Truman Arnold Companies: Fill & Download for Free

This subject reminds me of how some school textbooks in the American South purposely omit the word slaves and substitute this word with "workers" and servants.Textbooks Calling Slaves ‘Workers’ Too Offensive Even For TexasMcGraw-Hill to rewrite textbook after mom's complaintMost black slaves in America spent their entire lives being forced to work to build generational wealth, prosperity, and security for other people as well as companies and were beaten, raped, and tortured, and or had family members who were.Why obfuscate the obvious? Why purposely teach only one side?What are they afraid of? Guilt? Taking responsibility?The Smithsonian has every right to only showcase a landing gear tire if it wanted to, but I think if they want to be considered as a responsible party and an authoritative organization that can be trusted, they need to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.So what are the historical facts regarding the Enola Gay? What is the truth? What are the facts they are purposely omitting?The Enola Gay was involved in dropping an atomic weapon on the civilians of a nation that was already militarily defeated, and had been trying to surrender for almost an entire year through diplomatic channels.Allied Supreme Commander General Eisenhower, Admiral Nimitz, General MacArthur, Commanding General of the US Army Air Forces Hap Arnold, Admiral Halsey, General LeMay, all stated unanimously after the war that they totally knew the Japanese had been trying to surrender through diplomatic channels since 1944, the Japanese were already militarily defeated, and in their view an Atomic Weapon did not need to be dropped on civilians to end the war.That's a fact you won't find at the Smithsonian exhibit.Boeing B-29 Superfortress "Enola Gay"Rare photographs show the nightmare aftermath of HiroshimaUnlike a few Quorans and others who are apparently scared to death of the truth, I am not afraid of the truth. You can have an opinion on whether or not the atomic weapon should have been used, as I certainly do, and that's totally fine, but if a school, museum, textbook, or person is afraid of the truth and wants to reject and or whitewash facts I lose pretty much all respect for them.President Eisenhower:"In 1945 ... , Secretary of War Stimson visited my headquarters in Germany, [and] informed me that our government was preparing to drop an atomic bomb on Japan. I was one of those who felt that there were a number of cogent reasons to question the wisdom of such an act.... During his recitation of the relevant facts, I had been conscious of a feeling of depression and so I voiced to him my grave misgivings, first on the basis of my belief that Japan was already defeated and that dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary, and second because I thought that our country should avoid shocking world opinion by the use of a weapon whose employment was, I thought, no longer mandatory as a measure to save American lives. It was my belief that Japan was, at that very moment, seeking some way to surrender with a minimum loss of 'face.' The Secretary was deeply perturbed by my attitude, almost angrily refuting the reasons I gave for my quick conclusions."Source: The White House Years: Mandate for Change: 1953-1956: A Personal Account (New York: Doubleday, 1963), pp. 312-313.Eisenhower's Opinion on the Atomic BombIn his 1965 study, Atomic Diplomacy: Hiroshima and Potsdam (pp. 107, 108), historian Gar Alperovitz writes:Although Japanese peace feelers had been sent out as early as September 1 9 4 4 (and [China's] Chiang Kai-shek had been approached regarding surrender possibilities in December 1944), the real effort to end the war began in the spring of 1945. This effort stressed the role of the Soviet Union ...Admiral William F. Halsey, Jr., Commander U.S. Third Fleet, stated publicly in 1946:The first atomic bomb was an unnecessary experiment. . . . It was a mistake to ever drop it. . . . [the scientists] had this toy and they wanted to try it out, so they dropped it. . . . It killed a lot of Japs, but the Japs had put out a lot of peace feelers through Russia long before. (See p. 331, Chapter 26)In mid-April [1945] the [US] Joint Intelligence Committee reported that Japanese leaders were looking for a way to modify the surrender terms to end the war. The State Department was convinced the Emperor was actively seeking a way to stop the fighting. ( Really?) -----Yes, really.