Summary Ohio Attorney General Office Citizen Protection Forms: Fill & Download for Free

Yes. 20 reasons why the paper entitled "Complaints of group-stalking ('gang-stalking'): an exploratory study of their nature and impact on complainants" by Dr. Lorraine Sheridan and Dr. David James (published online in 2015) - concluding that all people alleging organized group harassment are delusional - is, at best, shoddy research.P​reface - My name is Richard Griesinger. During the 50 years I lived in Pinellas County, Florida USA, I was never harassed by local law enforcement until just days after I started dating my ex-girlfriend (Jennifer Brunner) - the divorcing, soon to be ex-wife of the then fourth highest member of the Pinellas County Sheriff’s Office (Major Kirk Brunner, now retired). His best friend, Dan, had been an FBI agent in the nearby Tampa office according to my ex-girlfriend. She and I dated from 2003 until 2011 despite police harassment. The ex-husband blamed me - "the attorney-boyfriend" - for the divorce throughout our relationship per my ex-girlfriend. She initialed a list itemizing some of the harassment, uploaded into my main website - My Five Years of Systematic Police Harassment in Pinellas County Florida (and Organized Group Harassment) (link). The harassment in 2003 (by Sheriff vehicles parked near my house when my ex-girlfriend started coming over to my house) lasted only a few weeks. There was no harassment during the next five years (until 2008). But the new harassment lasted for years and was much more extensive. - The ex-husband was behind it because it occurred just days after a relationship-related event (discussed in my main website). I had to close my law office in 2012 because of the harassment, the hacking of my office’s and personal computers, phones, iphone, and email accounts, and other dirty tricks. (I was in private practice in Pinellas County for over 20 years). Initially, the harassment was traditional police harassment, if you will, by police cruisers. But because I continued dating my ex-girlfriend despite harassment, the ex-husband and/or his cohorts in the Pinellas County Sheriff’s Office tapped into a network of ordinary individuals to harass me. I referred to this harassment as “psychological lynching” in the addendum to my FBI color of law complaint which I filed with the FBI’s Clearwater field office in May 2013. Significantly, I filed it before I researched organized group harassment (gangstalking) online, before the first Snowden documents were published, and before Jeffrey Kantor's lawsuit was discussed by news media online. The type of "psychological lynching" against me which I experienced has been variously referred to as community mobbing, public mobbing, organized mobbing, community stalking, group stalking, vigilante stalking, group adult bullying, organized harassment, organized psychological harassment, organized stalking, cause stalking, street theater, and, most often, as gangstalking. I contend that members of, and/or persons associated with, the U.S. law enforcement/intelligence/private contractor community have illegally harassed me and, no doubt, many other law-abiding Americans.I do not buy into outlandish claims online and elsewhere that gangstalking involves mind reading and other such nonsense. No doubt, truly delusional individuals post online, but Snowden documents revealed that intelligence agencies have tools to flood the internet with false information and have tools to disrupt online polls (like questionnaires) and discussion forums to discredit legitimate topics and individuals. (link to The Intercept article about Edward Snowden revelations). Another example of intentional disinformation - A noted left-leaning Swedish journalist, Martin Frederiksson, who surprisingly wrote anti-WikiLeaks articles, was discovered in 2010 to be on the payroll of Sweden's intelligence agency. Near the bottom of my website at +++, I have discussed three disinformative websites about organized group stalking (gangstalking) and which discussed me - pop~agenda~culture, Research Gang Stalking, and Protected Blog › Log in. The tell-tale signs of a disinformative website regarding organized stalking are some or all of the following - (a) a bizarre website name such as “Your BioAPI and a small experiment in insanity...,” "LunaticOutPost - Conspiracy - Ufo - Fun - Discussion Forum," "http://medawarscornflakes.com," “Kooky Stuff - Gangstalking”, "TalkShoe voice talk shows and discussion groups," "popagandaculture..." (connoting propaganda). No legitimate victim would use such names; (b) lack of a verifiable name and location of the author; (c) lack of specific details about why the author was initially harassed and other facts regarding the author's harassment; (d) goofy graphics; and (e) interspersing the website with outlandlsh references to UFO’s and the like.The psychological (and financial) harassment against me has often involved bizarre activity and has been extensive, therefore, it has plausible deniability. Because very similar harassment still occurs even though I now live in another country (Thailand), I contend that it must be directed and/or financed by members of U.S. agencies. My website is not a commentary about the Thai government or police.Interestingly, before I discussed the Sheridan and James gangstalking study - "Complaints of group-stalking ('gang-stalking'): an exploratory study of their nature and impact on complainants" - in this website, the study was easily accessible online on the publisher's website (Taylor & Francis Online). Now it is not. That is, links to the study now only bring the reader to a short summary (abstract), not to the full study. Now one has to pay $258 just for 30 days access. However I believe that Drs. Sheridan and James "research" study is available on the ResearchGate - Share and discover research website (link) by clicking "Download Full-Text PDF" at its upper right-hand corner (or another possible link). The Sheridan and James study may just be misleading and shoddy research. However, based upon my personal experience, I contend that it was written at the behest of a corrupt person(s) in, or associated with, the U.S. law enforcement/intelligence/private contractor community concerned about the few, but growing number of, legitimate websites and posts online like mine. The Sheridan and James paper reminded me of the tobacco industry's past misuse of "research" to downplay the cancer link. I also contend that the above community is at the heart of organized group harassment (although corporations and other entities have used the same tactics, discussed below. Government agencies and corporations in the United States and other countries have often misused psychologists and psychiatrists to diagnose dissidents, whistleblowers, and other targets as "delusional.” For example, in 2005 an in-house psychologist labeled an NSA intelligence analyst, Russell Tice, “delusional” after he blew the whistle on NSA’s massive illegal surveillance of law-abiding Americans. Another NSA psychologist played the same game against computer specialist, Diane Ring, who was retaliated against due to a personal vendetta. Former NSA contract officer, Thomas Reinbold, said employees called NSA’s “delusional” tactic as “doing a mental." Another example of the “delusional” tactic - the U.S. Department of Labor determined the Pacific Gas and Electric Company used an in-house psychiatrist to diagnose as “delusional” the manager, and whistleblower (Neil J. Aiken), of its Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant (link to New York Times article re labeling whistleblowers as "delusional"). Another example, the East German secret police (Stasi) and the Soviet Union's KGB, under its program called Psikhushkas, used the “delusional” tactic against political dissidents and others. But perhaps the worst example of governmental officials using the “delusional” tactic is the following - In 2009, New York Police Department Police Officer Adrian Schoolcraft accurately revealed to his Internal Affairs department that many cops in his station were engaged in a criminal conspiracy. How did his superiors respond? - He was physically abducted from his residence by N.Y.P.D. members and committed to a psychiatric hospital for six days! His lawsuit recently settled for a total of nearly two million dollars.(1) Dr. Lorraine Sheridan, a forensic psychologist, and Dr. David James, a forensic psychiatrist, have no background, training, or expertise in the U.S. law enforcement/intelligence/private contractor community. They have never substantially investigated, nor have relied upon any substantial investigation, of the above community. Dr. Sheridan works with law enforcement only in the field of traditional stalking, if you will. Drs. Sheridan and James extensively relied upon Dr. Paul Mullen in their study, but he is just a forensic psychiatrist who also has no background, training, or expertise of the above community and never conducted, or relied upon, a substantial investigation of the community.