How to Edit Your CONSENT to a Criminal Record Check Schedule A EMPLOYEE Use this form to apply for a Online Easily Than Ever
Follow these steps to get your CONSENT to a Criminal Record Check Schedule A EMPLOYEE Use this form to apply for a edited with accuracy and agility:
- Hit the Get Form button on this page.
- You will go to our PDF editor.
- Make some changes to your document, like highlighting, blackout, and other tools in the top toolbar.
- Hit the Download button and download your all-set document into you local computer.
We Are Proud of Letting You Edit CONSENT to a Criminal Record Check Schedule A EMPLOYEE Use this form to apply for a In the Most Efficient Way
How to Edit Your CONSENT to a Criminal Record Check Schedule A EMPLOYEE Use this form to apply for a Online
If you need to sign a document, you may need to add text, fill out the date, and do other editing. CocoDoc makes it very easy to edit your form with just a few clicks. Let's see how this works.
- Hit the Get Form button on this page.
- You will go to our free PDF editor web app.
- When the editor appears, click the tool icon in the top toolbar to edit your form, like inserting images and checking.
- To add date, click the Date icon, hold and drag the generated date to the target place.
- Change the default date by changing the default to another date in the box.
- Click OK to save your edits and click the Download button to use the form offline.
How to Edit Text for Your CONSENT to a Criminal Record Check Schedule A EMPLOYEE Use this form to apply for a with Adobe DC on Windows
Adobe DC on Windows is a useful tool to edit your file on a PC. This is especially useful when you finish the job about file edit offline. So, let'get started.
- Click the Adobe DC app on Windows.
- Find and click the Edit PDF tool.
- Click the Select a File button and select a file from you computer.
- Click a text box to edit the text font, size, and other formats.
- Select File > Save or File > Save As to confirm the edit to your CONSENT to a Criminal Record Check Schedule A EMPLOYEE Use this form to apply for a.
How to Edit Your CONSENT to a Criminal Record Check Schedule A EMPLOYEE Use this form to apply for a With Adobe Dc on Mac
- Select a file on you computer and Open it with the Adobe DC for Mac.
- Navigate to and click Edit PDF from the right position.
- Edit your form as needed by selecting the tool from the top toolbar.
- Click the Fill & Sign tool and select the Sign icon in the top toolbar to customize your signature in different ways.
- Select File > Save to save the changed file.
How to Edit your CONSENT to a Criminal Record Check Schedule A EMPLOYEE Use this form to apply for a from G Suite with CocoDoc
Like using G Suite for your work to complete a form? You can edit your form in Google Drive with CocoDoc, so you can fill out your PDF without Leaving The Platform.
- Go to Google Workspace Marketplace, search and install CocoDoc for Google Drive add-on.
- Go to the Drive, find and right click the form and select Open With.
- Select the CocoDoc PDF option, and allow your Google account to integrate into CocoDoc in the popup windows.
- Choose the PDF Editor option to open the CocoDoc PDF editor.
- Click the tool in the top toolbar to edit your CONSENT to a Criminal Record Check Schedule A EMPLOYEE Use this form to apply for a on the needed position, like signing and adding text.
- Click the Download button to save your form.
PDF Editor FAQ
What is your opinion on Delhi Janlokpal tabled by AAP Delhi Govt in the assembly?
I have gone through the present Bill and 2014 draft fully. I found it is very much similar except the appointment of Jan Lokpal and Removal of Jan Lokpal members. Manish Sisodia has given the explanation why those things were changed from the 2014 bill. Prashant Bhushan had started a seething attack against from last three days. Over the debates he even lost cool on the AAP representative and abused him. Never I had seen him behaved like that. This made to read the both bills at a stretch and write a blog in comparison of the drafts. The content of my blog I am writing down here as wellJan Lokpal Body:2014: Minimum 7 member body and according to need and requirement couldincreased upto 11. Of 7 one is Chairman of the body.2015: 3 member body. Of 3 one is chairmanSelection Committee:2014: Lieutenant Governor(LG), Chief Minister(CM), Leader of opposition(LOP),two High Court Judges, two eminent persons who will be selected by othersexcluding LG and former LokpalChairman of the committee is CM2015: LG, CM, LOP, Chief Justice of High Court, Speaker of the assembly(The recommendation of 4 is binding on LG and LG have no say in selection)Chairman of the committee is Chief Justice of High CourtTenure and conditions:2014: 1) 7 years and no additional term after completion of the term.2) They should not hold any other office, any other office of profit, shall not beconnected to any political party.3) On ceasing to hold the office, they are ineligible(for a period of 5years) forfurther appointment under of Government of Delhi or Government of India.2015: 1) 5 years and entitled to one more additional term after completion of theterm.2) They should not hold any other office, any other office of profit, shall not beconnected to any political party.3) On ceasing to hold the office, they are ineligible for further appointmentunder of Government of Delhi or Government of India.Removal of the Jan Lokpal:2014: Could be removed by President of India only after recommendation from HighCourt followed by a complaint and an enquiry formulated by HC on thegrounds ofa) misbehavior,misconduct or any act of corruption under the Lokpal actb) is unfit of holding the office for the reason infirmity of mind and bodyc) is adjudged insolventd) engages in his term of office in any paid employment outside duties of theoffice2015: Could be removed by LG of Delhi only after an address by the legislativeassembly supported by a majority of total membership in the legislativeassembly and majority not less than two-thirds of members present there of.Voting should be presented to LG on same session on the grounds of provenmisbehavior and incapacityThe procedure for the presentation of an address and for the investigation andproof of the misbehavior or incapacity of the Chairperson or a Member of theJanlokpal under sub-section (1) shall be as prescribed in the Rules.(Edit: Using same law and rules which is used to remove Judges of SupremeCourt)Penalty on false complaint on Jan Lokpal :2014: An imprisonment term upto 1 year or fine upto 5 lakhs or both2015: Not specified explicitly in the draft(Draft is to be tabled on assembly fordiscussion on Nov 30. So, we could know some details by then only)Jurisdiction of Jan Lokpal:2014: Shall inquire or cause an inquiry or investigation to be conducted any on matterinvolved in, or arising from, or connected with any such allegations of an act ofcorruption either suo moto or on a complaint made to it, in respect of publicservants and other persons who may be tried along with such public servantsand also perform other functions under this actShall NOT inquire or cause an inquiry or investigation to be conducted into anymatter involved in, or arising from, or connected with any such allegations ofan act of corruption against any member of legislative assembly of Delhi inrespect of anything done or said, or vote given by him in the assembly or anycommittee thereof covered under the provisions contained in the section 18 ofthe Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi Act1991.2015: Subject to the provisions of this Act, on receiving complaints from theGovernment or from members of the public or suo motu, the Jan Lokpal mayproceed to inquire or investigate into the allegation of ‘corruption’ occurring inthe National Capital Territory of Delhi.Provided that no inquiry shall be instituted on grounds of technical or procedurallapses in acts performed by public servants in good faith during the course oftheir official duties unless there is malafide.Frivolous and malafide complaints:2014: Imprisonment of 1 year. or Imprisonment of 1 year with fine of 1 Lakh2015: Imprisonment of 1 year or fine of 1 Lakh or bothInvestigation wings:2014: Shall constitute Investigation wing for conducting investigation against any offencealleged to have been committed with respect to an act of corruption by a publicservant or others.Until the Investigation is constituted Jan Lokpal shall seek such number ofinvestigating officers and staff as prescribed from the Delhi Police or Governmentor any other agency for carrying out its functions and activities under this Actand such agency will provide such officer and staff2015: The Jan Lokpal may appoint or, with the consent of the Government, designateofficers or agencies as Investigation Officers, authorized to investigate offencesunder this Act.The Jan Lokpal may, for the purpose of conducting any inquiry or investigation,utilise the services of any officer or organisation or investigation agency of theCentral Government or the Government or any other government of any state orUnion Territory, as the case may be.(Edit: Independent Investigation wing as perDeputy CM address in the assembly before introducing the Bill)Completion of Investigation:2014: Every Jan Lokpal Investigating Officer shall endeavor to complete theinvestigation of an offence under this act within a period of six months.Provided however that, if required, he may obtain extension of time from theJan Lokpal bench, subject to the condition that the investigation shall becompleted within a period not exceeding twelve months2015: Every Jan Lokpal Investigating Officer shall endeavor to complete theinvestigation into any case within a period of six months.Provided however that, if required, such officer or agency may obtain extensionof time from the Jan Lokpal, subject to the condition that ordinarily theinvestigation shall be completed within a period not exceeding twelve months.Prosecution Wings:2014: The Jan Lokpal shall also constitute a prosecution wing and appoint a Directorof Prosecution and such other officers and employees to assist the Director ofProsecution for the purpose of prosecution of public servants and other otherpersons who may be tried along with the Public servants in relation to anycomplaint under this actAfter the approval of the Jan Lokpal, the Director of prosecution shall file a casebefore the special court and take all necessary steps in respect of the prosecutionof the public servants in relation to any offence punishable under this act.2015: The Jan Lokpal shall also constitute a prosecution wing and appoint a Directorof Prosecution and such other officers and employees to assist the Director ofProsecution for the purpose of prosecution of public servants in relation to anycomplaint made under this act.After the approval of the Jan Lokpal, the Director of prosecution shall file a casebefore the special court and take all necessary steps in respect of the prosecutionof the public servants in relation to any offence punishable under this act.