Tonto National Monument: Fill & Download for Free

I have been to Tonto National Monument. I really liked it because I called ahead and got reservations for the Ranger led hike to the Upper Dwellings. This is the best part of the Monument. If I had just shown up and could have only gone to the Lower Dwellings it would have been ok, But the education from the Ranger on the hike to the restricted Upper Dwelling made this a truly memorable hike. I also combined this visit with a camping trip with friends to Windy Hill Campground at Roosevelt Lake and with a trip along the Apache Trail. The good and the bad is that Tonto NM is sort of out in the middle of nowhere about 2 hours from Phoenix.Tonto National Monument (U.S. National Park Service).Quintessential ArizonaThe Salado Phenomena, 700 years ago, blended ideas of neighboring Native American cultures to emerge a unique and vibrant society. Tonto National Monument showcases two Salado-style cliff dwellings. Colorful pottery, woven cotton cloth, and other artifacts tell a story of people living and using resources from the northern Sonoran Desert from 1250 to 1450 CE.If you are driving the highways from Phoenix to Miami to Roosevelt Lake just to see the Lower Cliff Dwellings, I’m not sure I would find that worth the trip. If this is your only option, I would add the Besh ba Gowah ruins in Globe and the Mexican Food at Guayo’s El Rey on Sullivan Street in Miami (best Mexican food in Arizona IMHO). The Guayo’s on the turn to Roosevelt is good, but the Guayo’s El Rey in Miami is mas mejor. Or combine the trip to Tonto NM with an adventure along the Apache Trail with lunch at Tortilla Flat.Here is some info on Besh ba Gowah Besh Ba Gowah Archeological Park- City of GlobeOne mile southwest of the City of Globe, Arizona, stand the ruins of the ancient Salado people who occupied the site nearly 800 years ago.This ancient village is known today as Besh Ba Gowah. The term was originally given by the Apaches to the early settlement of Globe. Roughly translated, the term means “place of metal.”The partially restored ruins, along with the adjacent museum provide a fascinating glimpse at the lifestyle of the people who occupied this region over two centuries before Columbus discovered the “New World.”Besh Ba Gowah offers visitors a chance to explore the ruins, a museum which houses a large collection of Salado pottery and artifacts, botanical gardens, and a gift shop.Guayo's El Rey, Miami - Restaurant Reviews, Phone Number & Photos - TripAdvisorTonto National Monument is small and doesn’t compare to Wupatki National Monument Wupatki National Monument (U.S. National Park Service) or Chaco Culture National Historic Park. Chaco Culture National Historical Park (U.S. National Park Service)Tonto NM is more like Montezuma Castle National Monument Montezuma Castle National Monument (U.S. National Park Service) . I think Tonto NM is better than Tuzigoot National Monument (U.S. National Park Service). I also like Walnut Canyon near Flagstaff. Walnut Canyon National Monument (U.S. National Park Service) These other ruins are closer to other things to do. As I said before, Tonto NM is sort of a out there on its own.https://hikearizona.com/decoder.php?ZTN=661Tonto National Monument - Upper Dwellings Photoset • Al_HikesAZ • 2013-04-26 • HikeArizona.COM

Canyon de Chelly National Monument has cliffs, spires, ancient pueblos/dwellings, and foliage rather than cacti, plus people still live in the the canyon.Just a few of the other Parks or Monuments with ancient dwellings:Wupatki National Monument (U.S. National Park Service)Walnut Canyon National Monument (U.S. National Park Service)Basic Information - Bandelier National Monument (U.S. National Park Service)Mesa Verde National Park (U.S. National Park Service)