(2) The Sheridan and James study was based solely upon the answers of 128 anonymous and “self-selected” persons to a questionnaire which the co-authors posted online. The questionnaire was placed on an unnamed website which was hosted by an unnamed organization offering advice to group stalking victims. My response - The anonymity of respondents afforded an easy opportunity to post phony disinformation online - a tactic exposed by Snowden documents. In 2014, Snowden documents revealed that the British equivalent of the NSA - the GCHQ - has tools to manipulate results of online polls (e.g., answers to questionnaires), to disrupt online forum discussions, etc. No doubt, in addition to phony respondents to Drs. Sheridan and James' questionnaire, there were also legitimate and truly delusional respondents. (I wonder if the unnamed organization used by Drs. Sheridan and James was FFCHS, a probable disinformation site. For example, its website previously advised victims to detoxify their bodies by ingesting “food grade diatomaceous earth” - in other words, to eat dirt. This advice was removed in May 2014 after it was pictured in a screen shot, taken in January 2014 and discussed in the website Fight "Gang Stalking", discussed below. Three fairly recent mass shooters in the United States - Myron May, Gavin Long, and Aaron Alexis - who reported being victims of group harassment, stated that they were in contact with FFCHS for advice. Yet, I have not read of any substantial investigation conducted by the FBI or other law enforcement agency of FFCHS).(3) Surprisingly, Drs. Sheridan and James failed to discuss the recognized "Martha Mitchell effect" which warns psychologists, psychiatrists, and other mental health professionals not to diagnose a patient as "delusional” just because his or her claims seem far-fetched, particularly if the patient has no history of being delusional or clinically paranoid. Martha Mitchell was the outspoken, alcoholic wife of President Nixon's Attorney General. Her rants to news reporters about illegal conspiracies within the White House were dismissed by everyone (except for White House reporter Helen Thomas). White House officials tried to downplay her claims as "delusional." But the Watergate hearings proved Mrs. Mitchell’s claims to be true. (link to Wikipedia article about the Martha Mitchell effect).(4) Forensic psychologists and psychiatrists often testify in civil and criminal proceedings as to a person’s competency. Yet, Drs. Sheridan and James, who are forensic professionals, did not reference the case of The People of the State of New York vs. D.J.H. (link), New York Supreme Court, Queens County, decided in 2011 - in which the Court relied upon the “Martha Mitchell effect.” (I found the case online simply by searching “Martha Mitchell effect" and “lawsuit”). The Court released a man who had been confined to a psychiatric hospital. The Court wrote that he was formerly a wealthy Iranian who competently testified in the case that (whether or not true) he incurred great financial loss due to illegal activity of government officials in New York, that New York cops planted two weapons in his home, and that evidence went missing in his civil case (all three claims certainly possible). The Court noted that the man knowingly refused a plea bargain in the criminal case against him just so he could testify in open court. The Court rejected the opinion of the state's medical witness, a psychiatrist, that the man was "delusional” merely because his claims seemed far-fetched and he would become upset and angry when discussing them. Importantly, the Court noted that neither the state's witness, nor any other person or entity, ever conducted a substantial investigation of the man's claims.(5) Drs. Sheridan and James relied upon the textbook definition of a “delusion” to be a firmly-held “false” and “bizarre” belief, despite “incontrovertible or obvious evidence” to the contrary, which very few others believe. Religious beliefs are excluded only because many people share similar beliefs. My response - As stated above, the beliefs of Martha Mitchell and pre-Snowden NSA whistleblowers, for example, were not supported by “incontrovertible or obvious evidence" and were, no doubt, considered “bizarre” at the time, but turned out to be true. Also, as stated below, U.S. diplomats wrote of harassment which was certainly bizarre. (The more bizarre or minor the harassment, the less likely it will be believed without documentation).(6) Drs. Sheridan and James wrote that the beliefs of the 128 respondents to their questionnaire basically fell into one of three categories - (a) “highly improbable” beliefs - such as regarding an elaborate organization carrying out its activities; (b) “impossible” beliefs - such as witchcraft focused through gold objects and the invasion of a person’s dreams at night; or (c) “impossible and bizarre” beliefs - such as a family dog replaced by an exact double with a bad temper and the remote enlargement of bodily organs. My response - The examples stated in (b) and (c), were either posted as intentional disinformation (per the Snowden documents discussed above) and/or posted by truly delusional persons. The categories (b) and (c) seem to be a distinction without a difference. But a belief based upon bizarre events certainly does not make a belief impossible (e.g., those of the U.S. diplomats discussed below). However, I am not suggesting the examples of (b) or (c) above were possible. Regarding (a) above - I contend that there is not one monolithic, world-wide organization harassing law-abiding American citizens. Rather, it is, most likely, a loose network of (hopefully, just rogue) members of the U.S. law enforcement/intelligence/private contractor community. Laws enacted after 9-11 have facilitated the sharing of information, whether or not accurate, among the 17 U.S. intelligence agencies, law enforcement agencies at all levels, and local fusion centers. Additionally, U.S. private contractors (now nearly a half million with top secret clearances) have access to much of this information. Members of a private organization Law Enforcement Intelligence Unit (LEIU), who include active and retired police officers and private investigators, also have access to much of this information. The LEIU exists to "gather, record, and exchange confidential information, not available through regular police channels." Lastly, U.S. corporations are increasingly hiring part-time "surveillance role players" (discussed below). The networking, unaccountibility, funding, and advanced technology of the above entities facilitate opportunity to illegally harass law-abiding Americans.(7) Drs. Sheridan and James failed to mention that U.S. diplomats complained of bizarre harassment, having plausible deniability, similar to complainants of organized harassment. Fairly recently, WikiLeaks revealed top secret U.S. diplomatic cables that Russian agents, presumably, were breaking into the diplomats’ homes just to move a piece of furniture, to turn on a t.v., etc. (link to Washington Post article re the psychological harassment of U.S. diplomats). I wonder if Drs. Sheridan and James consider the U.S. diplomats to be “delusional”? Another example of bizarre harassment appeared in a Sydney Morning Herald article in 2015. Michael Page, the CEO of a well-established local firm in Sydney called Netventures, said he contacted a lawyer after his firm's address and phone number were listed on the internet as those of Australia's domestic intelligence agency ASIO. During the prior two months, Mr. Page received strange and intimidating emails, text messages, and phone calls, his home's front door lock was broken, his home's power often went out, and he said "I came home and there was a bowl of sugar in the middle of the kitchen floor." He had a falling out with a prior employee who said he trained with ASIO. Mr. Page believed that he might be the victim of gangstalking where a person is relentlessly targeted and harassed. (link to Sydney Morning Herald article about possible gangstalking of CEO Michael Page). A very similar and even more recent example of bizarre psychological harassment is the following - On October 13, 2016, ABC 10 News (KGTV, San Diego, California) interviewed Facika Tafara who was the target of psychological harassment. Although it was not mentioned in the segment, she is a board certified physician specializing in internal medicine and the director of the Family Health Centers of San Diego. The ABC 10 News segment did not discuss the motive for harassing Dr. Tafara, but my guess is that she crossed a powerful member of the San Diego community, perhaps a high ranking law enforcement officer (like I did). The following is a summary of the segment - “A San Diego mother said she was being targeted for weeks by people she doesn’t know coming in her house when she’s not there. Facika Tafara thinks she may be the victim of a bizarre practice called gang stalking or community stalking. ‘It’s like an alternate reality, really,' she said. 