*Fleet Admiral Chester Nimitz in September 1945, according to The New York Times, "took the opportunity of adding his voice to those insisting that Japan had been defeated before the atomic bombings and Russia's entry into the war." In October, Nimitz stated, "The Japanese had, in fact, already sued for peace before the atomic age was announced to the world with the destruction of Hiroshima and before the Russian entry into war." Nimitz's widow later recalled that he "always felt badly over the dropping of that bomb because he said we had Japan beaten already." She recalled direct statement by Nimitz that "I felt that that was an unnecessary loss of civilian life...We had them beaten. They hadn't enough food, they couldn't do anything." (pp.329-330)*The commanding general of the U.S. Army Air Forces, Hap Arnold, stated in his 1949 memoir that "it always appeared to us that, atomic bomb or no atomic bomb,the Japanese were already on the verge of collapse." Arnold's deputy, Lt. General Ira Eaker, later stated that "Arnold's view was that it was unnecessary. He said that he knew the Japanese wanted peace. ..."it is not necessary to use it in order to conquer the Japanese..." (p.335)"The war would have been over without the Russians entering and without the atomic bomb." In November 1945, LeMay added that it was "obvious that the atomic bombdid not end the war against Japan. Japan was finished long before either one of the two atomic bombs were dropped..." (p.336)The diary of MacArthur's pilot, Weldon Rhoades, from August 7, 1945 states that"General MacArthur definitely is appalled and depressed by this Frankenstein monster [the bomb]." Herbert Hoover's diary regarding a May 1946 meeting with MacArthur states "I told MacArthur of my memorandum of mid-May 1945 to Truman, that peace could be had with Japan by which our major objectives would be accomplished. MacArthur said that was correct and that we could have avoided all of the losses, the Atomic bomb, and the entry of Russia into Manchuria." In a postwar interview with journalist Norman Cousins, MacArthur expressed the view that there was "no military justification for the dropping of the bomb. The war might have ended weeks earlier...if the United States had agreed, as it later did anyway, to the retention of the institution of the emperor." (pp.350-352)In his memoirs Admiral William D. Leahy, the President's Chief of Staff--and the top official who presided over meetings of both the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Combined U.S.-U.K. Chiefs of Staff--minced few words:[T]he use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender.---Fleet Admiral William D. Leahy,Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff during World War IIJ. Samuel Walker, chief historian of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission."Careful scholarly treatment of the records and manuscripts opened over the past few years has greatly enhanced our understanding of why the Truman administration used atomic weapons against Japan. Experts continue to disagree on some issues, but critical questions have been answered. The consensus among scholars is that the bomb was NOT needed to avoid an invasion of Japan and to end the war within a relatively short time. It is clear that alternatives to the bomb existed and thatTruman and his advisers knew it."What did Air Force General Curits E. LeMay have to say about it?"LeMay: The war would have been over in two weeks without the Russians entering and without the atomic bomb."The Press: You mean that, sir? Without the Russians and the atomic bomb?"LeMay: Yes, with the B-29…"The Press: General, why use the atomic bomb? Why did we use it then?"LeMay: Well, the other people were not convinced…"The Press: Had they not surrendered because of the atomic bomb?"LeMay: The atomic bomb had nothing to do with the end of the war at all.

