In Addition To This Claim Form, You Must Submit Proof Of Payment: Fill & Download for Free

I think that it’s a plan put forth by those who wish to make an end run around the Constitution to deprive people of their rights, and by the well-meaning but useful idiots of the first group.There are quite a few problems with demanding mental health checks before buying a gun.The first is that they simply don’t work the way proponents think or claim they do. They seem to envision this process like an inspection for your car. Just pop in to the shrink and make sure everything is hunky dory.But that’s not how it works. At best, a psychiatrist may be able to say that, in this particular moment, a patient is or is not calm, rational, and functional, but unless the person in question is a regular patient there is absolutely nothing predictive a psychiatrist can say.Psych evals also do not ever produce a “clean bill of mental heath”. They provide a multi-faceted and complex result describing a range of factors that simply cannot ever be summed up as “safe” or “unsafe”.And before you declare “Well then let’s just require anyone who owns a gun to go to regular therapy”, first off by doing so you are attempting to pathologize gun ownership as a de-facto mental illness.Then there’s the liability issue. What happens when someone given a “safe” eval goes on and commits murder? You know that psychologist is going to get sued by the victim’s family. “Welp, better downcheck everyone, just to be safe”. Enough said there.And what happens when a psychologist is biased? Unprofessional? Commits malfeasance? It will happen. Salih F. Canpolat tells of of how his father was downchecked in Turkey by a psychologist because “You are going to hunt and kill animals with this weapon, therefore I am not giving you a clear bill[1][1][1][1]”.We also have the moral issue. Do you really want people to be forced to submit to a State psychologist in order to exercise their rights? You are aware of the utterly flagrant and rampant abuse of “psychology” enacted by fascist and communist regimes in order to quell dissent, yes? If someone couldn’t be arrested for crimethink, they would be institutionalized for mental health issues.It’s no different than a mandatory mental health exam before you vote. After all, it would be better for society if you were in a proper mental state when you vote, right? That you’re aware of all the facts and understand the greater impact of the election. We wouldn’t want you voting unwisely, would we? Think of the children.Further, such a requirement is easy to abuse in order to effect a de-facto universal gun ban. Ensure that too few psychologists are licensed or permitted to perform the exams. Formulate testing requirements that are impossible to pass. Ensure that expenses for testing are far too high for anyone but the wealthy to pay, thereby ensuring that the poor are systematically denied their rights.Finally we get to the legal issue. I would argue that a psych eval is simply illegal, following the same reasoning as the 24th amendment.Amendment XXIV[2][2][2][2]Section 1.The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.Psych evals are expensive, and there is no way that a psych eval to buy a gun will meet the requirements of medical necessity necessary for it to be covered by insurance. Especially since the proposed NY laws would require an eval for every single purchase, sale, or transfer.Therefore, such evals will have to be paid for by the prospective buyer. Which means that the Citizen is being required to pay what is arguably a tax, fee, or fine, in order to exercise a right. This is akin to a poll tax. Not a tax paid as an incidental expense, such as gas expenses to drive to a polling station. No, a poll tax is a fee paid for no other purpose than to pervert a right into a privilege, requiring the payment of before the “right” can be exercised.In the same way, these psych evals, in addition to all their other flaws, would illegally serve as a tax that must be paid before a right may be exercised. And in the US, we do not require testing, permission, or proof of “need” to exercise our rights. That’s what rights are.New York’s proposed laws will not solve the problem they claim to solve, nor are they moral, just, or legal. The sole purpose of these laws is to disarm the civil population. They can have no other practical effect.Like all anti-gun laws, this is nothing more than deprivation of rights under the color of law[3][3][3][3].Original question-What do you know or think about New York wanting psych evaluations to buy a gun?Footnotes[1] Bearing Arms[1] Bearing Arms[1] Bearing Arms[1] Bearing Arms[2] 24th Amendment[2] 24th Amendment[2] 24th Amendment[2] 24th Amendment[3] 18 U.S. Code § 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law[3] 18 U.S. Code § 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law[3] 18 U.S. Code § 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law[3] 18 U.S. Code § 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law

This happens a lot. I’m not a lawyer or regulator, but I can tell you what has worked for others. I make no promises that it will work for you, but it’s worth a try.First and foremost, read your insurance policy, especially the requirement for submitting timely proof of loss. Generally, claims are payable only when certain conditions are met. For instance, claims must be submitted prior to a specific deadline. Additionally, claims for covered services are typically payable only to the insured, or to the provider of services if the insured assigned benefits to the provider in writing.Advise the collection agency that you “have not, as of today” received a statement from the hospital or an EOB (Explanation of Benefits) from the insurance company to inform you that you owe any payment on the bill. Request two documents from the agency: (1) a detailed itemized bill from the hospital that shows the billing date and your address, and (2) a copy of a written agreement that you signed, which states that you agreed to pay the collection agency for your hospital care.A collection agency is often unable to produce either of these two documents. Frequently, they will turn their attention elsewhere. Just as frequently, they become very persistent. You don’t owe the collector any explanation. Simply request the two documents to prove that you have a valid obligation.Hospitals sell uncollectible accounts to collection agencies who then try to get someone to pay them. Collectors show little regard for whether the bills were appropriately submitted for payment in the first place. The hospital’s decision to sell the account suggests it was not payable. Further, you probably couldn’t have prevented the bill from going to the collector and you probably don’t owe the collector now.Many patients needlessly pay debts that have been written off by providers. If the hospital wrote off your debt, why do you need to pay it, especially to a third party collector you don’t even know?If you decide to try this, don’t cut corners. Read your insurance policy thoroughly and make sure it does, indeed, support that, under your specific circumstances and your described coverage, you do not have a liability.You may need to speak to the insurance company regarding your claims history. Often, a hospital will write off an account that was too old to submit to the insurance company. You don’t control when the hospital bills the insurer.Certain providers render services on your behalf that are covered under a hospital assignment of benefits. You should always pay providers for services you receive unless they do not expect payment from you. Don’t pay a third party that did not treat you and that you never agreed to pay.Hope this helps.

Tax Benefits For Home Loan Under Section 24:Section 24 of the IT Act allows the borrower of the home loan to claim tax deduction on the interest that is paid towards the housing loan. According to the clauses mentioned under this Section, income from the borrower’s property is reduced by the figure of the interest paid on the housing loan. However, there is a condition for claiming this tax deduction. The home loan must have been taken for the purpose of purchasing a property, construction of the house, repair of the house, reconstruction or remodeling, etc.Other tax benefits that can be availed are mentioned below:Tax Benefits For Home Loan Under Section 80EE:This Section under the Income Tax Act was reintroduced in the 2016 Union Budget. It has a provision of claiming an additional amount of Rs.50,000 as tax benefit when you take a home loan. This claim can be made on the interest that is paid towards the loan amount. This additional claim is over and above the claim of Rs.1.5 lakh and Rs.2 lakh under Section 80C and Section 24 on the Income Tax Act, respectively.Tax Benefits For Home Loan Under Section 80C:Under Section 80C of the Income Tax Act, the borrower of the housing loan is allowed to claim tax deduction on the principal amount. Rs.1.5 lakh is the maximum amount that can be claimed under this Section as tax exemption. You must understand that this deduction is the sum total of all the deductions under Section 80C and includes sums invested in fixed deposits, PPFs, Senior Citizens Savings Scheme, National Savings Certificate, etc.Documents required – All your property documents and proof of purchase are required for this process. Please talk to your bank to know about any specific document needed.