Notification That Employment Has Ceased: Fill & Download for Free

I think your question is flawed.First of all, no employer would be believable who “bad mouths” their good employees in order to retain them. If that employee was truly “bad news,” that employer would get rid of them. (It is too easy to cook up a “poor performance” scenario, put them on 30 days probation, and then fire them. There is no reason to keep poor performers around. )Setting aside the impracticality of your question, how can you best handle this situation?If you have applied for a different job at a different company, that potential employer will not contact your current employer UNLESS you give them specific permission to do so. Some Applications even ask, “Is it okay if we contact your current employer.” No one hunting for a different job is going to allow the notification to your current employer that you are “on the hunt” to get out of there. (That can serve to damage your working relationship in a variety of ways, and your current employer may just decide you are now “toast,” and get rid of you before you are ready to leave.)Most smart employers have strict rules about giving job references. Most employers have learned this the hard way. And usually the rule is that the only information they will provide is job title, dates of employment, and to verify compensation levels. (Verify by saying, “that is correct,” or “that is not correct.”)Anything else that a current or former employer has to say could become the subject of a defamation lawsuit. That employer has nothing to gain by providing any additional information beyond what I have described. But there is an expensive “downside risk” in saying too much. So they will not do that. At least, the people in H.R. won’t do it. They know better.The problem pops up when inquiring employers by-pass the H. R. department by contacting the current or former supervisor directly. And then that supervisor starts blabbering at the mouth saying too much, or saying things they shouldn’t be saying. In most smart companies, that is not supposed to happen. And with proper training it won’t happen. But we do not live in a perfect world, and some people do stupid things.If you happen to be an employee (or job seeker) who suspects someone is “bad mouthing” you, then you may consider putting it to the test. If you have someone you know well who can place a call pretending to be a person doing employment verification checks to process a new Job Application, they can make the call to find out what is being said. (Be careful about caller ID, and stuff like that.)Depending on the laws in your state, that person calling can even record the conversation.If someone in your employment history is saying something bad about you, then that would be good to know. And you should be able to put a stop to that if you can target the source, and if you have proper evidence. (And that might mean a stern “cease and desist” type letter that threatens a defamation lawsuit, or a defamation lawsuit.)(I know something about this stuff because I have 7 years experience as a Human Resources Manager of a national corporation.)I did not answer your second question about “verbal promises” because there is no context to your question. What promises? Of course, promises can be broken. And a verbal promise is not the same as an oral contract.

Hi,EPF :Even after attaining the residential status as NRI, you can continue holding EPF account till the retirement age of 55 years. The interest on such accounts will still be credited till 58 years of your age.If an employee who is a member of EPF scheme, quits or retires from his employment and continues holding the accumulated PF balance, he/she has to pay tax on interest from the date of unemployment.So, the interest on EPF is tax-exempt only when the member is employed and the Interest credited to an employee provident fund (EPF) account after an individual ceases to be in employment is taxable in his/her hands in the year of credit. Interest that has been accrued post employment is taxable. This is as per the recent order by Income tax appellate Tribunal.PPF :NRIs cannot open a new PPF account in India. However, they are allowed to keep contributing to their existing PPF accounts as per a 2003 notification. This was for the PPF account they opened prior to becoming NRIs.Sometime back in 2017, the Govt has come up with a notification that NRIs can not continue their investments in PPF accounts, however this was later reversed.Kindly go through below articles for more info;Latest NSC & PPF rules for Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) | New Amendments to PPF Act & NSCInterest on Inoperative EPF accounts | Will I get interest on my Dormant EPF account?EPF Interest Income & Withdrawals | Tax Implications | Is EPF Interest taxable?

There are those who want to improve their lives in any country. Russia does not refer to this in some exceptional cases. With the figure of 20%, I do not quite agree. This "study" is made according to the principle of the three "PPP".In Russia, if someone invents and fantasizes in various calculations, then they say that he used the principle: "Floor, finger, ceiling." In Russian, all these words begin with the letter "P".I remember the times of the USSR, when so many Soviet people simply dreamed of leaving for Western countries. When the “iron curtain” collapsed, the former Soviet people quickly realized that in the west they were only waiting in the form of traitors who are ready to talk for days about the “horrors of bloody communist power”.Our people were surprised to learn that there are many problems of their own in Western countries and even the rich. Not all were ready to replace some problems with others. It turns out that for a “rich” life, for example, in the USA one must work and not pretend that you work, but really give all the power to work. Many things that they had in the USSR by default, in the west were worth huge money. Received diplomas in the USSR had no legal force in the west and everything had to start all over again.Now only those who have managed to steal in their own country and legalize all this in Europe or the United States are successfully settling down in Western countries.Many do not know, but now in Germany labor exchanges officially send unemployed women to work in brothels as prostitutes, and in case of refusal to work as a prostitute, there should be a rejection of social benefits for unemployment.This is what is happening in modern Germany:"Everything is extremely transparent: a certain German (not an emigrant), a pretty girl of 25 years old, having lost her job as a programmer, got registered at the labor exchange. Or rather, in the employment center, as it is now called to call. She took shape as a programmer, but just the case indicated that she also had the qualification "waiter, bartender" and was ready to work in a cafe or bar seven days a week and at night shifts. Then, having received the right to unemployment benefits, she began to wait for a vacancy.I waited a long time. But I waited. A year later, a referral letter came from the employment center: they say, there is an employer who has studied your “profile” (application) and is interested in your services. Phone number attached. However, when the delighted girl called the cherished phone, it turned out that the “interested firm” was not really a bar or a restaurant, but the most ordinary brothel, where she was offered a vacancy of a “sex worker”. That is a prostitute.Naturally, the indignant German interrupted the conversation, reporting everything to the employment center - and soon found in the mailbox a notification that from such or such a number her unemployment benefit decreased by 50% due to the refusal of the first job referral. And then, perhaps, completely deprived of benefits.Naturally, the girl went to court - and found out that there is no reason to sue. For the employment center did not violate any laws, but, on the contrary, acted strictly in accordance with them. Since, after legalization of prostitution in 2002 by the Bundestag, the intimate sphere of activity was entered in the register of official “professions and crafts”, and the owners of legal brothels now, being obliged to pay taxes and health insurance for their employees, gained access to official databases of employment centers. In this connection, as a result of the “welfare reforms” implemented by Frau Merkel’s cabinet, now any woman under 55 years old, who hasn’t waited for a job in her specialty for a year, is obliged to go where she is sent, even if she is a prostitute. .Meanwhile, unemployment in Germany is growing, having exceeded 4.5 million, which, after 1950, has never happened before, and employment centers firmly admit that "not a single official profession is shameful." So the choice of our waitress and her friends in misfortune is small: either pushing her legs apart, or starving on the street. The third is actually not given. "This article was not published yesterday or even the day before yesterday, but back in 2005.And since then, having received a referral to a brothel, the overwhelming majority of girls no longer even try to kick, but go where they are sent, and work, by whom they will say. Fortunately, after a wide propaganda campaign organized by the authorities, “prostitution on a voucher” ceased to be considered something shameful, in the eyes of the society having equated with something like a special type of massage.I think that now, having learned about this news, then a lot of girls with "reduced social responsibility" in friendly ranks rush to Germany for work, encouraged by the state ...This is just one of the examples of "European values." There are still many fantasies about gender equality, same-sex marriage and imposed emigration from the Middle East, whose representatives enjoy the benefits of civilization more than the indigenous people.