'It’s spooky, and it’s my understanding that if this is actually what it is, it can go on for years.' The reporter said that community or gang stalking is an eerie practice that takes aim at your psyche to make you almost feel like you’re going crazy. In Tafara’s case, she said she noticed strange things out of place in her house when she would get home from work such as her windows being opened at the same level, dresser drawers opened at the same distance. She said she even found a camera inside the bedroom of her 11-year-old son. Tafara said she contacted police, and detectives visited her home, but they said 'if it happens again call us, but there’s not much we can do because we don’t know who it is, we don't have a face...' That local law enforcement did not conduct a substantial investigation of Dr. Tafara's harassment is no surprise to me. Neither the FBI’s Clearwater Florida field office, the Pinellas County Florida Sheriff’s Office, nor the Clearwater Florida Police Department investigated my factually specific, written complaints of a criminal conspiracy against me by members of local law enforcement and others on behalf of them. Based upon my personal experience, the psychological harassment described by Dr. Tafara is just one tactic used in organized psychological harassment. Other tactics that I have experienced in Pinellas County, Florida and here in Chiang Mai, Thailand are street theater and mobbing. (I define “street theater” as a pre-arranged display in public, usually by more than one person, to psychologically harass. Although the term "mobbing" is often used as a synonym for organized harassment or gangstalking, I define it more narrowly as one tool of organized harassment - subtle, intentional crowding of an individual in public places, such as a store, usually by one or two people at a time to psychologically harass and/or to attempt to provoke a response.). I emailed the U.S. Consulate's Office here in Chiang Mai on March 19, 2015 just for the record. I briefly discussed the psychological harassment of me by Americans, presumably evangelicals (e.g., a guy at a fitness center quietly repeating that a man was hit by a slow moving vehicle). My email also briefly discussed similar harassment which occurred in Pinellas County, Florida, and I cited my main website - My Five Years of Systematic Police Harassment in Pinellas County Florida (and Organized Group Harassment). Significantly, I sent my email well before I had my Summary translated into Thai and gave it to a few Thai people. Again, my website is not a commentary about the Thai government or police. (link to the ABC10 News, San Diego, t.v. segment regarding the possible gangstalking or community stalking of Dr. Facika Tafara).(8) Drs. Sheridan and James failed to research the history of organized group psychological harassment (or, if they did research it, they did not include it in their study). They wrote - “Little is known about the nature of the phenomenon of group- or gang-stalking.” and “Group-stalking is an unresearched area.” My response - Any research would show that group psychological harassment was extensively used by East Germany’s law enforcement/domestic intelligence agency (Stasi) until 1990 under its Zersetzung program (discussed below in paragraph 11); by the Soviet Union; by the United States’ FBI under its Zertsetzung-like Cointelpro program in which targets were illegally harassed, not just surveiled (including John Lennon, Martin Luther King, actress Jean Seberg, among others); by the Church of Scientology against defecting members; by corporations against whistleblowers such as Stephanie Gibaud (In 2015, a French labor tribunal ruled that Ms. Gibaud, the former marketing director of UBS Bank’s Paris subsidiary, was targeted with psychological harassment by UBS when she refused to destroy records showing that UBS concealed more than 12 billion euros via offshore accounts. Referring to her psychological harassment, Ms. Gibaud said - "That’s what I call ‘organised mobbing, gang stalking.’ It’s meant to make you crack. That’s what they expect". (link to Reuters article about the psychological harassment of Stephanie Gibaud).(9) Drs. Sheridan and James excluded discussion of legislation, enacted by several countries which define and prohibit group psychological harassment in the workplace (known as "mobbing" in Canada and European countries). (link to Wikipedia article about workplace mobbing and other types of mobbing).(10) Drs. Sheridan and James failed to discuss, even to criticize, that an increasing number of academic writings have been published about group psychological harassment outside of the workplace (academically referred to as “public mobbing” or “community mobbing”). For example, Professor Brian Martin (professor of social studies at the University of Wollongong, Australia), and Professor Florencia Peña Saint-Martin (professor of anthropology at the National School of Anthropology and History, Mexico) co-authored a paper published in 2014, an excerpt of which follows - “In mobbing, targets are judged ‘guilty’ .... afterwards, evidence to justify this initial judgment is gathered … Perpetrators manipulate and hide information, lie, … and monitor targets in a continual search for ‘new evidence’ that supposedly proves their allegations … There is a long history of other types of mob behavior, not to be confused with … mobs .., notably the Ku Klux Klan … The concept of mobbing today refers to more subtle forms of aggression … such as … continual derogatory comments, …starting rumors...’” (excerpt translated from Norma González Coordinadora Organización, Prometeo Editores, 2014). (I referred to the mobbing against me in Pinellas County, Florida as "psychological lynching" in the complaint I filed with the local FBI office. It continues even though I am residing in a foreign city. Mobbing is not only psychological harassment, but also an attempt to provoke responses which could be used against a person).(11) Surprisingly, Drs. Sheridan and James failed to discuss the well-documented use of diabolical, subtle psychological harassment by East Germany’s law enforcement/domestic intelligence agency (Stasi). Thousands of law-abiding citizens were targeted until 1990 when Germany reunified. The goal of the harassment, known as “Zersetzung” (decomposition), was stated in Stasi Directive 1/76 - “...systematic degradation of reputation, image, and prestige in a database on one part true, verifiable and degrading, and on the other part false, plausible, irrefutable, and always degrading…” It is important to know that Stasi used its extensive surveillance power, not only to surveil citizens, but also to harass them. I contend that members of the U.S. law enforcement/intelligence/private contractor community are doing the same. The goal of Stasi's surveillance was to know - “everything about everybody.” But even more onerous is the NSA’s present goal as stated in a PowerPoint slide revealed by Edward Snowden - “Collect It All; Process It All; Exploit It All; Partner It All; Sniff It All; and Know It All.” Stasi agents, with the help of civilians, such as neighbors, co-workers, employees of local businesses, health care providers, etc. spread lies and half-truths, entered targets’ residences just to move, add, or remove an object, engaged in mobbing, etc. Similarly, I contend that local FBI agents, perhaps by misusing the FBI's Infragard program, illegally convinced community members, including a few of my neighbors, local businesses, local professionals (e.g., Dr. Michelle Zetoony), and others to harass me. Of course, members of the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office, and persons acting on their behalf, did so as well, including the financial harassment of my law practice. I can only speculate who hacked my law office's internet usage, as well as my personal internet usage - which continues. An exiled East German, Jurgen Fuchs, wrote an article entitled “You’re Going to Crack,” in a West German magazine, Der Spiegel, about his personal account of being targeted under Zersetzung. Of course, the Stasi labelled him “paranoid,” much like the NSA has done to whistleblowers. But like pre-Snowden whistleblowers, Mr. Fuchs was later vindicated when Stasi documents were released to the public. (link to Zersetzung article in Wikipedia). My main website discusses Zersetzung-like tactics used against me. (Possibly relevant, Snowden documents revealed that, via NSA’s “Stateroom” program, the NSA and CIA jointly operate in countries, such as Thailand including in northwest Thailand where Chiang Mai is located. “These sites are small in size and in number of personnel staffing them. They are covert, and their true mission is not known by the majority of the diplomatic staff at the facility [U.S. embassies and consulates] where they are assigned").