The bombings had nothing to do with Japan. They were a warning to Stalin.The real answer is not a related to the military. The military had run out of targets. Both the U.S Admiralty and General Staff were aware of Japanese attempts to surrender going back to 1944, and had been actively lobbying President Truman not to use the atomic bombs.MILITARY leaders urge Truman not to use Atomic Bombs on Japan.These men spent their entire careers learning how to be exemplary leaders. Duty, honor, courage, love of country, and service was and is their creed. The U.S military leaders did not want to cowardly slaughter defenseless women and children, but the order came down the chain of command to hit two cities full of Japanese civilians with atomic weapons.Cadet Honor CodeUnderstanding this subject requires one to fully grasp the history; the geographical borders of 1945, the military positions on all sides, but most importantly the Allied politics of 1944, and 1945.The question really needs to be "Why did President Truman against the advice of virtually all U.S Admirals and Generals decide to drop the atomic bombs on defenseless civilians knowing full well the Japanese were trying to surrender?In October 1944, Winston Churchill sold out millions of Eastern Europeans and handed them over to the psychopathic, autocrat, mass murderer Jospeh Stalin.Percentages agreementWhy? Like his Predecessor Chamberlain, rather than demand self determination and the removal of Soviet forces from Eastern Europe, Churchill thought some appeasement would work with Stalin. As an Imperialist, purposely leaving the American Ambassador out of this particular meeting, Churchill proposed spheres of influence rather than confront Stalin about removing the Red Army after the War.It should strike anyone who knows anything about WWII as being quite contradictory for Churchill to be dividing up Europe with Stalin by scribbling on scrap paper, and then shortly after the war giving his "Iron Curtain" speech.It was nothing more than fantastic political theater. Churchill virtually created the postwar borders himself. It was his idea. Stalin obliged.So the stage was being set for what would become the Cold War. Learning of this un democratic division of countries, President Roosevelt was furious, but due to the onset of the illness that would eventually take his life, President Roosevelt couldn't do anything about it.Why 2 atomic bombs? By the end of the war, the Red Army was an even bigger war machine than Nazi Germany, fully mechanized with a skilled officer core. If Stalin were to attempt to take even more territory in Europe, the United States was not totally prepared to fight WW III immediately after fighting WWII.Stalin was quoted as saying, "Tsar Alexander reached Paris" meaning that he would've loved to have been able to swallow all of Western Europe as well.By time the Allies met again at Potsdam, Truman had become President and the spheres of influence agreement had been made public. Unlike Churchill the Imperialist trading groups of people like playing cards in a deck, Truman wanted to show U.S resolve and also if possible to somehow frighten Stalin.You'll find many answers on this subject that state it was total war, the Japanese deserved it etc. At the end of the day, virtually all US military leaders short of begging, asked Truman not to use the atomic bombs because the war-fighters knew they had already militarily defeated Japan. It was well known around the world the Japanese had been trying to surrender so this fireworks show, the atomic bombings had nothing to do with Japan, but had everything to do with the developing Cold War. The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was the first shot fired during the Cold War.Which leaders were against the bombings? The Japanese were trying to surrender? When?President Eisenhower:"In 1945 ... , Secretary of War Stimson visited my headquarters in Germany, [and] informed me that our government was preparing to drop an atomic bomb on Japan. I was one of those who felt that there were a number of cogent reasons to question the wisdom of such an act.... During his recitation of the relevant facts, I had been conscious of a feeling of depression and so I voiced to him my grave misgivings,first on the basis of my belief that Japan was already defeated and that dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary, and second because I thought that our country should avoid shocking world opinion by the use of a weapon whose employment was, I thought, no longer mandatory as a measure to