(Edit: Independent Prosecution wing as per Deputy CM address in the assemblybefore introducing the Bill. Prosecution should be finished within 6 months andrarest of rare cases should be finished within 12 months )Complaints:2014: Complaint can be made by any person at any offices of Jan Lokpal. No fees willbe incurred. However complaints shall be accompanied by an affidavit asprescribed.No such complaint shall be merely rejected on grounds of motive or intention ofthe complaint.The Jan Lokpal, however shall not entertain anonymous complaint. Providedthat, where a request is made by any person making a complaint to Jan Lokpalnot to disclose his identity. Then the identity shall not be disclosed as per suchprocedure as may be prescribed.2015: Every complaint shall be made in such form and in such manner as may beprescribed by the Jan Lokpal.Trials and Special Courts:2014: Every effort will be made by Special Courts to complete the trial within 6 monthsif more time is required within a maximum period of twelve monthsJan Lokpal shall make an annual assessment of the number of special courtsrequired and shall make a recommendation and such recommendation shall bebinding on the GovernmentChief Justice of High Court may constitute such special benches to hear appealsin respect of cases under this act, so that such appeal will be decided within aperiod of 6 months2015: The Government may, in consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court ofDelhi, constitute such number of Special Courts, as recommended by the JanLokpal, to hear and decide the cases arising out of the Prevention of CorruptionAct, 1988 (49 of 1988) or under this Act.The Court(s) or the Special Court(s) constituted under sub-section (1) shallensure completion of each trial within a period of six months from the date offiling of the case in the Court.Provided that in case the trial cannot be completed within a period of six months,the Court or Special Court(s) shall record reasons therefore and complete thetrial within a further period of not more than three months or such furtherperiods not exceeding three months each, for reasons to be recorded in writingbefore the end of each such three month period, but not exceeding a total periodof one year.Provided further that no court shall stay proceedings instituted pursuant to anyinvestigation undertaken by the Jan Lokpal under this Act on any grounds andno Court shall exercise powers of revision in respect of any interlocutory orderpassed in any inquiry, trial, appeal or other proceedings.To achieve the objective of a speedy trial, the Jan Lokpal shall make an annualassessment of the number of Special Courts required for this purpose and shallmake a recommendation to the Government for creating requisite number ofSpecial Courts under Sub-section (1).Provisional Attachment of Assets:2014: Jan Lokpal shall temporarily attach property and assets acquired by accusedpublic servants in certain cases as provided by the act.Jan Lokpal either suo moto or on the complaint of an investigation officer or anauthorized officer may, at any stage of investigation under this act. If satisfied forreasons to be recorded in writing, that a public servant alleged to have committedan act of corruption or any other officers who will be tried along with such publicservant, is likely conceal or transfer the assets through such act of corruption, byan interim order, direct attachment of such assets or direct appropriate agenciesto take such action and such interim order shall be final outcome of the casebefore the special court2015: Where the Jan Lokpal has reason to believe, the reason for such belief to berecorded in writing, on the basis of material in his possession, that(a) any person is in possession of any proceeds of corruption;(b) such person is accused of having committed an offence relating tocorruption; and(c) such proceeds of offence are likely to be concealed, transferred or dealtwith in any manner which may result in frustrating any proceedingsrelating to confiscation of such proceeds of offense, the Jan Lokpal may,by order in writing, provisionally attach such property for a period notexceeding ninety days from the date of the order, in the manner providedin the SecondSchedule to the Income Tax Act, 1961(43 of 1961) and the Jan Lokpal shallbe deemed to be an officer under sub-rule (e) of rule 1 of that Schedule.Every order of attachment made under subsection (1) shall cease to have effectafter the expiry of the period specified in that subsection or after the expiry of theperiod as directed by the Special Court.Confirmation of Attachment of Assets:2014: Explicitly not specified2015: Shall within 30 days of attachment, file an application in the special court toconfirm the attachment of the assets. If Special Court is of opinion, the assets isacquired through corrupt means, shall make an order for confirmation ofattachment of such property till the completion of the proceedings in courtagainst the person whose property is confiscatedSeizure,confiscation of assets and recovery:2014: If convicted by Special Court, Court shall as feasible, ascertain the gains of theaccrued to him including the assets, property acquired by him out of acts ofcorruption and loss to the public exchequer or to any other person by the acts ofcorruption of such convicted persons.May order to confiscate all the assets and properties of the convicted persons aswell as subjected accruals to these assetsMay impose fine as is sufficient to effect the recovery of entire loss to publicexchequer caused by the convicted persons2015: If acquitted, property shall be restored along with the benefits which might havebeen accrued during the period of attachment.If convicted, property shall be confiscated and vest in the Government of theNational Capital Territory of Delhi free from any encumbrance or leaseholdinterest excluding any debt due to any bank or financial institution.Quantum of Punishment:2014: Where any person is convicted for any act of corruption defined and investigatedunder this Act - or under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 he shall bepunished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than sixmonths and 17 may extend up to ten years and may, and in rarest of rare cases,extend up to imprisonment for life for special reasons to be recorded in writingand with fine. Provided that the Special Court may, for reasons to be recorded inwriting, award imprisonment for a term of less than six months.While awarding punishment, the Special Court may take into consideration therank of the public servant while awarding him punishment and the Special Courtmay award higher punishment to a public servant holding higher rank2015: Where any person is convicted for any act of corruption defined and investigatedunder this Act - or under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 he shall bepunished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than sixmonths and 17 may extend up to ten years and may, and in rarest of rare cases,extend up to imprisonment for life for special reasons to be recorded in writingand with fine. Provided that the Special Court may, for reasons to be recorded inwriting, award imprisonment for a term of less than six months.While awarding punishment, the Special Court may take into consideration therank of the public servant while awarding him punishment and the Special Courtmay award higher punishment to a public servant holding higher rankProtection of Whistle blowers:2014: Any public official or any other person having information regarding corruptionin any public authority would be encouraged to send the informationconfidentially to the Jan Lokpal, and Jan Lokpal may get an inquiry conductedinto such information and if necessary order an investigation in the matter underthis Act.Shall issue orders for full protection to whistle blowers from any threat of physicalharm or government harassment. Shall direct government to give necessaryprotection to the whistle blowers. Identity of such whistle blowers shall be keptstrictly confidential and protected if the whistle blower so desires.Will expedite the investigation on complaint of whistle blowers facing physicalthreat and shall be completed within 3 months of receipt of the same.2015: Any public official or any other person having information regarding corruptionin any public authority would be encouraged to send the informationconfidentially to the Jan Lokpal, and Jan Lokpal may get an inquiry conductedinto such information and if necessary order an investigation in the matter underthis Act.Shall issue orders for full protection to whistle blowers from any threat of physicalharm or government harassment. Shall direct government to give necessarysecurity to the whistle blowers. Identity of such whistle blowers shall be keptstrictly confidential and protected if the whistle blower so desires.If the Jan Lokpal is satisfied upon inquiry or investigation, that the complaint ofthe whistle blower is genuine, in addition to criminal action as may be takenunder this Act against such person involved either in the act of corruption or inthe harassment of such whistle blower, it would also be open to the Jan Lokpal torecommend disciplinary action against such person.”My take:Both the drafts have included suo moto powers as well as the powers to issue orders to the requisite public authority or agency to suspend or transfer the accused public servants in the event of doubt that they may tamper the evidence or influence the investigation using his powers given by his post.It is almost similar to 2014 except in appointment, removal of Jan Lokpal members. In my view, it will be apt if they replace speaker with one more HC judge and also add former Lokpal chairman. According to SC observation on eminent person in NJAC and recent lokayukta debacle in Karnataka. Seems they made these changes in the appointment and removal. I agree with SC observation, apolitical people does not exist in reality. They are yet to formulate a selection procedure and I hope in that they will make some checks and balance there.However, the procedure is laid, if government desire, they will misuse it to select their favorites. No process is foolproof and I am sure if any chance congress and bjp forms the government in Delhi, they will remove this bill and implement their own version.Having searched about impeachment process on Judges. I have found this article explaining well.The law on impeachment of judgesAfter reading the above article, I came to know it is actually cumbersome process, not like they could remove the LokPal just like that by voting 2/3 majority in the assembly house. So, I think there is nothing to worry about this process either.Also, in 2014, the jurisdiction is on Central Government employees as well excluding the GOI ministers, MPs and Judiciary members. In 2015, they have included "any act of corruption in the NCT of Delhi" which included all functionaries except Judiciary members.in the two drafts, CM, MLAs of Delhi Assembly, Delhi Cabinet Ministers, Delhi Police, Delhi Developmental Authority, MCDs and other local bodies also comes under the ambit of Lokpal. So they could be investigated as well if any complaints were made against them. That is because, Anti Corruption act is based on territorial than departmental in functioning. Naturally, LokPal powers also comes under the territorial one which is in the 2011 Anna Hazare bill as well. So, I don't get why Prashant Bhushan despite supporting Arvind Kejriwal move of FIR against the then Petroleum minister; now accusing Arvind Kejriwal has inserted an illegal clause in the Bill. Of course Center will outrightly reject the Bill even if it's jurisdiction is put on State employees alone. It is because, they do not want Delhi Police to be under LokPal of state despite anti corruption wing having powers to take action against Police Officers. So rejection politics jibe from Prashant Bhushan is also does not hold any value here.Independent Investigation wing and prosecution wing is in both draft while in 2015, Jan Lokpal may appoint Investigation officers at the time of Complaint compared to 2014 where a set of people will be selected to form Investigation wing which may get expanded on the nature and requirement of case. Once complaint is deemed genuine and investigation has commenced, it is not allowed to be withdrawn. This will avoid the political hit jobs which are in plenty in the High Courts now a days.No changes in punishment or whistle blower sections (except the missing statement of fast tracking the case if Whistle blower is threatened by physical harm). Adding the factual information and evidence criteria, along with punishment on malafide and frivolous case, it will deter the people who might misuse the body for political fights to attack any politician or government. This clause was not there in 2011 version.In 2015 draft Jan Lokpal may get additional term but they can not get any government job in their life time again after their term is finished. In 2014 draft, after five year cooling period they can apply for any government job.Overall, In my view 2011 version of activists is like a super power which create chaos if implemented since it goes beyond the constitutional way of keeping checks and balances. It will create a situation where in future, there will be people initiating movement to have a LokPal for the LokPal. While , UPA's 2013 bill is diluted in terms of punishment, confiscation of assets area; 2015 is fine tuned enough to be powerful to act against corrupts and also have the constraints to be within the checks and balances.
