This Agreement Made Effective The Day Day Of Month, Year By And Between The County: Fill & Download for Free

In an ideal world, you should let the lawyer draft the contract document. This is mainly because the lawyer will know the subtle and dangerous points behind the contractual language.Final and complete understandingLots of people get into frightful legal situations because they have the attitude that "oh, we don't need anything complex or special" because it's a straightforward deal. Most people cannot appreciate the fact that a written contract document is the final and complete understanding of a transaction in most contractual situations.Is there a kind of set format?Yes and no. Strictly speaking in law, the contract document may be written in any way -- as long as the provisions (clauses) are clear in meaning and intent. But also strictly speaking in law, the contract document has evolved sufficiently over centuries to nearly always come in a standard format.The first obvious 'standardisation' is that the opening paragraph (the preamble) makes it abundantly clear what the hell the document is all about. The second (a sort of general rule) is that headings have no legal effect -- the legal effect is in the clauses themselves.Should've been, but didn'tNow that you've got the general idea, this is what people (i.e. those not legally trained) should have done but almost always never do, and then end up in a frightful legal mess when the deal goes down the drain:-1. During negotiations, anything reached or agreed between you and the other party should have been written in plain language in a document usually called "Memorandum of Understanding." The points are numbered.2. The MOU is then 'incorporated' into the main contract itself by the lawyer finalising the contract document. The MOU is attached to the contract document, and the main contract provisions will refer to the MOU clauses (with or without additional explanation as appropriate).Suggested solution for this caseNow, to address your situation more directly, this is how your contract should appear:-THIS AGREEMENT made on __ day of [month] __ in the year __ between __ (hereinafter "Party A") and __ ("Party B") in the county of __.1. The Memorandum of Understanding dated __ attached to this Agreement is an integral part of this Agreement until and unless amended and/or superseded otherwise by mutual agreement between the parties of this Agreement.[2. The following provisions shall prevail and supersede those clauses in the Memorandum of Understanding as indicated:-][list]3. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties and interpreted in accordance with the relevant laws of [county or country] __ as applicable.Party A's signature: _____ Party B's signature: _____MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING1. This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) dated __ is between __ (Party A) and __ (Party B).2. Party A forwards customer orders about carpentry services to Party B for fulfillment.3. Party B pays Party A an agreed percentage of every customer order arising from Point 2 above.4. Party B will ensure the work to be carried out will be to a standard of workmanship and quality reasonably expected to fit the nature of the item for use.5. Party A will not directly engage customers of Party B for any type of carpentry services without Party B's consent, and Party A promises not to do so that may result in loss of work for Party B.6. The agreed percentage referenced in Point 3 above is __% based on [calculation method].7. Amendments and additional clauses to this MOU shall be by mutual agreement or by operation of law and attached as MOU Appendixes or added to the main Agreement document.Party A's signature: _____ Party B's signature: _____The lawyer will sort out the legality of your MOU clauses, as long as you're clear about things in plain enough language.

