Proposing A Solution Essay Outline. Proposing A Solution Essay Outline: Fill & Download for Free

One possible type of argumentative essay would be the problem/solution essay.Define the problem.Provide evidence of the extent of the problem.Describe the causes of the problem.Describe the effects of the problem: maybe past, present, and future.Propose possible solutions or mitigations.Conclude with a warning of the effects if the solutions are not followed, or the improvement if they are.You can see where you need research here. Various definitions of the problem? How serious or extensive is it, in different places or in different points of view? Is there agreement on the causes? In a longer essay, you could spend several pages on the past effects, current effects, and predicted future effects. Lots of research to propose solutions.I find that it helps my students if they create a list of questions to be answered, rather than just an outline of points, because you can tell when you’ve answered a question.

One reason is that climate alarmists use a particularly frustrating fallacy to push their solutions. And so, our points are rarely addressed, and our “passion” is frustration at a sophistic trick.Conflating Implementation with Problem IdentificationIn order to solve a problem, we need at least these four steps:Correctly identify that a problem exists and what its extent is.Correctly identify the causes of the problem, and their relative contributions.Correctly identify the “best” solution, which usually is the most effective with the least cost.Implement that best solution well.Our frustration comes when the alarmists start arguing #2, #3, and #4. When we push back, the alarmists will justify, say, their solutions, by appealing to (a small part of) #1.“You are ‘denying’ that there is a problem at all.”“No, we may have disagreements with your certainty at many points of these steps, but the least of our disagreements will be with historic data on warming; we were just now arguing our biggest disagreement with you — against implementing your totalitarian, civilization-destroying solution! Why did you just change the subject back to historic warming data?”Employing the Motte And Bailey Fallacy for Global WarmingThe fallacy being used is a common one. It is called the “Motte-and-Bailey Fallacy”[1] , whose obscure name is why most of us don’t know it well enough to call them on it. Instead, when the alarmists deploy it, we only know that we have been tricked somehow. Our faces get red, and we become apoplectic. This is what you are misconstruing as our “passion”.The use of this fallacy is very dishonest, but it works well, and so the alarmists use it regularly.A “bailey” is an enclosed area lightly defended where most of the people hang out day-to-day. A “motte” is a hill with a castle atop it, behind the bailey. Upon attack, the people retreat from the bailey to the motte, which is much more fortified and much easier to defend, but it is sufficiently restrictive that it is not where the people want to be day-to-day.The worst use of this fallacy is when alarmists cry out for international governmental control of the world economy to ‘save’ us from global warming. As you can see from the steps I’ve outlined above, which are necessary to well solve a problem, the alarmists are demanding an implementation of a particular solution — they are operating at step #4. That would be they hanging out in their “bailey”.We anti-alarmists, seeing the alarmists at the end of the problem solution process, will object for a myriad of reasons. We might object because we think that their solution (e.g., Paris):will not be implemented well (#4),will not solve the actual problem (#3),causes more problems than it solves (#3),is far inferior to better solutions (#3),solves a less important cause (#3)misidentifies the most important causes (#2),exaggerates the size of the problem (#1)uses Monte Carlo simulations as though they were crystal balls (#1)uses economic forecasts of the future world economy as though they were crystal balls (#1)etc.Upon hearing our concerns, the alarmists retreat from the bailey to their motte. They stop arguing for their proposed one-world-totalitarian solution <0559>, and instead fall back to their well-defended fortress.“Are you denying that the temperature has increased over the last century!!! Oh, my!! How can you be so unscientific!!!!”Oh, man, is that irritating!{To see this demonstrated, the humor in this parable <0302> is derived from the warrior’s repeatedly falling back to pointing out the paw print (his motte) every time his totalitarian solution (his bailey) is challenged by the old man: <0302>}The Motte-and-Bailey Fallacy is so effective because it conflates the outrageous (a one world totalitarian government enslaving all human action) with the easily defended (temperatures have increased a bit in the past). It is so frustrating because were we to agree that the motte is well defended (i.e., temperatures may have increased in the past), the alarmists would cheerfully return to their bailey, happily pronouncing that “all scientists agree” with some outrageous totalitarian solution. <0535>Asking for intellectual honesty from alarmists is not possible: this fallacy has been so effective that there is no reason for them to discontinue using it.The solution is to call them on it.If there is any “overwhelming agreement of scientists”, it is only on some minimal aspects of Step #1.Our passion is not against historical data, but against, for example, the refusal to talk about the destruction of humanity that would occur were we to implement many alarmists’ solutions (e.g., Step #4). <1355>See Related:What do global warming skeptics really believe across all the claims for climate change?0302: Parable: Which fools dismiss global warming?0069: What are the most convincing arguments against global warming?1355: What is the libertarian solution to global warming?0535: How can libertarians be so unscientific as to deny climate change?0559: Why do the best-educated people seem to be authoritarian?1172: What is the strongest argument against libertarianism?→ More essays on <Global Warming and Environment> by Dennis→ Return to the <Table of Contents> of Dennis’ Libertarian Musings<, ThoughtControl, GlobWarm,>Footnotes[1] Motte and bailey