What services are provided by Vogo?
What is the use of impeaching Trump when Republicans in Congress will never vote against him and he will claim to be exonerated if he’s not removed from office? What would be the advantage of giving him that opportunity?
Yes by all means impeach him, give the second rate fake reality show Con Man the opportunity to lie in the face of his greedy lying crime spree and let the Republicans loyal to Trump be outed as accomplices. Impeachment hearings are the only way to hold Dictator draft dodger Cadet Spanky Bone Spurs the chicken hawk responsible for his presidential crime spree. Yes Robert Mueller outlined and documented some of Trump’s crimes but he is a military trained Republican brown noser who believes in the chain of command above all. The following two reports on Trump are long and rather ruff drafts but the content and links expressing Trump’s many crimes as a morally bankrupt business schmuck and as de facto POTUS an acronym he has shortened to POS:The Reality of Donald TrumpHere are some facts about the criminal con man in chief: Here is Trump talking highly of a sex trafficker and pedophile who got off with a very light sentence. The prosecutor who arranged a deal to quash investigation and indictment of people like Donald Trump and Bill Clinton who both visited ‘sex slave’ was rewarded by Trump with an appointment as Secretary of Labor, Alex Acosta:"I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,'' Trump once said about the convicted sex offender Jeffery Epstein owner of sex slave island. "He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it -- Jeffrey enjoys his social life."7 Things You Need To Know About Trump And Sex Slave IslandHere is a list of many crimes Trump as able to buy or bully his way out of: The Many Scandals of Donald Trump: A Cheat SheetHere is Trump cussing while campaigning for President, this is not a crime but this is how pathetic of a person he his yet because of his inheritance stupid moralless people worship him like god: Donald Trump Cursing CompilationWhen 10,000 lies become truths to people...Here are his Crimes, his executive orders violating the laws written and passed by the US Congress:We The People RuleHere is a list of what is known about Trumps Russian connections and Russian connections to his campaign:https://www.msn.com/ecid=spartandhp#image=18n-us/news/politics/heres-what-we-know-about-the-17-known-investigations-into-trump-his-campaign-and-russia/ss-BBR66Hc?oHere is evidence that Trump lied to the American people about the XL and DAPL, he promised it would be made from steel made in the USA, a lie is not necessarily a crime but showing favoritism to a company owned by Russian oligarchs I as president is a crime: Trump Reverses Pledge To Mandate U.S. Steel For Keystone Pipeline. A Direct Beneficiary Is A Russian Oligarch With Close Ties To Vladimir PutinTrump Reverses Pledge To Mandate U.S. Steel For Keystone Pipeline. A Direct Beneficiary Is A Russian Oligarch With Close Ties To Vladimir PutinTrump’s ‘order’ that all pipelines be made with U.S. steel is a classic fake-outHow a Russian Steel Oligarch and Putin Ally Is Profiting from the Keystone XL PipelineHere is evidence that Trump is again granting contracts to companies that will build the wall with steel from the same Russian Oligarch owned company the pipeline was built with: the BOLLARD WALL (Steel Slats) that Trump wants on the Southern Border are manufactured with "AMERICAN STEEL".... I put American Steel in quotes because the steel comes from a company called EVRAZ that is indeed located at two locations in America. Guess who OWNS EVRAZ.... the RUSSIANS! (specifically Roman Abramovich and Alexander Abramov: Russian Oligarchs).. And just when steel prices are going through the roof because of Tariffs.... The contract that Trump was talking about in the Rose Garden to upgrade existing barriers in the San Diego area involves 14 miles of steel slat construction by a Texas company SLSCO using EVRAZ steel. FOURTEEN MILES and the cost to AMERICAN TAXPAYERS is 147 MILLION DOLLARS. You don't have to be a math wizard to figure out that the great deal maker is paying TEN MILLION DOLLARS a MILE for a see through fence.According to the U.S. Treasury, 114 Russian politicians and 96 Russian oligarchs own stock in Evraz. Abromavich has known ties to Jared and Ivanka and his wife Dasha is a long time friend of Ivanka. REAL EASY TO FACT CHECK!!!!Trump offers DACA protections in exchange for border wall; Democrats opposedSLSCO wins $145M border wall contractFact Check: Trump Confuses, Misleads on Border WallTrump refused to reinforce sanctions against Russian Oligarchs and unilaterally repealed sanctions against Russian oligarchs passed into law by Congress: As Sanctions Lift, Russian Oligarch's Company Adds Trump Transition Member To Its BoardTrump hires illegal aliens at his Golf Courses and other properties:Making President Trump’s Bed: A Housekeeper Without Papers , A pipeline of undocumented workers for Donald Trump ran from Costa Rica to N.J.: 'My whole town practically lived there' , Attorney says more undocumented workers are employed at Trump golf courseTrump breaks law for his Saudi Prince buddy: Trump accused of breaking law after refusing to report to Congress on Khashoggi’s brutal killingTrump violates the US Constitution treaty clause concerning the Geneva Convention and civilian war conflict deaths:NDAA Civilian Casualties ReportingCongress Steps Up Accountability for Drones Strikes and Other Military Operations - Just SecurityObama reveals how many civilians died in U.S. drone attacksWar Powers Resolution - Wikipediawar crimeshttps://www.marines.mil/Portals/59/Publications/MCTP%2011-10A%20(Formerly%20MCRP%204-11.8B).pdf?ver=2016-06-02-153525-19310 U.S. Code Part I - ORGANIZATION AND GENERAL MILITARY POWERSTrump scraps requirement to report some air strikesObama reveals how many civilians died in U.S. drone attacksU.S. Airstrikes In Somalia May Amount To War Crimes, Says Rights GroupUN to investigate civilian deaths from US drone strikesCongress Steps Up Accountability for Drones Strikes and Other Military Operations - Just Securityhttps://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3515908/Use-of-Force-Principles-FINAL.pdf116th CONGRESS1st SessionH. R. ______To Impeach Donald John Trump, President of the United States.IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESJanuary 3, 2019Mr. DRIESSEN introduces the following bill; which shall be referred to the House Committee on the JudiciaryResolutionTo bring about a vote of House of Representatives to pass this resolution, H.Res. ____, initially giving its Judiciary Committee authority to investigate whether sufficient grounds exist to impeach President Donald J. Trump Sr. for high crimes and misdemeanors, as documented within the text, citations and sources of the Articles of Impeachment within this Resolution; that if the committee does in fact find the Articles of this Resolution to be sufficient to cause the President’s impeachment in their opinion; then finally this resolution to impeach the president on said grounds shall be scheduled for a vote by the full legislative body of the House of Representatives if and when the House of Representatives does in fact vote for the Judiciary Committee investigation and the committee finds sufficient grounds and the Body of the House does vote to impeach President Donald Trump, in addition to the result of the House passing this Act to Impeach President Donald Trump; the content of this Resolution and any additional factual grounds to be determined by the committee and the House of Representatives as a whole shall be exhibited, delivered to the Senate and we shall wait for their decision to, or not to, bring the President to trial for said accusations of high crimes and misdemeanors as detailed within the content of this resolution and any resulting continuing investigation in accordance with Article 1, Section 3, Clause 6 of the United States Constitution. We are not vilifying everyone in the government nor private corporate life, we just want our Constitutionally guaranteed rights and reasonable application of the United States Code of laws to be honored, we want equal protection of the laws, all though the US Constitution clearly states that no one is above the law, in the case of a President breaking the law, impeachment is the only constitutional recourse. We believe that the Articles with end notes and sources of information attached will convince the majority and super majorities of the House of Representatives and the Senate to take action necessary to preserve this union, this nation, as a Constitutional Republic requiring the Impeachment of Donald Trump and as well as all cabinet members who offered little to no resistance to and are therefore accomplices to Trump’s illegal acts as President1.SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.This Act may be cited as the “Impeach Donald Trump Act”.SEC. 2. FINDINGS.Since the founding of the United States of America, there always has been great leniency, great leeway concerning the executive branches interpretation and enforcement of internal the laws, as well as to their authority and conduct concerning international policy, treaties and relationships, an amount of acquiescence given to the President and the executive branch from the other to branches of government and allowed them by the people themselves. None the less the constitution does clearly state through Article 2, Section 4 that the president is not above the law and when a Resolution containing Articles of Impeachment clearly states that words, actions and even executive orders of the President are in violation of the Constitution as well as of federal code written into law; when such evidence is submitted to Congress, they will be impelled to take action and vote to impeach a sitting president. In the least when the following Articles and sections of this Resolution are considered, I believe the Congressional bodies will come to order and agree that if anybody other than the President, any other President, flaunted the law to the extent Trump has, they would be criminally prosecuted. It would be far simpler to place the entire blame on Donald Trump, he is not the cause of the problem, only a symptom. In fact an unbiased factual history of the United States of America is far from a beacon of egalitarian principles and human rights. Bringing an end to a tyrannical dictatorial president as proven so by the Articles of this resolution will not prevent and bring and end to such despotism hiding behind the preamble, We The People of the United States, being used by a very small elite portion of the population to justify their domination of a government by and for the wealth of those few, their modus operandi, right from the beginning, was so eloquently challenged by Patrick Henry stating, “I smell a rat”. The selection of Trump as President by the electoral college, the second time in this young century that a candidate who lost the majority vote was thus selected, should serve a sign, as a notice to all citizens that our Constitution is antiquated and the current government does not represent the needs or the wishes of the majority. The United States government does not meet the standards of a Constitutional Republic. Therefore considering the