Hsc Assessment Policy: Fill & Download for Free

Have no idea on this as such...but maybe these can helpTesco Interview Questions Tesco Assessment Centre Exercises and Interview Preparation - JobTestPrepHow to stand out in your Tesco interview: approaches and strategiesTesco HSC Reviews Current Hiring Trends in Analytics in India

When you talk about Mumbai University it's a vast thingIt includesIt's department and centresAffiliated collegesServices provided by various department to affiliated collegesCurriculum and coursesQuality of the assessment and so on.So let me try to explain these pointsQuality of the education : very poor, not usefulHowever few department such as centre for African Studies , department of politics, department of sociology, department or economics and public policies really do well.Same about some affiliated colleges who does better than the university departments such as Mithibai, NM, Xavier's, Jai Hind, Pratham, JBIMS etc. Given an opportunity, these institute soon may convert themselves to a deemed university like ICT did.The worst department is examination department . It will make you cry and give up your degree. The University staffs are far below average non responsiveNow the quality of education, it is worse. There is no set parameter for evaluation of answer paper and you are on the mercy of the examiner. They check word to word answer from their preferred textbook and there is no set criteria. If you know anything latest happening in your subject area and accordingly write the answers , you are most likely to be failed . The assessment is really poor. You really don't need to study hard. 75% of the question papers are repeated every year. Just read those questions. There is no difference between syllabus at HSC level, graduation level and post graduation level. The answer assessment and syllabus always remains the same .This is the case in affiliated colleges too.Mumbai University needs major overhaul.

I attended a public high school in an Australian country town from 1978 to 1983. School was pretty uninspiring and I don’t recall any particular class or teacher that really motivated me. There was very little technology (only basic computers toward the end; otherwise the good ol’ VHS at best) and being a relatively small school (about 1,000 students), it didn’t have much choice of subjects, even in the senior years. You did and studied what you were told (or else).The teaching was mostly lackluster chalk-and-talk, very prescriptive, and not very accommodating of differences in learning style and opinion or perspective. Discipline was harsh, with corporal punishment (the cane) being commonplace for often quite arbitrary infringements (including myself), but I’d never actually heard of anyone being suspended or expelled, even for sometimes quite serious infractions. Detention was also rare, probably because they’d have to find some teacher willing to supervise. Bullying was common, as was fighting, both boys and girls. Sport ruled all. A boy that didn’t play sport and looked like they remotely enjoyed intellectual pursuits was a prime candidate for being bullied as a ‘poofter’ (homosexual). It also didn’t take much for a girl to ‘earn’ the title of being either a slut or frigid.The behavior of some of the staff verged on the sadistic (and sometimes sexually predatory) and many would demoralize, torment or bastardize particular students without fear of repercussion. One teacher would have students bend over in front of the class and hit them (backhand or forehand, your choice) on the backside with a plywood made-for-purpose bat. Another would grind his steel-capped boots into a student’s foot while sneering in their face. Others were incredibly lazy and substandard. Yet others would cadge cigarettes off students in exchange for a smoke break. These were the teachers many would decades later recall as ‘tough but fair teachers’. Even the most benign of teachers were sarcastic and acerbic in their dealings with students. You’d never think of complaining to your parents.For the most part students were naive about sex and illicit drugs (it was after all the country), but alcohol and smoking were common enough. Uniform policy was lax, boys wore desert boots instead of polished shoes and grey cord jeans or King-Gee shorts not college grays and the girls held a strike (and won) for the right to wear tailored trousers in my early years. Of my cohort of perhaps 200, fewer than 35 went past Year 10 to Years 11 and 12 (HSC, 100% exam assessed), the main purpose of which was to gain university entrance, which was largely elitist given the competition for places in what was then a small, heavily regulated tertiary system. Those that left school earlier went straight into work, including the military, or trained through technical education for the trades, or motherhood.Now couldn't be more different. My wife is a high school teacher/administrator and I’m a university academic with a fair knowledge of the high school system and curricula. My children are now both in high school. There is now a much wider range of subjects to choose from (some of the stuff they do is unbelievably exciting and interesting), bullying and physical violence is not tolerated (including as corporal punishment), and rules including for uniforms are set and adhered to. There is a heavy emphasis on technology and skills (work and other), and most students continue right through to Year 12, with many more continuing to university in what has become a mass tertiary system. Students are taught to be inquiring and critical.The teachers are better trained, much more aware of their roles and responsibilities and and adherence to the curriculum and students of their rights as individuals. Difference is accommodated and celebrated. Teachers take the welfare of students very seriously and much more information is gathered on student progression and any punishments are carefully documented and justified. My teacher wife spends more than a fair bit of her time communicating with the parents of all students, mine were contacted once in 6 years and that was for a meeting to tell me they thought I should leave as I was ‘disruptive’! Two masters degrees and a PhD later, I think they were wrong!Even from the outside, high school, whether public or private (independent and Catholic) (and between myself, my wife and children, I’ve experienced them all as a researcher, parent, teacher and/or student) is much much better now than in the 70s. Certainly not perfect and we certainly weren’t expected to grow up so quick nor experienced the modern trials of social media like kids today. While I can only truly comment from my experience, I can say I’ve talked to enough people over the years to know that it certainly wasn’t unique. But I also had many fun times at high school and made some great friends, many of who I’m still friends with today (even if for some only at a distance via Facebook).