Statutory Declaration Bc: Fill & Download for Free

This are the new rules for Indian passport as declared on 23rd Dec, 2016.In order to streamline, liberalize and ease the process of issue of passport, the Ministry of External Affairs has taken a number of steps in the realm of passport policy which is expected to benefit the citizens of India applying for a passport. The details of these steps are given below:-PROOF OF DATE OF BIRTHAs per the extant statutory provisions of the Passport Rules, 1980, all the applicants born on or after 26/01/1989, in order to get a passport, had to, hitherto, mandatorily submit the Birth Certificate as the proof of Date of Birth (DOB). It has now been decided that all applicants of passports can submit any one of the following documents as the proof of DOB while submitting the passport application:(i) Birth Certificate (BC) issued by the Registrar of Births & Deaths or the Municipal Corporation or any other prescribed authority whosoever has been empowered under the Registration of Birth & Deaths Act, 1969 to register the birth of a child born in India;(ii) Transfer/School leaving/Matriculation Certificate issued by the school last attended/recognized educational board containing the DOB of the applicant;(iii) PAN Card issued by the Income Tax Department with the DOB of applicant;(iv) Aadhar Card/E-Aadhar having the DOB of applicant;(v) Copy of the extract of the service record of the applicant (only in respect of Government servants) or the Pay Pension Order (in respect of retired Government Servants), duly attested/certified by the officer/in-charge of the Administration of the concerned Ministry/Department of the applicant, having his DOB;(vi) Driving licence issued by the Transport Department of concerned State Government, having the DOB of applicant;(vii) Election Photo Identity Card (EPIC) issued by the Election Commission of India having the DOB of applicant;(viii) Policy Bond issued by the Public Life Insurance Corporations/Companies having the DOB of the holder of the insurance policy.Report of the Inter Ministerial CommitteeA three-member Committee comprising of the officials of the Ministry of External Affairs and the Ministry of Women and Child Development was constituted to examine various issues pertaining to passport applications where mother/child has insisted that the name of the father should not be mentioned in the passport and also relating to passport issues to children with single parent and to adopted children. The Report of the Committee has been accepted by the Minister of External Affairs.The following policy changes have been made inter-alia on the basis of the recommendations of this Committee:(i) The online passport application form now requires the applicant to provide the name of father or mother or legal guardian, i.e., only one parent and not both. This would enable single parents to apply for passports for their children and to also issue passports where the name of either the father or the mother is not required to be printed at the request of the applicant.(ii) The total number of Annexes prescribed in the Passport Rule, 1980, has been brought down to 9 from the present 15. Annexes A, C, D, E, J, and K have been removed and certain Annexes have been merged.(iii) All the annexes that are required to be given by the applicants would be in the form of a self declaration on a plain paper. No attestation/swearing by/before any Notary/Executive Magistrate/First Class Judicial Magistrate would be henceforth necessary.(iv) Married applicants would not be required to provide Annexure K or any marriage certificate.(v) The Passport application form does not require the applicant to provide the name of her/his spouse in case of separated or divorced persons. Such applicants for passports would not be required to provide even the Divorce Decree.(vi) Orphaned children who do not have any proof of DOB such as Birth Certificate or the Matriculation Certificate or the declaratory Court order, may now submit a declaration given by the Head of the Orphanage/Child Care Home on their official letter head of the organization confirming the DOB of the applicant.(vii) In case of children not born out of wedlock, the applicant for the passport of such children should submit only Annexure G while submitting the passport application.(viii) In case of issue of passport to in-country domestically adopted children, submission of the registered adoption deed would no longer be required. In the absence of any deed to this effect, the passport applicant may give a declaration on a plain paper confirming the adoption.(ix) Government servants, who are not able to obtain the Identity Certificate (Annexure-B)/ No-Objection Certificate (Annexure-M) from their concerned employer and intend to get the passport on urgent basis can now get the passport by submitting a self-declaration in Annexure-‘N’ that he/she has given prior Intimation letter to his/her employer informing that he/she was applying for an ordinary passport to a Passport Issuing Authority.(x) Sadhus/ Sanyasis can apply for a passport with the name of their spiritual Guru mentioned in the passport application in lieu of their biological parent(s) name(s) subject to their providing of at least one public document such as Election Photo Identity Card (EPIC) issued by the Election Commission of India, PAN card, Adhar Card, etc wherein the name of the Guru has been recorded against the column(s) for parent(s) name(s).