Articles of this Resolution, knowing, believing them to accurately describe the actions of Donald Trump as high crimes and misdemeanors, meaning to make tough moral choices to impeach and try a sitting president, we must all realize that this is the beginning of change not the end, we have the right and duty to begin the process of modifying our Constitution to the point where it becomes a new Constitution, one to be the basis of all this Nations laws, one being capable of guiding the people and those who ascend to leadership positions after a fashion to truly guarantee the promises of the older Declaration of Independence and the older Constitution that now has proven to have failed us all.Article 1 (count 1), DAPL and Keystone Executive ordersFrom the first US law concerning the protection of the environment, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1948, laws that were passed by Congress concerning regulation of natural resources to prevent unnecessary pollution and depletion of those resources for profit, some of those laws enacted require environmental impact studies of commercial for profit projects such as a pipe line. A pipe line which will benefit a corporate capitalist class of individuals at the expense of citizens and nature itself. The vast majority of monetary benefits of the pipeline will go to the few the already extremely wealthy, that have monopolized wealth to the point of being no less than royal nobility is nothing short of a crime. For President Trump to sign an executive order, to use the office of President to over rule, to bypass laws put in place to protect our natural resources which we all share equally and need for our very survival is criminal in both act and intent.We believe that a Presidential Executive Order over ruling the permitting process for such projects as determined by U.S. Code › Title 33 › Chapter 26 › Subchapter IV › § 1344 is not only a violation as determined by § 1344(s), but because of the fact that leaks and spills have already occurred since Trump’s decision to demand the pipeline construction and operation proceed without the completion of impact studies required by laws discussed here, we believe 33 USC § 1319 (c) criminal penalties should also apply. An order to, “approve in an expedited manner” and “as satisfying all applicable requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act, forgoing a complete permit process” the words of Mr. Trump’s order2 violate environmental law enacted by the US Congress https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3410448/Construction-of-the-Dakota-Access-Pipeline.pdf. Although accidents and even acts of nature and nature’s God happen and resulting pollution is not considered a criminal or liability due to unforeseeable negligence, when a President knowingly and purposefully approves projects such as this ordering construction and operation to proceed without complete studies, he is accepting the responsibility for any spills and leaks that may have been prevented by a more complete regulatory process. Such leaks did happen in the Dakota Access Pipeline and the Keystone XL http://Pipeline3https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/16/us/keystone-pipeline-leaks-south-dakota.html Five Spills, Six Months in Operation: Dakota Access Track Record Highlights Unavoidable Reality — Pipelines Leak and there is now no way of determining if the leaks and spills would or would not have happened with a proper legal environmental impact study and continuing Congressionally mandated regulations. “Nobody thought any politician would have the guts to approve that final leg. I just closed my eyes, and I said, ‘Do it,” Trump said in a speech in Cincinnati in June of 2017. Two US District Judges have ruled that Trump’s Executive orders involving the DAPL and KXL pipelines may violate the law4 http://earthjustice.org/sites/default/files/files/DAPL-order.pdf Denial of Motion to Dismiss Therefore we consider the executive orders to expedite pipeline construction and operation by forgoing laws enacted by Congress is an impeachable offense.Here is a report on a 210,000 gallon leak since Trumps Executive Order:Keystone Pipeline Leaks 210,000 Gallons of Oil in South DakotaHere is another report of a leak since Trump’s Executive order:Pipeline spills 176,000 gallons 150 miles from Standing Rock.23 U.S. Code § 139 – Efficient environmental reviews for project decisionmaking explains the process that Mr. TrumpArticle 2 (count 2), Immigration Executive OrdersThere are no articles, sections or clauses in the US Constitution specifically denying Constitutional rights to any human being within its territory, in fact the 14th Amendment in part states, “nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Furthermore, the United States Government became a signatory nation to the UN Convention and Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugeesof 1951 and 1967 on November 1st 19685 States Parties to the 1951 Convention and its 1967 Protocol Convention and Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees . Also, in the interest of expressing the importance this treaty is to the current business at hand of identifying and giving an account of impeachable offenses we must take notice of Article 6, Section 2 of the US Constitution: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”. There is US Code relating to refugees and migrants seeking asylum which does give ultimate authority to the US Attorney General in certain cases involving accusations of immigrant’s involvement in terrorism and certain violent crime, also a consideration of the existence of a Safe Third Country is to be determined by the US Attorney General rather than the courts, which seems to be at odds conflicting with the Constitution as mentioned above, see 8 U.S. Code § 1158 – Asylum. Here are Trump orders(a)Muslim ban and instigating hateTrump’s Executive orders concerning refugees from 7 countries relies on false statements related to the 9/11 attacks and does not ban people from Saudi Arabia(15), United Arab Emerates(2), Lebanon(1) or Egypt(1) which the official account of 9/11 claims the hijackers were from. Trump’s Executive Order 13769 signed January 27th 2017 only mentions Syria directly but, he mentions 217(a)(12) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1187(a)(12), which include Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen countries in war and turmoil where people with the most legitimate refugee claims would come from. In the case of Iraq his order would ban interpreters and others who aided US soldiers fighting there. Trump’s statement about honor killings is used to include all people from all those countries who do not necessarily practice such old testament based practice. This would be no different than judging all NRA members or for that matter all US citizens by the actions Stephan Paddock the Las Vegas shooter. There are obviously more instances of racism, xenophobia and hate and bigotry in Trump’s immigration executive orders that are a hindrance to US immigration and foreign policy rather than any notion of protecting us. I think legislators should read the actual Executive Orders and the resulting federal court orders stating that Trump’s orders are against the law and unconstitutional. Three of Trumps Executive Orders concerning immigration and refugee policy from Muslim Countries are Order 13769 signed January 27th 2017, Order 13780 March 6, 2017 and Proclamation 9645 September 24, 2017 http://Proclamation6https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-protecting-nation-foreign-terrorist-entry-united-states/https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-protecting-nation-foreign-terrorist-entry-united-states-2/ , Presidential Proclamation Enhancing Vetting Capabilities and Processes for Detecting Attempted Entry Into the United States by Terrorists or Other Public-Safety Threats | The White House . The Sally Yates letter in as polite of words stated that she is “not convinced that the defense of the Executive Order (13769) is consistent with these responsibilities nor am I convinced that the Executive Order is lawful.”7 Full text: Sally Yates' letter to Justice Department attorneys on Trump's travel ban All of the “Travel Ban” executive orders had been challenged by interested parties and found to be unconstitutional by multiple federal district and appeals courts in various districts and appeal circuits. Yes the country is divided and it took the appointment of another conservative judge that in conservative situations comes under the ideology that the president has unbridled powers above Congress and even the Constitution, alt-right republicanism gives “Supreme Power” to the elected selected officials rather than to the Constitution and the people.Everything you need to know about the travel ban: A timelinehttps://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0d/Letter-From-Sally-Yates.pdf/page1-593px-Letter-From-Sally-Yates.pdf.jpgTimeline of the Muslim BanJun 26, 2018Trump v. Hawaii - SCOTUSblogSeven CountriesConvention Relating to the Status of RefugeesThe Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, also known as the 1951 Refugee Convention,(b) Mexican Xenophobe and separating parents from children in detention.“I will build a great wall — and nobody builds walls better than me, believe me –and I’ll build them very inexpensively. I will build a great, great wall on our southern border, and I will make Mexico pay for that wall. Mark my words.” Donald Trump June 2015 30 of Donald Trump's wildest quotes“I have a judge who is a hater of Donald Trump, a hater. He’s a hater,”, I’ll tell you what it has to do. I’ve had ruling after ruling after ruling that’s been bad rulings, OK? I’ve been treated very unfairly. Before him, we had another judge. If that judge was still there, this case would have been over two years ago. Let me just tell you, I’ve had horrible rulings, I’ve been treated very unfairly by this judge. Now, this judge is of Mexican heritage. I’m building a wall, OK? I’m building a wall. I am going to do very well with the Hispanics, the Mexicans”,”We are building a wall. He’s a Mexican. We’re building a wall between here and Mexico.” Trump's attacks on Judge Curiel are still jarring to read18 U.S. Code § 1521 – Retaliating against a Federal judge or Federal law enforcement officer by false claim or slander of title.“When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending the best. They’re sending people that have lots of problems and they’re bringing those problems. They’re bringing drugs, they’re bringing crime. They’re rapists and some, I assume, are good people, but I speak to border guards and they’re telling us what we’re getting.” Donald Trump June 2015. “You wouldn’t believe how bad these people are. These aren’t people, these are animals, and we’re taking them out of the country at a level and at a rate that’s never happened before.”May 16, 2018“I have put in place a zero-tolerance policy for illegal entry on our southwest border. If you cross this border unlawfully, then we will prosecute you. It’s that simple. If you smuggle illegal aliens across our border, then we will prosecute you. If you are smuggling a child, then we will prosecute you and that child will be separated from you as required by law,” he said. Jeff Sessions May 7th 2018Zero Tollerence first issued April 11, 2017, memorandum letter made public April 6, 2018https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1049751/downloadJune 15, 2018 During a briefing call today, Homeland Security officials confirmed to reporters that 1,995 children were separated from 1,940 adults at the U.S.