Sc Tax Advisors: Fill & Download for Free

Supreme court has agreed to review the earlier judgement in the light of stolen documents of the Rafale contract if there is any wrong doing is there in the Rafale contract . It never means somebody is guilty . This Rahul is a just a kid who cannot read any file or read even a simple Supreme Court Judgement even , cannot even understand anything ,as Mamata has discribed and an Amul baby as Achuthanandan has spelt out. He jumps to preconcieved concepts injected into his mind by his stupid selfish advisers ( tharoor like characters) .So now the Supreme Court hearing has to start and it will take several months to arrive at the judgement ..It only means the following :-The basic tenets or canons of public expenditure Canons of Public Expenditure - Public Finance propriety are transparency , accountability , lack of arbitariness, spending tax payers money in a competitive justifiable manner as if we are spending our own money with due diligence ,following due set procedures , approval from the competent authorities and overall proper utilisation and safeguarding the public money from misuse . Every citizen is duty bound to ensure this especially govt servants and judiciary when called upon. Supreme Court will examine them as relevant to this contract..We all probably donot know that DPP Defence Procurement Procedure brought into force during Vajapayee govt in 2002 ,is a just a set of standard guidelines to aid Defence procurements. If every sentence written in 1400 pages of DPP is followed India just can't procure even a single Defence procurement in it's lifetime ..For all the 3 judges of the bench to read this it may take one month at least (@ 40 pages per day ) it may take a month at least ..SC will examine , wherever it was not possible to follow the standard guidelines the official has to write the proposed deviation to DPP and then get it endorsed by the competent committee concerned. The Supreme Court will see and examine whatever deviations were sought to DPP are valid or not ,whether by over ruling of dissent notes was in order or not , if public money has been jeopardised.or enough safeguards are in place in the contract for safetey of the public money .Rahul and N Ram have been brandishing the stolen papers of Rafale contract files as if they have caught hold of a million tons of gold from Modi's team .Fresh Rafale dogfight erupts over ‘incomplete’ MoD note - Times of India in one such note one S.K.Sharma Deputy secretary in ministry of defense who is not even s member of the Rafale negotiating team outs up a unsolicited note . How and whose sake ??!In fact most of the Indian public including Rahul till date have just not understood what is so incriminating matter is there in these stolen zerox copies ???Rahul has been injected to believe that these N Ram' s stolen papers contain only some dissent notes of three members of the Indian negotiating team ( INT) . Rafale deal: dissent note by domain experts in the Indian Negotiating Team . No where N Ram writes these dissent notes have been suitably addressed by senior committees like Defence Acquisition Council and Cabinet Committee on Security before contract was signed ..He doesn't even know dissent is a normal expression in democracy .If there is no dissent it means dictatorship the way Rahul's grand mother ruled India and damaged it beyond imagination.I am sure Govt will involve CAG also to comment upon the decision making process if it is in order or not :- Answer :-CAG will confirm it to be in order .SC will take note of it . Bcoz CAG is the federal auditor . Comptroller and Auditor General of India - Wikipedia CAG knows much much more about procedural propriety in any govt contract making . Even Supreme Court judges don't have that kind of a exposure as CAG has it..So taking CAG in the loop is a must for the Supreme Court.Modi govts Rafale fighter jet deal 2.86% cheaper than UPAs: CAG report In fact CAG has remarked the deal is cheaper than UPA proposal.SC will examine ,whether India will get all 36 Rafale fighter jets in time All Rafale jets to be delivered by 2022: Sitharaman ( who has been visiting France to regularly monitoring has confirmed vjetscwill be delivered bas per schedule ..)with spares ,services and gurantee etc as contracted or not.??Answer : In view of French govt guranteeing it SC will accept thier words . Nirmala' s regular monitoring report on satisfactory compliance will be submitted to SC .SC will examine if all the three designated Commitees i.e. Indian negotiating team ( INT) , Defence Acquisition Council , Cabinet Committee on Security have approved the deviations sought or not .???Rafale deal negotiations involved 74 meetings before CCS approval, say analysts Inbox x Answer :- All the three committees have endorsed the decision with deviations. Supreme Court will ok it.SC will examine if the dissent notes of three officers of MOD cud have been followed or not . If not the reasons for it. Answer : Rafale purchase contract has been signed with French govt and not with