People who love public lands and what they are philosophically preserved for are aware and are incensed. I write this in full acknowledgement of the rift between Gifford Pinchot style “greatest good for the greatest number” conservation verses preservation for scenic, historic, scientific, cultural and recreational values.Tonto National Monument Archeological District - WikipediaAnother answerer sums up the anti common-people’s-monument view in favour of commerce. He employs a narrow, more material definition of monument:According to Google it’s “a building, structure, or site that is of historical importance or interest.”Chris Everett's answer to Are people outside of Utah aware of what is happening to Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante national monuments? If so, what do they think about it?This is well and good if that is the actual legal, Department of Interior definition, but it is not.Passed in 1906, the Antiquities Act (Act) authorizes the President to “declare by public proclamation historic landmarks, historic and prehistoric structures, and other objects of historic or scientific interest that are situated on land owned or controlled by the Federal Government to be national monuments.”National Monuments ReviewComb Ridge in Utah involves east dipping strata of the Jurassic Navajo Sandstone (the main yellow/white sandstone), … | Amazing places on earth, Earth view, GeologyThe entire greater Comb Ridge area is an historic landmark, containing many structures.Pueblo Bonito, Chaco Culture National Historical Park, Chaco Canyon, New Mexico. Photo Scott Haefner. | Travel new mexico, Mexico travel, New mexico Was a national monument first in 1907.Are national monuments statues or buildings?No. Although many national monuments contain memorials or historic structures, these sites protect areas of land and/or water, similar to other kinds of national park sites, and are not individual statues.What Is a National Monument?Areas of land. Potentially large areas of land, rather than tiny “sites.”10 Under-The-Radar National Monuments to Visit - RVing with RexIt is demonstrably untrue that archeological resources were not intended to be protected by National Monument creation and maintenance. There are dozens and dozens of heritage archeological sites preserved as monuments:NPS Archeology Program: AccomplishmentsIt is also said by pro-industry, monument shrinkers that they were never intended to be so large, that selected presidents abused their powers given by the 1906 Antiquities Act.Trump’s former Secretary of the Interior’s rational for stripping Bear’s Ears National Monument by 84% and Grand Staircase Escalante National Monument by 46% is that, allegedly, national monuments are to be “limited to the smallest possible area consistent with proper care and management of the objects to be protected.” …However, it was T. Roosevelt himself who set aside 806,400 acres, an area larger than Rhode Island, as Grand Canyon National Monument In 1908.In answer to the huge outcry some made against his action, one of “abusing” the Antiquities Act:“the Antiquities Act…has originally been aimed at only small-sized parcels — most of the previous national monuments Roosevelt had created so far ranged in size from 160 to five thousand acres — the act did not absolutely restrict the number of acres a president could set aside.”Jesse Lee O’Connor 李杰西's answer to Why is the Trump administration suddenly going to allow drilling and mining in Utah areas that were previously protected as national monuments?Sounds cut and dry, doesn't it? No monuments larger than a state, as lambasted by critics. However, history is against them. What is the “smallest possible area” needed to preserved threatened resources? Grand Canyon National Monument was preserved by Theodore Roosevelt in 1908 prior to it becoming a National Park by congressional action.Natural Bridges National MonumentRhode Island has 775,900 acres/3,144 square kilometres. Most people would not say preserving Grand Canyon, a larger area which contains archeological resources, as a mistake though T. Roosevelt received much criticism. His cousin FDR was similarly lambasted for creating the Jackson Hole National Monument in 1943 invoking antiquities; his critics said “there was no history here,” pointedly ignoring the First Nations. Today, few wish Grand Teton National Park was only its 1929 land area instead of as it is with the addition of the monument in 1950.There are benefits to more citizens in land preserved for non-utilitarian values. This is a major theme in Dayton Duncan’s/Ken Burn’s “The National Parks: America’s Best Idea.”It’s undeniable that some jobs are threatened by preserving “worthless desert for idealistic tree huggers.” I’m just reinforcing that there are some lands with higher values than merely for money. Duncan and Burns emphasized there is spiritual value in some areas easily overlooked but as necessary to humans as other more obvious needs.https://www.gofruita.com/traveltips/colorado-national-monument-coolest-destination-you%E2%80%99ve-never-heardThis is history, it is what has happened. It’s not a judgement of good or bad. However, previously federally esteemed principles are falling to powerfully narrow interests with devastating results to most of us, the public of public lands. It’s been said turning over federal land to state control is for the greater public good, these are “still public lands.” You have to decide at the voting polls; is the greater public good served in honouring sacred Native concerns along with non-motorised recreation and resource protection or in allowing extractive industries power, archeological site desecration ease of access and state government profit? In light of extraction already having commercial freedom across the vast majority of public lands on multiple-use National Forest (non wilderness) and BLM land,* National Park Service Land, only 3.66% of the US with more than half of it in Alaska, is meant to be reserved for non extractive commercial use. It is designated for the “little people,” the ones without huge capitol, lobbying power and friends in high places.You can decide as you vote and as you support whether modern Muirs, Thoreaus, Emersons and Catlins have access to unmechinised retreats or as more and more land is given over to despoliation for the sake of profit in the hands of a few.Aztec Ruins National MonumentThe conflict has boiled down to “us against them.” This is to be regretted. US government in the past was more supportive of preservation for the masses over profits for a few. The few are among “the people,” undeniably. So are tree huggers, backpackers, First Americans and cultural heritage buffs. Who shall have the greatest voice? Again, on the majority of public lands extractive industry is permitted and encouraged. This conflict is for you/we the people, to decide.Cultural & Archaeological SignificanceList of national monuments of the United States - Wikipedia*BLM is for Bureau of Land Management. The other use is a new, non historic social co-opting of the acronym.