-Mexico border from April 19 through May 31. These adults were referred for prosecution after illegally crossing the border. How Trump's family separation policy became what it is todayICE spends more than $2 billion a year on immigrant detention through private jails…Big Money As Private Immigrant Jails BoomMr. Trump’s own inauguration fund collected $500,000 from two private prison companies housing detained migrant families. Some Contractors Housing Migrant Children Are Familiar to Trump’s Inner CircleCase 2:18-cv-00939 Document 1 Filed 06/26/18 Page 1 of 128https://nj.gov/oag/newsreleases18/Family-Sep-Complaint.pdfThis is what the ‘zero-tolerance’ policy on the border means for people fleeing violenceTrump Calls Some Unauthorized Immigrants ‘Animals’ in Ranthttps://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2017/03/17/nations-have-separated-children-from-parents-before-it-never-ends-well/?utm_term=.85726efce524Case 2:18-cv-00939 Document 1 Filed 06/26/18https://nj.gov/oag/newsreleases18/Family-Sep-Complaint.pdfArticle 3 (count), nepotismTrump, in a statement on Monday announcing the choice (for senior advisor), said Kushner(his son in law) was a “tremendous asset and trusted advisor throughout the campaign and transition.” Trump's son-in-law Kushner to become senior White House adviserHer official title will be assistant to the president; her husband, Jared Kushner, has the title of senior adviser, and also does not get paid. Ivanka Trump gets new White House titleKimberly Guilfoyle and Donald Trump Jr. made their hot-and-heavy romance as official as possible by appearing together as a couple at Wednesday’s July Fourth celebration at the White House.https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/07/05/kimberly-guilfoyle-debuts-as-donald-trump-jr-s-girlfriend-at-white-house/https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2017/03/30/how-trumps-children-and-their-spouses-are-still-tied-to-the-white-house/?utm_term=.1383289ace7f5 U.S. Code § 3110 – Employment of relatives; restrictionsU.S. Code › Title 5 › Part III › Subpart B › Chapter 31 › Subchapter I › § 3110https://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/03/justice-department-legal-memos-presidents-appoint-relatives-243395https://www.thedailybeast.com/meet-the-trump-officials-making-government-a-family-businessPresident Donald Trump’s family appears to have grown richer since he entered the White House. The wealth is coming in because Trump, unlike past presidents, handed control of his businesses over to his children instead of fully divesting from them. The president’s daughter, Ivanka Trump, and son-in-law, Jared Kushner, have similarly stepped down as bosses of their companies but maintained a hand in them. https://www.newsweek.com/trump-family-members-have-gotten-much-richer-president-moved-white-house-975993“We conclude that section 3110 [of the U.S. Code] does not bar this appointment,” according to the 14-page memo from the Justice Department. “We believe that the President’s special hiring authority in 3 U.S.C. § 105(a) permits him to make appointments to the White House Office that the anti-nepotism statute might otherwise forbid.”https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/nepotism-laws-apply-jared-kushner-appointment-doj/story?id=44951811“We shouldn’t forget why we have these [laws]. It was to try to purify the presidency to a certain respect, or to create more accountability in the people that they appoint,” Julian Zelizerhttps://www.npr.org/2017/01/05/508382236/trump-relatives-potential-white-house-roles-could-test-anti-nepotism-lawThis issue alone has been watered down by people who do not consider that the Constitution forbids nobility. Although there is a natural, psychological tendency for humans to seek alphas and by definition of republic officials have “supreme power”, we have a Constitution as the highest law of the land not celebrity nobility rule.Article 4 (count), emoluments clauseOverall, the report found, political groups spent more than $1.2 million at Trump properties during his first year in office, after never having spent more than $100,000 “in any given year going back to at least 2002.” https://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2018-03-05/how-is-donald-trump-profiting-from-the-presidency-let-us-count-the-waysCorey Ciorciari, policy and research director at the Center for American Progress Action Fund, acknowledged this but said he’s still comfortable with $3.6 million as a reasonable, if not conservative, estimate for the cost of one of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago trips .https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/apr/18/center-american-progress-action-fund/how-much-do-donald-trumps-trips-mar-lago-cost/$75 million to protect Melania and Barron in New York. https://www.cheatsheet.com/money-career/trumps-56-million-in-golf-trips-cost-by-extravagant-cost.html/Blumenthal, et al. v. Trumphttps://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/trump-and-foreign-emoluments-clause/Blumenthal case is well documented and while it is a civil case it seems of little doubt to prove violation of the Emoluments clause by Donald Trumphttps://www.theusconstitution.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Blumenthal_v_Trump_DDC_Amended_Complaint_Final.pdfhttps://www.businessinsider.com/trump-emoluments-clause-justice-department-denies-trump-is-violating-the-constitution-2018-6In their recent financial disclosure forms, Donald Trump, Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner reported more than $500 million in income. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/28/trump-collects-on-business-and-presidency-is-boosting-brand.htmlConstitutionArticle 1, section 9:8: No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.Article 2 section 1:7: The President shall, at stated Times, receive for his Services, a Compensation, which shall neither be encreased nor diminished during the Period for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them.5 U.S. Code § 7342 – Receipt and disposition of foreign gifts and decorations18 U.S. Code § 209 – Salary of Government officials and employees payable only by United States18 U.S. Code § 208 – Acts affecting a personal financial interesthttps://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/20918 U.S. Code § 216 – Penalties and injunctionsIn their recent financial disclosure forms, Donald Trump, Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner reported more than $500 million in income. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/28/trump-collects-on-business-and-presidency-is-boosting-brand.htmlOverall, the report found, political groups spent more than $1.2 million at Trump properties during his first year in office, after never having spent more than $100,000 “in any given year going back to at least 2002.” https://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2018-03-05/how-is-donald-trump-profiting-from-the-presidency-let-us-count-the-waysCorey Ciorciari, policy and research director at the Center for American Progress Action Fund, acknowledged this but said he’s still comfortable with $3.6 million as a reasonable, if not conservative, estimate for the cost of one of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago trips .https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/apr/18/center-american-progress-action-fund/how-much-do-donald-trumps-trips-mar-lago-cost/$75 million to protect Melania and Barron in New York. https://www.cheatsheet.com/money-career/trumps-56-million-in-golf-trips-cost-by-extravagant-cost.html/Blumenthal, et al. v. Trumphttps://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/trump-and-foreign-emoluments-clause/Blumenthal case is well documented and while it is a civil case it seems of little doubt to prove violation of the Emoluments clause by Donald Trumphttps://www.theusconstitution.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Blumenthal_v_Trump_DDC_Amended_Complaint_Final.pdfhttps://www.businessinsider.com/trump-emoluments-clause-justice-department-denies-trump-is-violating-the-constitution-2018-6Article 5 (count) Conspiracy concerning foreign national election laws“Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Trump said on July 27, 2016, the same day the indictment says hackers targeted a domain used by Clinton’s personal office.https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-russia-emails-hack-clinton-same-day-mueller-2018-7https://investigaterussia.org/timelines/everything-we-know-about-russia-and-president-trumpEven if the meeting was about “adoptions of Russian children by Americans”, the meeting is still against the law, in fact since private Russian entities not connected to the government do not have any authority concerning such things, so if this alibi, this defense were true it would be even greater proof of the Russian party’s of the June 9, 2016 meeting connection to the Russian government.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_Tower_meetingFormer White House Advisor Stephen Bannon says Donold Trump knew about a meeting between a Russian lawyer and his son, Donald Trump Jr. and that Trump himself may have met Russian contacts the same day. blob:https://www.huffingtonpost.com/cf2ff744-dc88-48a7-8bbf-f05070d416b518 U.S. Code § 953 – Private correspondence with foreign governmentsAny citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.This section shall not abridge the right of a citizen to apply, himself or his agent, to any foreign government or the agents thereof for redress of any injury which he may have sustained from such government or any of its agents or subjects.(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 744; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)52 U.S. Code § 30121 – Contributions and donations by foreign nationals18 U.S. Code § 953 – Private correspondence with foreign governmentsUS CodeArticle 6 (count), obstruction concerning Russian US election meddlingMembers of the 2016 Trump campaign had several meetings with individuals who had Russian connections. On June 9, 2016, a meeting was held in Trump Tower in New York City between three senior members of the Donald Trump presidential campaign – Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner, and Paul Manafort – and at least five other people, including Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya. The meeting was arranged by publicist and long-time Trump acquantiance, Rob Goldstone on behalf of his client, singer-songwriter Emin Agalarov. It was disclosed to U.S. government officials when Kushner filed a revised version of his security clearance form., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_Tower_meeting52 U.S. Code § 30121 – Contributions and donations by foreign nationals18 U.S. Code § 953 – Private correspondence with foreign governmentsUS CodeThis is undeniably probable cause, enough to indict those who attended the meeting. The only thing holding this back is republicans insisting that the President has supreme un-challenge-able executive powers, something that is not written into the Constitution.The president’s response stated that the meeting “primarily discussed a program about the adoption of Russian children.” It omitted any mention of Clinton. