Confirmation Program Mass Activity Sheet # 2 For Mass On The Sunday Of 12 07 14 Conf: Fill & Download for Free

Well, In past 2-3 years, Newgen Software has aggressively recruited hundreds of graduates/ experienced personnel in the field of Technology, Business, Logistics, Sales, Marketing and Quality Control. Hence, it is slowly but surely, emerging as a mass recruiter for CS/IT engineering graduates for NCR region.Earlier, we didnt had the concept of "Bench Strength" and every individual was recruited on Requirement basis. However, due to increase in demand of Newgen Automated products and services, the demand for new employees, within India and outside, have skyrocketed. Earlier, the barrier of entry in Software Development was quite high and Newgen was never considered as a mass recruiter. They used to pick and choose, one, maybe two fresh graduates from premium engineering colleges in NCR. Now, they usually take in 10-15 graduates from the same college and a dedicated Learning and Development department has also been active since couple of years.A new batch of fresh graduates usually constitute of 25-30 individuals and they go through one month of rigorous on- job training on Newgen products and Newgen supported API's (in case of Software engineering batch). The process for training is pretty much similar in case of graduates from other fields as well, however, their curriculum might vary.Recruitment process in case of Fresh graduates/ 1-2 yrs experienced personnels in the field of Software Development.1. If it is a campus recruitment drive, an IT/CS background student should have a minimum of 60% in 10th , 12th and college to sit in aptitude test.2. In case of off-campus fresh graduates/ 1-2 yrs experienced personnel, someone from within the company can refer your resume to the HR dept. The HR Dept, then takes the decision to send you an invitation to participate in the recruitment drive to be held on a specified date. The prerequisites are pretty much similar to that of a fresh graduate. Your experience in latest technology matters a lot!3. After this , the recruitment process is pretty much similar for both, the candidate has to go through a common aptitude test. This test will consist of four sections. You will be provided with an OMR sheet to mark your answer. These sections are as follows: Quantitative aptitude, Logical reasoning, Communication skills and computer skills. The level of each section shall be medium to high. An student studying regularly for aptitude tests can clear the test.4. You need atleast 20-22 out of 30 to go through the next level. If you are selected, you would have to give a Psychometric Test. Now this section only test your mental stability and decision making skills. It consists of around 100 questions with no particular right or wrong answer. A normal individual with sound logical and deductive skills can easily clear the paper. You have to be absolutely stupid to fail this test.5. The selected individuals are then informed by a phone call or mail to appear for next leg of the drive. Usually, you are asked to come on the very next day for technical interview and HR round. Technical interview is driven by your past experience or your field of specialization. You are usually asked to pick 2 or 3 subjects you are comfortable with. Please use discretion and prepare seriously as the interviewer is usually a Project Manager or a Group Head, who has vast knowledge of his field. He will grill you and might even ask you to write programs on common or uncommon algorithms ad hoc! It is not uncommon for a interviewer to ask the candidate to provide multiple architectural solutions for common problems that might occur in Banking system or even a postal office and how to automate them. This leg usually takes 45 minutes to 1 hour.6. If you go through the technical interview leg, your selection is 90% assured. In HR interview, they usually check your communication skills as most of our clients are outside India. You have to be seriously handicapped in communication skills to fail this final leg! It usually takes 15- 20 minutes as they verify your mark sheets and certificates. It is advisable to bring your certificates, in case of any achievements in the field of sports or other extra curricular activities. Your interests and academic or non academic achievements should be backed up with relevant certificates or medals.7. If you have been selected, you will get a call or a confirmation mail from the HR Dept., specifying your joining date as well your CTC.Congratulations, you have made it this far!P.S - In case of other fields such as Sales and Business Analysts, the process for fresh graduates is pretty much similar except that they might recruit from Business Schools and the aptitude test does not have a tough technical section. However, a basic knowledge of Computer Systems and its languages will definitely increase your chances.- In case of experienced Business and sales consultants, the process is quite different and its prerequisites are not a common knowledge amongst Newgen employees.