Dassault aviation. When you are signing any contract with the soveriegn govt of any nation you don't put any stupid conditions on that govt as if that French govt will take your money and run away like any private vendor .is that correct ???SC will ok it ..SC will examine of past precedences ..Answer :-Similar waivers were given to Russian govt and US govt in case of purchase of S-400 missiles shield and US howitzers . US had supplied the ordered howitzers . Similarly for the C-17 transport Aircrafts and C-130 Aircrafts ordered during UPA rule also didn't have Integrity Pacts and Soverign gurantees .. Similarly Su-30 Mk I fighter jets ordered decades ago from Russia too never had Soverign gurantees and Integrity Pacts in the contract. When such was the case how suddenly these clauses have become a requirement ?????Integrity clause often given a miss, say defence ministry officials on Rafale row No problems were encountered. Same is expected here .SC will examine following 12 Deviations ( a to l) :-No 'integrity pacts' in defence deals with US, Russia too: IAF - Times of India This are the past precedences IAF confirms .( a) Checking the books of accounts of the vendors :Here vendor is French govt . Nobody will say nor the other soverign govt will accept such humiliating conditions . By the way DPP is an Indian standard procedure and not a French manual as such .What is internationally accepted norms are FIDIC norms and not DPP ..Indian Supreme Court will accept it .( b) Before we start debating offset deal with Dassault which is at 50% of the contract value i.e. 20% more than the DPP stipulation of 30 % of the contract value …Rafale deal comes with 50 per cent offset clause So India is benefeited that too with over 100 Indian vendors Offset with Reliance Defence only 10% of obligation, in talks with 100 other Indian companies: Dassault CEO on Rafale deal - Times of India much more than DPP stipulation. Non-alignment of arbitration clauses for offset with main supply protocols .Answer :- Offset is an understanding that the benefeciary ( Dassault) will invest 50% of the money he will be receiving with Indian vendors .Answer :- In offset understanding govt' s role is just to ensure 50 % amount is invested with the Indian vendors in the given time schedule of 67 months from contract signing date . If by mistake of Dassault the money invested sinks in Arabian sea it is not Govt's lookout .So if for this offset obligations arbitration clause is changed to UNICITRAL what harm is there??? . After all UNICITRAL is also globally acceptable norm UN based . Supreme Court will accept it .Opinion of Amit cowshish former Financial advisor Defence Acquisition ministry of defense on offset Making the offset policy work better is also given here ..( c) Deletion of undue influence clause .:-Answer :- When govt of India is signing the contract with govt of France where is the question of undue influence ??.For S-400 Defence shield also similar was the norm . Govt is not paying money to private vendors . Right ??? Supreme Court okays it .( d) Deletion of clause on agency commission payment :- Answer :- Once again when contract is between two govts the subject of agency commission doesn't arise . Indian govt is not making any payment to private vendors .. Supreme Court okays it .( d) Not using the word offset :- Answer :- The word “ Offset “ is our DPP invention with which French authorities were not comfortable , so in it's place the word “ make in India “ was used…So what is wrong ???? Supreme Court okays it .( e) Overstretching the offset investments beyond the delivery period of 67 months for the last jet .Answer :- For Dassault to get final payment for the last jet which will be supplied in the 67 th month it may take another one year .So add 12 more months to 67 = 79 months .So they have asked 84 months to complete the last investments in offset . i.e just 5 more months after they get the final payment they will complete the offset deals …Govts job is like a witness only . Dassault has said over 100 vendors they are in touch with to finalize offset deals ..What is the big deal ??? Supreme Court okays it .( f) Starting of Offset investments after 36 months of contract signing :-Answer :- These offset investments to be made it requires due diligence to select a right Indian vendors ,for right products ,right prices ,trainings to vendor personnel , quality control etc . Dassault has short listed over 100 vendors in India . Now will it not take time to do all this above to satisfactory levels ??? Can all this be done in one month .???? Are Dassault getting all the payments in first month of contract signing ??? Payments are always staggered stage payments. So Dassault needs time to line up the things with all the vendors . So 36 months start date is reasonable . After all they have deliver the 36 fighter jets also . Offset is only a side obligation and not the main work as such. Supreme Court okays it .