(12) Drs. Sheridan and James failed to discuss that U.S. private contractors and intelligence agencies are increasingly advertising for part-time - “surveillance role players.” These players are typically persons with security clearances and recruited from the U.S. military and law enforcement. They are hired to work in everyday places in a community and must sign non-disclosure agreements. The potential to misuse “surveillance role players” to harass targets is obvious. This subject is ripe for investigative reporting.(13) Although Drs. Sheridan and James listed the website - Fight "Gang Stalking" (link) - in its Reference section, they failed to discuss it, even to criticize it. I believe that this website (not the one in Facebook) is one of the few legitimate, well-researched sites online regarding the past and recent history of organized group harassment. Although not relevant to its legitimacy, the website is ranked high in any online search of the subject.(14) Drs. Sheridan and James failed to discuss the concerns of prominent Americans (some listed below) about the lack of accountability, past abuses, and potential for future abuse of the U.S. law enforcement/intelligence/private contractor community, particularly after 9-11 - former CIA operative Valerie Plame; Pulitzer Prize recipient and former Washington Post journalist Diane Priest in her book "Top Secret America"; Senator Frank Church (who, 40 years ago, chaired the Senate Committee which investigated systemic abuses by the FBI, NSA, CIA, and the IRS and accurately predicted the future widespread misuse of secrecy and technology. He warned - "That capability at any time could be turned on the American people..." and added that the community's secrecy and technology "could enable it to impose total tyranny, and there would be no way to fight back."); Edward Snowden; pre-Snowden NSA whistleblowers; former CIA division chief Melvin Goodman (who said, in 2008, the U.S. intelligence and private contractor community lacks accountability and "is essentially out of control. It's outrageous"); and former FBI counterintelligence agent and whistleblower, Michael German. Mr German, like others, is concerned that local fusion centers, created after 9-11, share information throughout the U.S. law enforcement/intelligence community, whether or not facts and assumptions are correct. He is also concerned about the potential for abuse of the FBI’s Infragard program (which I know of firsthand), and the new low threshold to initiate FBI investigations.(15) Drs. Sheridan and James failed to discuss the following persons’ allegations of organized group harassment (gangstalking) - Florida Highway Patrol Trooper Donna Watts (link to her pending federal lawsuit - Donna Jane Watts vs. City of Palm Gardens, et. al.), very similar allegations by another female Florida law enforcement officer Toni Foudy, Mr. and Mrs. Krlich of Hubbard Ohio (link to ABC’s 20/20 interview of Mr. and Mrs. Krlich) who filed a federal lawsuit (Krlich vs. Taafe; link) in February 2017), Jeffrey Kantor (whose federal lawsuit was dismissed for lack of evidence (similar to claims of pre-Snowden whistleblowers who lacked Snowden's documentation) (link to American Bar Association article about Jeffrey Kantor's federal lawsuit), Stephanie Gibaud (discussed above), Roderick Russell, and me. I discussed the above individuals more extensively in my main website - My Five Years of Systematic Police Harassment in Pinellas County Florida (and Organized Group Harassment).(16) Drs. Sheridan and James implied that persons complaining of group stalking suffer from psychiatric problems, such as staying in their residences and fearing to go out. My response - Drs. Sheridan and James apparently did not read, for example, Trooper Watts' pending federal lawsuit stating that she began living like a hermit due to the constant harassment by numerous Miami cops for months. Trooper Watts received intimidating voice messages of her private phones; police vehicles stalked her on and off duty; her private information was illegally accessed in a police database by a hundred cops; her neighbors reported seeing "strange--looking cars" idling and parked in their cul-de-sac (typical of the psychological harassment against me), etc. All this because Trooper Watts stopped a police cruiser travelling over 120 mph through traffic. She didn't know if the cruiser was stolen because its driver ignored her lights and siren for miles. It turned out that the driver was an off-duty Miami cop late for his second job. He was later fired. A law enforcement officer in Sarasota County, Florida (next to the county where I used to live) posted the following anonymous comment online about Trooper Watts. It was one of many posts personally attacking Trooper Watts in Activity Stream - LEO Affairs Forums (“leo” meaning law enforcement officers. - “ Dear Donna: All of us at the Sarasota County Sheriff's Office feel you will be out of a job in the near future. We do not condone stopping or writing other cops citations in this county and have a strong brother/sister hood in this tri-county area. With that being said, we would like to offer you a second chance at the Sarasota County Sheriff's Office Animal Services Unit cleaning our kennels. You being a piece of $hit will fit right in with cleaning up animal $hit. Please consider this position as your days are most likely numbered from the Florida Highway Patrol for your inappropriate/dangerous and malicious actions. We look forward to handing you a bucket and a mop in the near future. (link to an article about Trooper Donna Watts' experience) (link to Trooper Donna Watts' ongoing federal lawsuit, of note are paragraphs 170-182 and 332-339).(17) Drs. Sheridan and James implied that victims of group stalking are not to be believed because they have “no idea” who their stalkers might be. My response - No response is needed.(18) Drs. Sheridan and James wrote - “...We have not been able to find any record in the literature of cases where victims have been subject to two or more separate stalking campaigns by unrelated individuals in one 12-month period.” My response - Drs. Sheridan and James failed to discuss the federal lawsuits filed on behalf of Trooper Watts and Mr. Kantor, failed to discuss the EEOC lawsuit filed on behalf of by NSA intelligence analyst Karen Stewart, failed to discuss Roderick Russell's website (link) regarding the Zertsetzung-like harassment against him, failed to discuss my main website, and other legitimate sites.(19) Drs. Sheridan and James wrote that there are “limited police … resources” on the subject of organized psychological harassment. My response - The reason is obvious.