Introduction Letter To Customers: Fill & Download for Free

Thanks for the A2A.Highly appreciate if you could clearly outline the question once again! What do you mean by an Introduction Letter here?Introduction Letter for your Software company like a Overview you will share with candidates? or Press? or for Customers? (since you are a HR professional, I doub’t you are not asking for marketing purposes.Please clarify.

Atrocities!Let me share one recent incident happened to my father.My father was using airtel broadband for the past 4 years. After the introduction of Jio,my father was not interested with airtel.He went to airtel show room with a letter to surrender the connection. They received the letter from my father and conveyed OK to my father. I told my father that someone will call and try to convince, try to be harsh with them on surrendering.My father received a call from a guy from the airtel and conveyed he is not interested. They offered many new things. Doubled the offer. Yet my father rejected and said no need any offers.Fast forward,My father received the monthly bill in which he was billed beyond the surrender date. He was shocked and informed me about this. I called the customer care and enquired about this. Information I received from them was really shocking. They said that, the guy approached my father had updated that my father accepted addional offer and said OK to continue with airtel.Anger went to the peak. Started scolding them and asked them to escalate the issue to higher officials. I wanted them to apologize my father on this. Connection was disconnected after 4 hours.Still, my father didn't get any call on my request to apology!Atrocities of Airtel is the major reason for success of Jio. !!Cheers!