What happens if the seller wants to stay past closing? What is a post occupancy agreement form? What does a NYC residential leaseback agreement template look like?Matching closing date preferences and general timing between home buyers and home sellers is a tricky process. Sometimes a seller wants to stay past closing because he or she has not found a new home to move into yet. When this is the case, the parties can either agree to delay the closing date or to a sign a residential leaseback agreement.A residential leaseback agreement allows a seller to stay past closing in the apartment even after ownership has changed. The amount of money paid by the seller to effectively rent the seller’s former home is negotiable, but is typically at least greater than or equal to the buyer’s mortgage and maintenance payments on a monthly basis. This arrangement might be favorable to either party as a faster closing provides certainty in many areas. For example, a quicker closing may allow a buyer to lock in a favorable mortgage rate instead of having to wait.See a sample NYC residential leaseback agreement template in its original formatting here: NYC Residential Leaseback Agreement Template | Hauseit NYCNYC Residential Leaseback Agreement TemplatePOST CLOSING POSSESSION AGREEMENTAGREEMENT, made this [X] day of [Month], 2015, by and between [Seller Name], (hereinafter referred to as the “Seller”), and [Buyer Name], (hereinafter referred to as the “Purchaser”).WHEREAS, Seller and Purchaser have entered into a certain Contract of Sale (the “Contract”), dated the day [X] of [Month], 2015, for the purchase of Premises known as Cooperative Unit [X] at [Address], andWHEREAS, Seller is desirous of remaining in possession of the premises after the transfer the Shares and Proprietary Lease appurtenant to the Unit, (the “Closing”), that has occurred on this date pursuant to the Contract.NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the transfer the Shares and Proprietary Lease appurtenant to the Unit to the Purchaser on the [X] day of [Month], 2015, without the Seller giving vacant possession of the Premises to the Purchaser, it is hereby agreed as follows:Post Closing Possession Period. The Seller shall have the option of remaining in possession through 7:00 PM on November 31, 2015.No Landlord/Tenant Relationship. This agreement shall not be deemed to have created the relationship of Landlord and Tenant between the Seller and the Seller shall not be considered a tenant of the Property and shall pay no rent therefore, but shall be considered as former owners remaining in possession and may be treated in accordance with R.P.A.P.L Section 713(8).Holdover Fee. Upon closing, Sellers shall pay to or credit the Purchasers the sum of $[Number] ([Amount] Dollars) representing the Seller’s fee for the period from closing, through November 31, 2015, based on the per diem mortgage payment on Seller’s current loan and the monthly maintenance on a per diem basis.Escrowed Funds. Upon closing, the Sellers shall deposit with Sellers’ attorney the sum of $30,000.00 (Thirty Thousand Dollars), (the “Escrow Funds”), with Seller’s attorney agreeing to act as Escrow Agent, and hold the Escrow Funds in escrow, until such time as the Seller has delivered the Premises vacant and in broom clean condition with all personal property as stated in the Contract, no later than 7:00 PM, November 31, 2015, (date of possession). The escrow fund shall not be a limitation on Seller’s liability.Holdover Penalty. In the event that the Seller has not delivered the Premises vacant and in a broom clean condition by November 31, 2015 at 7:00 PM, then, and in that event, it is agreed that the Escrow Agent shall pay to the Purchaser the sum of $1,000.00 (One Thousand) Dollars per day, for each and every day that the Seller fails to deliver the Premises vacant and in a broom clean condition to the Purchasers, in addition to all fees and expenses pursuant to paragraph 3 Said payment or payments shall be made from the Escrow Funds held by the Escrow Agent but shall not be limited thereto, the Seller remaining liable for any deficiency that may thereafter occur.Utilities. Until Seller vacates the Property, Seller shall be responsible for and pay all utility charges including but not limited to gas, electricity, telephone, water, propane and/or fuel and oil use, and cable and security system charges if any.Maintenance of Premises. Seller shall maintain the Property, including the smoke alarm and carbon monoxide detectors, in the same order and condition as of the Closing Date, reasonable wear and tear Seller shall not make any alterations or changes to the appearance of the Property during the Term without the prior written consent of Buyer, including, without limitation, the redecorating or remodeling of any portion of the Property, or the removal of any included appliances and fixtures, except as otherwise provided herein.Damage/Repairs. In the event that the Premises are not delivered in accordance with the terms of the Contract, then the same shall be repaired by the Seller, at the Seller’s sole cost and expense, and upon failure to do so by the Seller, the Purchaser shall cause the necessary repairs and/or cleaning to be made and the Escrow Agent shall pay for same from the Escrow Funds upon presentment of receipted bills evidencing the cost thereof to the Purchaser, however, payment shall not be limited to the amount held in Escrow, with Seller remaining liable for any deficiency that may thereafter occur.Release of Escrow. The Escrow Agent shall not release the Escrow Funds to Seller, until such time as the Purchaser shall have had a fair opportunity to inspect the Premises, and Escrow Agent has been informed by Purchaser that the premises are in the condition as contemplated by the Contract of Sellers’ attorney, upon