Colorado Personal Property Bill Of Sale: Fill & Download for Free

In Colorado, the county clerk and recorder keeps public records of real estate deeds. Deeds are notarized before recording and show ownership. The clerk can issue a certified copy of a real estate deed from the public records.For other types of property, there may be a title, bill of sale or receipt to show ownership.For personal property with no deed, title, bill of sale or receipt, a notarized affidavit of ownership can certify ownership of property.Disclaimer: I am not an attorney and this information is not legal advice.

Arizona and Colorado - four methods of purchase.I've done this four different ways.1. Gun store - this is the way most guns are purchased. Ignore anyone who says otherwise, most guns are purchased by law-abiding people from gun stores. 70% of my personal guns were purchased this way. The process is time-consuming but not complicated. You pick out a gun to purchase, show your ID (must be from the state you're in), fill out the background check form, wait for the NICS to clear you, pay the money, leave with your gun.2. Gun show - this is basically the same as buying from a store in most cases because the dealers at gun shows are FFL dealers, not private sellers. The only difference is I usually pay cash and don't get much of a receipt at gun shows. A hand-written bill of sale is good enough though.3. Internet (through FFL dealers) - I've done this twice. In one case, I was able to pay with a credit card, and in the other I had to mail an actual check. The firearm is shipped from the out of state dealer to my local dealer. My local dealer performs the background check and if it's clear he hands you the gun. I have paid $25 for this service in one case, and in another case I got the "free to friends" deal.4. In person (from a stranger) - I met a guy at a gun range and he had something I wanted, and he didn't really like it any more. I was able to convince him to sell it to me on the spot. There was no background check, but we were both shooting personally owned weapons at a range, so that indicates "able to pass" and doing the actual check would have been a pointless waste of money. I gave him cash, he gave me a handwritten bill of sale on a business card with his contact info, and we traded property for cash. Haggling was involved but it was a friendly transaction, he didn't want that gun any more and I did.It is important to note here, that I have no criminal record. For violent felonious criminals, the process is actually easier.As for cost, in general guns are expensive. You can research the current market rates for new guns by going to any web site of a company which sells them: Brownells, Cabela's, GunBroker, etc. Market values change according to political climate and supply and demand. Some sought-after guns are over-priced, some common guns are cheap. Not always.The gun world is like any other hobby - there is a lower limit to cost but there's no upper limit. You can spend ridiculous amounts of money on guns if you want to. Here's some typical examples from my collection though...Cheapies (under $400)Here is a young man posing with my Remington 870 - It's a cheap pump-action 20-gauge shotgun. $299 (Dick's Sporting Goods)And, here's a cheap handgun - I hated this weapon actually and gave it to my son as his first personal handgun. ($399 from G&G Guns in Colorado)And, here's a couple thousand-dollar guns...Kimber Eclipse Pro II ($1050 from Healey in Mesa, AZ)Smith and Wesson M&P 15 "Standard" ($1099 from Machine Gun Tours in Lakewood, CO and there's $1200 of mods visible in the photo, mostly the scope)

Does the Second Amendment give you the right to concealed carry?Once again it would appear we need to have Constitution 101 placed in schools…First of all as pointed out in some answers, In the US we have unalienable Rights, and Constitutional protections.Secondly, the COTUS only applies to actions of the Federal Government.Thirdly, the whole of the Bill of Rights are redundant. The COTUS was written and ratified WITHOUT the Bill of Rights, which is why they are amendments. Had the Federalists won the debate, and excluded the Bill of Rights, it would alter nothing.Let me explain:I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted. For why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do? Why, for instance, should it be said that the liberty of the press shall not be restrained, when no power is given by which restrictions may be imposed? I will not contend that such a provision would confer a regulating power; but it is evident that it would furnish, to men disposed to usurp, a plausible pretense for claiming that power. Federalist No 84{btw, questions like this demonstrate the Federalist were correct, and that the BoR would be used by those disposed to usurp, the context to do so. People look to the BoR to see what the Federal is prohibited from doing, not at the COTUS to see what it is delegated to do.}So as you can see, the Federal is delegated no power to legislate anything, pertaining to arms. So the Federal cannot legislate a prohibition to carry concealed. One needs to remember, that they had to pass the 18th Amendment to delegate the power to the Federal to do something as simple as banning the manufacture and sale of alcohol. Apply that same logic to everything else, and see what you come up with…So according the 10th Amendment…The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.the power to prohibit concealed carry is power reserved to the States, if they are also delegated that power in their Constitution.E.G. Colorado:Section 13.Right to bear arms. The right of no person to keep and bear arms in defense of his home, person and property, or in aid of the civil power when thereto legally summoned, shall be called in question; but nothing herein contained shall be construed to justify the practice of carrying concealed weapons.So Colorado can legally prohibit concealed carry, but it cannot legally prohibit open carry, because as it says:A person has a right to bear (carry) arms in defense of his person. And a person takes their person, where ever they go…