What is a conclusion?A conclusion is what you will leave with your readerIt "wraps up" your essayIt demonstrates to the reader that you accomplished what you set out to doIt shows how you have proved your thesisIt provides the reader with a sense of closure on the topicStrategies for an effective conclusionPlay the "So What" Game.When you read a statement from the conclusion, ask yourself, "So what?" or "Why should anybody care?"Ponder that question and answer itBasically, I’m just saying that education was important to DouglassSo what?Well, it was important because it was a key to him feeling like a free and equal citizenWhy should anybody care?That’s important because plantation owners tried to keep slaves from being educated so that they could maintain control. When Douglass obtained an education, he undermined that control personally.Return to the theme or themes in the introductionThis brings the reader full circleIf you begin by describing a scenario, you can end with the same scenario as proof that your essay is helpful in creating a new understandingRefer to the introductory paragraph by using key words, or parallel concepts and images that you also used in the introductionSummarizeInclude a brief summary of the paper’s main points, but don’t simply repeat things that were in the paperPull it all togetherShow your reader how the points you made and the support and examples you used fit togetherInclude a provocative insight or quotation from the research or reading you did for the paperPropose a course of action, a solution to an issue, or questions for further studyPoint to broader implicationsA paper about the style of writer, Virginia Woolf, could point to her influence on other writers or later feministsConcluding strategies that do not workBeginning with an unnecessary, overused phraseThese may work in speeches, but they come across as wooden and trite in writing"in conclusion""in summary""in closing""as shown in the essay"Stating the thesis for the very first timeIntroducing a new idea or subtopic in your conclusionMaking sentimental, emotional appeals that are out of character with the rest of the paperIncluding evidence (quotations, statistics, etc.) that should be in the body of the paperIneffective conclusions"That’s My Story and I’m Sticking to It"Restates the thesis and is usually painfully shortDoes not push ideas forwardWritten when the writer can’t think of anything else to sayExampleIn conclusion, Frederick Douglass was, as we have seen, a pioneer in American education, proving that education was a major force for social change with regard to slavery."Sherlock Holmes"State the thesis for the first time in the conclusionWriter thinks it would be more dramatic to keep the reader in suspense and then "wow" them with the main idea, as in a Sherlock Holmes mysteryReaders want an analytical discussion of the topic in academic style, with the thesis statement up front"America the Beautiful"Draws on emotion to make its appealOut of character with the rest of the paper"Grab Bag"Includes extra information thought of or found but couldn’t integrate into the main bodyCreates confusion for the readerConclusion outlineTopic sentenceFresh rephrasing of thesis statementSupporting sentencesSummarize or wrap up the main points in the body of the essayExplain how ideas fit togetherClosing sentenceFinal wordsConnects back to the introductionProvides a sense of closure