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-letter-admits-he-dictated-misleading-statement-on-sons-meeting-with-russian_us_5b135a6ee4b0d5e89e2048dd18 U.S. Code § 1510 – Obstruction of criminal investigationshttps://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-defends-sons-meeting-russians-125100609.htmlhttps://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/politics/Why-the-2016-Trump-Tower-Meeting-Matters-490173031.htmlArticle 7 (count) Money LaunderingBuyers connected to Russia or former Soviet republics made 86 all-cash sales — totaling nearly $109 million — at 10 Trump-branded properties in South Florida and New York City, https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a21654291/wow-its-strange-these-russians-paid-millions-in-cash-for-trump-properties/https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/white-house/article210477439.htmlhttps://www.alternet.org/greatest-intelligence-operation-our-time-investigative-journalist-details-how-trump-has-been?src=newsletter1095255https://www.globalwitness.org/en/campaigns/corruption-and-money-laundering/narco-a-lago-panama/?accessible=truehttps://www.globalwitness.org/en/campaigns/corruption-and-money-laundering/narco-a-lago-panama/?accessible=true#meet-the-brokersThe tale of the Trump Toronto illuminates what it means for the US to have a leader whose business model has long depended on exchanging his family name for money with a murky past, no questions askedhttps://www.ft.com/trumptorontoTrump accepted Russian money on a personal level, as well; Russian fertilizer magnate Dmitry Rybolovlev’s 2008 purchased of one of Trump’s mansions in Palm Beach for $53 million more than Trump had paid for it four years earlier.https://themoscowproject.org/collusion/eric-trump-funding-need-russia/https://www.wired.com/story/if-trump-is-laundering-russian-money-heres-how-it-works/U.S. Code › Title 18 › Part I › Chapter 95 › § 195618 U.S. Code § 1956 – Laundering of monetary instrumentsU.S. Code › Title 18 › Part I › Chapter 95 › § 195718 U.S. Code § 1957 – Engaging in monetary transactions in property derived from specified unlawful activityArticle 8 (count) ConspiracyTrump might not have planned well enough to believe he actually would become president but he has certainly planned to use the presidency for personal profits far above and beyond the salary for the position. A conspiracy is a secret agreement by people to commit something wrong or illegal.Not releasing his taxes or blind trust his businesses. Defrauding the United States.18 U.S. Code § 371U.S. Code › Title 18 › Part I › Chapter 19 › § 37118 U.S. Code § 371 – Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United StatesArticle 9 (count) TreasonWhen does an ideology, a drive for power and wealth above others become a crime, become unconstitutional, become treasonous? When a small group of people use any means necessary to gain wealth and power over the United States by means which violate the United States Constitution. Not that every president since and including Reagan no matter democrat or republican id not increase the powers and wealth of the aristocracy it is now obvious that Trump is the aristocracy.Propaganda on it’s own is not a crime it is free speech and the government by law can release, “for domestic distribution, motion 19 pictures, films, videotapes,” ‘Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012 H. R. 5736Trump said he would take down the US Government. Trump put people in Agencies that previously were sued by and sued the agenciesTrump threatens to shut down the government over the border http://wall.https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/30/us/politics/trump-government-shutdown.htmBannon impishly declared himself a “Leninist,” saying that the Soviet leader “wanted to destroy the state, and that’s my goal too. I want to bring everything crashing down, and destroy all of today’s establishment.”http://fortune.com/2017/02/25/bannon-trump-cabinet-cpac/“I always say we have to be unpredictable….predictable is bad.” http://fortune.com/2017/02/25/bannon-trump-cabinet-cpac/Trump wants to abolish the US Postal service which is a constitutionally mandated agency.http://prospect.org/article/trump-moves-gut-post-office18 U.S. Code Chapter 115 – TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES18 U.S. Code § 2385 – Advocating overthrow of GovernmentU.S. Code › Title 18 › Part I › Chapter 115 › § 238518 U.S. Code § 2381 – TreasonIs dismantling the US government and replacing it with a very private corporate orientated self entitled group of million and billionaires treason or not? If there was just one instance of one of these Articles which are very similar to counts of a criminal complaint I would say no, but obviously this is not the case here. We have an octopus full of testicles designed for a private person to profit off of the presidency.Republican philosophy once elected the president can do no wrong. We must decide what we want this country to be. The founding fathers did not want a royal class, a two class or a caste system, and even if many of them owned slaves, in theory, every person is to be equal with no titles of nobility. When a small group of un-elected people control the money and the commerce that is exactly what we have. “This Is How the Republican Party Plans to Destroy the Federal GovernmentThe Overthrow Project existed before Trump, but it may not survive his presidency.”https://www.thenation.com/article/this-is-how-the-republican-party-plans-to-destroy-the-federal-government/https://www.vox.com/polyarchy/2017/9/22/16345194/republican-party-pathologicalThat project could not proceed as smoothly without recent Supreme Court decisions, the first of which named George W Bush to the presidency in 2000. The Citizens Union decision further opened the pockets of party campaign donors and turned individual oligarchs into campaign funders as well. The elimination of Section V of the 1965 Voting Rights act enabled several Southern states to immediately implement old and new voter suppression schemes.https://www.huffingtonpost.com/herbert-gans/the-republican-establishm_b_8929984.htmlSupreme Court decisions that are anti-worker’s rights. Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, 584 U.S. ___ (2018) using binding arbitration agreements as an employer technique to deprives workers of the 7th Amendment Constitutional right to court access and common law, class action (collective) law suits are a long standing basic right.Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, No. 16-1466, 585 U.S. ___ (2018) is a union busting court order that deprives a majority of workers in a workplace of the right to collective bargaining by removing the financial means of supporting collective bargaining. Collective bargaining, the right to unionize in an internationally recognized human right. United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 23, (4) Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCC_fairness_doctrineAristocracy is a form of government that places strength in the hands of a small, privileged ruling class.Since the Citizen’s United v FEC decision, more so than ever the republicans of the congress are doing the bidding of people that are obscenely rich, unimaginably rich compared to the rest of us. Hedge fund operators are on top of the income pyramid, some of them personally gaining over a billion dollars of wealth in a year. https://www.forbes.com/hedge-fund-managers/list/#tab:overallSo to break that down, is you worked 40 hours a week for 50 weeks a years that is 2000 hours, so 1,000,000,000/2000 = 500,000 or a half of a million dollars an hour. Certainly only an unconstitutional system of royalty of unconstitutional nobility can account for such a gross range of income inequality.These people use some of their money to pay for propaganda to support their political agenda. For instance let’s compare the United States Constitution with socialism, socialism is something that capitalist modern neo-republican operatives spend hours upon hours telling people to hate. Here is a definition of socialism:To keep it short we will just look at the 1st Article, Section 8:Section 81: The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;2: To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;3: To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;4: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;5: To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;6: To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;7: To establish Post Offices and post Roads;8: To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;9: To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;10: To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;11: To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;12: To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;13: To provide and maintain a Navy;14: To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;15: To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;16: To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;All of these powers are powers that can be equated to socialism because these powers are to be wielded by elected officers whose job is to represent the people of their Districts and States in the United States Government.Socialism: a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.https://www.dictionary.com/browse/socialism?s=tSocialism: 1: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private propertyb : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/socialismSince Trump and republicans hate socialism and the Constitution contains many Articles synonymous with the meaning of socialism, they are hating and speaking against the United States Constitution. Speech, even hate speech without accompanying acts is not necessarily a crimes let alone treason but acting in ways to promote and allow a noble neo-capitalist class to rule over common people by violating the constitution is exactly treasonous.“The point is that you can’t be too greedy.” Art of the Deal (1987) p. 48Quotes from Trump: The Art of the Deal (1987) p. 48 by Donald J. Trump with Tony Schwartz.https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Donald_TrumpTherefore since there is no other Constitution, no other basis for our laws and it is obvious that a private group or class of people have been unconstitutionally meddling with our nation’s economy to profit from nature’s resources and the works of it’s people, we must turn this ship around and bring this crime against nation, humanity and nature to a stop. Although some people view..?