save American lives. It was my belief that Japan was, at that very moment, seeking some way to surrender with a minimum loss of 'face.' The Secretary was deeply perturbed by my attitude, almost angrily refuting the reasons I gave for my quick conclusions."Source: The White House Years: Mandate for Change: 1953-1956: A Personal Account (New York: Doubleday, 1963), pp. 312-313.Eisenhower's Opinion on the Atomic BombIn his 1965 study, Atomic Diplomacy: Hiroshima and Potsdam (pp. 107, 108), historian Gar Alperovitz writes:Although Japanese peace feelers had been sent out as early as September 1 9 4 4 (and [China's] Chiang Kai-shek had been approached regarding surrender possibilities in December 1944), the real effort to end the war began in the spring of 1945. This effort stressed the role of the Soviet Union ...Admiral William F. Halsey, Jr., Commander U.S. Third Fleet, stated publicly in 1946:The first atomic bomb was an unnecessary experiment. . . . It was a mistake to ever drop it. . . . [the scientists] had this toy and they wanted to try it out, so they dropped it. . . . It killed a lot of Japs, but the Japs had put out a lot of peace feelers through Russia long before. (See p. 331, Chapter 26)In mid-April [1945] the [US] Joint Intelligence Committee reported that Japanese leaders were looking for a way to modify the surrender terms to end the war. The State Department was convinced the Emperor was actively seeking a way to stop the fighting. ( Really?) -----Yes, really.*Fleet Admiral Chester Nimitz in September 1945, according to The New York Times, "took the opportunity of adding his voice to those insisting that Japan had been defeated before the atomic bombings and Russia's entry into the war." In October, Nimitz stated, "The Japanese had, in fact, already sued for peace before the atomic age was announced to the world with the destruction of Hiroshima and before the Russian entry into war." Nimitz's widow later recalled that he "always felt badly over the dropping of that bomb because he said we had Japan beaten already." She recalled direct statement by Nimitz that "I felt that that was an unnecessary loss of civilian life...We had them beaten. They hadn't enough food, they couldn't do anything." (pp.329-330)*The commanding general of the U.S. Army Air Forces, Hap Arnold, stated in his 1949 memoir that "it always appeared to us that, atomic bomb or no atomic bomb,the Japanese were already on the verge of collapse." Arnold's deputy, Lt. General Ira Eaker, later stated that "Arnold's view was that it was unnecessary. He said that he knew the Japanese wanted peace. ..."it is not necessary to use it in order to conquer the Japanese..." (p.335)"The war would have been over without the Russians entering and without the atomic bomb." In November 1945, LeMay added that it was "obvious that the atomic bomb did not end the war against Japan. Japan was finished long before either one of the two atomic bombs were dropped..." (p.336)Brigadier Gen. Carter W. Clarke, the officer in charge of preparing MAGIC intercepted cable summaries in 1945, stated in a 1959 interview:We brought them [the Japanese] down to an abject surrender through the accelerated sinking of their merchant marine and hunger alone, and when we didn't need to do it, and we knew we didn't need to do it, and they knew that we knew we didn't need to do it, we used them as an experiment for two atomic bombs. (See p. 359, Chapter 28)Time-Life editor Henry R. Luce later recalled that during a May-June 1945 tour of the Pacific theater:. . . I spent a morning at Cavite in the Philippines with Admiral Frank Wagnerin front of huge maps. Admiral Wagner was in charge of air search-and-patrol of all the East Asian seas and coasts. He showed me that in all those millions of square miles there was literally not a single target worth the powder to blow it up; there were only junks and mostly small ones at that.Similarly, I dined one night with Admiral [Arthur] Radford [later Joint Chiefs Chairman, 1953-57] on the carrier Yorktown leading a task force from Ulithi to bomb Kyushu, the main southern island of Japan. Radford had invited me to be alone with him in a tiny room far up the superstructure of theYorktown, where not a sound could be heard. Even so, it was in a whisper that he turned to me and said: "Luce, don't you think the war is over?" My reply, of course, was that he should know better than I. For his part, all he could say was that the few little revetments and rural bridges that he might find to bomb in Kyushu wouldn't begin to pay for the fuel he was