5 regular, and 6 federal. Each province is a bit different when it comes to being a statutory holiday. In BC and Alberta, I always got a day off or holiday pay on Remembrance Day, but now that I moved to Ontario (big mistake!) there's nothing. Remembrance Day of last year, I had a moment of silence at the factory where I worked. Well. Would've been a moment of silence if it weren't for the silence being punctuated by angry meatheads declaring “WTF this is bullshit. Just keep working"

The reason is that the “anti-immigrant” anger is actually one based against ethnically groups that are seen as “racially” or religiously “not white” or not American”. It is mostly racist. None of these anti-immigrant people have a problem with Irish or Canadian or Russian immigrants. Once Russians and Irish and Italians and Greeks were seen as both “not white” and “not American” and the Catholic ones as controlled by an alien religious leader, the Pope. Now they are not seen that way and anti immigrant groups have no problem with them. In 1970, the US Census Bureau actually changed Indian’s listing to “white”. In many places Indian immigrants are slowly morphing into being seen as “not minorities”. I’m not saying they are not discriminated against but it is changing. In the 1970s most Indian Americans were relatively poor struggling immigrants. They were not highly paid engineers or Governors of states in those days. They often aspired to owning a small business. In fact today, 50% of all the motels in America are owned by Indian Americans. A Patel Motel Cartel? Why Indian Americans Dominate the U.S. Motel Industry. Racial friction in the US has always been in part about Class. As more Indian Americans move into the upper income brackets the view has shifted. They are not seen as in the same category as “Mexicans” but anti-immigration hordes of fools.Canadians lead the world in visa over stays but no one is upset by that. DHS now estimates 93,000 Canadian overstays, more than double the amount of Mexican overstays (42,000). Canada has a smaller population that Mexico so its citizens also have a higher rate of overstays in addition to just raw figures. None of Trumps supporters are upset that his first wife got to the US by using a illegal false marriage. Noe are worried about his current wife who came to the US on a flimsy pretty much false visa that allowed her to work as a model. Why are they not worried? Because it is about race and religion. This has always been that case from the first immigration laws in the 1880 that were against Chinese. Before that anyone could come with no visas or passports. Today, in much of US culture, Indian immigrants are seen as a sort of “whites”. Just as Greeks were once seen as having a strange religion and being “dark” and “unclean” but now are seen as “white”. So, most anti immigrant people don’t mind Indians. The two Indian American Governors are Republicans in states that are still often very racist. It was not much of an issue when Nikki Haley (parents from Punjab) ran for office. It would have been for a black man in North Carolina. It also helps that Indian Americans are a very small population, 0.9% of the population or 2,843,391 in 2010. But remember, the Muslim population is the SAME and faces huge anti immigration pressure. Muslims accounted for 0.9% of American adults in 2014, up from 0.4% in 2007, due largely to immigration.Once upon a time Indian immigrant faced very serious anti-immigrant violence and anger. In 1907, in Bellingham WA for example a mob of 400 or more white men attacked East Indian immigrants who were working in the lumber mills. They were mostly Sikhs. They attacked their homes, dragged them put and beat them. Their possessions were stolen. 125 were driven out of town to Canada the next day. 6 were hospitalized. 400 were held in jail. Other riots like this happened in California, Vancouver BC and Everett WA. The rioters were part of the The Asiatic Exclusion League. It was started by 67 Labor Unions.That group yelled about their “outrage at the Turban Tide / Hindoo Invasion (sic)” as well as the “Yellow Peril”.In 1923 United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind declared that Indian people were “not white. ” and therefore could not become US citizens. He argued that he hated blacks and other “lower races’ and should be seen as “white” because he was “Aryan” and high caste. He lost. He was ruled not Caucasian in the "common understanding", so he could not be included in the "statutory category as white persons". The Court reiterated its holding in Ozawa v. United States, saying that the words "free white person" in the naturalization act were "synonymous with the word ‘Caucasian’ only as that word is popularly understood," His nationality was taken away. After this case and Indians became classified as non-whites, Indian Americans were banned by anti-miscegenation laws from marrying white Americans in the states of Arizona, Virginia, South Carolina and Georgia.Then in 1924 Immigration quota laws were put in place to pretty much keep out everyone but Northern and Western Europeans (except for very low numbers of others) and anyone from the Americas was allowed in. This kept out Indians and Chinese and Slavs and Italians and Greeks and Turks and Armenians. All these people were seen as “not white”. Indians remained in this category until 1970. Thind did get his citizenship later in 1935 by his status as a WWI veteran but the government fought that too. After him (except where local clerks didn’t obey the Supreme court) no one from India was allowed to become a citizen until 1946. At that time in part becasue of India fighting in WWII and Independence, they were given a quota of 100 immigrants a year. The same was done for Chinese in 1943.In 1965, President Johnson signed the Hart-Celler Immigration Act. It ended the national origins quota system that had been started in 1921. In 1965–1970, 27,859 Indian immigrants entered the United States. Immigration from India in 1965–1993 was 558,980. In 1970 Indians were ruled “white” by the US Census. Indian American groups, through their own petitioning, successfully changed their racial classification from White to Asian in the 1977 "through Statistical Directive 15 of the Office of Management and Budget", causing Indian Americans to be listed as Asian in the 1980 US Census. Self reporting was done since them and many Indian Americans from the NW report themselves as “white” which drives down the real numbers of Indian Americans in the statistics.Again, “Anti- immigration” is code. It does not mean people want to keep out Canadians or any Europeans. It means they want to keep out people they feel are “not like them” or threatening” or “different”. They want to blame their problems on other people when in fact high immigration has always been a source of strength for American culture. From 1860 to 1930 the percentage of people who were foreign born in the US was always as high or higher than today. the period from 1940–1970 when the percentages or foreign born got lower and lower, are a strange anomaly from US history.