NO. The oceans reflect BUT LAG the impact of solar cycles and thus they are also cyclical. Many have been fooled by the El Nino warming ocean currents that has come to an end. The oceans are cooling just like the atmosphere and the blank sun.REFERENCESMajor Greenland Glacier Is GrowingJune 6, 2019JPEGJakobshavn Glacier in western Greenland is notorious for being the world’s fastest-moving glacier. It is also one of the most active, discharging a tremendous amount of ice from the Greenland Ice Sheet into Ilulissat Icefjord and adjacent Disko Bay—with implications for sea level rise. The image above, acquired on June 6, 2019, by the Operational Land Imager (OLI) on Landsat 8, shows a natural-color view of the glacier.Jakobshavn has spent decades in retreat—that is, until scientists observed an unexpected advance between 2016 and 2017. In addition to growing toward the ocean, the glacier was found to be slowing and thickening. New data collected in March 2019 confirm that the glacier has grown for the third year in a row, and scientists attribute the change to cool ocean waters.“The third straight year of thickening of Greenland’s biggest glacier supports our conclusion that the ocean is the culprit,” said Josh Willis, an ocean scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory and principal investigator of the Oceans Melting Greenland (OMG) mission.2016 - 2019JPEGThe maps above show how the glacier’s height changed between March 2016 and 2017 (top); March 2017 and 2018 (middle); and March 2018 and 2019 (bottom). The elevation data come from a radar altimeter that has been flown on research airplanes each spring as part of OMG. Blue areas represent where the glacier’s height has increased, in some areas by as much as 30 meters per year.The change is particularly striking at the glacier’s front (solid blue area on the left) between 2016 and 2017. That’s when the glacier advanced the most, replacing open water and sea ice with towering glacial ice. The glacier has not advanced as much since then, but it continues to slow and thicken.Willis compared the glacier’s behavior to silly putty. “Pull it from one end and it stretches and gets thinner, or squash it together and it gets thicker,” he said. The latter scenario is what is happening now as the glacier slows down: Notice that by the third year, thickening is occurring across an increasingly wide area.Willis and colleagues think the glacier is reacting to a shift in a climate pattern called the North Atlantic Oscillation, which has brought cold water northward along Greenland’s west coast. Measurements of the temperatures collected by the OMG team show that the cold water has persisted.“Even three years after the cold water arrived, the glacier is still reacting,” Willis said. “I’m really excited to go back this August and measure the temperature again. Is it still cold? Or has it warmed back up?”NASA Earth Observatory images by Joshua Stevens, using Landsat data from the U.S. Geological Survey, and data courtesy of Josh Willis/NASA JPL and the Oceans Melting Greenland (OMG) Program. Story by Kathryn Hansen.Major Greenland Glacier Is Growinghttps://notrickszone.com/2017/09/11/12-new-papers-north-atlantic-pacific-and-southern-oceans-are-cooling-as-glaciers-thicken-gain-mass/12 New Papers: North Atlantic, Pacific, And Southern Oceans Are Cooling As Glaciers Thicken, Gain MassBy Kenneth Richard on 11. September 2017Share this...Graph Source Duchez et al., 2016Contrary to expectations, climate scientists continue to report that large regions of the Earth have not been warming in recent decades.According to Dieng et al. (2017), for example, the global oceans underwent a slowdown, a pause, or even a slight cooling trend during 2003 to 2013. This undermines expectations from climate models which presume the increase in radiative forcing from human CO2 emissions should substantially increase ocean temperatures.The authors indicate that the recent trends in ocean temperatures “may just reflect a 60-year natural cycle“, the AMO (Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation), and not follow radiative forcing trends.Dieng et al., 2017 We investigate the global mean and regional change of sea surface and land surface temperature over 2003–2013, using a large number of different data sets, and compare with changes observed over the past few decades (starting in 1950). … While confirming cooling of eastern tropical Pacific during the last decade as reported in several recent studies, our results show that the reduced rate of change of the 2003–2013 time span is a global phenomenon. GMST short-term trends since 1950 computed over successive 11-year windows with 1-year overlap show important decadal variability that highly correlates with 11-year trends of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation index. The GMST 11-year trend distribution is well fitted by a Gaussian function, confirming an unforced origin related to internal climate variability.We evaluate the time derivative of full-depth ocean heat content to determine the planetary energy imbalance with different approaches: in situ measurements, ocean reanalysis and global sea level budget. For 2003–2013, it amounts to 0.5 +/− 0.1 W m−2, 0.68 +/− 0.1 W m−2 and 0.65 +/− 0.1 W m−2, respectively for the three approaches. Although the uncertainty is quite large because of considerable errors in the climate sensitivity parameter, we find no evidence of decrease in net radiative forcing in the recent years, but rather an increase compared