(20) Drs. Sheridan and James wrote that their study of group stalking was the first to use the scientific method and peer review. My response - This is gobbledygook. What is needed instead is a Congressional investigation of organized psychological (and financial) harassment of the unaccountable U.S. law enforcement/intelligence/private contractor community similar to the Senate “Church Committee” of 40 years ago. There also needs to be substantial investigative reporting on the subject.A year after the Sheridan and James paper was published online, and only three weeks after the Washington Post article about the bizarre psychological harassment of U.S. diplomats, a New York Times article entitled "United States of Paranoia: They See Gangs of Stalkers" by Mike McPhate (link) was published (June 2016). Mr. McPhate relied upon the Sheridan and James paper to conclude that all complainants of organized group harassment must be delusional. Like Drs. Sheridan and James, Mr. McPhate has no background, training, or expertise in the U.S. law enforcement/intelligence/private contractor community. (He was the New York Times web page designer and manager). Also, like Drs. Sheridan and James, he failed to substantially investigate, or rely upon any substantial investigation of the community. (Years earlier, another New York Times reporter, Judith Miller, wrote articles based upon misinformation spoon-fed to her by government officials shortly before the U.S. invaded Iraq). Mr. McPhate's poor research and/or biased journalism was demonstrated by what he wrote, or more correctly, by what he failed to write about Karen Stewart in his article - “Karen Stewart of Tallahassee, Florida, believes large numbers of regular people have been brainwashed by the National Security Agency into thinking that she is a traitor or terrorist. Wherever she goes, she says - to church, to the grocery store, to the doctor’s office - they are there, watching. It baffles her, she said. But worse ,’It makes me angry to see how many people in this country are sociopaths. They are absolute group think drones,’ she said ’I don’t even consider them human anymore.’” But, astonishingly, Mr. McPhate failed to write that Karen Stewart was a longtime intelligence analyst for the National Security Agency (NSA) in the Weapons and Space department. She had worked for the NSA for 28 years until she was fired. Because another employee was credited with, and promoted for, Mrs. Stewart’s award-winning intelligence work, Mrs. Stewart filed an EEOC lawsuit against the NSA in 2010. She alleged that the other employee, who also worked in the Weapons and Space department, was a woman who provided sexual favors to NSA managers. NSA officials threatened to label her “delusional” if she did not drop her lawsuit. But she did not drop her lawsuit, was then diagnosed as "delusional” by the NSA - despite prior positive evaluations - and was fired. Another NSA whistleblower, Thomas Reinbold, said that NSA employees call NSA's delusional tactic as “ doing a mental." Because of my experience, I believe Karen Stewart that she was the target of organized group harassment by NSA security and by civilians acting on its behalf.Shortly after Mr. McPhate's article was published, another article, entitled “The Nightmarish Online World of ‘Gang-Stalking,’”(link) by Roisin Kiberd (link), was published online (July 2016). Ms. Kiberd, like Mr. McPhate, also relied upon the Sheridan and James paper to also conclude that all people reporting group harassment must be delusional. Like Drs. Sheridan and James and Mike McPhate, Ms. Kiberd has no background, training, or expertise in the U.S. law enforcement/intelligence/private contractor community, and did not substantially investigate, or rely upon any substantial investigation, of the community.Other articles have relied upon the Sheridan and James' "research" and, unfortunately, future articles will do so as well.​​​​​+++ More than a year after the Sheridan and James gangstalking "research" was posted online (on July 16, 2015), I published my website criticizing the study (on August 18, 2016). The two following articles appeared online just a few days after I published my website - An article entitled “Academic Research on Organized Gang Stalking is Lacking. So are Sheridan and James, and Dietrich” (posted in the website pop~agenda~culture on September 9, 2016) and an article entitled “Gangstalking Study by Dr. Lorraine Sheridan is Fundamentally Flawed” (posted in the website - Research Gang Stalking on September 14, 2016, which is linked to the above website). I am certain that the two phony articles were published as disinformation by a corrupt person(s) in, or associated with, the U.S. law enforcement/intelligence/private contractor community to counter my website. Consider the following - I sent the following email to the supposed author of the first article on October 3, 2016 -“ Mon, Oct 3, 2016<[email protected]> Name: Richard GriesingerContact Form URL: ContactDear volunteer teacher:I have read your criticism of the Drs. Sheridan and James study re group-stalking. I believe the study is shoddy "research," but I have some questions for you - 1. What is your name? 2. What city do you live in? 3. What [my comment - I meant to ask - Why] are you writing articles about group-stalking? That is, are you a victim of group-stalking? If so, what are the specific reason(s)? Your website contains no details of your personal experience (names, dates, etc.) why not?Thank you,Richard Griesinger ”I received the following email reply on October 5, 2016 - which not only failed to answer my questions, but also attempted to intimidate and threatened me. Understand that the author wrote that “she” was a volunteer teacher, but comes across as a private investigator. But more significantly, although the author is a supposed fellow victim of organized harassment - supposedly empathetic with fellow victims - “she" did “her” best to try to intimidate, threaten, and marginalize me -“ Richard-Also, in my sidebar, I have posted some 'free tools that you can use' to document these gang stalkers. As you might imagine, as an investigative journalist, I have developed habits- and one of those habits is checking IP addresses. Yours is x.xx.xxx.xx [my comment - I changed the numbers to x's], in Thailand, as you noted. I have also noticed someone (you) checking my blogs regularly in the last several days via my wordpress 'stats counter.' This sort of information, while in and of itself is not a case or necessarily immediately useful, is evidentiary material in piece and in parcel. In my sidebar, I offer you free tools that you can use as well to document any harassment you might still be enduring. I do not know what you would like from your personal situation, but I am available to investigate should you need a stateside investigator. As you know, these hidden investigations take the form of harassment, and death threats etc. And much of the is online, and leaves trace evidence. And, it is these little pieces of data that create for you, and others, the basic claim that you have been, in fact, targeted by scumbags.Best regards,popi ”A few hours later, I received another email from “popi” - which also did not answer my questions and was another attempt to intimidate and threaten me --“ Hi Chiang Mai ( Richard?).You can call me popi, like the flower. Well, for all of your questions, I would have to defer to my attorneys, located in my sidebar, where you can also read a bit about me in my bio ( but not too much). I am primarily, a writer, and a journalist. My case began many years ago, when I wrote a story about a purported terrorist in a college newspaper. Yes, I have been gang staked multiple times, in multiple places over time. And, my website DOES contain details, but they are laced within the narrative itself. Unlike yourself, I cannot afford to leave this country in order to write my story [my comment - "popi"'s community knows full well that I moved to Chiang Mai because I could no longer afford to live in Pinellas County due to my loss of income [my comment - "Popi''s community knows full well that I moved to Chiang Mai because I could no longer afford to live in Pinellas County due to my loss of income], and as you well know, people get hurt and even killed over talking about these things [my comment - intimidation and threats]. If I recall correctly- you are the guy who got stalked in Florida? Your narrative is a wonderful, clear, and concise telling of your tale.Very helpful, and insightful, and unlike the nutty blogs out there, is nearly court room worthy. And, this that you endured is called "pedofication," this situation that you described in your online work. A man named John Lang, an ex-marine, and a police corruption activist, from Fresno California was found dead in his burning house, as firefighters sat blocks away [my comment - more intimidation and threats], after he described essentially the same thing you described. They accused you of being a pedophile and so on. This fits a pattern, and part of my goal is to reveal those that do these things to others. I am offering a reward of up to 15k for anyone who can successfully bring a group of these cowardly POS to trial, and conviction. I honestly don't care if the people who are accused by these gang stalkers are indeed guilty of these purported crimes [my comment - I care] - what matters to me is how these hidden harassment campaigns, misuse of inappropriately gained personal data, and slander based in hearsay are affecting my country. I mean- if these things are true about you, and others, as the stalkers claim- then why not get it into a courtroom? [my comment - I tried to hire a law firm to file a police misconduct lawsuit, but soon learned that firms only wanted to handle cases that involve one or two incidents and, therefore, easier to litigate]. The answer to that is that they are avoiding, in