Only Individuals To Affix: Fill & Download for Free

Greeting !ITR 4s is a user friendly form and is simple and accurate. It helps optimize your cost and is faster in processing and generates transparency. This form does not require you to affix any documents. Taxpayer can fill up this form manually or electronically with or without a digital signature with the income tax department. Only individuals, Hindu Undivided Family and small business taxpayers deriving their income from business which has presumptive income under section 44AD and 44AE, income from salary or pension, income from one house property and income from other sources can use this form.Be Peaceful !!!

This is a very good question. The answer is yes, but only a few, most of which are names of new-found chemical elements.The question can be decomposed to three questions:What are Chinese characters made from?How do Chinese characters convey concepts?How do Chinese characters convey new concepts?What are Chinese characters made from?As a non-native speaker of Chinese you may think these characters are made from random strokes such as 一丨丿丶. In fact, however, strokes make character components or ‘radicals’ (部首), and most characters are made from radicals.Radicals are not randomly improvised. Most of them represent either a meaning or a pronunciation. For example, 信 (xin4, ‘trust’) is made from 亻 (a slightly rearranged version of 人, ‘person’ or ‘human’) and 言 (yan2, meaning ‘to say’ or ‘word’). This indicates what a person says should be trustworthy. On the other hand, 妈 (ma1, ‘mother’) is made from 女 (nü3, ‘woman’) and 马 (ma3, ‘horse’). Obviously there is nothing in common between a woman and a horse; the 马 here merely suggests the pronunciation.Knowing this, you can infer that if a new character have to be invented, it will be made from existing radicals (whose meanings or pronunciations are fixed) rather than from a new, random pattern of strokes. So it is.Radicals in Chinese are quite similar to affixes in English. However, another type of ‘affixes’ in Chinese are described in the second part.How do Chinese characters convey concepts?In the simplest cases, basically every individual character has its own meaning. However, as the Chinese language has quite a long, evolving history (about some 5,000 years), new (and usually related) meanings and concepts have been attached to the original characters.For example, 信, originally a verb ‘trust’, can also be used as an adjective ‘trustworthy’, or a noun ‘trustworthiness’, or an adverb ‘exactly’, or ‘believe’ or ‘faith’ or ‘signal’ or ‘message’ or ‘letter’ (the one you put in an envelope)…However, since a single character can represent so many concepts (打, ‘hit’, has some 26 different meanings), how do native speakers tell what exactly it means?In classical Chinese, this is a, well, slightly difficult job. Therefore, in modern Chinese, two or even more characters can be combined to specify what exactly they mean.Take a look at our old pal, 信. In modern Chinese, we use 信任 for ‘trust’, 可信 for ‘trustworthy’, 信用 for ‘trustworthiness’, 信然 for ‘exactly’, 相信 for ‘believe’, 信仰 for ‘faith’, 信号 for ‘signal’, 信息 for ‘message’ and 书信 for ‘letter’.This is it. Every Chinese character can be used as a prefix or suffix. Certain combinations of characters can be used to convey more accurate concepts.How do Chinese characters convey new concepts?The two questions above answered, this question seems natural. There are three ways for this.By inventing a new character. This happens only when extremely important scientific concepts are introduced, or a new chemical element is found. For example, we invented 熵 for ‘entropy’, 镄 for the 100th chemical element Fermium. Of course, these characters are made from existing radicals, whose meanings or pronunciations are already fixed. 熵 is a combination of 火(‘fire’, indicating ‘energy’) and 商 (‘quotient’), since the physics term ‘entropy’ is defined in a form of division. 镄 is made from 钅 (‘metal’) and 费 (which sounds like ‘fay’). As far as I know, there are perhaps no more than 50 newly invented characters.By using a character combination indicating the pronunciation. This happened mainly in the late 19th century and early 20th century, during which a large number of new concepts were introduced from Europe and America. For example, 咖啡 for ‘coffee’, 巧克力 for ‘chocolate’. The combination 巧克力 literally makes no sense; it merely sounds like how a English speaker pronounce ‘chocolate’. And in the same way we translate names of people and places, e.g. 特朗普 (T-rum-p) for ‘Trump’, 英国 (En-country) for ‘England’ or ‘UK’.By using a character combination, which assembles several meanings. For example, 自由主义 (‘liberalism’) is made from 自由 (‘liberty’ or ‘freedom’) and 主义 (‘theory’ or ‘doctrine’). And 自由 (‘liberty’ or ‘freedom’) itself is made from 自 (‘self’) and 由 (‘obey’). 外科 (‘surgery’) is made from 外 (‘outer’) and 科 (‘medical specialty’). If this sounds too much like prefixes and suffixes, here are some slightly different examples. 长颈鹿 (long neck deer) for ‘giraffe’. 牛肉 (cow meat) for ‘beef’. 动量 (movement measurement) for ‘momentum’. Nowadays, most new concepts introduced in scientific research and everyday life are expressed in Chinese this way. This is really helpful. Since every individual character has its own meaning, from the combination you can easily (and with much confidence) ‘realize’ what it means, even before knowing its definition, rather than memorizing a completely unrelated new word. In this way, Chinese has a vocabulary of about 3,500 frequently used characters and zero ‘new’ words, while English has only 26 letters in the alphabet but tens of thousands (and counting) of words.By the way, there might be multiple ways of conveying the same concept at different periods in history. In early 20th century we used 德律风 (te-le-phone) for ‘telephone’; nowadays we use 电话 (‘electronic talk’) instead.As introduced above, yes, a few characters are still being invented. But we don’t have to invent a completely new character every time there is something new in science and society - that won’t work for 5,000 years of history!

In my opinion, the term has been hijacked and remains very misunderstood. There are loads of asshats wandering the planet who lie, cheat, steal, gaslight, and otherwise make other people’s lives miserable who are unlikely to be narcissists based on the epidemiological prevalence of the PD.But, it’s tempting to affix a label to abusive people - labels help human beings to locate, and thus rationalise certain negative behaviours. Fair enough but ultimately, a diagnosis of clinical narcissism can only be determined after careful and complex evaluation by a trained mental health professional.Whatever the label one chooses to use, it remains that if an individual is abusive in any way, shape, or form, the only way to deal with them is to remove oneself from the firing squad and get out. Permanently.