Apd Full Form In Banking: Fill & Download for Free

Both are considered serious mental illnesses because of the intractability of the illness and the lack of a full understanding of the etiology. Treatment for psychopathy is usually done in a confinement setting, where residents are taughtby a behavioral approach to learn to "act as if" they know how to be good citizens.Samenow(2004) convinced a large portion of professionals that Aspd or Psychopaths were not amenable to treatment of any kind. Later research at Kings College, London(2012) indicates that certain psychopathic individuals showremarkable difference in brain scans than others with the same diagnosis do not. The most violent and criminal psychopaths show a difference in discernable gray matter, not present in other psychopaths.This has led to some behavioral cognitive approaches, one of which is mentioned above. Of course violent offenders would be totally inappropriate for anexperimental group similar to the ones being used in the correctional system.Unfortunately, there is little in the way of retrospective studies that indicate howwell these groups are changing the behavior of non-violent ASPD individuals.Many professionals are convinced that there is absolutely no redemption forthese individuals, however, contrary to Samenow's assertion that white collarcriminals are there because of an "accident" in their thinking, it has been proven otherwise. Low social background is not the only path to criminality. Look atBernie Madoff, for instance. He used his status and his ethnicity to bilk his ownclass out of millions, and has shown no remorse whatsoever. Page on world.com, Enron, and Lincoln Savings and loan were all scammed by psychopaths, some of whom wiggled their way out of serving time, just as the executives of banks likeChase, used "too big to fail" as a way of side stepping prosecution.Sociopaths seem to have a conscience, but conveniently forget all about it in orderto carry out criminal activities they justify with various rationalizations. Bear inmind, that most sociopaths and their brethren, psychopaths, don't get caught.Not all are violent, but they lack empathy for their victims who they look down on,especially if they ask for mercy.Thanks for the A2APsychopathy,Lifescript.com: Healthy Living for Womenhttps:www.friedgreentomatoes.org/articles/apd-sociopathy-psychopathy,awarenessy, incurable, nothing can fix, Page on www.psyuchopathy Page on awareness.comPage on journal of forensic and investigative accounting, V6,issue2,jul-dec2014

I immediately thought of this clip from The Beast (of War) when I read your question:That’s one way to do it! Although somewhat inaccurate in that most tanks don’t have “motion sensors” or a flamethrower on the roof, I think it gets the point across.It’s important to examine the motivation and armament of your typical Armoured Fighting Vehicle (AFV or “tank”) crew as part of the answer to your question.AFV crews are typically trained to believe that they are the elite in their respective armies, with some regiments having a proud tradition dating back to the days waxed moustaches, gleaming sabres, dashing silk scarves, massed cavalry charges, and the like.They’re proud (pompous if you’re not one of them) and their job is to drive in, blow the shit out of absolutely everything, and then drive away whilst snickering, leaving the PBI (Poor Bloody Infantry, i.e., cannon fodder) to clean up the mess.They are particularly motivated to not, under any circumstances, lose their “mount” (their tank, AFV or “ride”) for the following reasons but not necessarily in this order:Honour: it would be a disservice to the cavalry;Home: while the PBI dig a hole to call home, AFV crews have a mobile home with all their stuff in it, often including coffee makers and fridges;Inconvenience: walking home like the rest of the rabble would suck, hard.Most people also underestimate just how heavily armed AFVs and their crews themselves are, relative to the average PBI. Our full combat load, for one vehicle, when I was member of the Royal Canadian Armoured Corps, was as follows:Main gun: 40+ rounds of HESH (High Explosive Squash Head), APDS (Sabot), WP Smoke and Canister (a really big shotgun shell) or several hundred cannon shells for an autocannonCoaxial machinegun (MG) and sometimes a commander’s MG: 5,000+ rounds6–8 smoke dischargers plus reloads1 or 2 extra machineguns or SAWs (M249 equivalent) for picquet duty and sparesA submachinegun, carbine or rifle for each member of the crew plus 1 or 2 handguns: 100’s of rounds for these weaponsBayonets, knives, brass knuckles and tomahawksA