notice that premises are in order shall, within 48 hours, release any and all remaining escrow funds to Seller. If following the date of possession, Seller’s’ attorney is not notified of any problems relating to the condition of the premises within 3 business days, Purchaser will be deemed to have accepted the premises in their current condition, and Seller’s attorney shall release all remaining escrow funds to Seller.Insurance. Seller shall maintain and continue to have liability insurance policy for both property and personal injury (which may be in the form of a “tenant’s policy”), in full force and effect throughout the term of their post-closing possession, as tenants, or as so required by the insurance Purchaser shall be indemnified and held harmless from any liabilities or claims made upon Seller during the period of Seller’s post-closing possession. Purchaser shall be required to purchase a cooperative “homeowner’s” policy to take effect on the date of closing. Each party shall submit a copy of such policies to the other at closing upon request.Purchaser Inspection. Purchaser shall have the right to a “walk through inspection” within the 48 hours prior to Closing, as well as a second “walk through inspection” within twenty four (24) hours after Seller provides vacant and broom clean possession.Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, without regard to the lapse, cancellation, failure or disclaimer of the insurance policy(ies) referred to in Section IO above, Seller shall indemnify Purchaser from and against any and all liability and shall hold Purchaser harmless from and shall pay any claims, damages, loss, cost or expense (including without limitation, reasonable legal fees and disbursements, court costs, the cost of appellate proceedings and any other reasonable costs of litigation) which Seller incurs arising out of or in connection with bodily injury or property damage occurring to any person or persons, including but not limited to Seller, members of Seller’s immediate family, guests, licensees and invitees, occurring during the Term and within or on any portion of the Property, regardless of the cause, excepting only events of injury or damage caused by the willful misconduct or negligence of Purchaser, Purchaser’s agents, contractors, employees, invitees, guests and permitees.Seller’s Default. In the event Seller does not deliver the Premises in accordance with this Agreement, Seller shall be in default of the Purchaser may, upon Seller’s default, proceed with summary eviction proceedings governed by the provisions of RPAPL Article 7, including but not limited to §713 relating to “grounds where no landlord-tenant relationship exists.” Seller specifically authorizes delivery of a copy of the Notice of Petition and Petition pursuant to RPAPL §§713 and 735 and acknowledges and agrees that such delivery shall be deemed good and sufficient service upon Seller. Seller shall pay Purchaser’s expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees, disbursements, court costs, the costs of appellate proceedings, and any other reasonable costs of litigation) should such action be necessary.Purchaser’s Access. Purchaser shall have the right to access the Unit at reasonable times, and with reasonable notice to Seller, during the post-possession period.Miscellaneous.This Agreement represents the complete agreement of the parties concerning the granting of post-closing occupancy of the Property to No oral agreements or promises will be binding. If any of the terms and provisions of the Contract conflict with any of the terms and provisions of this Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall prevail, except that in the case of such a conflict as to the description of the Property or the identity of Buyer or Seller, the Contract shall control. If any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement are for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the other terms or conditions of this Agreement.This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York without regard to principles of conflicts of laws. Any and all disputes, controversies or litigation that may arise between the parties must be brought in the county where the Property is located.No waiver by Seller or Buyer of any rights of the parties hereunder shall be deemed or construed to be a waiver of such rights with respect to other or future actions of the parties.This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and bind their respective heirs, successors and assigns, except as otherwise provided herein. The rights of possession hereunder are personal to Seller and Buyer and may not be assigned, nor may the Property be sublet. Any assignment shall be absolutely null and void and constitute a breach of this Agreement such that Buyer shall, at Buyer’s option, have the right to terminate this Agreement.This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. This Agreement may be transmitted electronically and the parties intend that electronically or facsimile transmitted signatures constitute original signatures and are binding on the parties.This Agreement is intended to supplement the real estate contract to memorialize the intent of the parties, and shall be considered legal and binding upon the Parties. The parties ratify and reaffirm the real estate contract and agree that in the event the Title is not transferred from Seller to Purchaser, this Agreement shall be deemed null and void and have no further effect.This Agreement shall survive closing.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals the day and year first above written.Seller:Purchaser:Agreed to by Escrowee:Please note: this article is not intended to serve as legal or tax advice. You should consult your lawyer and tax attorney for all aspects of your real estate transaction.