plain legal terms- they are avoiding cases where clear legal standing would invoke the very hidden processes that they employ in these domestic terror campaigns waged against American citizens. I am interested in interviewing people who this has happened to, and also, possibly building towards a class action lawsuit, or in the very least, bringing this practice to light in a legitimate narrative structure that 'ordinary' people can understand, and begin to dismantle as a social ill. My case, like yours, involves dirty cops who misused data, and access to my personal life. It also included Jewish organizations [my comment - My harassment has not included Jewish organizations, but has included many evangelicals], community groups and more. And, regardless of their basis, it was illegal and needs to be brought to light. I am sure you have heard that phrase more than once from these religious nutjobs? They are fond of the phrase " what happens in darkness...." and so on. So, yes, my goal is to shine a light on these POS. If you are interested in telling me more, it would be on condition of anonymity- I am a journalist doing deep cover journalism, and my word is my bond. I would sit in jail for a source that provides accurate, factual information, and I would even put that into a confidentiality agreement if necessary. Well, if you would like to coresspond, I will be available.Best regards,popi “1st Update re"popi" --I regularly Google search my name "Richard Griesinger" with the word “harass” or "gangstalking" to see what websites have discussed me. In mid October 2016, my search revealed an article entitled "Former Clearwater Florida City Attorney criticizes Dr. Lorraine ..." posted in the website pop~agenda~culture. Although I previously opened that website (as "popi" mentioned in "her" first email above), I tried to open it after it mentioned me, but I could not. It is now marked “private." (The “popi,” who sent me the two above emails claims “her” real name is “popi gander.” The phrase “pop-agenda-culture” is listed near the top of the website; “popagandi” is the name of the author of the sister website - whatisorganizedstalking.wordpress. com). As a bad pun, the above names bring to mind "propaganda" defined as misleading information designed to promote a cause. The website - pop~agenda~culture - preposterously begins with a quote by a science fiction writer (Kurt Vonnegut), contains outrageous posts (either written as disinformation or posted by delusional individuals), discusses chewing gum on the bottom of a shoe, its sidebar contains an item "this is not a conspiracy theory blog," and, of course, contains no specific and verifiable facts about the author.2nd Update re "popi" --On November 13, 2016, “popi” - the anonymous corrupt person or persons in, or associated with, the U.S. law enforcement/intelligence/private contractor community - published the below article online about me entitled “In re: Richard Griesinger, Esq, and online defamation and libel." The article was published soon after I discussed “her” above two threatening emails to me in this website. The article was published in several of "her" disinformative websites,e.g., Protected Blog › Log in, Research Gang Stalking. and pop~agenda~culture. There are perhaps five reasons why "popi"'s community is concerned about my two websites - (1) My factual statements about the organized financial and psychological harassment against me since 2008 are true, many are detailed, and some are documented; (2) I am a credible person (established attorney forced to close my law office in 2012 due to hacking and harassment); (3) The motive for my harassment - revenge by the ex-husband (a high ranking law enforcement officer whose divorcing/ex-wife I dated from 2003 to 2011 - is obvious and documented; (4) I am verifiable (i.e., my identity and location is clear, unlike “popi”); and (5) The above community’s use of gangstalking and other harassing tactics is slowly losing the cover of plausible deniability due to increasing exposure in legitimate media (e.g., a Sydney Morning Herald article about CEO Michael Page in Australia, an ABC TV segment about Dr. Facika Tafara in California, Miami Herald articles about Florida Highway Patrol Trooper Donna Watts, an ABC TV 20/20 segment about Mr. and Mrs. Krlich in Ohio, etc.), and due to an increasing number of legitimate websites by credible individuals (for example, Roderick Russell in Canada, longtime NSA intelligence analyst Karen Stewart, and me). The following is “popi”’s article about me, portions of which I have bolded and underlined, followed by my comments in brackets -- “In re: Richard Griesinger, Esq, and online defamation and libel. The researcher of organized stalking will note various information/disinformation on the web about organized gang stalking [my comment - I agree, and the websites and articles by “popi”’s community are prime examples of disinformation. Snowden documents revealed that Western intelligence agencies post phony websites and articles online to discredit legitimate individuals and topics]. What should become clear after some amount of time is that this is by design of the hidden cultural practice that it is. This researcher has several blogs, and I do not use my personal identity in any of them [my comment - “popi” wouldn’t even disclose “her” name or city of residence to me by email] because in this ‘phenomena’ what then happens is that blogs are stalked, hacked, and online comes offline, as gang stalkers seek to silence those of us who research, or raise awareness of this topic. In other words, criminal activity under color of law begins when this topic is discussed openly [my comment - subtle intimidation and threats against me]. I wrote about a case that has all the trappings of authenticity - the case of one Richard Griesinger, Esq. [my comment - authentic because all of my factual statements are true, many are specific, and some are documented - a concern to “popi”’s community] - on one of my blogs, and the very next day received a phone call from a state where he formerly resided. That could indicate that he is not who he says he is; it could indicate that his blog is just another psyop; it could indicate many other things. But to me, the researcher, what it revealed- again- is how well connected these people are, as I never give that phone number to anyone-ever. That seems significant. Then, the blog became increasingly interesting to some in the community of gang stalking, and for various reasons, I closed the blog to any but registered and verified users. In short order, Israeli’s, MEPCON, and a few un-named persons requested access. Put another way- my blog got mobbed by people interested in that story and others. I have been mobbed by the fanatical Zionists, LEIU pedophiles, Israeli’s from Squad 8200, and law enforcement as well as pimple faced military trolls​ [my comment - What??], and often, these mobbing’s come offline, into the real world, where these people do other things that endanger life and safety [my comment - again, more intimidation and threats]. What this indicates to the researcher, is an inference that this topic gets certain folks riled up in the least, and drives some into furious counter-narrative. That seems important, because most legitimate research agrees that those who practice in the occult of gang stalking, are in fact from within the LEO and security industry, which at this time, has effectively replaced the Ku Klux Klan, the JDO, and the so-called ‘white identity’ movement that preceded the current Christian Zionists [my comment - Harassment against me in Pinellas County, Florida and here in Chiang Mai has included, among others, American evangelicals (e.g., by Pinellas County Circuit Judge George Greer, former client Cathy Bulger, my ex-girlfriend’s ex-husband, basically a Catholic evangelical, probably a large number of law enforcement officers in Pinellas County, etc.), no doubt, because I viewed some gay porn online. I never would have a gay or bisexual encounter, but that should be nobody’s business] as fanatical bombers and so on, as a domestic terrorists. In fact, the cross cultural membership, criminal, and institutional corruption of theses LEIU, security contractor, Scientologist/Mormon/Christian/Jewish gangs [my comment - My harassment has not involved Jewish gangs, but has involved evangelicals], LEO’s, community policing initiatives nearly vindicate the modern Klan as a mere political action group that practices free speech, and their version of history. According to OSINT easily found online, Richard Griesinger, Esq., was formerly a City Attorney in Pinellas County Florida, in an era when Scientologists were seeking influence in