Legal Rights, Including The Right To Sue: Fill & Download for Free

Short version: I think this whole thing was a fucking shitshow.Slightly longer version: I think when you start doing no-knock warrant service, at night, there is a non-zero risk that somebody is going to start shooting at you. I find this sort of warrant to be highly suspect, needlessly provocative, and not generally in the interests of justice.People have a right to defend their homes, and you don’t get to claim the protection of the badge if you don’t adequately identify yourself, and I find the evidence that police announced insufficient, or at the very least that the announcement was insufficient.I find that the approval of the warrant itself was overly quick, given that it was an application for a no knock warrant, and I strongly suspect that the application itself was fraudulent, as it was based in part on the statement of a postal inspector, which doesn’t seem to have happened. This matter should be investigated by federal agents, and if it was indeed fraudulent than serious federal charges should be brought against all involved, and the department should be subject to a consent decree, including federal monitorings of all warrants for at least ten years. This is a violation of the most basic of all rights, and violations of it can not be tolerated.I find that the clothing worn by the officers was insufficient to identify them as police officers, and that their tactics, training, and procedures were inadequate to the task of performance of such warrant service.While this whole thing may have been “legal” it is just barely so, and that certainly doesn’t make it right, or within the bounds of what I would consider minimum acceptable performance for a law enforcement agency.While Mattingly may be within his legal right to sue Mr. Walker, I have little sympathy for the suit.

This isn't the first time Young has called out the president and his campaign for using his music. He told Rolling Stone in 2018 that Trump "does not have my permission to use the song ‘Rockin’ In The Free World’ at his appearances," but "legally, he has the right to, however it goes against my wishes."They have the legal right to use it as it does not appear Young owns the licensing rights.When Young complained about the issue in 2015, then-Trump campaign manager told Fox News the campaign had legally secured rights to use the song through music licensing company ASCAP. Lewandowski told Fox News that "despite Neil's differing political views, Mr. Trump likes him very much."'This is NOT OK with me': Neil Young upset Trump used his music at Mt. Rushmore eventI will say that in some media sources this detail is not included and it gives the impression that the campaign is violating copyright rather than just Young's personal permission.

ShortThe angry beach customer said “After I’m done with you, you’re going to wish you never knew my name” and began to walk away.I replied in the most calm and cool manner I could possibly manage “what’s your name again?”LongI was working on a private beach as a chair runner (yep, I get paid to set up chairs at 5 am and take them back up at 5 pm), we are not a well liked occupation on the beaches of Northwest Florida and this day was no different.Beach property laws are a major pain and most of the tourists don’t know them and won’t accept an answer they don’t agree with regarding where they can sit on the beach. But basically, only beach front houses have the right to kick people off their property (including the beach) so after this crew of 4 people set up in their personal chairs and Umbrellas in front of beach house owner A, he asked us to make them move and he had the legal right to do so, we obliged and asked the aforementioned crew to move and they begrudgingly did….10 feet over in front of a different group of people in rented chairs I had set up. But only this time, this group was not staying on a beachfront house (the beach belonged to a fairly expensive gated community with some houses on the interior and 2 boardwalks for their access) and had no legal right to make them move again.So after a few repeated interactions consisting of him asking me to move the crew sitting in front of them and me explaining there was nothing I could do other than move his chairs a few feet over to have an unobstructed view (but he refused this alternative, because he paid a lot money for his house and had more right to the beach than the people in front of him….who also paid a lot of money). At this point he demanded a notarized legal copy of the rules, to speak to my boss, and informed me that he would tell all of his friends on Facebook and the people around him to never return to this beach because of the careless beach chair guys (I’ve been called communist, incompetent, etc. so this had little effect on me) and he was going to sue for “false advertising” despite the signage making it abundantly clear we make no refunds and the other one defining the rules I was repeating to him.He finished off with “After I’m done with you, you’re going to wish you never knew my name” and began walking away.I maintained the calmest composure I could possibly manage and replied “excuse me, what is your name again?”Edit: Heres the obligatory “thanks for all the upvotes” and such edit. Also, I thought the answer ended well with the one-liner becuase the story’s real ending is bit of a let down. I don’t think he heard me or didn’t care to acknowledge it said because he kept walking away. My boss never told me about anything happening that made me wish I never knew his name (and quite frankly I don’t remember it).