and widening the economy. GST consolidates multiple taxes into one. It is important to have rules in place to ensure that a registered business smoothly transitions to GST.[15]Economic Union: The GST impact on the transportation of goods and services from state to another has been a very welcoming change. Goods can be easily transported from one place to another under the new regime. This encourages businesses to have a PAN India presence. The movement of goods across state borders can be done easily via the procedure of generation of the e-way bill.Ease of Pan India Business: As of March 2014, there were 12, 76,861 service tax assessees in the country out of which only the top 50 paid more than 50% of the tax collected nationwide. These pan-India businesses already work in a unified market and will see compliance burden becoming lesser. But they will have to separately register every place of business in each state.Removal of Cascading effect of taxes/ Tax on Tax/ Double Taxation: This effect of taxes stacking upon one another for services providers. This had been a major issue for all businesses as they were aggrieved with paying taxes twice. Under the previous tax regime, the transfer of goods came under the service contract. This meant that every invoice had the value of goods as well as services. Both of these attracted a rate of 70% each giving a total rate of 140%. Under GST, the taxes are unified under the supply of services and the taxation system is unified.Increase in Competitiveness: Under the old taxation system, taxes used to constitute about 25-30% of the retail price of the goods and services. The implementation of GST, prices have gone down since the burden of paying tax has fallen onto the end consumer of the goods and services. Therefore, there is a scope for businesses to produce more at lesser effective costs, leading to a rise in competition.Formalisation of Economy by Demonetisation and GST LinkageThere is a strong link between demonetization and GST. Both are towards restraining black money generation, promotion of accountability, business promotion, use of digitization money. Without demonetization, success of GST would have been flawed. In case we are facing less teething problems in comparison to other countries where it was implemented, it is due to its follow up with demonetization. It forced the people to deal with banks while depositing money in banks, which prompted them to spend through banking channels. It has also boosted the people to trade on line because of their surplus money now stands deposited in the banks.If technology and data analytics has delivered results, both financial and moral, around demonetisation and direct taxes, the GST goes one step ahead on the GST and indirect taxes front. Here, the linkages of databases, big and small, through technology that is wired into the Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) is embedded into the very conceptualisation, construction and execution of the policy. The entire system is electronic. Incentives have been created to ensure compliance — one entity cannot get tax credits if the previous entity does not pass it. Although the hard and almost unrelenting compliancecould be harsh on the technologically-challenged, the Indian entrepreneur is smart enough to learn. Other issues like electricity or broadband availability is being addressed through GST Suvidha Providers.[16]Cross Border Strikes and Impact on SecurityThe time for developing capabilities for counter-strikes is now ripe. The global political, diplomatic and economic scenario in India and Pakistan has changed drastically, over the past two decades.Pakistan remains, in international perspectives, an economically bankrupt and politically dysfunctional country, which is ostensibly democratic, but run by a military elite, which is given to promoting religious extremism across its neighbourhood. Its actions, like hosting Osama bin Laden secretly for over a decade, promoting Taliban extremism in Afghanistan and using internationally discredited terrorist groups for Jihad abroad, have irreparably sullied its international image and reliability.[17]The recent Cross Border Strikes reflect an Offensive-Defence Strategy that has never been attempted at the National Scale. It is a disruptive event in the timeline of Indian Security since 1971 War. The proactive strategy attempts to keep the enemy at receiving end of the initiative.The present government has refrained from publishing a national defence white paper. Ali Ahmed writes that operations such as the “surgical strike” across the LoC suggest that India’s disposition towards the use of force has changed from traditional “strategic restraint” to “strategic proactivism”.[18]Diplomatic isolation is the outcome of strong military muscle and linkage of terrorism. After the precision air strikes by the Indian Air Force on the small town of Balakot in Pakistan’s Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province, public attention in India is now focused on bringing the leaders of the Jaish-e- Mohammed, including Jaish Supremo Maulana Masood Azhar to justice.[19]In fact this has led to the boldest initiative of revocation of Article 370.Impact of Revocation of Article 370Having broken the nexus of ‘Black Money’ generators, Anti National Forces and Money Laundering Businesses/NGOs the Demonetisation, GST allowed space to the National Security apparatus to deal with weakened Pakistan boldly through Cross Border strikes and isolate it internationally while planning for final blow on Revocation of Article 370 and 35 A thereby paving the way for Final Solution to Kashmir problem that has bled 42000 lives and siphoned 2.7 lakh crores of Indian Taxpayers money on trying to keep Kashmiri Leaders and Separatists happy.This is the culmination of a corrective action awaited since the Historical Blunder caused in 1947 by the Congress Leadership. The World is with India today despite the revocation of the draconion and unjust laws which had become blackmail tools by the likes of Abdullahs, Muftis, Lones and Hurriyat Leaders. I have already discussed the matter in various questions on the issue.What do you think about article 370 for J&K?What are your views on the increasing of the Security Forces in J&K? What made the centre do this? Will the decision affect the daily life of citizens?As per international law, is it possible to divide J&K and also make it an integral part of India? Can Pakistan rightfully raise any dispute?Footnotes[1] Demonetization Definition[2] http://www.informaticsjournals.com/index.php/jbt/article/download/21191/17728[3] RBI says 99.3% demonetised notes were returned; major points from central bank's annual report[4] Demonetisation hit growth by 2 percentage points: US Study[5] http://www.informaticsjournals.com/index.php/jbt/article/download/21191/17728[6] Income tax dept attaches benami properties worth Rs3,500 crore[7] The arrow effect of demonetisation and GST | ORF[8] Demonetisation effect: Funds tap turns dry for terror and Maoist groups[9] Demonetisation deterred terror funding, boosted digitalisation: FM Sitharaman[10] NIA Arrests Former J&K MLA Rashid Engineer in Terror-funding Case[11] Terror funding case: Three Kashmiri separatists arrested, sent to 10-day NIA custody[12] 13 terror financers in Jammu and Kashmir identified: Officials[13] VIF News Digest: National Security, Defence Studies and Terrorism, 16-30 June, 2019[14] NIA arrests Jharkhand-based transporter for providing fund to Maoists[15] GST Transition | GST Migration Process Simplified[16] The arrow effect of demonetisation and GST | ORF[17] Advantage India, after Balakot air strike[18] India’s Strategic Preparedness in Times of Escalating Cross-border Tensions[19] Advantage India, after Balakot air strike