Application Form Non-Teaching: Fill & Download for Free

Non -formal ways: that put (formulation process) ideas prominent than formulas with illustrations derived from real life. Make the students try to understand that Maths is a decoded form of real facts in life.

That's true,Being from a small private college I had a gullible feeling that in IIT, professors must be extremely smart and doing unprecedented work & it's true also. Some of the professor are extremely good in teaching but the irony of fact is IIT professors are pressurised to do more research than taking classes.They are never questioned if they don't take a particular class but they are definitely questioned if they fail to produce significant research. It is only out of their interest they take classes and complete the syllabus .Coming back to the question, how IIT’Ian's study? Based of my experiences, You will be shocked to know an IITian has a very strong basics, which comes from his studies of 11th and 12th, however his engineering basics are very poor .That is the reason you don't see any iit Btech or MTech doing critical research , most of them do startups which are most commonly based on a new product or mobile application ( non technical ). This is Because IITian have a innovative mind which they have developed through their JEE or GATE preparations.The inference is :“If you want to be successful in life, you cannot depend on the external resources to teach you. Make your own road to success”I hope I answered your question. Love you

I would probably say something like:The name “Lisp” comes from “list processing” because everything is in the form of a list, both the data being processed and the instructions telling the computer how to process it. In the latter case, the first thing in the list is the instruction and the rest are inputs to it — often other lists.Lists are enclosed with parentheses, which ends up looking like that antisemitic meme from Twitter. The fancy name for these lists is “symbolic expressions,” or “s-expressions.” People often poke fun at Lisp code’s appearance as in the joke “Lots of Irritating Spurious Parentheses.”Despite being the second oldest language (or family of languages, more accurately) in use today, Lisp has a cult following and for much of the same reason it used to be popular for artificial intelligence. Since everything is a list, instructions can be “quoted” and treated as data for other instructions. This makes it easy to write programs that modify themselves. The fancy Greek name for this property is “homoiconicity.”If you’ve ever tried to teach programming it becomes immediately evident that most “non-programmers,” as in people who have no idea what the activity of programming even amounts to, have no frame of reference for a plethora of concepts programmers treat as axiomatic. You can’t even assume the same “common knowledge” not directly related to programming, e.g. what a tilde is.I’ve actually had better luck explaining monads to non-programmer friends than if-then-else statements. Everyone can understand list concatenation. You could say the same for predicates, but how conditionals execute is rather difficult to explain from first principles. It’s a calling convention, really, and in a way the mother of all calling conventions in that (to my knowledge) contemplating it led to the strictness distinction¹.I think what it comes down to is that anthropomorphizing the computer, built into the term “imperative” programming, isn’t the best pedagogy. Few programmers could explain lambda calculus from NAND gates up, but more importantly I’m not sure such an explanation would be useful for drawing a connection between the semantics of programming languages and applications non-programmers are familiar with. Process calculi might be, though. Robin Milner demonstrated both call-by-value and call-by-name embeddings of the lambda calculus in the π-calculus². If you think drawing on such methods is heavy-handed then maybe you haven’t tried explaining programming to enough adults who have no idea how software is made. Besides, you could always use Alligator Eggs.1. Landin (1965), A Correspondence Between ALGOL 60 and Church's Lambda-Notation.2. Milner (1992), Functions as Processes.