Form Fill Consent To Treat: Fill & Download for Free

Nothing like going through school being told by Feminists that, despite being far more likely to be... maimed, imprisoned, killed, homeless, robbed, commit suicide, suffer from a severe mental condition, die at work, face social isolation, and have my problems ignored by society, that I am a monster and a potential rapist who actually controls the world and I have a huge privilege that makes my life magical. I can be conscripted to fight in a war, I am more likely to work a dangerous job that goes wrong, if I become a father, odds are I don't get jack for time off with them. If I get divorced , I'll likely lose access to my own children as well as my home and much of my assets and wealth and the courts and laws are already set up to make this likely. In a disaster, my life is treated as less important -- "women and children first", and I may end up being publically shamed for following my self-preservation instincts. I do not have the option to meet a nice girl and just take care of the home for her; a man must work or he becomes at best an acceptable butt of jokes. Welfare, should I face poverty, is geared for women and children. Shelters, if I face violence, are for women and children. Support programs are almost all for women and children. It's considered okay for a woman to hit me, but if I hit her back, it's wrong. I'm expected to hide my feelings and be a working drone. The psychological pressures placed on men are immense.Should I be in a relationship, sex is in all probability going to be determiend by my girlfriend/wife's level of libido. I want it more than her? Too bad. I try to get more out of her? I'm an abuser. She gives in? By new definitions that makes me a rapist for having a biological need! And what if the situations are reversed? Then I'm a faggot. Also, in a relationship, if we go for counseling, counseling is primarily geared towards female communication and thought styles, and most counselors are women. I've noticed a pretty disquieting trend of couple who go through counseling "successfully" seem to have the result of the guy being so browbeat and disheartened that he just keeps quiet about his needs and perspectives.And then comes sex. Not only, according to actual science, does sexual repression come mostly from women, but women have far more freedom to explore and try their sexuality. Female sexuality and beauty are far more celebrated and evaluated. Female sexuality is something almost mystical, beautiful, spiritual. A woman having sex is making gentle moans, writhing a little, savoring touch. It's almost like a form of communion. Male sexuality is dirty, degrading, bestial, thrusting IN! IN! IN! Men having sex are sweaty, make weird faces, grunt oddly, and filled with an overwheming urge to spill seed. A girl sees a man she finds sexy. Good for her having some confidence. A boy sees a woman he finds sexy. Pervert! Women going to a strip show? Celebration of free sexuality? Men doing the same? Dogs after meat. Women traveling and yearning for exotic locales, romance, and sex? Seeking fulfilment like we all wish. Men doing that? Losers! A woman having standards? Good for her. A man having standards? Shallow pig! A woman gets reproductive control; by consentng to sex, she does not necessarily consult to parenthood. I, on the otherhand, cannot be allowed to not consent to parenthood after consenting to sex, or even if I didn't consent -- "Take responsibility!" Female sexual problems get enormous amounts of research and science put into them. Your vagina hurts during sex? Can't get wet. You poor darling. Male ones get jokes and ridicule and told to just try harder or quit being a fag. Painful erections? Can't stay hard? She needs a 'real' man who isn't secretly gay. A girl taking up a geeky hobby is an intelligent lady with a quirk. A man having a geeky hobby is a shutin loser unworthy of his scrotum

