Bull Green House: Fill & Download for Free

Does the Millennium Falcon count? Seriously the Tu-4 Bull is the Soviet copy of the B-29. The B-50 is a B-29 with bigger, more powerful engines. The Soviets built improved versions of the Bull. They all have similar nose designs. An older design than the B-29 is the Heinkel He 111. It has a greenhouse cockpit. Not sure about the He 70. Might be some others with green house cockpits from China and the Soviet Union.

‘Jallikattu’, the single word which created an uproar in the beginning of the new year 2017 and why it needs to be supported. one may wonder why a north Indian suddenly started caring about a south Indian tradition. But let me make it very clear here that India is coming out from the mindset of provincial states to a single nationhood outlook.The mass molestation in bangluru has shamed every corner of India the same way the bangluru people felt. The cauvery water sharing issue is no longer an issue confined to karnataka and Tamilnadu but rather whole India today have an opinion about it. ‘Jallikattu’ , you can find enough knowledge about this tradition on google baba and wikipedia. It’s easily available there. I am in no mood to end up just another compiler but rather share my opinion to rebuff those who are opposing it just for the sake of opposition like Rahul baba of INC and Kejriwal of AAP. Here are my points to those opposing it.1)The bull taming sport is a cruelty on animals.This is the most ridiculous theory in circulation by the liberals these days. Those who kill animals to fill their stomach up, suddenly their compassion has woken up from the slumber and yearning for nirvana by showing compassion to animals. This is sheer hypocracy. If you really care about the cruelty on animals, first stop eating them. ‘Paap kare aur Ganga nahaye’ so take it easy all those who are opposing Jallikaatu on this ground.Now here they give one more wrong theory that eating animal is not a cruelty because it supports food chain which is good for environment. Also it is a personal choice so nobody has the right to intrude.Here also you are propagating a wrong notion my friend. Please get updated. The 2016 climate change report submitted by the UN scientists all over the globe, published that ‘beef’ and ‘meat’ eating is really a concern as they were responsible for green house gases more than transport pollution in the entire world. The UN in it’s framework on climate change to combat the green house gases categorically insisted on cutting down the ‘beef and meet’ consumption to a significant level as this was essential. I know you won’t easily believe me on this. Please click on the link below for the synopsis of the climate change report.Eating less meat essential to curb climate change, says reportIf you still need more evidence, feel free to watch the UN documentary #Before the Flood on you tube. I promise you won’t get bored as it has featured Leonardo Dicaprio as the lead and many high profile figures from across the globe.So, now all your lies , misconceptions and theories of food chain has been brought down by the UNO. Food habit is no longer a personal choice and everyone now, has a moral responsibility towards our future generation to give them a safer planet earth. If we can put cap on transportation and industrial pollutions, why should Food habit pollution should be left out to individuals.One more hypocritical theory they put forward is meat eating existed from ages. It was humans first profession. It can not be undone all of a sudden.This is ludicrous because at one point you are talking of cruelty on animals and at the same time you are favouring the cruelty on them just to satisfy your appetite for them. Moreover when humans started hunting, that time we were called ‘uncivilized’ and ‘uneducated’. Now we are both civilized and educated. How can we conduct ourselves in the same old barbaric manner.Now please stop your hypocracy, stop running after your taste for animals and start acting to save the world instead of getting banned the ‘Jallikattu’.2.) ‘Jallikattu’ is a dangerous sport for humans. It may kill the players and there are instances of players getting killed.yes, like many other high risks sports ‘Jallikattu’ is also associated with risk. The ‘Produnova’ step in gymnastics is also life threatening step. The bull fight of spain is also a high risk sport. Playings have died on the fields even in cricket and football. Do we ban them all on this ground. We all cheered our own ‘Dipa karmakar’ when she did the ‘Produnova’ inspite of the high risk associated with it. The truth is , the players playing the high risk sports are not a novice. They undergo months training to perform them. Same is the case with Jallikattu.3.) We can not disrespect supreme’s court order and goverment can not bring ordinances to stay the order. This will malign the image of supreme court.We all Indians should have a high regard for supreme court’s decisions. This is not the first time supreme court will have to review its decisions. The latest instance is of Cauvery water dispute where the karnataka govt refused to share the water as per supreme court order and a board was constituted to review the decision. There are several instances to present. one such case is ‘The Shah Bano case’, where the govt really maligned the court’s image for appeasement politics. The justice given by the court was snatched by the goverment.4.) Why the court and NGOs have problems with Hindu traditions only.Hey! All those liberals and extremists, it is humble request to all. Please keep ‘Jallikattu’ out of a communal colour.5.) why organisations like PETA and others have Problems with ‘Jallikattu’ and why have’t they acted against bull fighting in spain.PETA is a respected institution. It has done tremendous good jobs. I do not believe all the theories defaming them. But PETA is also run by people like us. They are also prone to take erroneous decisions. Why haven’t they acted against the ‘bull fighting’ in spain, just ask them. I think they should.#’Jallikattu should not be banned.

