Ati Templates: Fill & Download for Free

Let’s start with built-in (“C-style”) array types. Here is a simple array of 10 int values:int ai[10]; // (1) You could create a synonym for the type “array of 10 ints” as follows:using TenInts = int[10]; If you wanted an array of 20 of those things, replace in (1) “int” by TenInts and 10 by 20:TenInts ati[20]; You can do the same thing with a single declaration as follows:int ai[10][20]; Being able to read these kinds of declarations takes a bit of practice. Here are some things to remember:You read such declarations “from the inside out”; i.e., you start with the name (ai) which is “an array of 10 elements” of “an array of 20 elements”.Decorations on the right of the name (i.e., like [20] for an array or (int, int) for a function) take precedence over those on the left (like & for reference) unless there are parentheses (what’s inside parentheses comes before what’s outside of them).Soint *ap[10]; is an array of 10 pointers to int, butint (*pa)[10]; is a pointer to an array of 10 ints.Finally, note that C++ includes an array template that can be quite convenient, and whose syntax is more regular:#include <array> std::array<int, 10> ai; // Different from the ai in (1)! std::array<std::array<int, 10>, 20> aai;  // Array of 20 arrays of 10 ints each. I generally recommend using this alternative because std::array instances behave more consistently as value types, whereas builtin arrays tend to decay to pointers to their first element, thereby behaving a little like reference types.

Thanks for the A2A.Yes, the two are related languages. Arabic is Semitic, while Oromo is Cushitic, but both are Afro-Asiatic languages. Besides the two being classed under separate branches of Afro-Asiatic, there isn’t a uniform agreement on how closely related they are compared to other branches of Afro-Asiatic. On the whole, though, they are very distantly related. Even languages under the same branch of Afro-Asiatic can be strikingly different (i.e., Amharic v. Arabic). I’ve read that their branches converge beyond 6–7,000 years ago, since Proto-Semitic is dated to sometime around 4,000 B.C.E. [1][1][1][1][2][2][2][2]Grammatically, they’re pretty different, since Arabic makes heavy use of the Semitic 3-consonant root template to construct words, whereas Oromo, does not. Also, whereas Arabic is primarily a VSO language (i.e., “cake I eat.”), but Oromo is an SOV language (i.e., “I cake eat”).[3][3][3][3] In spite of this, though, there are still some lexical similarities, especially in basic words.Here’s are a few cognates for pronouns:“English”…….Oromo[4][4][4][4]…..Arabic[5][5][5][5]“I”…………ani, an ………أنا (ana)“You”…… ati …………انتَ (anta)/انتِ (anti)“We”…… nuti, nu'i, nu…..نحن (naHnu)Otherwise, there are other similarities, but I think this covers enough.Footnotes[1] https://www.phil.muni.cz/jazyk/files/AAmigrationsCORR.pdf[1] https://www.phil.muni.cz/jazyk/files/AAmigrationsCORR.pdf[1] https://www.phil.muni.cz/jazyk/files/AAmigrationsCORR.pdf[1] https://www.phil.muni.cz/jazyk/files/AAmigrationsCORR.pdf[2] Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of Semitic languages identifies an Early Bronze Age origin of Semitic in the Near East[2] Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of Semitic languages identifies an Early Bronze Age origin of Semitic in the Near East[2] Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of Semitic languages identifies an Early Bronze Age origin of Semitic in the Near East[2] Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of Semitic languages identifies an Early Bronze Age origin of Semitic in the Near East[3] http://www.imedpub.com/articles/investigating-afan-oromo-language-structure-and-developing-effective-file-editing-tool-as-plugin-into-ms-word-to-support-text-entr.pdf[3] http://www.imedpub.com/articles/investigating-afan-oromo-language-structure-and-developing-effective-file-editing-tool-as-plugin-into-ms-word-to-support-text-entr.pdf[3] http://www.imedpub.com/articles/investigating-afan-oromo-language-structure-and-developing-effective-file-editing-tool-as-plugin-into-ms-word-to-support-text-entr.pdf[3] http://www.imedpub.com/articles/investigating-afan-oromo-language-structure-and-developing-effective-file-editing-tool-as-plugin-into-ms-word-to-support-text-entr.pdf[4] https://www.hf.uio.no/iln/om/organisasjon/tekstlab/prosjekter/Ethiopia/05-appleyard.pdf[4] https://www.hf.uio.no/iln/om/organisasjon/tekstlab/prosjekter/Ethiopia/05-appleyard.pdf[4] https://www.hf.uio.no/iln/om/organisasjon/tekstlab/prosjekter/Ethiopia/05-appleyard.pdf[4] https://www.hf.uio.no/iln/om/organisasjon/tekstlab/prosjekter/Ethiopia/05-appleyard.pdf[5] https://arabic.desert-sky.net/g_pronouns.html[5] https://arabic.desert-sky.net/g_pronouns.html[5] https://arabic.desert-sky.net/g_pronouns.html[5] https://arabic.desert-sky.net/g_pronouns.html

The machine that does this is a specific class of broadcast hardware known generally as the 'CG' for 'character generator' - a term that clearly shows it's years.There are also generally two layers, at least, of GFX control - production, and master control.Master control is the 24/7 control of a station, and would do things like local weather inserts. On a CBS during the NFL, the score ticker maybe super imposed over all the various feeds from master control.Then you have production control, where a CG operator works a specific show. This is true for live sports, live news, and even the Daily Show and Colbert Report.Sports is the high end, but it's basically the same tech across the board, with more or less emphasis on Newsroom integration, tho everybody has it. Many but not all of the vendors do Weather products too.These are generally OEMed PCs running Windows, though a few companies use Linux. A lot of the video hardware is OEMed from Matrox, NVIDA is bigger in this market then ATI.'Chyron' - http://www.chyron.com/ - is a big player, and perhaps the oldest. Some places use 'chyron' as a noun instead of CG, or will refer to a graphic template as 'a chyron.'Vizrt - http://www.vizrt.com/ - is generally considered the best in terms of GFX capability, and a whole lot of other stuff, but it's also complex and really expensive. ESPN uses them, so do the Big 3 for NFL and what not. All those rotating player headshots and gleaming metal are usually Viz. They also have the best super hi-res map integration, it's so smooth and beautiful.http://www.pixelpower.com/usa/index.aspx is another mid-range vendor in the space, along with http://www.miranda.com/ that makes a lot of other broadcast gear, like multi-viewers, as well as low end CGs aimed mostly at master control.Orad is also pretty cool, they do CGs and things like virtual sets and player tracking for football, as well as weather, and the Big Iron broadcast vendors, Harris and Grass Valley both have CG products.