that area. I saved a copy of the original webpage (here is what he- or someone- calls his original webpage), and all communications I have had with him, as often these near legitimate stories are in fact psychological operations designed to intimidate me, the researcher, or the people like him, a purported victim of gang stalking. In other words, I protect both of us, from whoever would corrupt or challenge the narrative. I use WordPress because it auto saves posts with a time stamp, as does Gmail, and so, I can prove beyond any and all reasonable doubt that Richard Griesinger has libeled and defamed this author [my comment - Truth is a complete defense, and anonymous persons, like “popi,” cannot be the subject of defamation], and attempted to discredit the narrative I have documented. I will make this available to any credentialed researcher of organized gang stalking, should you be verifiable as an authentic researcher. I reached out to this Griesinger fellow, because I believe that much of what he wrote is an authentic story, and based upon his recent post, I believe that, like many of these victims, his narrative is mixed with features of a possibly un-diagnosed personality disorder [my comment - First, remember that "popi" is supposedly a fellow victim of organized group harassment, but is doing "her" best to marginalize me! Also, as I discussed in both of my websites - governmental agencies, corporations, and other entities in the United States and other countries have used the “delusional” tactic against whistleblowers, dissidents, and targets (e.g., the NSA against whistleblowers Russell Tice and Thomas Reinbold, the Pacific Gas & Electric Company against a manager and whistleblower Neil J. Aiken, etc. all of whom were later vindicated], but I find his story credible on cursory research ( I am not a mental health professional [my comment - There "she" goes again], this is just my opinion about a person who made their business public online; nor do I seek to make life harder for this fellow, but I will not discuss it further than that.) I attempted a dialogue with this person/entity, and in return, was rewarded with libelous, slanderous comments about my work. A sad fact of those of us who actually seek to bring light to this dark practice are often pitted against each other, perhaps by our own biases or mental illness [my comment - There “she” goes again]; and often by agents and agencies whose exact goal is this form of exploitation. I have a background with social workers and psychologists, and so, I am aware that mental illness can be of the paranoid variety. Griesinger’s current version of “his” story exhibits this trait [my comment - There “she” goes again. And, as I wrote above, "popi" is supposedly a fellow victim of organized group harassment]. These days, and since I closed that blog, this blog gets hits every two days or so from Thailand. I can prove that to any legitimate researcher of organized gang stalking. So, Mr/Miss Griesinger, [email protected], former City Prosecutor, etc, or whoever, whatever agency has co-opted your/his name and identity, I once again, here in plain sight of the whole world, extend you the opportunity to retract your slander/libel, or whatever it is. Then, in lieu of that, I will take other measures [my comment - more subtle intimidation and threats]. Now, to the researcher of organized stalking, note that Thailand is a beneficiary of tens of millions of American dollars per year [my comment - no doubt, “popi” is letting me know that “her” community has financial clout in Thailand] for initiatives that ‘combat sex trafficking and child sexual exploitation.’ [my comment - I will not be smeared as a pedophile, child molester, a potential one, a sex trafficker, or potential one. My ex-girlfriend’s ex-husband - a high ranking local law enforcement officer whose best friend was a retired FBI agent - had me smeared for revenge (detailed in my main website). The smear has always been secret (that is, always behind my back or anonymous) and was denied by law enforcement in Pinellas County. My attempts to hire professionals to disprove it were always interfered with. The FBI denied my written request to investigate. (I notified the U.S. Consulate’s Office here in Chiang Mai in 2015 of the smear and threats against me, my main website, etc. just for record). It is a cross-roads nexus state where sex trafficking takes place as children and women, and Thai lady-boys are shuffled across borders by actual rings of sex traffickers. This is one reason why talking about this topic can be dangerous [my comment - more intimidation and threats], both to the researcher, and to individuals who are targeted by gang stalking. Organized rings of pedophiles, and literal and actual gangs of sex traffickers operate from Thailand to America and beyond, often in the disguise of these social justice movements, and anti-sex trafficking NGO’s, cults and actual gangs, many of which are funded by USAID and other military’ intelligence agency black budgets. Do you see a connection? I do. It is this researchers opinion that organized gang stalking, pornography, prostitution, and sex trafficking are related, and part of my hypotheses is that both sides of the trafficking narrative derive billions per year, one way or the other, and often work together, as was the case of Yugoslavia/Bosnia in the 1993 era. It is no different today, and many who research gang stalking will find this to be the case as well- there is a provable link between those who create a moral panic, and those who police the narratives of moral panic. In fact, they are one and the same, like Laurel and Hardy, Pinky and the Brain-or a cat and a mouse [my comment - What??] : those who claim to be ‘combating’ a moral scourge, are the exact same people and groups deriving profit from all sides of the issue. But in the case of the ‘targeted individual,’they are the scratching post the cats sharpen claws on; a form of bullying so severe and debilitating, that many take their own lives, are forced into false confessions, or worse, with some committing crimes in attempts to get a case into a court room, because the involvement of police and other institutional and community occult factors into often unwinnable dilemmas, and legal basis or legal standing issues. So, Mr. Griesinger, I do not wish to add to your trauma- regardless of whatever you were accused of, the hidden practice of gang stalking needs to be brought into the light- I applaud your attempt to do that. And as you know, I extended my empathy to you, and you returned it by posting alleged private data. Regardless of your choice, once again- I ask that you retract your deliberate lies, and other statements about my writing, and my hypotheses. Any correspondence I have had with you will be revealed in a court room if necessary [my comment - I have nothing to hide except embarrassment, but your community certainly has a lot to hide. Also, I have been consistently denied the opportunity to place the secret smear and harassment against me into public view.]. And, in lieu of that, I will take further active measures [my comment - more intimidation and threats].“ (posted on November 13, 2016). [My final comment - Compare the content of my two websites with that of “popi”’s emails, 'her' article about me, and 'her' disinformative websites. Unlike “popi,” I am verifiable and have provided specific details regarding the motive and nature of the hacking and organized financial and psychological harassment against me].3rd Update re "popi"'s community --I recently (December 6, 2016) noticed text at the top of one of my documents ("CM - Diary") in my Google Docs app on my iphone. I did not write it. (A linguistic expert isn't needed to show this). The text was hacked and placed into my “CM - Diary,” no doubt, as a psychological ploy by a corrupt person(s) in, or associated with, the U.S. law enforcement/intelligence/private contractor community. "CM" stands for Chiang Mai, the Thai city where I live. I do not write lengthy, general text in my CM-Diary, but rather only write short comments about specific events which occur in Chiang Mai, except for an occasional, short general comment. Although much of the content is true and although I wrote somewhat similar text in other Google Docs, some of it is not, and some of it is exaggerated. Interestingly, the hacked text does contains some methods which are used to harass me (in Chiang Mai and previously in Pinellas County, Florida). I have bolded and underlined portions of the text followed by my comments in brackets. -- “The number of people despising me here in Chiang Mai is astounding [my comment - First, consider the diabolical effort in writing