( f) DPP amendment in 2015 :- Answer Defence offset policy: Amendments by Modi government exactly what have been long required :-DPPor for that matter any standard set of procedures in any govt procurement is not written in stone for eternity . It has to keep changing with the changing times and ultimate did goal intended needs to be delivered at all times. Even in the past several times DPP is amended. So what is wrong ??? The 2015 DPP amendments were long overdue to restore investor confidence the above opinion of Economic Times newspaper says. This amendment gives one year time for the main vendor to give details on offset, delegates Secretary ( Defence production) with powers to decide on problems bduring it's implementation of offset obligations and makes selection of offset partners easier . Is there anything wrong making implementation of offset easier ????And by the way FIDIC norms are the internationally acceptable norms not the Indian DPP . Supreme Court okays it .( g) Dassault overloaded with orders :- Answer :- That is always the case everywhere .To ensure timely deliveries Indian govt had taken French govts endorsement not only for supply of ,36 jets but for spares,trainings etc too. Supreme Court okays it .( h) Not providing Sovereign gurantee :. Answer :- The Rafale contract is between two Soverign Govts who have signed the contracts . French govt is itself a Sovereign govt . That itself is more than enough . No govt in the world will give you a separate gurantee even after signing the Contracts. Even in S-400 case Russia had declined to give a separate gurantee over and above the endorsement of the contracts .similar is the case here . Supreme Court okays it .Parallel negotiations by PMO :- PMO's monitoring of progress cannot be construed as interference: Defence minister Nirmala Sitharaman - Times of India Sonia Gandhi and Rahul were monitoring Prime minister' s office on all important decisions for 10 years under the garb of “ National Advisory Council “ NAC in a totally unconstitutional manner .Did these opposition' parties or N Ram raise a single objection in 10 years 2004–2014 ???( I) Parallel negotiations by the PMO undermining the negotiations by the INT ( indian negotiating team of MOD) .Answer :- If three junior officials of MOD are not able to come to any useful fruitful conclusions for months and years together ,can't even understand the spirit of the DPP manual , can PMO keep quiet ??? Prime Minister has the responsiblities of ensuring the security of the nation . These 3 dissenting officers donot have the responsiblities of answering for the security of the nation which please note … Even if our security is severely jeopardised and Govts unable to order for 12 years in a row from 2004–2016 ,???? In fact Indian Armed forces need over 800 fighter jets to be replaced . Now present position ,excepting Su-30 which are 10–15 years old remaining all other fighter jets are beyond thier lives ( scrap or junk conditions ) In fact bcoz of PMO all stupid issues mentioned above were all addressed satisfactorily and contract cud be signed in Sept 2016.Othetwise even today contract wud not have been signed for sure . If in doubt please check what happened between ,2004–2014 under defacto Prime Minister Rahul Sonia ??? National Advisory Council - Wikipedia This NAC was boss of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh .and all congressmen kept quiet . Supreme Court will okay it..,( j) Offset negotiations undermined by PMO interventions :- Rafale deal comes with 50 per cent offset clause Answer :- Bcoz of PMO interventions offser obligations which was only 30 % as per DPP was increased to 50 % i.e. Indian Economy stands benefeited by additional Rs12,000 crores more investments by Dassault over and above Rs 18,000 crores of investments as per the DPP..Any comments anybody please ???! Where is the question of undermining . ??? It was a huge benefiet to Indian economy .Does anybody think Defence Ministry is a personal property of 3 juniormost officials of MOD and they are the Gods of all other senior officials of INT ,Defence Acquisition Council ,Cabinet Committee on Security including Defence Minister and Prime Minister have to obey these 3 officers opinions ???? If that was the case 3 different committees were just not required Supreme Court will okay it .These three junior officers shud have been delegated to decide all the Defence procurement without another 21 senior members in three committees . Why not ???? Is it the way any Corporate or a govt works across the world ???Dissent notes of three junior officers of Ministry of Defense :Rafale deal: dissent note by domain experts in the Indian Negotiating Team all the points in this dissent notes have been addressed above already except that rival competetior Eurotyphoon fighter from Germany which had offered 20 % discount after price bids opening .As per the Defence procurement procedure any discount after commercial bids are opened cannot be considered . So thier offer although cheaper since it vitiates the tender conditions cannot be considered by govt . Is that clear ????