to the previous decades.We can note that the correlation between GMST [global mean surface temperature] trends and AMO trends is quite high. It amounts 0.88 over the whole time span. At the beginning of the record, the correlation with PDO trends is also high (equal to 0.8) but breaks down after the mid-1980s. The GMST and AMO trends shown in Figure 6 show a low in the 1960s and high in the 1990s, suggestive of a 60-year oscillation, as reported for the global mean sea level by Chambers et al. (2012). Thus the observed temporal evolution of the GMST [global mean surface temperature] trends may just reflect a 60-year natural cycle driven by the AMO.Subpolar North Atlantic Cooling Rapidly Since 2005According to Piecuch et al. (2017) there has been no net warming of the North Atlantic Ocean in the last quarter century. The warming that occurred in the 10 years from 1994-2004 has been completely negated by an even more pronounced cooling trend since 2005. The predominant (87%) cause of the warming was determined to be of the same natural (non-anthropogenic) origin as the subsequent cooling: advection, the movement/circulation of heat via internal processes. In fact, human CO2 emissions are never mentioned as even contributing to the the 1994-2004 warming.Piecuch et al., 2017 The subpolar North Atlantic (SPNA) is subject to strong decadal variability, with implications for surface climate and its predictability. In 2004–2005, SPNA decadal upper ocean and sea-surface temperature trends reversed from warming during 1994–2004 to cooling over 2005–2015. … Over the last two decades, the SPNA has undergone a pronounced climate shift. Decadal OHC and SST trends reversed sign around 2004–2005, with a strong warming seen during 1994–2004 and marked cooling observed over 2005–2015. These trend reversals were pronounced (> 0.1 °C yr−1 in magnitude) in the northeastern North Atlantic (south and west of Iceland) and in the Labrador Sea. … To identify basic processes controlling SPNA thermal variations, we diagnose the SPNA heat budget using ECCOv4. Changes in the heat content of an oceanic control volume can be caused by convergences and divergences of advective, diffusive, and surface heat fluxes within the control volume. [Advective heat convergence] explains 87% of the total [ocean heat content] variance, the former [warming] showing similar decadal behavior to the latter [cooling], increasing over 1994–2004, and decreasing over 2005–2015. … These results demonstrate that the recent SPNA decadal trend reversal was mostly owing to advective convergences by ocean circulation … decadal variability during 1993–2015 is in largest part related to advection by horizontal gyres.Yeager and Robson (2017) also point out that, like it did from the 1960s to 1980s, the North Atlantic “has again been cooling”, a trend which they and others expect to continue. Sea surface temperatures are no warmer today than they were in the 1950s.Yeager and Robson, 2017 [W]hile the late twentieth century Atlantic was dominated by NAO-driven THC [thermohaline circulation] variability, other mechanisms may dominate in other time periods. … More recently, the SPNA [sub polar North Atlantic] upper ocean has again been cooling, which is also thought to be related to a slowdown in the THC. A continued near-term cooling of the SPNA has been forecast by a number of prediction systems, with implications for pan-Atlantic climate.The Southern Ocean Has Been Cooling Since The 1970s, Contrary To ModelsLatif et al., 2017 The Southern Ocean featured some remarkable changes during the recent decades. For example, large parts of the Southern Ocean, despite rapidly rising atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations, depicted a surface cooling since the 1970s, whereas most of the planet has warmed considerably. In contrast, climate models generally simulate Southern Ocean surface warming when driven with observed historical radiative forcing. The mechanisms behind the surface cooling and other prominent changes in the Southern Ocean sector climate during the recent decades, such as expanding sea ice extent, abyssal warming, and CO2 uptake, are still under debate. Observational coverage is sparse, and records are short but rapidly growing, making the Southern Ocean climate system one of the least explored. It is thus difficult to separate current trends from underlying decadal to centennial scale variability.Turney et al., 2017 Occupying about 14% of the world’s surface, the Southern Ocean plays a fundamental role in ocean and atmosphere circulation, carbon cycling and Antarctic ice-sheet dynamics. … As a result of anomalies in the overlying wind, the surrounding waters are strongly influenced by variations in northward Ekman transport of cold fresh subantarctic surface water and anomalous fluxes of sensible and latent heat at the atmosphere–ocean interface. This has produced a cooling trend since 1979.Sea Ice Has Been Expanding For The Entire Southern Hemisphere Since The 1970sComiso et al., 2017 The Antarctic sea ice extent has been slowly increasing contrary to expected trends due to global warming and results from coupled climate models. After a record high extent in 2012 the extent was even higher in 2014 when the magnitude exceeded 20 × 106 km 2for the first time during the satellite era. … [T]he trend in sea ice cover is strongly influenced by the trend in surface temperature [cooling]. … A case study comparing the record high in 2014 with a relatively low ice extent in 2015 also shows strong