… So the conspiracy to effectually void the US Constitution is not the work of Trump alone and Republicans have been working in that direction for a very long time.When does an ideology become treasonous? https://democracyguardian.com/republican-agenda-rich-guy-overlords-ruling-worker-drones-8105d1d10a1e1Article2, Section 4,: The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.http://2https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3410448/Construction-of-the-Dakota-Access-Pipeline.pdfhttp://3https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/16/us/keystone-pipeline-leaks-south-dakota.htmlFive Spills, Six Months in Operation: Dakota Access Track Record Highlights Unavoidable Reality — Pipelines Leak4 http://earthjustice.org/sites/default/files/files/DAPL-order.pdf , Denial of Motion to Dismisshttp://5http://www.unhcr.org/en-us/protection/basic/3b73b0d63/states-parties-1951-convention-its-1967-protocol.html Convention and Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugeeshttp://6https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-protecting-nation-foreign-terrorist-entry-united-states/https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-protecting-nation-foreign-terrorist-entry-united-states-2/ , Presidential Proclamation Enhancing Vetting Capabilities and Processes for Detecting Attempted Entry Into the United States by Terrorists or Other Public-Safety Threats | The White Househttp://7https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/full-text-sally-yates-letter-to-justice-department-attorneys-1.5492535***Addendum Posted 3/27/2019:We The People Rule ,The Many Scandals of Donald Trump: A Cheat Sheethttps://www.msn.com/ecid=spartandhp#image=18n-us/news/politics/heres-what-we-know-about-the-17-known-investigations-into-trump-his-campaign-and-russia/ss-BBR66Hc?oThe Republican Guard and their Demolican allies will read this differently but, it is obvious the majority of Trump’s staff is either acting as accomplices or incompetent. Although the founding fathers were nothing short of evil, held African American slaves, were genocidal to the Native Peoples, treated women as possessions, sold European working class immigrants off to the international bankster cartel setting up a monetary system monopolizing weapons dealing war profiteering elite self entitled empire of nobility contrary to their own Constitution; none the less if and when Spanky Bone Spurs is impeached, and found guilty of the crimes we all know he should be charged with, the following Section of Article 2 of the constitution should be interpreted to mean his whole staff infection administration should resign when Trump finally receives his just reward: Section 4The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.“Trumps not dumb. He is your president.” is both a false dichotomy and the old bait and switch typical of Trumpian double speak reverse of logic, Here are a few links about Trump, maybe read a bit of each one of them and watch the video, the if you would like to discuss Trump just leave a reply here, talk to you later have a nice day:“Trumps not dumb. He is your president.” is both a false dichotomy and the old bait and switch typical of Trumpian double speak reverse of logic. Here are a few links about Trump, maybe read a bit of each one of them and watch the video, then if you would like to discuss Trump just leave a reply here, talk to you later have a nice day: Donald Trump Cursing CompilationWe The People Rule ,The Many Scandals of Donald Trump: A Cheat Sheethttps://www.msn.com/ecid=spartandhp#image=18n-us/news/politics/heres-what-we-know-about-the-17-known-investigations-into-trump-his-campaign-and-russia/ss-BBR66Hc?oTrump in Iraq: President Trump makes surprise visit to Iraq, thanks troops for their serviceFlynn is getting a brake compared to Cohen because he is Pentagon Military, the greediest, lying-est criminal division of the monetary system monopolizing, weapons dealing, war profiteering defacto ZioNazi United States Government. If they were hard on Flynn they would all have jail time coming. If there a valid Constitution, if the laws were applied equally, if there were a GOD 99.9% of selected US Government officials and businessmen would be going to prison for war crimes, crimes against humanity and crimes against nature, mark my words.I am not a liberal, I am an anarchist, we are all soon to be on a more level playing field. where people who actually work to benefit our nation rather than being ruled by a hierarchy of parasites, until you realize the social economic structure is not based on meritocracy but on a parasitic pyramid, you are a foolish insignificant little circus monkey trained by the organ grinder to bark like a dog, part of the problem rather that part of the solution.The Many Scandals of Donald Trump: A Cheat Sheet , We The People RuleHere's what we know about the 17 known investigations into Trump, his campaign, and RussiaThe Coming CollapseDonald Trump, you are such a greedy, lying, megalomaniac, narcissistic pig you cantr even fake being ‘nice’! I almost feel sorry for you! Christmas is a time to be humble appreciative of others and generous, all you have done is Tweet hate and disgust, think about Jesus, think about his words, “treat others as you wish to be treated, Luke 6:31, the least among us shall be our masters, Matthew 25:31, Love Your Enemies, Matthew 5:44”, that is what Christmas is really about Merry Christmas Mr Trump!Michael J. Geanoulis Sr.: Let’s revisit the 17th Amendment. No! Let’s not revisit the moral ineptitude and unbridled greed of royal white male slave holding landlords who were genocidal towards the native peoples and sold European working class immigrants off to international banksters from the get go. Let us not echo Trump calling democracy, “rule of the mob”. The first state to “ratify” the US Constitution was Delaware, the colony’s population was over 59 thousand people recognized as citizens and who knows how many more Indians, slaves, women and others that were not counted, 30 people signing on to the Constitution is not valid ratification, it is not apporval of a majority of, We the People. As Patrick Henry said, “I smell a rat”. Instead of going back, it is time to go into the future, a future where every person who desires has the right to vote on the laws and appropriations we are all to live under and within. With people like Geanoulis monopolizing the news media for the elite minority, the monetary system monopolizing, weapons dealing, war profiteering ilk in power and wealth. Some individuals are raking in billions of dollars a year like parasites not contributing anything in the system that was corrupt from the get go. Maybe, instead, it is time for a real revolution of the New West We The People Rule ?What more evidence of Trump-Russia collusion do you need?'Concrete evidence of collusion between Trump team and Russia' handed to official investigationTop Democrat suggests proof of Trump-Russia collusion still to comeThere’s actually lots of evidence of Trump-Russia collusionTrump Says There’s No Evidence of Collusion. There Is So Much Evidence Already.America’s founding fathers probably didn’t envision Donald Trump. They did, however, include a sentence in the U.S. Constitution that could curb the activities of a businessman-president. Trump’s decision to keep his stakes in his global business, the Trump Organization, raised the question of whether he is continually violating what’s known as the “emoluments clause.” Critics of the president have filed lawsuits pressing the case.1. What does the Constitution say?The foreign emoluments clause — in Article I, Section 9 — reads, “No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”2. What does that mean?Merriam-Webster defines emoluments as “returns arising from office or employment usually in the form of compensation or perquisites.” Historians largely agree that the original intent of the constitutional provision was to discourage early American leaders from being influenced by gifts or titles bestowed by European governments or royalty.3. Why is this an issue for Trump?Though he stepped away from day-to-day operations of his businesses, Trump retains ownership in companies that do business with foreign diplomats, state-controlled companies and state-owned television channels. The Trump International Hotel in Manhattan, for instance, got a noticeable revenue boost from a five-day stay by associates of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, according to the Washington Post. The Trump International Hotel Washington, D.C. also gets business from foreign governments and their representatives. It’s also housed in a building that Trump’s company leases from the U.S. government, which raises another issue: A second constitutional clause — in Article II, Section 1 — says the president receives a salary while in office but “shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them.”4. So has Trump accepted an emolument?That might be for judges to decide. Two lawsuits pressing that argument cite trademarks granted to Trump’s company by China’s government; rent paid at Trump Tower in New York by the Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd. and the Abu Dhabi Tourism & Culture Authority; and events booked at Trump’s Washington hotel by the embassy of Kuwait and by a lobbying firm working for Saudi Arabia. The foreign emoluments clause makes Congress the arbiter of whether any of this crosses the legal line. Following their win in the midterm elections, Democrats in the House of Representatives will be able to open an investigation next year.5. Does Trump acknowledge those were emoluments?No. His lawyers say fair-market transactions, like when a foreign delegation pays the market rate to stay at a Trump hotel, are permitted. The U.S. Justice Department, defending Trump in court, argued that the strict interpretation being applied by Trump’s critics would mean that “presidents from the very beginning of the Republic, including George Washington, would have received prohibited ‘emoluments.’” Trump pledged early in his presidency to donate to the U.S. Treasury “all profits” from foreign government patronage of his hotels. In March, the Trump Organization said it turned over $151,470 to the U.S. Treasury, representing profits from foreign governments in 2017.6. Didn’t Trump put his companies in a trust for this reason?Yes, but it’s not the kind of blind trust that most recent presidents have used to avoid conflicts. The one Trump created is overseen by an independent ethics officer and managed by Trump’s sons, Eric and Don Jr., and Chief Financial Officer Allen Weisselberg. It holds profits from the business for him and allows him to draw money. A blind trust, by contrast, would be run by a fully independent trustee, who would have no contact with Trump and would be the sole decision-maker on keeping, selling or reinvesting Trump’s assets.7. Who’s suing, and for what?A lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Maryland and the District of Columbia accuses Trump of violating the Constitution by holding a financial interest in the Washington hotel. (A federal judge ruled on Nov. 2 that the case can advance to the evidence-gathering stage.) Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, or CREW, is appealing the dismissal of its lawsuit, which it filed in New York along with a Washington-area restaurant association and luxury hotel event booker that say Trump’s businesses pose unfair competition. In another suit, almost 200 Democratic members of Congress are seeking “the opportunity to cast a binding vote” on the issue, since the Constitution requires the president to obtain “the consent of Congress” before accepting an emolument. A federal judge on Sept. 28 denied the Trump administration’s request to dismiss that one.8. What does legal precedent tell us?Not much. It’s exceedingly rare for emoluments to be litigated in court, especially as they relate to the president. But the issue does come up occasionally. In 2009, amid political dueling about whether President Barack Obama could keep his Nobel Peace Prize, the Justice Department advised that there was no emoluments violation because the committee that awards the prize isn’t a “King, Prince, or foreign State.” In 1963, President John F. Kennedy declined an offer of honorary Irish citizenship on the advice of the Justice Department.