( k) Is there any document found indicating bribery ??? Answer : Nothing found .It is worth recalling here N Ram had in his possession some bribery related papers from Bofors firm . Here nothing . Supreme Court will okay it .( l ) The dissent note in Indian negotiating team was overruled by 4–3 majority .: Answer :- So what ??? in democracy it always happens . Even your ( Supreme Court' s judement in 1973 in Keshavanand Bharati judgment it was with 7–6 majority Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Wikipedia only but nevertheless it was a big saviour for the Indian democracy else today India wud have been a rotten rogue state . Thanks to Supreme Court of India .. Democracy was saved by 7–6 majority in Supreme Court .In case of parliamentary deadlocks also where in a normal bill is approved by Lok Sabha but not approved by Rajyasabha , govt calls a joint session of parliament to get it passed . It is a normal slender majority is irrelevant . And subsequently even Defence Acquisition Council headed by Defence Minister and also Cabinet Committee on Security headed by the Prime Minister also has approved it on top of INT ' s approval..So where is the wrong doing my dear Arun Shourie , Yashwant Sinha and Prashant Bhushan ji ????? Why you are wasting time of Supreme Court and confusing the whole nation that too joining with a most corrupt family of India who have damaged India for last 50 years or so ???? This is your service to mother India ????Did any of the Quorans find anything wrong in the above deviations ????Supreme Court after going thru all the above will come to the conclusion that all Deviations are in order and done with bonafide intentions .Conclusions :- The petetioners case with contentions will be dismissed as baseless ,unfounded , frivolous and a criminal waste of Court’ s time and resources .So govt shud request Supreme Court to levy at least RS 500 crores each penalty damages on petetioners for having wasted the Supreme Court' s time and resources for several months on some stolen zerox papers from Defence Ministry .. These 3 petetioners are much more richer and can arrange this amount easily . Supreme Court shud note that penalty shud be proportional to thier paying capacities.Defence Minister shud lodge a case of Rs500 crores damages from petetioners for the undue problems created by them ..as a deterrent for such future litigants on ensuring against frivolous petetions .Supreme Court is requested to take note that if the petetioners are worth more than Rs 3000 crores , levying a penalty of Rs10 lakhs is all just meaningless . It shud be proportional to thier net worth .Then only it will send correct message to future such litigants golfers etc not to waste Supreme Court's valuable time on frivolous litigations to settle thier personal scores that too on stolen papers …Defence Minister also has to lodge a case against Rs500 crores damages against N Ram bcoz he got the stolen papers first and gave it to Rahul team for bombarding on road side . So if this damages are recovered in future no media newspaper will dare to spend money to get zerox copies of sensitive Defence Ministry documents stolen for printing in thier newspapers..The Rs1500 -2000 crores damages so collected from these petetioners as above can be made use of by the govt to transform the judicial infrastructure all over India in all courts to enable people get speedier justice .And the petetioners names engraved in a marble plaque in front of every court premises where this money is used.Supreme Court in future too can use same methodology to charge damages for frivolous as per petetioners net worth in similar cases that wud a very useful tool .Else getting all confidential papers stealthily from MOD and other ministries by paying money , raising fake controversies , throwing out performing constititutionalky elected Govts will be become a business opportunities for the fake netas , fake journalists ,and real scamsters .By the way do we know what N Ram' s own brothers N Ravi and N Murali :—The Hindu editor-in-chief, N Ram's brother, N Ravi says he has turned the newspaper into an apologist for A Raja The Hindu editor-in-chief, N Ram's brother, N Ravi says he has turned the newspaper into an apologist for A Raja andN Murali N Murali: Double standards on display at Hindu N Murali: Double standards on display at Hindu | India News - Times of India say about him ??? Gist is he is a totally sold out ( to corrupt and politicial idiots ) rogue from the family untrustworthy within his own family ????Can we trust N Ram' s bogus Rafale scam now ????Meanwhile govt shud amend the policy for all govt servants catering for compulsory 3 years conscription starting from MOD officials and Union leaders of all PSUs ,state govt officers ,staffs etc . This is the only way shortage of officers in Armed forces is addressed and also the smart officers of MOD are utilised in border security duties and are properly sensitised about thier responsiblities ..Any other deviations pending from N Ram' s stolen zerox copies of Rafale contract extracts from our learned friends ???? I can answer easily ???