No, but here are a few often-forgotten facts about the history of bilateral relations between the United Kingdom and Ireland over the past hundred years that you may find interesting in this context:Treaty Ports: When Home Rule was granted to Ireland (note: to the entirety of the island, not just to 26 out of the 32 counties) on 6th December 1922, the United Kingdom reserved for itself under the Anglo-Irish Treaty establishing the Irish Free State rights of access to and use of harbour facilities in four ports on the Irish coastline, to wit:Lough Swilly (Loch Súilidhe) in Donegal in the northwest of the island, facing out towards the open Atlantic;Belfast Lough (Loch Laoigh) in the northeast of the island (obviously, Belfast was an important centre for shipbuilding in those days, being, amongst other things, the place where RMS Titanic was constructed);Berehaven (Cuan Bhaile Chaisleáin Bhéarra) in the southwest of the island, again facing out towards the open Atlantic; andQueenstown (renamed to (An) Cóbh in 1920) on the southern coast of the island (and, coincidentally, the last place where the Titanic made landfall in April 1912, prior to her encounter with the iceberg in the North Atlantic a few days later).These four ports in Ireland were collectively known as the ‘Treaty Ports’, on account of the special provisions made for them in the Anglo-Irish Treaty. I am not sure - not having researched the point in sufficient detail to date - whether, in the case of the Treaty Ports, the United Kingdom retained sovereignty over the relevant ports or merely had access to and use of the port facilities in question. In either case, the feeling that it was necessary for the Royal Navy to continue to be present in the Treaty Ports after independence - and the fact that the British Government had required this as one of conditions to Irish home rule - was born from the concern that the United Kingdom needed to protect its interests in general and its use of the North Atlantic shipping lanes in particular, in the event of a resumption of hostilities with Germany at some point in the future. You see, at the point in time when the Anglo-Irish Treaty was signed and became effective (signed 1921, effective 1922), the memories of the Great War (1914–18) were still very fresh. In the War, the United Kingdom had suffered greatly from the effects of the submarine warfare that Germany had conducted in the North Atlantic, with the loss of naval, merchant and civilian shipping. As such, the British Government was determined that, should hostilities with Germany break out once again, the United Kingdom would be able to patrol and to protect its interests in the North Atlantic, Irish home rule notwithstanding - hence the concept of the Treaty Ports.In the end, only three out of the four planned Treaty Ports actually functioned as Treaty Ports. In the case of the fourth one - Belfast Lough - there was ultimately no need to treat it as a Treaty Port. This is because, as expected and immediately after the effectiveness of Home Rule in the entirety of the island of Ireland , Northern Ireland immediately exercised its right to opt out of the Irish Free State and petitioned HM the King in London for readmission into the United Kingdom, which petition was accepted. Belfast Lough had been included in the Anglo-Irish Treaty as a ‘failsafe’ measure to ensure the continued presence of the Royal Navy in those waters in the event that, contrary to expectations, Northern Ireland did not exercise its right to opt out of the Irish Free State during ‘Ulster Month’ (the month-long period after 6th December 1922 allotted for Northern Ireland to determine whether it wanted to stay within the Irish Free State or be readmitted to the United Kingdom). However, in the end and as expected, Northern Ireland immediately exercised its right of opt-out from the Irish Free State and petitioned for readmission to the United Kingdom. As such, and depending on your point of view, the period during which Northern Ireland was either part of the Irish Free State or in legal ‘limbo’ between the Irish Free State and the United Kingdom varies between twenty-four hours to a week at most. In either case, Belfast Lough never, in practical terms, left the United Kingdom and so the provisions in the Anglo-Irish Treaty for it to be treated as a Treaty Port quickly became moot.As for the remaining Treaty Ports, these remained a bone of contention between the United Kingdom and the Irish Free State for the remainder of the 1920’s and into the 1930’s. For some on the British side, the Treaty Ports were a necessity and a precaution in the event of a resumption