burning on his task force. (See pp. 331-332, Chapter 26)The diary of MacArthur's pilot, Weldon Rhoades, from August 7, 1945 states that"General MacArthur definitely is appalled and depressed by this Frankenstein monster [the bomb]." Herbert Hoover's diary regarding a May 1946 meeting with MacArthur states "I told MacArthur of my memorandum of mid-May 1945 to Truman, that peace could be had with Japan by which our major objectives would be accomplished. MacArthur said that was correct and that we could have avoided all of the losses, the Atomic bomb, and the entry of Russia into Manchuria." In a postwar interview with journalist Norman Cousins, MacArthur expressed the view that there was "no military justification for the dropping of the bomb. The war might have ended weeks earlier...if the United States had agreed, as it later did anyway, to the retention of the institution of the emperor." (pp.350-352)In his memoirs Admiral William D. Leahy, the President's Chief of Staff--and the top official who presided over meetings of both the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Combined U.S.-U.K. Chiefs of Staff--minced few words:[T]he use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender.---Fleet Admiral William D. Leahy,Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff during World War IIJ. Samuel Walker, chief historian of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission."Careful scholarly treatment of the records and manuscripts opened over the past few years has greatly enhanced our understanding of why the Truman administration used atomic weapons against Japan. Experts continue to disagree on some issues, but critical questions have been answered. The consensus among scholars is that the bomb was NOT needed to avoid an invasion of Japan and to end the war within a relatively short time. It is clear that alternatives to the bomb existed and thatTruman and his advisers knew it."What did Air Force General Curits E. LeMay have to say about it?"LeMay: The war would have been over in two weeks without the Russians entering and without the atomic bomb."The Press: You mean that, sir? Without the Russians and the atomic bomb?"LeMay: Yes, with the B-29…"The Press: General, why use the atomic bomb? Why did we use it then?"LeMay: Well, the other people were not convinced…"The Press: Had they not surrendered because of the atomic bomb?"LeMay: The atomic bomb had nothing to do with the end of the war at all.It should be clear that the military establishment was against using the atomic bomb as they all felt the Japanese were already militarily defeated and they knew the Japanese were trying to surrender as well.At Potsdam, Truman was still unaware that the Manhattan project had been penetrated by the Soviets almost from the very beginning of the program. Recruited by the Soviet NKVD, and working in conjunction with David Greenglass, Harry Gold, and others, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg had been passing Atomic secrets to the Soviets beginning in 1942.Due to the The Rosenberg's high treason, we know now that the Soviet's first atomic design was a carbon-copy of the of the first US Atomic Bomb.Soviet A-Bomb Built From U.S. Data, Russian SaysWhat does this all mean? The military leaders were all against it. President Truman made a political decision to drop the atomic bombs in an attempt to strengthen the US position at postwar negotiations. He wanted to show Stalin we had a weapon of incredible power and he did not keep this a secret from Stalin.President Truman's version:On July 24, I casually mentioned to Stalin that we had a new weapon of unusual destructive force. The Russian Premier showed no special interest. All he said was he was glad to hear it and hoped we would make “good use of it against the Japanese.”Harry S. Truman,Year of Decisions(Garden City, NY: Doubleday and Company, 1955) p. 416.Again, this atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were in reality a live fire warning shot at the Soviet Union. Did the civilians of Japan deserve it? I'm not so sure they did, but was is clear is that the bombings had nothing to do with the Japanese surrendering and the end of the war.We never saw the Japanese as any type of serious threat past May-June of 1945 capturing of Okinawa. The Japanese had no strength left, no food. They could not do anything.The bombings had nothing to do with Japan. They were a warning to Stalin. We allowed Hirohito to remain Emperor, and we cleaned up Hirohito's image so much we allowed him to come play with Mickey Mouse.