sensitivity to changes in surface temperature. The results suggest that the positive trend is a consequence of the spatial variability of global trends in surface temperature and that the ability of current climate models to forecast sea ice trend can be improved through better performance in reproducing observed surface temperatures in the Antarctic region.The Pacific Ocean Has Also Been Cooling Since The 1970sLi, 2017 In the Southern Ocean, the increasing trend of the total OHC slowed down and started to decrease from 1980, and it started to increase again after 1995. In the warming context over the whole period [1970-2009], the Pacific was losing heat, especially in the deep water below 1000 m and in the upper layer above 300 m, excluding the surface 20 m layer in which the OHC kept increasing through the time.Glaciers, Ice Sheets Stable, Even Gaining MassGoel et al., 2017 Ice rises are a useful resource to investigate evolution and past climate of the DML coastal region. We investigate Blåskimen Island ice rise, one of the larger isle-type ice rises at the calving front of the intersection of Fimbul and Jelbart Ice Shelves, using geophysical methods. … Using the Input-Output method for a range of parameters and column setups, we conclude that Blåskimen Island has been thickening over the past nine years [2005-2014]. Thickening rates cannot be determined precisely, but ensemble results show that thickening rate averaged over the ice rise varies between 0.07 m a−1 and 0.35 m a−1 [per year]. On longer timescales, we speculate that the summit of Blåskimen Island has been stable within several kilometers at least in the past ∼600 years but no longer than several millennia.Bader et al., 2017 Rather than reflecting major changes in ice flow path over time, the provenance changes are interpreted to indicate relative stability of the East Antarctic ice sheet.Martín-Español et al., 2017 We investigate the mass balance of East Antarctica for 2003–2013 using a Bayesian statistical framework. … We apportion mass trends to SMB and ice dynamics for the EAIS, based on two different assumptions, different remote sensing data and two RCMs. In the first experiment, the model apportions about a third of the mass trend to ice dynamics, +17 Gt/yr, and two thirds, +40 Gt yr−1 to SMB, resulting in a total mass trend for the EAIS [East Antarctic Ice Sheet] of +57 ± 20 Gt yr−1.Bolch et al., 2017 Previous geodetic estimates of mass changes in the Karakoram revealed balanced budgets or a possible slight mass gain since ∼ 2000. Indications of longer-term stability exist but only very few mass budget analyses are available before 2000. Here, based on 1973 Hexagon KH-9, ∼ 2009 ASTER and the SRTM DTM, we show that glaciers in the Hunza River basin (central Karakoram) were on average in balance or showed slight insignificant mass loss within the period ∼ 1973–2009.Predictions Of Future Cooling, Ice ExpansionÅrthun et al., 2017 Statistical regression models show that a significant part of northern climate variability thus can be skillfully predicted up to a decade in advance based on the state of the ocean. Particularly, we predict that Norwegian air temperature will decrease over the coming years, although staying above the long-term (1981–2010) average. Winter Arctic sea ice extent will remain low but with a general increase towards 2020.Pittard et al., 2017 We suggest the Lambert-Amery glacial system will remain stable, or gain ice mass and mitigate a portion of potential future sea level rise over the next 500 years, with a range of +3.6 to -117.5 mm GMSL-equivalent.Share this...Posted in Cooling/Temperature, Glaciers | 41 Responses41 responses to “12 New Papers: North Atlantic, Pacific, And Southern Oceans Are Cooling As Glaciers Thicken, Gain Mass”1.Bitter&twisted 11. September 2017 at 5:38 PM | PermalinkCome on SebastianH- let’s hear the alarmist spin on this.Not really working out as the models predicted, is it?1.SebastianH 12. September 2017 at 1:12 AM | PermalinkDoesn’t look like cooling to me …https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/state-climate-highlights/2016Picking out the blue spots and declaring that oceans are cooling is kind of a selective perception, isn’t it?1.Kenneth Richard 12. September 2017 at 4:22 AM | PermalinkThe authors of the peer-reviewed scientific papers cited in the article do not appear to have gathered their data by gazing at a colorized NOAA graph and then “picking out the blue spots and declaring that oceans are cooling”.According to the scientists, for example, the North Atlantic OHC has been cooling for the last 10+ years for the same reasons that they warmed for the 10 years before that: natural heat redistribution processes. CO2 is not mentioned as a factor in the 10-year warming or the 10-year cooling. The North Atlantic’s sea surface temperatures are cooler now than they were in the 1950s.Same with the Southern Ocean, which occupies “about 14% of the world’s surface”. It’s been cooling for 4 decades, which is largely why the sea ice extent has been growing throughout the SH.Your colorized NOAA map doesn’t show any of this, of course. So does this mean the NOAA graph is right, and scientists publishing papers in peer-reviewed journals are wrong?Why have the Southern Ocean and Pacific Ocean been cooling for multiple decades, SebastianH? What’s the mechanism? What’s the mechanism that caused the North Atlantic to warm up from 1994 to 2004? Do you believe it was CO2 emissions from humans? Assuming you do, why do you believe that?