In response to the answer given by James Moriarty:“Ancient Macedonians were different from ancient Greeks but they were Hellenized to a certain extent”.The Macedonians were not “Hellenized”, as they actually were a Greek people; they spoke Greek (Doric Greek with elements of Aeolic Greek) and shared the same language, religion, cults and customs, with the southern Greeks, albeit with their regional twists, a common characteristic of all ancient Greek people. They even identified themselves as Greeks:“Now that these descendants of Perdiccas [i.e: the Macedonians] are Greeks, as they themselves say, I myself chance to know and will prove it in the later part of my history.” (Herodotus, “Histories”, 5.22.1)Philip II, in his letter to the Council and People of Athens (quoted by the Athenian democratic politician Demosthenes, his political enemy who insulted him by calling him a “barbarian”), makes it rather clear that he considers himself a Greek:“Not content with this, you have shown your contempt for right and your hostility to me by actually sending an embassy to urge the king of Persia [i.e: Artaxerxes III] to declare war on me. This is the most amazing exploit of all; for, before the king reduced Egypt and Phoenicia, you passed a decree calling on me to make common cause with the rest of the Greeks against him, in case he attempted to interfere with us.” (Philip II, King of Macedonia 382BC-336BC, in his letter to the Council and People of Athens, quoted by Demosthenes in“Philip's Letter to Athenians”, Speeches, 12.6, Demosthenes, Philip)Alexander the Great, the most renowned Macedonian, in fact, Hellenised the East by spreading the ancient Greek culture and language to the people he conquered:“But when he [Alexander] came to talk with Diogenes himself in Corinth, he was so awed and astounded with the life and the worth of the man that often, when remembrance of the philosopher came to him, he would say, ‘If I were not Alexander,I should be Diogenes,’ that is to say: ‘If I did not actively practise philosophy, I should apply myself to its theoretical pursuit.’ He did not say, ‘If I were not a king, I should be Diogenes,’ nor ‘If I were not rich and an Argead’ ; for he did not rank Fortune above Wisdom, nor a crown and royal purple above the philosopher's wallet and threadbare gown. But he said, ‘If I were not Alexander, I should be Diogenes’; that is to say: ‘If it were not my purpose to combine foreign things with things Greek, to traverse and civilize every continent, to search out the uttermost parts of land and sea, to push the bounds of Macedonia to the farthest Ocean, and to disseminate and shower the blessings of Greek justice and peace over every nation, I should not be content to sit quietly in the luxury of idle power, but I should emulate the frugality of Diogenes. But as things are, forgive me, Diogenes, that I imitate Heracles, and emulate Perseus, and follow in the footsteps of Dionysus, the divine author and progenitor of my family, and desire that victorious Greeks should dance again in India and revive the memory of the Bacchic revels among the savage mountain tribes beyond the Caucasus. Even there it is said that there are certain holy men, a law unto themselves, who follow a rigid gymnosophy and give all their time to God ; they are more frugal than Diogenes since they have no need of a wallet. For they do not store up food, since they have it ever fresh and green from the earth; the flowing rivers give them drink and they have fallen leaves and grassy earth to lie upon. Because of me even those faraway sages shall come to know of Diogenes, and he of them. And I also, like Diogenes, must alter the standard of coinage and stamp foreign states with the impress of Greek government.’ (Plutarch, “Moralia: On the Fortune of Alexander” [De Alexandri magni fortuna aut virtute], 1.10, De Alexandri magni fortuna aut virtute)“O wondrous power of Philosophic Instruction, that brought the Indians to worship Greek gods, and the Scythians to bury their dead, not to devour them! We admire Carneades' power, which made Cleitomachus, formerly called Hasdrubal, and a Carthaginian by birth, adopt Greek ways ... But when Alexander was civilizing Asia, Homer was commonly read, and the children of the Persians, of the Susianians, and of the Gedrosians learned to chant the tragedies of Sophocles and Euripides. Yet through Alexander Bactria and the Caucasus learned to revere the gods of the Greeks. Alexander established more than seventy cities among savage tribes, and sowed all Asia with Greek magistracies ... Egypt would not have its Alexandria, nor Mesopotamia its Seleucia, nor Sogdiana its Prophthasia, nor India its Bucephalia, nor the Caucasus a Greek city, for by the founding of cities in these places savagery was extinguished and the worse element, gaining familiarity with the better, changed under its influence.” (Plutarch, “Moralia: On the Fortune of Alexander”, I, 5, 328d, 329a)Summing up,“We must remember too that Philip and Alexander were Greeks, descended from Heracles, wished to be recognised as Greeks, as benefactors of the Greeks, even as Heracles had been.” (Nicholas Hammond, British scholar and expert on Macedon, “Alexander the Great”, p.257)“...the kings of Macedon bid for Greek support by being more Greek than the Greeks. […] Macedonia was inhabited by sturdy gentry and peasantry all composed of the same racial elements as the Greeks.” (David George Hogarth, “Philip and Alexander of Macedon”, pp.9-10)“We know the ancient Macedonians were fundamentally Greeks. That is to say they were Greek speakers and ethnically they were Greeks. (Yale University, “Introduction to Ancient Greek History, Philip, Demosthenes and the Fall of the Polis”, 2007)“There is still more than enough evidence and reasoned theory to suggest that the Macedonians were racially Greek.” (Ian Worthington, Lecturer in Classics and Ancient History, “Alexander the Great: Man and God”, Routledge)As for Philip and his feelings about the Greeks:“His [Philip's] course seems to have been directed towards the establishment of stability in Greece, not conquest.” (Eugene Borza, “In the Shadows of Olympus”, p.230)“They (Macedonians) felt as Greeks, and they had no temptation to destroy what they claimed was their mother country (Greece). They had clearly no wish to swallow up Greece in Macedonia, but rather to make Macedonia, as a Greek state, the ruling power of Greece. Such was undoubtedly the aim of Philip and Alexander too.” (Theodore Ayrault Dodge, “Alexander”, p.187)“In the end, the Greeks would fall under the rule of a single man, who would unify Greece: Philip II, king of Macedon (360-336 BC). His son, Alexander the Great, would lead the Greeks on a conquest of the ancient Near East vastly expanding the Greek world.” (Michael Burger, “The Shaping of Western Civilization: From Antiquity to the Enlightenment”, University of Toronto Press, 2008, p.76)“Afterwards he [Alexander] revived his father's League of Corinth, and with it his plan for a pan-Hellenic invasion of Asia to punish the Persians for the suffering of the Greeks, especially the Athenians, in the Greco-Persian Wars and to liberate the Greek cities of Asia Minor.” (Victor Davis Hanson, “Makers of Ancient Strategy: From the Persian Wars to the Fall of Rome”, Princeton University Press, 2012, p.119)“That sense of being one people allowed each Greek state and its citizens to contribute their values, experiences, traditions, resources, and talents to a new national identity and psyche. It was not until Philip's reign that a common sentiment of what it meant to be a Hellene reached all Greeks. Alexander took this culture of Hellenism with him to Asia, but it was Philip, as leader of the Greeks, who created it and in doing so made the Hellenistic Age possible.” (Richard A. Gabriel, “Philip II of Macedonia: Greater Than Alexander”, 2010, p.232