An idiot who hit me ( lost control at 55+ mph in a two-lane 35 mph zone trying to pass me ), jumped out of his pickup truck, and came to my driver’s side window, and shouted,“… What are you, some kind of Democrat ?!? …”He had babies in car seats in his pickup truck, he apparently was ON THE PHONE with the baby’s mama when he hit me ( no wonder he lost control of his truck ), and she apparently heard the whole thing, and apparently told him to shut up and sit in his own god-damn truck, roll the windows up and lock the doors, stay with her babies, and not go near anyone … so, he got back in his truck, and he refused to even open his window a crack, suddenly looking sheepish and kowtowed ( definitely not even a barnyard animal, but a wild animal on a short leash, and definitely not the alpha dog in the family ).What I tried to do:I CALMLY tried to trade legal paperwork with him, license, registration, insurance, ignoring his tirade ( I’ve learned to let insurance companies duke it out, I’ve learned not to fight in the streets over an accident ).He continued to ignore me, and stayed locked securely in his truck.The baby’s mama arrived soon after, took her kids, and left him there, she was apparently pissed that he does this all the time.Then the cops arrived, and spent an inordinate amount of time listening to him spout off about all the evils in the world that he and T-Rump were gonna fix, me being ahead of him on the road was too much to tolerate.While I waited, and waited, and waited.A -l-o-n-g- while later the cops got to me and apologized for how difficult the other driver was, and thanked me for my patience ( I was just overwhelmed with empathy that this poor cop has to deal with life-threatening shit-for-brains maniacs like that all the time, and I was happy to cooperate and make it super easy for the cop, no problem here ).Baby momma saved his life, because if he continued his assaultative rant outside his truck, in my face, he would have gone down:“... I don’t know how he tripped and got dragged down the road, caught under a passing truck, officer …”- - - - - - - - - -From the Schizo Quora Anonymous Sock Puppet Moderator department:… can anyone imagine a relevant and specific credential for being hit by another driver?- - - - - - - - - -/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Diversion ( maybe ) over “T-Rump” \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////In response to others:James Dalton 8m ago “… Your saying all that happened before the police arrived, and trump had something to do with this…….you should be a politician if this whole Quora storytelling thing don’t work …”I never said anything about T-Rump - the idiot driver who hit me asked, facetiously, if I was a Democrat.I’m just a testifying witness/victim.Thanks for exploring this.- - - - - - - - - -Daniel Foster 1h ago “… You lost me at T-Rump, is that how you learned to spell it on the playground? some people can’t answer a question without political bias (either side) and it ruins the entire read …”No, you lost yourself at T-Rump, unable to recognize famous people’s nicknames, like J-Lo, and so on, and when Jennifer Lopez was with Alex Rodriguez, they were J-Rod - it goes back years, like when Barbara Woolworth and Garry grant were nicknamed Cash and Carry, even Bill and Hillary were Billary for a while when they were actually together … remember DesiLu for Desi Arnaz and Lucille Ball?Should we work up a new nickname for hypersensitive T-Rump melting snowflakes?Why, because T-Rump alone must be protected from teasing, afraid to take what he dishes out?What T-Rump dishes out:DumboWhere's Hunter1 Percent Biden1 Percent JoeCrazy Joe BidenQuid Pro JoeSleepy JoeVery slow sleepy JoeLittle Michael BloombergMini Mike BloombergMini MikeDa Nang RichardDa Nang DickMr. Tough GuyGov. Jerry "Moonbeam" BrownBush OriginalLow Energy JebBoot-Edge-EdgeBootedgeedgeAlfred E. NeumanSleepin' Bob CaseyWild BillCrazy HillaryCrooked HillaryHeartless HillaryLyin' HillaryLeakin' Lying ComeySanctimonious James ComeySlimeball James