Authorization For Medication Review: Fill & Download for Free

Pfizer has a vaccine developed since a few months, but it’s not likely going to be released by October because testing is still ongoing. The one vaccine (of the most discussed ones) that may be authorized for a limited distribution by October or November is the AstraZeneca one, which will finish its last trial at the end of this month, so by early September the draft of the Phase III testing will be available for review, so that this vaccine can be approved with an emergency procedure.As you can see, also the Pfizer vaccine is in Phase III, but it entered the last phase of testing about a month later than the AstraZeneca one, so it will have the drafted results for review by October, and it should take at least one more. Indeed, in the lat three months of the year we may have a number of vaccines getting ready for review and emergency approval: as you can see there are six already in Phase III and at least 5 more getting ready to enter it.Notice, please, that this does not mean that by the last three months of the year there will be half a dozen of vaccines in widespread distribution: some of these may fail to be authorized, or even all of them may (when a vaccine arrives to Phase III it’s relatively less common it will not be authorized, but it’s far from being impossible, actually many are in face of rampant side effects or lack of results). Also, the emergency authorization may not be followed by a full authorization: modest results may be enough to allow its use for first responders and medical personnel at a particularly high risk, but it may never be authorized for use on the general population. Finally, for a few months the authorized vaccine will still not be in general distribution, as the various health systems in the world will first concentrate on administering it to the healthcare personnel, first responders, and people at particular risk.Oh, and then there is Russia. Allegedly the Russian drug agency claims it will authorize a vaccine for general use and distribution in October. <raisehairbrow>It claims.<raisehairbrow/>

1.The report "coronavirus may have been spreading in China last August, Harvard research suggestions" from Forbes news summarizes the content of this paper：KEY FACTSHarvard and Boston researchers examined satellite data of parking lots across hospitals in Wuhan, alongside online search data on Chinese search engine Baidu for symptoms such as “diarrhea” or “cough”.A rise in online searches for symptoms was spotted, alongside a sharp rise in hospital traffic in August last year, around four months before the virus became linked to a seafood market in the city.The researchers say there was a “unique increase” in searches for diarrhea not seen in previous flu seasons, which they say is a “more COVID-19 specific symptom and only shows an association with the current epidemic.”Satellite imagery and online search trends have previously been used to monitor “early indicators of epidemics” and trends that traditional public health bodies may not be aware of, the researchers said.The study has not yet been peer reviewed or accepted for publication.link：Coronavirus May Have Been Spreading In China Last August, Harvard Research SuggestsThe last sentence above is very important: This is an article that has not been peer reviewed and published,That means this article has not been scientifically verified.2.They used satellite images to get traffic changes, plus Baidu search term changes, and came to the conclusion that Wuhan was popular in August. There are only two figures in the whole article:There are several key mistakes:1). It is unreasonable to use the number of vehicles in the parking lot instead of the hospital flow. Because part of the vehicles in the parking lot come from the hospital staff, and driving to see a doctor only accounts for a small part of the number of patients, whether it can reflect the whole medical treatment is also worth discussing.2). It's easy to understand that the traffic flow in the middle of a day will change. However, the article does not discuss the change of traffic flow in a day, instead, it only uses 140 satellite images for analysis from January 9, 2018 to April 30, 2020. The time of each graph is uncertain. How can we analyze it? It can also be seen from the broken line of each hospital's individual changes in Figure 2A that the data beat disorderly and there is no rule. On the contrary, after the data of several hospitals are averaged, the line is magically flattened.3). In the paper,the author also said that the change of "cough" search is similar to the seasonal cold in previous years, but why not analyze the possible source of "diarrhea" and directly connect with covid-19? In fact, there are many reasons for diarrhea, such as cold stomach, flu complications, unhealthy diet and so on. Only a little fluctuation can not explain the problem. Even if the rise of diarrhea is really caused by covid-19, then the search volume of diarrhea must have been rising all the time and the speed is getting faster and faster, but in fact, the data shows that the search volume of diarrhea still slightly decreased around December 2019, until the new crown began to spread, and then it rose rapidly.4). The most critical refutation evidence is that if the virus appeared in Wuhan in August, with reference to the development trend of the United States and without fortification, China should be all infected now, but the actual situation is obviously not so.From a scientific point of view, as long as there are data and reasonable analysis, all kinds of speculation should be allowed. But why should I interpret this article as a political operation? Because I found the following egg in the references:Some Chinese websites are quoted in the references. Do you find any strange Chinese characters circled in red? It is found in acrobat that the font of these Chinese characters is Microsoft JhengHei, namely Microsoft regular bold, which is the default Chinese font of windows system in Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao (corresponding to the default font in mainland China is Microsoft YaHei). It has been confirmed that the quoted websites are written in simplified Chinese. It must be someone who uses the traditional Chinese operating system that makes the original simplified content become traditional font in the paper, leading to some strange phenomena.Reasonable guesses:1. There are people from Taiwan, Hong Kong and other regions in the team, and they use traditional windows system;2. The team got help from people from Taiwan, Hong Kong and other regions, and the person inserted these references in the article and sent them back to the team. The first point is more likely to be true, because if there are no Chinese speakers, it will be difficult to collect data with Baidu. Either way, I think this article is highly likely to have a political purpose.Author: convergent electronLink: 如何看待哈佛大学一篇论文，利用卫星图像和百度检索数据推测新冠发生于 2019 年 8 月？Source: ZhihuThe copyright belongs to the author. For commercial reprint, please contact the author for authorization. For non-commercial reprint, please indicate the source.

Some of them are, most of them are not, supposedly.As Andrew Holtz, author of The Medical Science of House, M.D. puts it:"..while the cases are highly improbable (and that's putting it mildly), they are not completely impossible. Of course, often what appears as one case is really a combination of strange features from several real cases. And some of the reports in medical journals that describe similar cases are autopsy reports; that is, the strange disease happened, but in the real world, doctors didn't figure it out in time, or even if they did, there was nothing they could do to save the patient."For more details, you can refer to this website, Medical Reviews of House, written by Scott Morrison, a physician from Illinois. It contains reviews and ratings of all the episodes of House.I hope this helps.