I have not gone through different answers on this question but I will like to make a value addition to this question by adding two names whom I find equally annoying irrespective of their age., experience, political parties and range of many other things.The first name I have is of Udit RajYes, a Lok Sabha MP from North-west Delhi constituency. Dr Raj has also served as the Assistant Commissioner in Income Tax department in the 90s.What annoys me the most about this man can be found in his second designation. He is also the National Chairman of the All India Confederation of SC/ST Organization.Now, in an age where the debate is on a high to remove the bars of reservation on economic bases, Udit Raj has got a totally different agenda to propagate. Being a member of the ruling party, he is slowly establishing a movement to seek reservation for the SC/ST community in the private sector.Yes, the same private sector batting on whose shoulders, Indian IT is ruling the world, Raj wants to degrade the quality of same with the introduction of Reservation here!Second name on the list may astonish many people reading this but before you decide to outrage, kindly read the logic given here:Former Prime Minister, Manmohan SinghManmohan Singh lately addressed the Rajya Sabha in which he 'apparently' gave a challenge to the government and sitting PM Narendra Modi. MMS raised few questions which seem to be genuine and I have mentioned about his speeches in my previous answers here:Himanshu Poswal's answer to Why did Dr. Manmohan Singh comment so late about demonetisation?Himanshu Poswal's answer to What do you think about Dr. Manmohan Singh's speech on PM Modi’s demonetization policy on 24th November 2016?Now, why I find him annoying follows now:Dr Singh joined as the core man in policy making of the Indian economy in the year 1972. Let us look at his career at a glance since then:- Chief Economic Advisor 1972-1976.- Secretary, Ministry of Finance 1976-1980- Member of Planning Commission 1980-1982- Governor, RBI, 1982-1985- Deputy Chairman. Planning Commission, 1985-1987- Following his tenure at the Planning Commission, he was Secretary General of the South Commission, an independent economic policy think tank headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland from 1987 to November 1990- Advisor to Prime Minister of India on Economic Affairs under Prime Minister V.P. Singh- March 1991- June 1991 Chairman of UGC- Finance Minister 1991-1996- LoP in Rajya Sabha 1998-2004- Prime Minister of India 2004-2014An impressive and long tenure by the most learned man of Indian politics in the current hour.What is annoying is that despite being the core man in the economic policy formation of India for 30-40 years, Dr Singh questioned NaMo government which is just 2.5 years old. It is him who need to answer that despite being in the core, why more 60 crore Indian families did not have bank accounts?Why the annual growth rate fell down by almost 50% during his tenure as the Prime Minister?I respect him a lot and his achievements as the Finance Minister are commendable. But I lost a big portion of respect for Dr Singh after his latest remark in RS. A man of his credibility giving off his respect to fulfilling the desires of his political masters is not just disappointing but a shameful event in the Indian political history.

I worked at VA 3 years. I was a real go-getter, training myself every evening after work. I was one of very few people who were ever sent to a training course.My wife (RIP) was P&T 100% SC with SMC R-2.And our children’s college was paid for, and our property taxes exempted.It seems like a lot until you figure we lost my wife, their mother, and $150k annual income.So, to your question:Where is a complete list of benefits for a 100% P&T veteran?Short answer: No such animal.Long answer: Benefits are made by law, interpreted by courts, written into regulations by lawyers, and administered by clerk with various levels of training.Laws change quite often-sometimes depending upon the popularity of the newest war.Courts include the VA’s own court of veteran’s appeals. When a veteran wins a case, all the affected veterans might or might not get the new benefit—someday.Regulations are not normally accessed by the clerks at VA. They sometimes don’t even see training materials.All that sucks, of course. That’s the process required by the constraints of law and appropriations.This is why we need the VSOs. I used a VSO from Paralyzed Veterans of America. He gave us great service.One time, I failed to follow up to make sure a fax was received by VA, so I lost out on a $10,000 insurance policy I applied for. The application didn’t go through on the fax machines.I learned too late that my property taxes could be exempt in my county, for the service-connected death of a Permanently and Totally disabled vet. That was $3000 I paid that I didn’t have to.FRANKLY, YOU ARE ON YOUR OWN. Veteran benefits come from so many sources and change so often that you need to stay in constant contact with advisors and law firms and read the Federal Register and go to County Council meetings and read all the newsletters from all the veteran organizations.The best single source, so far, is an online group of old Nam vets who comprise a VERY busy forum onVETBENEFITS (dot) NETGood luck.