ComeySlippery James ComeyShady James ComeyLiddle' Bob CorkerLyin' TedTexas TedBeautiful TedHightax Andrew CuomoSleepin' JoeDicky DurbinSneaky Dianne FeinsteinLeaking Dianne FeinsteinJeff FlakeyRejected Senator Jeff FlakeAl FrankensteinLightweight Senator Kirsten GillibrandPuppet JonesCorrupt KaineLamb the ShamWacky OmarosaWacky and Deranged OmarosaMad dog Moderate dog Evan McMuffinHighly Conflicted Bob MuellerFat JerryCheatin' ObamaEva Perón / EvitaFoul Mouthed OmarDummy BetoThe FlailerTruly weird Senator Rand PaulHigh Tax, High Crime Nancy PelosiMS-13 Lover Nancy PelosiCrazy NancyNervous NancyMike PounceWacky JackyMr. PeepersLittle Marco Liddle Marco0% Tim RyanBasically Braindead BernieThe Nutty ProfessorCrazy BernieLittle Adam SchittSleazy Adam SchiffPencil NeckShifty SchiffCrooked Adam SchiffLyin', cheatin', liddle' Adam "Shifty" SchiffCryin' ChuckFake Tears Chuck SchumerHead Clown Chuck SchumerMr. MagooDumb SouthernerCrazy ArnoldWacky Tom SteyerWeirdo Tom SteyerImpeachment TomBig LutherGoofy Elizabeth WarrenPocahontas Fake PocahontasThe IndianUber Left Elizabeth WarrenCrazy Maxine WatersLow-IQ Maxine WatersWacky Congresswoman WilsonHYPOCRISY MUCH ? ! ?Presidents have survived these nicknames:George Washington— The American Cincinnatus— The American Fabius— The Father of His CountryJohn Adams— The Colossus of Independence— Old Sink or Swim— His RotundityThomas Jefferson— The Apostle of Democracy— The Man of the People— The Sage of MonticelloJames Madison— Little Jemmy— His Little Majesty— Father of the ConstitutionJames Monroe— The Era of Good Feelings President[— The Last Cocked HatJohn Quincy Adams— Old Man Eloquent— The AbolitionistAndrew Jackson— The Hero of New Orleans— Old Hickory— King Mob— King Andrew— JackassMartin Van Buren— The American Talleyrand— The Careful Dutchman— The Enchanter— The Great Manager— The Master Spirit— Martin Van Ruin— Matty Van— The Mistletoe Politician— Old Kinderhook ( OK )— Red Fox of Kinderhook— The Little MagicianWilliam Henry Harrison— General Mum— Tippecanoe— Old Tippecanoe— Washington of the WestJohn Tyler— His AccidencyJames K. Polk— Napoleon of the Stump— Young HickoryZachary Taylor— Old Rough and ReadyMillard Fillmore— The American Louis PhilippeFranklin Pierce— Young Hickory of the Granite Hills— Young Hickory— Handsome FrankJames Buchanan— Old Public Functionary— Old Buck— Bachelor President— Ten-Cent JimmyAbraham Lincoln— The Ancient One— The Great Emancipator— The Liberator— Honest Abe— The Rail-Splitter— The Tycoon— Uncle AbeAndrew Johnson— The Tennessee TailorUlysses S. Grant— Unconditional Surrender GrantRutherford B. Hayes— Rutherfraud— His FraudulencyJames Garfield— Boatman Jim— Preacher PresidentChester A. Arthur— Chet— Gentleman Boss— Prince Arthur— The Dude PresidentGrover Cleveland— His Obstinacy— Uncle Jumbo— Grover the GoodBenjamin Harrison— The Front Porch Campaigner— The Human Iceberg— Little BenWilliam McKinley— The Napoleon of ProtectionTheodore Roosevelt— The Hero of San Juan Hill— The Lion— Teddy— TR— The Trust BusterWilliam Howard Taft— Big Chief— Big LubWoodrow Wilson— The Phrasemaker— The Schoolmaster:Warren G. Harding— Wobbly WarrenCalvin Coolidge— Cautious Cal— Cool Cal— Silent CalHerbert Hoover— The Great Engineer— The Great Humanitarian— The ChiefFranklin D. Roosevelt— FDR— That Man in the White House— SphinxHarry S. Truman— Give 'Em Hell HarryDwight D. Eisenhower— IkeJohn F. Kennedy— Jack— JFKLyndon B. Johnson— Bullshit Johnson— Bull Johnson— Landslide Lyndon— Light-Bulb Lyndon— LBJRichard Nixon— Tricky DickGerald Ford— Jerry— Mr. Nice GuyJimmy Carter— Jimmy— The Peanut FarmerRonald Reagan— Dutch— The Great Communicator— The Gipper— The Teflon PresidentGeorge H. W. Bush— 41— PoppyBill Clinton— Bubba— Slick Willie— The Comeback Kid— The First Black President— The Big DogGeorge W. Bush— 43— DubyaBarack Obama— No Drama ObamaDonald Trump— The Donald— 45— The 45— Conspiracy Theorist-in-Chief— President Snowflake— Snowflake-in-Chief— T-RumpYeah, T-Rump is so-o-o-o-o special.Get over it.Thanks for sharing.- - - - - - - - - -.