–With assistance from Ben Brody.To contact the reporters on this story: Andrew Harris in Washington at [email protected];Bob Van Voris in federal court in Manhattan at [email protected];Shahien Nasiripour in New York at [email protected] contact the editors responsible for this story: Leah Harrison Singer at [email protected], Laurence Arnold, Joe Schneider©2018 Bloomberg L.P.https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-emoluments-clause/2018/11/07/aeb78d72-e26d-11e8-ba30-a7ded04d8fac_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9519db39c9ecDraft dodger Donald Trump says avoiding STDs was his own personal 'Vietnam'According to the great Trump, McCain is far from a war hero.He made his feelings on the subject crystal clear during an appearance at the Family leadership Council summit in Iowa:[John McCain is] not a war hero.He was a war hero because he was captured.I like people who weren’t captured.Indeed Mr. Trump. Indeed.Now, in case any of you doubters out there are thinking Trump has no right to speak on the subject—given his draft dodging status—think again.Don’t question the Republican presidential candidate’s bravery…He may not have been languishing in the Hanoi Hilton, being subjected to unimaginable degrees of torture himself—but, don’t think he was living the high life.Far from it.In fact, Trump was suffering through his own personal “Vietnam” and it was every bit as terrifying, terrible and downright torturous as anything those soldier folks were undergoing at the time.Trump opened up about his “personal Vietnam” during an interview with Howard Stern back in 1997, which resurfaced on Buzzfeed yesterday:STERN: Now getting back to dating, and when you got to say to a woman, you gotta go to my personal doctor and I’m gonna have you checked out, is that a tough thing to say to a woman?TRUMP: It’s amazing, I can’t even believe it. I’ve been so lucky in terms of that whole world.It is a dangerous world out there.It’s like Vietnam, sort of.STERN: Hey it’s your personal Vietnam isn’t it?TRUMP: It is my personal Vietnam.I feel like a great and very brave soldier!STERN: A lot of guys who went through Vietnam came out unscathed. A lot of guys going through the ’80s having sex with different women came out with AIDS and all khrough the ’80s having sex with different women came out with AIDS and all kinds of things.TRUMP: This is better than Vietnam, but it’s uh… it’s more fun.STERN: A little better, but every vagina is a landmine, haven’t we both said that in private?TRUMP: [intense laughter] I think it is a potential landmine.There’s some real danger there.Sort of like Vietnam Donald.Sort of.Same same but different.Meanwhile, the self-professed “great and very brave soldier” has been continuing to do what he does best—disparaging actual, real, great and brave soldiers.Last week the Donald trash talked the parents of slain Muslim American soldier, Army Captain Humayun Khan, following their heartfelt and moving speech at the Democratic National ConventionI’ve been in the real world where I don’t repeat Cadet Spanky Bone Spurs lies, I don’t have echolilia, a mental disease like Trumpanzee circus monkeys in the clown show have. Here are some links with sources proving that what you wrote is an ignorant lie: False Stories Revive Claim About Trump Salary Donation - FactCheck.org , FACT CHECK: Did President Donald Trump Donate His Entire $400,000 Salary to Rebuild Military Cemeteries? , So while he is using the presidency as his private for profit business, paying back his Russian oligarch financiers by reversing his statement that the XL and DAPL were to be made with steel made in the USA. The steel was produced in Canada by a Russian oligarch owned company called EVRAZ. Parts of Trump’s border wall of shame are already being made with Russian oligarch steel from the same company. Trump refused to enforce sanctions against Russian oligarchs enacted by Congress. Then there are the Saudi Princes and his windfall to his properties. Guess how much his Golf outings have cost you ignorant fools? “Trump’s total golf expenses—including the cost of his Secret Service detail—currently stand at an estimated $83,000,000, according to http://TrumpGolfCount.com; the president played his most recent round on Sunday, Nov. 25, at Trump International.” Trump’s Secret Service may have just set a spending record for presidential golf carts , Trump's $56 Million in Golf Trips, Cost by Extravagant Cost , “Judicial Watch, who have vowed to monitor Trump’s travel expenses as closely as they did Obama’s (FOIA requests are already on file), reported in July 2017 that two months into Trump’s presidency taxpayers were already on the hook for $3.58 million in charges for air travel alone (i.e., excluding auxiliary costs such as Secret Service housing, local transporation, police protection, etc.) by the president, first lady, and vice president during February and March. That’s roughly $1.8 million per month, $700,000 more than the Obamas’ monthly average, which included the auxiliary costs we don’t yet have for Trump.”, FACT CHECK: Is Trump Spending More Taxpayer Dollars on Personal Travel than Obama Did?. So obviously the Trump fan club cult are stupid butt hurt monkey azzes who tongue lick feces warm right out of Trump’s azzzzz. YT comment 2/3/19There is plenty of evidence to indict Trump with numerous high crimes and misdemeanors worthy of impeachment. At this time anybody denying the fact of Trumps crimes should be arrested with him as accomplices. If the whole government was not full of crooks and liars they would be arrested a long time ago. Here are some facts about the criminal con man in chief: Here is Trump talking highly of a sex trafficker and pedophile who got off with a very light sentence. The prosecutor who arranged a deal to quash investigation and indictment of people like Donald Trump and Bill Clinton who both visited ‘sex slave’ was rewarded by Trump with an appointment as Secretary of Labor, Alex Acosta:“I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,” Trump once said about the convicted sex offender Jeffery Epstein owner of sex slave island. “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”7 Things You Need To Know About Trump And Sex Slave IslandHere is a list of many crimes Trump as able to buy or bully his way out of: The Many Scandals of Donald Trump: A Cheat SheetHere is Trump cussing while campaigning for President, this is not a crime but this is how pathetic of a person he his yet because of his inheritance stupid moralless people worship him like god: Donald Trump Cursing CompilationHere are his Crimes, his executive orders violating the laws written and passed by the US Congress:We The People RuleHere is a list of what is known about Trumps Russian connections and his Campaign:https://www.msn.com/ecid=spartandhp#image=18n-us/news/politics/heres-what-we-know-about-the-17-known-investigations-into-trump-his-campaign-and-russia/ss-BBR66Hc?oHere is evidence that Trump lied to the American people about the XL and DAPL, he promised it would be made from steel made in the USA, a lie is not necessarily a crime but showing favoritism to a company owned by Russian oligarchs I as president is a crime: Trump Reverses Pledge To Mandate U.S. Steel For Keystone Pipeline. A Direct Beneficiary Is A Russian Oligarch With Close Ties To Vladimir PutinTrump Reverses Pledge To Mandate U.S. Steel For Keystone Pipeline. A Direct Beneficiary Is A Russian Oligarch With Close Ties To Vladimir PutinTrump’s ‘order’ that all pipelines be made with U.S. steel is a classic fake-outHow a Russian Steel Oligarch and Putin Ally Is Profiting from the Keystone XL PipelineHere is evidence that Trump is again granting contracts to companies that will build the wall with steel from the same Russian Oligarch owned company the pipeline was built with: the BOLLARD WALL (Steel Slats) that Trump wants on the Southern Border are manufactured with “AMERICAN STEEL”…. I put American Steel in quotes because the steel comes from a company called EVRAZ that is indeed located at two locations in America. Guess who OWNS EVRAZ…. the RUSSIANS! (specifically Roman Abramovich and Alexander Abramov: Russian Oligarchs).. And just when steel prices are going through the roof because of Tariffs…. The contract that Trump was talking about in the Rose Garden to upgrade existing barriers in the San Diego area involves 14 miles of steel slat construction by a Texas company SLSCO using EVRAZ steel. FOURTEEN MILES and the cost to AMERICAN TAXPAYERS is 147 MILLION DOLLARS. You don’t have to be a math wizard to figure out that the great deal maker is paying TEN MILLION DOLLARS a MILE for a see through fence.According to the U.S. Treasury, 114 Russian politicians and 96 Russian oligarchs own stock in Evraz. Abromavich has known ties to Jared and Ivanka and his wife Dasha is a long time friend of Ivanka. REAL EASY TO FACT CHECK!!!!Trump offers DACA protections in exchange for border wall; Democrats opposedSLSCO wins $145M border wall contractFact Check: Trump Confuses, Misleads on Border WallTrump refused to reinforce sanctions against Russian Oligarchs and unilaterally repealed sanctions against Russian oligarchs passed into law by Congress: As Sanctions Lift, Russian Oligarch's Company Adds Trump Transition Member To Its BoardTrump hires illegal aliens at his Golf Courses and other properties:Making President Trump’s Bed: A Housekeeper Without Papers , A pipeline of undocumented workers for Donald Trump ran from Costa Rica to N.J.: 'My whole town practically lived there' , Attorney says more undocumented workers are employed at Trump golf courseTrump breaks law for his Saudi Prince buddy: Trump accused of breaking law after refusing to report to Congress on Khashoggi’s brutal killingTrump violates the US Constitution treaty clause concerning the Geneva Convention and civilian war conflict deaths:NDAA Civilian Casualties ReportingCongress Steps Up Accountability for Drones Strikes and Other Military Operations - Just SecurityObama reveals how many civilians died in U.S. drone attacksWar Powers Resolution - Wikipediawar crimeshttps://www.marines.mil/Portals/59/Publications/MCTP%2011-10A%20(Formerly%20MCRP%204-11.8B).pdf?ver=2016-06-02-153525-19310 U.S. Code Part I - ORGANIZATION AND GENERAL MILITARY POWERSTrump scraps requirement to report some air strikesObama reveals how many civilians died in U.S. drone attacksU.S. Airstrikes In Somalia May Amount To War Crimes, Says Rights Grouphttps://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/4909/textUN to investigate civilian deaths from US drone strikesCongress Steps Up Accountability for Drones Strikes and Other Military Operations - Just Securityhttps://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3515908/Use-of-Force-Principles-FINAL.pdf