box of hand grenades and smoke grenadesA box of mines, either “Claymore” or “toe-popper” type, or both4 M72 SRAAWs (aka LAWs)A bunch of parachute flares and trip flaresWire, for both obstacles, booby traps and field telephonesAxes, picks and shovelsWhatever else we could steal and cram in thereThis, of course, varied, depending on which type of vehicle we were crewing but that was the general idea. This is a lot of firepower for 3 or 4 guys.Your question invites a lot of speculation as to why the infantry are actually close enough to scamper onto your AFV. Speculative questions like:Why didn’t the AFV crew kill them or scare them off already?Why didn’t the AFV crew call for an emergency “dust-off”, where a neighbouring AFV fires MGs and canister rounds at your mount?Where are the accompanying infantry? What are they doing (instead of protecting the tanks, dammit!)?Why was the commander daft enough to drive into a dead-end laneway?Why hadn’t the infantry knocked the AFV out already with an RPG?How are they attacking? Just small arms, or molotovs or bags of flour or dry cement to screen the vision blocks?However, I’ll avoid the speculation as to how they got there and deal with the question as asked.We were trained in a number IA’s or Immediate Action drills for this very thing. These were expanded upon by the particular squadron you were serving in and then expanded upon again by the crew you worked with. In effect, there was an overall SOP or Standard Operating Procedure but the crew you served with also had its own plan on how to deal with this kind of problem.The first IA was to simply ignore them. But that one was only really applicable if you were in formation with other AFVs and/or you had friendly infantry with you to deal with this sort of thing.Our alarm for being assaulted by enemy infantry was “TROOPS CLOSE!” by any member of the crew. On hearing this, the driver would slam it into reverse or forward and zig zag as fast a possible towards the nearest bunch of “hard stuff”, like light-framed buildings, fences and trees. The commander would fire both banks of smoke dischargers and the gunner would fire the main gun and then spray the area we were leaving with the coax MG, while traversing the turret left and right. The commander and loader would then fire the roof mounted machineguns or their carbines, depending on what we were riding and we’d rinse and repeat until safe.To expand upon this, modern AFVs are relatively fast, compared to WWII tanks. Although not as fast as your car, they accelerate rather quickly, which can send guys on board flying in short order (this also why tankers wear helmets and where the derogatory term “zipperheads” comes from, due to stitches in crew members’ heads).The smoke dischargers fire grenades which explode in the air around the vehicle. Although designed to screen the tank, they scatter red or white phosphorous mixed with rubber around which burns super hot, sticks to almost anything, and burns underwater. The smoke produced is also mildly toxic.Here it is in action:Note how many explosions there are and just how fast the tank backs out of there.As for heading for the nearest “hard stuff”, the idea was that any infantry which were foolhardy enough to remain on board would be clinging on for their dear lives and would be brushed off by tree branches, the chain link fence or farmer’s shed that we drove through. Lacking any obstacles to drive through, the backup plan was to make best speed cross country, which would cause remaining infantry to fall off or cling on, at which point the commander or loader could shoot them off.The basic idea here is to brush off the guys on board, maybe kill some of them or scare them away and open the range up quickly so that we could engage with our mounted weapons. As modern AFVs are rather fast, no infantry on foot could even hope to keep up with one, unlike most WWII AFVs.In the case of our mount being bogged down, stuck or immobilized, say due to an RPG from these infantry, our IA was to open fire 360 degrees much like that video clip from The Beast. We even talked about it in those terms except that we’d also fire small arms from the hatches and pistol ports (yes, some AFVs have small armoured ports from which you can fire small arms out of). Yet another plan was rolling hand grenades out the top hatches until the enemy infantry got the idea that we didn’t like having them around, and politely died or left.In the worst case where we are both immobilized and our mounted weapons were out of action or ammunition, there was always this option:EDIT: Trying to get the YouTube links to work.