of hostilities with a ‘Foreign Power’ (as the Anglo-Irish Treaty couched its drafting in coded terms, but principally referring to Germany), whilst for some on the Irish side, they were an affront to the dignity and sovereignty of the new Irish state. As the relationship between the United Kingdom and the Irish Free State worsened (in part because of a long-running dispute over the amounts that Ireland was to pay to the United Kingdom on an instalment basis over decades for areas of land in Ireland that had been sold to local landowners in the 1880’s - the so-called ‘land annuities’), this resulted in various trade barriers being erected between the two countries between 1932 and 1937, in a series of uncooperative acts between the two Governments that became informally known as the ‘Economic War’.As a means of improving cooperation between the two Government and bringing the ‘Economic War’ to an end, the British Government made overtures to the Irish Government about handing the Treaty Ports over to the Irish Free State. Agreement on this was reached in 1938, with the individual Treaty Ports being evacuated by British forces in a phased manner over the autumn and winter of 1938. With that, the last British forces in areas of the island of Ireland outside of Northern Ireland left, and the Irish Free State (or Ireland as it had unilaterally declared itself in its constitutional reforms of 1936–37) took over the areas of the now-defunct Treaty Ports. Given that the ending and evacuation by the United Kingdom of the Treaty Ports took place against the backdrop of increasing tension in Europe caused by the expansion of Germany into Austria and its dismemberment of Czechoslovakia, the British renunciation of the Treaty Ports in 1938 was not without its severe critics in the United Kingdom. One such critic was Winston Churchill, which leads us to …Plan W: Plan W is one of those mysterious things - much spoken about in whispered, surreptitious terms, but at worst exaggerated in terms of its purpose and at best misunderstood. A kind of ‘open secret’ that almost everyone with an interest in Anglo-Irish history has heard about in vague terms, but where only very few are seemingly aware of the details. The point that Plan W was born out of wartime merely adds to its air of mystery and intrigue. Personally, I feel that I need to do a lot more research on it before I can write anything authoritative about it. However, for the sake of, and in the context of, providing an answer to this question, Plan W needs to be mentioned here and now.Although Ireland (meaning, the successor to the Irish Free State) was neutral in the Second World War (referred to as ‘the Emergency’ in Ireland), plans were drawn up between the Irish and the British Governments between 1940 and 1942 for cooperation between the two in the event of a German invasion of Ireland. By May 1940, with the fall of France and hence German troops twenty-odd miles away across the English Channel, the United Kingdom was deeply concerned at the possibility of a direct German invasion from France to the United Kingdom or an indirect German invasion via Ireland as a perceived ‘soft underbelly’ of the Anglo-Irish archipelago (remembering that the armed forces of the independent Ireland were much, much smaller than those of the United Kingdom).Whilst there had been informal discussions in June 1940 for the ‘handover’ of Northern Ireland to Ireland (i.e., the ending of partition and the reunification of the island of Ireland under an Irish government) in return for Ireland’s ending its position of neutrality and joining the the British-led Allies against the German-led Axis Powers, this proposal was not taken seriously (I mean, can you imagine radically changing the political status quo anywhere in the world - let alone between Ireland and Northern Ireland - in the middle of wartime?). Instead, plans were drawn up between the United Kingdom and Ireland for cooperation between their respective armed forces in the event of a German invasion of Ireland: this is Plan W.In outline terms, and in the event that Germany invaded Ireland (again, meaning the successor to the Irish Free State), Plan W envisaged that British forces, using Northern Ireland as a base and a bridgehead, would cross the border into Ireland and, in cooperation with Irish forces, engage with the German forces in an attempt to repulse them from the island. Of course, and given that many in the Irish Government had fought against the British in the Irish War of Independence of 1919–21, Plan W was not uncontroversial in Ireland. However, Taoiseach De Valera, in spite of his often anti-British