Here are a few nobody has mentioned yet:Expect to own a front-loading washing machine, which you can pick up second hand for as little as £20, and not have seen a top-loading washing machine since the 1960s.Not have air conditioning, because if you did have it you would only need it for two weeks a year and it isn't worth the bother.Marry at 16 (with parental consent in England and Wales, without it in Scotland). There are restrictions which say that a person in authority, such as a teacher, cannot have sex with a person who is under their authority and is 16 or 17 unless they marry them first, but other than that the age of sexual consent is 17 in Northern Ireland and 16 everywhere else. You can own your own flat and live wholly independently from the age of 16, although if you are under 17 and deemed to be in moral danger (i.e. a prostitute or addict) you can be sent back to your parents or into care until you turn 17. At 18 you are fully adult and can do absolutely everything except drive a heavy goods vehicle or own a business which sells alcohol, for which you have to be 21. It used to be that you had to be 21 to be an MP or town councillor and iirc 27 to be a magistrate, but now you can do those at 18 too. For some purposes the voting age is as low as 16.Live in a country (Scotland) where the leaders of the three largest political parties are all women and two of them are lesbians, and nobody thinks this odd.Live in a country where the poet laureate, the most popular and iconic sports presenter and several of the most popular stand up comics are all lesbians and nobody thinks this odd.Live in a country where one of the most significant artists and political pundits (Grayson Perry) is a large, butch, straight man who routinely dresses (in public, while giving his weighty political opinions) as an over-made-up six-year-old girl in a frilly frock, and even the right-wing press only grouches that he's probably not a real transvestite like popular novelist, comedian and political pundit Eddie Izzard, but just showing off.Live in a country where the music reviewer of one of the most right wing papers (The Daily Mail) is a passionate Lady Gaga fan, and the book reviewer is fond of science fiction and comic gay romances.Live in a country where the main right-wing party is passionately in favour of LGBT rights and sending aid to the Third World, and every major party is opposed to the death penalty and in favour of welfare and the NHS - although they have different ideas on how best to fund and run them.Live in a country where the main dispute between left and right is over state versus commercial ownership of major services and resources.Be sure that you will get to vote if you are entitled to do so. The government periodically sends a form to every household which you fill in to say who lives at that address and is eligible to vote (any changes can also be made online). A few weeks before an election everybody who is entitled to vote is sent a cardboard ticket with their name and address on it, which they take along to the local polling station where they are crossed off a list. That we know of, we get about 20 fraudulent votes out of a population of 65 million.Live in a country where your welfare payments are yours to do what you want with, and not given to you as food stamps or paid directly to your landlord. I can see the arguments on both sides, especially if the recipient is a gambling or drug addict or has serious learning difficulties, but the fundamental difference is that the US seems to treat welfare like charity, which is in the control of the giver, whereas we see it as a payment from a state-owned insurance firm - the British welfare state is even called National Insurance. If we are entitled to a payout from that state insurance system we don't expect it to tell us what to do with the money, any more than we expect our car insurer to tell us that our insurance payment can only be spent on a new car, if we chose to have it paid in cash.Not be given special consideration at university or let off your academic work just because you are good at some sport, unless sport is actually what you are studying - and especially not be let off from a rape charge because you're good at some sport. In fact, if you're famous you're more likely to be charged for minor offences, or even falsely set up for an offence, because the press pays so well for scandal that it may be worth some con artist's time to invent some.Edit: Plus, also, live in a country where almost nobody has heard of Ayn Rand, far less read her, and rightish-wing newspaper The Daily Telegraph felt obliged to explain her to its readership as "An unpleasant Russian-American fruitcake".But perhaps the most important of all is this. If we elect a Prime Minister, and he or she turns out to be very bad at it, they can be heaved out on the grounds of incompetence. We don't have to impeach them: all that's required is a successful vote of "no confidence" to be passed in Parliament, in order to force a new general election.

Facsimile.Yes, you read that correctly. In the 21st century, when the power of the internet can provide instant secure connectivity to transfer enormous quantities of data, U.S. hospitals pour millions and millions of dollars into EMRs that aren't compatible with each other, necessitating reliance on an ancient technology from the '60s unknown to the majority of human beings born in this country past 1995.In case you're curious, this is the process I usually go through:Step 1a: Make sure patient is conscious, can communicate, and has capacity to consent. If any of the above do not apply, hope that patient has legally recognized party that can consent for them present/reachable.Step 1b: Hope that patient or other related party remembers where they were treated, or at least enough information to successfully Google the treatment facility, like a street name, an intersection, anything. Hope that previous treatment facility still exists (they're obviously not getting care there right now for a reason, maybe the reason is because it's shut down).Step 2: Fill out, by hand, an extensive form to be signed by the patient explicitly consenting to the release of their medical information by the other healthcare entity.Step 3: Before asking the patient to sign the form, spend time explaining to the patient why access to prior records is necessary. Deal with patient reaction.Best scenario: Patient just nods, smiles, and signs form.Ok scenario: "Doc, I don't get it. I'm obviously here because I want treatment. If my past records are needed for treatment, why can't you just get them without having to go through me? Just do whatever it takes to get me better already." Patient signs form, shaking head.Stressful scenario: "Why the %$#& are you wasting my time with this @$#%&*!# instead of treating me?! If you need the *&@# records just get the $#@%ing records so we can get this &^*% done!" Patient throws pen in my face.Step 4: Find a working fax machine. This can be harder than an act of Congress.Step 5: Fax the form to the other facility. Hope their fax machine is working. Hope they have someone working at that time (at 3AM, this is not guaranteed). Call them to (hopefully) confirm receipt of the fax and explain that I need this information ASAP. If this step fails, try not to feel too much frustration that I spent over 2 decades studying to become a doctor only to be stalled by a piece of hardware that even my parents didn't own.Step 6: Wait for the other facility to find the requested records. This is, of course, assuming that they have someone working in medical records at that time. Even if they do, it could still be hours.Step 7: Receive, by fax, a bundle of grainy scanned papers from other facility. Hope desperately that the information I need is in there. Groan in realization that Control-F isn't going to help me and I need to search through the entire stack (sometimes hundreds of sheets, depending on patient's history) by hand to find what I need. Enlist medical student assistance if possible....and people wonder why I'm so obsessed with EMRs and how they need to be improved.