Not exactly, but he is psychopathic. Or at least the writers wrote his character this way.It’s always hard putting a diagnosis on a fictitious character. This is because throughout any movie or tv series, we don’t get to see how they really live their life; simply what they do that contributes to the general storyline. The same case is with Berlin. We have seen some dramatically socialisation scenes that build up our understanding of his character, but rarely have we been benefited to see what his day-to-day life is like. Hence, my answer will be based off what we know from watching Money Heist itself.Berlin was, as much as I detest saying it, a psychopath. We should look at the facts. A psychopath is a manipulative, cold and remorseless individual, who is scientifically characterised by having APD (Anti-Social Personality Disorder). Antisocial individuals are known for their remorseless and like the name suggests; they lack the essential need to socialise with other people, unless it involves giving them pleasure.The PCL-R (psychopathy check-list revised) is a list which is often used to identify psychopaths, and distinguish them from other antisocial individuals. Each item in the following checklist is given a score of 0, 1 or 2.Of course, many people find the PCL-R too imprecise, unprofessional or outdated, so this will only be one part of my answer.• glib and superficial charm• grandiose (exaggeratedly high) estimation of self• need for stimulation• pathological lying• cunning and manipulativeness• lack of remorse or guilt• shallow affect (superficial emotional responsiveness)• callousness and lack of empathy• parasitic lifestyle• poor behavioural controls• sexual promiscuity• early behaviour problems• lack of realistic long-term goals• impulsivity• irresponsibility• failure to accept responsibility for own actions• many short-term marital relationships• juvenile delinquency• revocation of conditional release• criminal versatilityA prototypical psychopath would receive a maximum score of 40, while someone with absolutely no psychopathic traits or tendencies would receive a score of zero. A score of 30 or above qualifies a person for a characterisation of psychopathy.(Information above taken from here; https://www.cbc.ca/doczone/m/features/the-hare-psychotherapy-checklist)Let’s work through some parts of the checklist.Glib and Superficial Charm - 2/2As Berlin himself admits, he has “amazing peoples skills”, and a pathological need to give a goof first impression. We see through Season(s) 1 and 2 that he is able to calm down the hostages, make them feel safe, he is able to charm many of the other gang members such as Helsinki and Oslo into doing tasks for him. As well as this, the audience are extremely charmed by him; it’s why he’s often the most favourited character of the show.Grandiose Estimation of Self Worth - 2/2In a flashback in season 4, Berlin violently stabs a man in the toilet with a fork in the genitalia while crudely mocking him. Why? Because he laughed at his bow-tie. We see him casually threaten Rio when he confronts him for ordering him to execute Monica. We see Berlin punishing Tokyo by unceremoniously turning her into the law, when she overthrew and played Russian roulette with him. Essentially, he’s cooktop punished those who have insulted him or threatens him in some way or another. He has Rio beaten up when he calls him “sick”, justifying the act with the fact that he endangered the operation. We see that as the leading robber, he’s extremely cocky; to the point where he even believes he can lead the robbers on personally when the Professor stops responding to them and they conclude that he is in trouble.Need for Stimulation - Unknown (we’ll assume 1)I can’t recall any time Berlin has needed stimulation. Being a tv series about robberies, gunfights and grand schemes, I doubt we ever will.Pathological Lying - 1/2Berlin is certainly a liar, as seen when he lies to the hostages and his fellow robbers time and time again, but many characters in Money Heist do. I doubt this makes him a pathological liar; but lying is certainly a major characteristic that the character bears.Cunning and Manipulativeness - 2/2Berlin is undoubtedly cunning. His intelligence and deceit fullness is shown throughout the entirety of Money Heist. And he’s certainly manipulative. He is able to persuade the rest of the robbers that Tokyo’s turn-in was for the best of the gang.Lack of Remorse or Guilt - 2/2This is the obvious one. A good example can be seen when he mercilessly and coldly orders the execution of a pregnant woman, of when he violently and proudly stabs a man with a fork to impotency, and how he literally show’s little to no remorse over the death of many of his own fellow robbers.Parasitic Lifestyle - 2/2Another obvious one. Berlin is a robber, and as Tokyo states isn’t he beginning he is a master and genius at the profession. He prefers to obtain money by taking it from others; not from earning it himself.Shallow Affect - 2/2When Oslo died, he respectively said “RIP”. When Moscow died, he appeared at the back; didn’t speak to him and showed very little disappointment.Poor Behavioural Controls - 0/2Berlin is always shown as a calm and composed character. At no point does he have unintended outbursts, and he has a firm control of his own behaviour.Sexual Promiscuity - 1/2He isn’t promiscuous at all, but he is lustful. He loves sex and barely loves the women. He frequently talks about his love-making, goes on violent and delusional, brutally raping a hostage.Early Behavioural Problems - Unknown (assume it’s 1)Lack of Realistic long term goals - 1/2Berlin is terminally ill, so while his goals are certainly unrealistic (his dream to go on a romantic island with Ariadne), it’s understandable and may not be as a result of his psychopathy. As well as this, his original plan to rob the bank instead of the mint with only a handful of people was laughable.Impulsivity - 1/2While he is frequently controlled by his sexual desires and his cruelty, Berlin rarely shows signs of uncontrollable impulsivity.Many Short term marital relationships - 2/2Apparently, he’s been married several times. 7 if I remember correctly. They all ended when his partner(s) realise he shows contempt to the children in their relationship.In the end, a lot of this is quite subjective, but according to the lay-out if events and facts he obtains most points necessary to classify as a psychopath. But as he is an imaginary character, this will obviously not be a neat fit into the PCL-R. Obviously it’s hard to place a psychopathic characterisation on this this drastically fictionalised individual. The writers clearly show intentions to characterise him as a psycho, however. They frequently and intent-fully show his lack of remorse and cold attitude on numerous occasions. He is written in such a way that time and time again, we fall in love over and over again with this character; the writers of the show frequently abuse this by making him do unspeakably cruel actions.