rhetoric, was the pragmatist on this occasion and agreed to cooperation between British and Irish forces on Irish soil in the event of a German invasion. In so doing, he probably recognised that it was better to be part of, and to be invited to discuss and to participate in, British military plans for Ireland in the form of Plan W, rather than to have something imposed upon him. The United Kingdom, chastened by the experience of the submarine warfare waged by Germany in the Great War, had a long-standing fear of attack from the West along its Atlantic seaboard, and would do its upmost to prevent it. After all, there was even shrill talk in the British Parliament and press at the time of the United Kingdom’s ‘taking back’ the Treaty Ports from Ireland - by force, if necessary - and using them to fight the Germans in the North Atlantic. De Valera knew and understood well that, in the British psyche, a German invasion of Ireland was a ‘red line’ that could not be crossed: one German foot on Irish soil and the British Army would come over the border from Northern Ireland to fight them off. In the end, better to be part of the British plans for Ireland in the event of a German invasion than not - hence Plan W.For some, Plan W represents a sensible approach, a ‘friendly’ cooperation between two ‘friendly’ countries borne out of wartime necessity and the need to join forces in the face of a threat from a common hostile invader. For others, Plan W represents a ‘back-door’ way for the United Kingdom to reoccupy the whole island of Ireland - ‘taking back’ what had been lost twenty years earlier - and using the cloak of a German invasion as the pretext and excuse to do so. In the end, the point is moot: Germany never attempted an invasion of Ireland in the Second World War, and so Plan W was never activated.Boundary commission: The border between Northern Ireland and the Irish Free State (now Ireland) was not originally set in stone. It was originally established by a British statute - the Government of Ireland Act 1920. This Act established a boundary between, and created, two bodies politic respectively known as ‘Northern Ireland’ (six of the counties of the historic province of Ulster) and ‘Southern Ireland’ (the remaining twenty-six counties of the remainder of the island of Ireland, including three counties of the historic province of Ulster). Crucially for our analysis, both ‘Northern Ireland’ and ‘Southern Ireland’ in this incarnation remained within, and were part of, the United Kingdom, pending a permanent settlement of the political status of Ireland as an island.When that permanent settlement came in the form of the Anglo-Irish Treaty of 1921 and the granting of Home Rule on 6th December 1922, the area to which Home Rule applied on the day of its coming into effect was - as mentioned above but often overlooked nowadays - the entirety of the island of Ireland. However, and also mentioned above, the area of ‘Northern Ireland’ immediately invoked its right to opt out of the Irish Free State and to be readmitted to the United Kingdom, which it was. As such, Northern Ireland (without the speech commas) is still a perfectly legitimate (and, indeed, the official) name for the six counties of Ulster that remain part of the United Kingdom. In contrast, at this point in time, ‘Southern Ireland’ became the Irish Free State (or, strictly speaking, the remainder of it after the exercise by Northern Ireland of its opt-out) and the term ‘Southern Ireland’ ceased to have any official use or relevance either in Ireland or the United Kingdom. The term is, however, still occasionally used outside of Ireland, albeit inaccurately and anachronistically.As part of the settlement contained within the Anglo-Treaty Treaty, it was agreed that a Boundary Commission (with members both from the United Kingdom and the Irish Free State) would be set up. The function of the Boundary Commission was to investigate and report on the boundary between Northern Ireland and the Irish Free State, and to make recommendations on the same. The Commission carried out its work between 1922 and 1925.When the report of the Commission’s findings was leaked to the press in November 1925, this created a furore. Amongst other things, the report did recommend some adjustments to the existing boundary, which would have meant the transfer of some territory from Northern Ireland to the Irish Free State, and vice versa.In the end, the furore created by the Commission’s report was so great that no-one in either the United Kingdom or the Irish Free State could ‘stomach’ the prospect of adjusting the existing boundary and thereby risk ‘kicking