I’ll go ahead and—as usual—disagree with pretty much every other answer on this topic, but begin by asking a question: What do you mean by aggressive?The truth of the matter is that there’s not a lot of great data out there surrounding dog bite statistics, but the data that is there doesn’t suggest that pit bulls are more likely than other dogs to bite humans. No data suggests this.With that said, if you are attacked by a dog, speaking from personal experience, the last dog you want that to be is a pit bull.I’ll communicate this information for about the 45th time on http://Quora.com (Isn’t someone supposed to moderate duplicate questions?): The lineage of dogs that include pit bulls were bred for a number of specific characteristics, the most important of these for the purposes of this discussion are: the tendency to bite, hold, and shake; the tendency to ignore traditional canine signs of submission; a general tendency towards animal aggression, and a trait referred to as gameness, which colloquially is best defined as the tendency to not give up, despite pain, injury, or other traditional signs that cause an animal to submit.These are the tendencies that made pit bulls and their ancestors great fighting/baiting dogs. These are the some of the traits for which pit bulls were bred.Keeping in mind what I’ve stated about human aggression above, you can’t ‘train’ these tendencies out of a dog. You can’t deprogram a pit bull to not exhibit animal aggression any more than you can train a setter to not point, or train a retriever to not swim. It’s in their nature; it’s in their DNA. That said, not every pit bull exhibits animal aggression; years of pet bull breeding have tended to not focus on this trait, but you can’t tell which pit bull will and which pit bull will not be animal aggressive.Again, speaking from personal experience, much more than most, no amount of socialization will render an animal aggressive pit bull no longer animal aggressive. Sure you might be able to keep it under control—I do—but you have to consider the needs of your dog. Yes, I could probably get away with bringing my OFRN to the dog park and not have it result in something catastrophic, but it would require CONSTANT vigilance on my part, and would more-or-less mean that the dog was unable to have a good time at the dog park. He’s much happier, and the general canine population is much more safe, if I walk him a mile and a a half into the woods by my house and let him off the leash.You can believe this or not. I’m pretty much done debating with people who “have a pit bull and have never had a problem” (until they do), know that I “must not be able to train dogs” (I formerly owned a business rehabbing aggressive dogs), or that I’m “anti-pit bull & lying” (lol!). That said, I’m also pretty much done giving people advice when they “don’t know what to do,” because their “pit bull—out of nowhere—attacked another dog” (it wasn’t out of nowhere), and that the dog “is a good dog,” but now the owner doesn’t “know what to do.”Once again: Keep your pit bull on a leash or otherwise restrained at all times. Learn the body language of dogs (though this isn’t always perfect), and learn to read your dogs emotions from its body language. If you do choose to bring your pit bull to the dog park, monitor body language pretty much constantly, and at the first sign of dominant or aggressive behavior, remove the dog. At this point, my advice would be to never go back to the dog park.Again, speaking from personal experience, pit bulls that were raised in dog parks can’t be reliably brought to dog parks for their entire life.That was the long answer. The short answer is that pit bulls don’t tend to be human aggressive, but if you’re not a dominant personality type, it might not be the breed for you. If a dog is going to be animal aggressive, you can’t train that tendency out of them, you can—potentially—modify the behavior, but you can’t change the nature of the dog.