the hornets’ nest’ between Unionists and Nationalists in Northern Ireland. To borrow another phrase, ‘sleeping dogs’ were allowed to lie. The governments of the Irish Free State, the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland (which, until its local parliament at Stormont was prorogued during the Troubles of the 1960’s and -70’s, had a certain degree of autonomy from Westminster) hastily signed an intergovernmental agreement in December 1925 on the basis of the existing boundary, which was thereby preserved and remains in place today.In the meantime, the Commission’s report was quietly suppressed both in Ireland and the United Kingdom and would not resurface into the public arena for decades (not until the 1970’s, if I am not mistaken). The intergovernmental agreement of 1925 might have solidified into permanence alleged errors made in the original, provisional boundary of 1920, however, when you think about it, that is perhaps understandable in the context of Ireland as an island at the time. When you think about it, the fifteen years leading up to 1925 and the final agreement on the border were a traumatic time for Ireland as an island - North or South, Protestant or Catholic, Unionist or Nationalist - because, in that period, the following events of historic significance to Ireland occurred:Death of King Edward VII as monarch of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland (1910)Sinking of RMS Titanic in the North Atlantic off Newfoundland (accidental collision with iceberg) (1912)Outbreak of the Great War (entirety of Ireland still within the United Kingdom, sends troops to the Front in continental Europe) (1914)Sinking of RMS Lusitania in the North Atlantic off the Old Head of Kinsale, Ireland (enemy action) (1915)Easter Rising in Dublin (declaration of an Irish Republic; major loss of support in Ireland for continuing to be part of the United Kingdom) (1916)Armistice at end of the Great War (Irish troops return home) (1918)General election of December 1918 (pro-independence Sinn Féin wins the vast majority of Irish constituencies; Unionists retain seats only in parts of Ulster and parts of Dublin) (1918)MPs who would have sat in the British Parliament at Westminster found a Dáil (assembly) in Dublin instead; Irish War of Independence begins (1919–21)Government of Ireland Act 1920 partitions Ireland into ‘Northern Ireland’ and ‘Southern Ireland’, both still within the United Kingdom (1920)Anglo-Irish Treaty signed, formally ending Irish War of Independence and granting Home Rule with effect on 6th December 1922; Irish Free State established (outside of the United Kingdom); Northern Ireland immediately secedes and rejoins the United Kingdom (1921–22)Irish Civil War in the Irish Free State between supporters and opponents of the 26-county state created by the Anglo-Irish Treaty; pro-Treaty groups eventually victorious (1922–23).That’s a lot of ‘history’ to pack into fifteen years. It is therefore no surprise that, by the end of 1925 and the arrival of the Commission’s report, no-one on either side of the political spectrum in either the Irish Free State or the United Kingdom had any ‘appetite’ for any further active conflict, and so the boundary remained unchanged.So, and to answer your question directly - are you still with me? ;-) - it is theoretically possible that Westminster could still today have legislative power over parts of Ireland that were arguably only ‘provisionally’ part of the Irish Free State between December 1922 and December 1925, if the recommendations of the Boundary Commission had been accepted and territory along the border transferred from the Irish Free State to Northern Ireland (and vice versa) as part of the recommended adjustments. However, that never happened, and so the provisional boundary became the permanent border. As such, Westminster has not since December 1922 actively legislated for (nor sought the reincorporation of) the parts of Ireland that became the Irish Free State (now Ireland). When the Irish Free State was still a dominion within the British Empire (from 1922 until, depending on your point of view, 1937 or 1949), Westminster actually prohibited itself from legislating on behalf of the dominions without their consent by virtue of the Statute of Westminster of 1931.The Statute of Westminster established the right of self-governance (including on matters of legislation) for each of the dominions, including the Irish Free State. As such, it would have been blatantly contrary to Westminster’s own principles (i.e., British constitutional law) if it had tried to legislate for, and govern, the Irish Free State after that.