and hacking the below text. Second, consider the diabolical and extensive effort to smear me in Chiang Mai as a pedophile. Also, although the fact of the smear is true (initially secretly spread as revenge by my ex-girlfriend’s ex-husband in Pinellas County. There has always been an evangelical undercurrent, if you will, involved in the smear both in Pinellas County and in Chiang Mai), I would not use the words "despising" and "astounding" in this context.] When viewed in one perspective, it’s almost fascinating. Again, I cope well because I naturally consider myself a reader, not a participant of my novel-like harassing experiences. What outfits [my comment - I do not use the word "outfit" or "outfits"] will some harassers be wearing, what newspaper or book will they be reading and want me to peek at [my comment - I do not use the word "peek," although Jeffrey Kantor's lawsuit, which I discussed, refers to "sneak and peek" surveillance]. What vehicles wlil be backing up near me this time. Will giggles [my comment - I do not use the word "giggle" or "giggles," but psychological harassment against me has included, for example, cars backing up as I pass, people coughing as I pass, a customer next to me in a restaurant doing his best to get my attention to an opened newspaper he was holding out which had the word “delusional” prominently displayed on a page, etc.] be used or a menacing look, or maybe get a passing cough. It all is curiously and loosely organized [my comment - The phrase "loosely organized" was parroted from what I wrote in this website (reason 6 above) - that I believe that there is a loose network worldwide of, hopefully just rogue, members of the U.S. law enforcement/intelligence/private contractor community. However, the harassment here in Chiang Mai, as in Pinellas County, Florida, is very organized]. I get it, but it really and truly has no lasting effect on me, except for the dramatic entry of an oddball-looking guy [my comment - I would not use the phrase "dramatic entry of an oddball-looking guy"] etc. It all seems a big waste of time and money (assuming some of the sheep are paid. No doubt, the vangies work free of change. They hate gays, I know, I get it. But the funny thing, folks [my comment - I would not use the word "folks" which I consider is disingenuous, particularly when used by politicians], I’m not gay, I know that’s a tough one for you. And for you vangies and others, I have never fantasized about my Little Brother and any other child, ever. You can believe that or not - it won’t change the truth. I admire the clean lifestyle and many values you vangies hold to, but I feel sorry for you as well, really (not pity), that your minds and emotions are trapped and limited by setting life and religion in black and white concrete. You folks have tried to set who I am in concrete terms as well, but most people defy such classifications. I’m not a religious person - I don’t like organized religions, particularly dogmatic ones like yours, any orthodox, maybe if I were black and the rousing and soulful gospel music and all, but I was a robotic acolyte for three or four years and the form over substance turned me off. Vange churches are even worse. Vanges are too Old Testament, not enough New Testament - lighten up and live longer."4th Update re “popi”’s community --That “popi”’s community - those corrupt individuals in, or associated with, the U.S. law enforcement/intelligence/private contractor community - is concerned about my website was demonstrated by five, no doubt related, websites which recently (in mid December 2016) posted “popi”’s phony criticism of my website - WordPress.com: Create a website or blog, WordPress.com: Create a website or blog, WordPress.com: Create a website or blog, WordPress.com: Create a website or blog, and WordPress.com: Create a website or blog. A minor update - In January 2016, I discovered two more, no doubt related, websites which also posted "popi"'s phony criticism of my website - http://en.wordpress.com and http://li.wordpress.com. A second minor update - In February 2017, I discovered yet another, no doubt, related website which posted "popi"'s phony critcism of my website - http://yi.wordpress.com. As I wrote above, Snowden documents revealed that intelligence agencies flood the internet with disinformation to discredit legitimate individuals and topics.

Do you think Trump understands that he has played into Putin's hands with his attacks on Biden and his Ukraine conspiracy theories? And now Putin considers Trump his stooge.This is totally CNN/House DP Plantation Party narrative. Exactly the opposite is true …ttps://www.quora.com/Do-you-think-CNN-is-fake-news/answer/Alana-Logan-4RussiaPutin haters who follow CNN -Alana Logan's answer to Has Putin overstepped his bounds as a legitimate leader of his country? If not, at what point do we say that Putin poses a bigger threat as the leader of Russia than his potential successors?https://www.quora.com/share/Do-Russians-think-Donald-Trump-is-a-joke-2?__nsrc__=4&__snid3__=5134022121Alana Logan's answer to Do Russians think Donald Trump is a joke?Alana Logan's answer to What US president do the people of Russia admire?ObamaAlana Logan's answer to Why is Russia invading Ukraine?Alana Logan's answer to Did Barack Obama effectively deal with Russia during his presidential tenure?Alana Logan's answer to What's currently happening in the US regarding the impeachment of Trump?Alana Logan's answer to Will President Trump be impeached?Ukraine call transcript, (which Schift altered when he read it out) - Ukraine Call Transcript. It has been released by Trump for the world to see and in fact he has released another transcript since then. Republicans are open and transparent about this fiasco but the Biden mob have thus far done everything in secret because they have a lot to hide. The truths are out anyway.Rep. Adam Achiff acknowledged on Thursday that he made up parts of the Ukraine phone call transcript when he delivered his opening statement at a much-watched TV hearing with Schiff, California Democrat and chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, said his reading was “part in parody”––but made the admission only after Rep. Mike Turner, Ohio Republican, called him out.In his opening statement, Schiff said Mr. Trump asked Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky for fabricated dirt on former Vice President Joe Biden and said Mr. Trump threatened to make the same request Mr. Zelensky eight times–––both quotes not in the transcript.When it came his time to question Joseph Maguire, the acting Director of National Intelligence, Mr. Turner noted inaccuracies uttered to a large TV audience as Democrats rev up talk of impeachment.“It’s not the conversation that was in the chairman’s opening statement,” Mr. Turner said. “And while the chairman was speaking I actually had someone text me, ‘is he just making this up?’ And yes, yes, he was because sometimes fiction is better than the actual words or the text. But luckily, the American public are smart, and they have the transcript. They’ve read the conversation. They know when someone is just making it up.”Schiff:“I want to mention that my colleague is right on both counts. It’s not okay, but also my summary of the president’s call was meant to be at least part in parody. The fact that that’s not clear is a separate problem in and of itself. Of course the president never said, ‘If you don’t understand me, I’m going to say it seven more times.’ My point is, that’s the message that the Ukraine president was receiving in not so many words.”The issue has to do with how many times Mr. Trump ask the Ukraine president to contact Attorney General William Barr about the role of former Vice President Biden and his son, Hunter, in Ukraine politics and business. A Wall Street Journal story said Mr. Trump pressured Mr. Zelensky eight times, which is not born out in the transcript.Schiff also said in his opening statement that Mr. Trump asked Mr. Zelensky to “make up dirt” on Mr. Biden––again something the president didn’t say in the 30-minute phone call in JulySchiff said the transcript, “reads like a classic organized crime shakedown. Shorn of its rambling character and in not so many words, this is the essence of what the president communicates. We’ve been very good to your country, very good. No other country has done as much as we have, but you know what, I don’t see much reciprocity here. I hear what you want. I have a favor I want from you, though. And I’m going to say this only seven times, so you better listen good. I want you to make up dirt on my political opponent understand the loss of it on this and on that.Republicans earlier this year asked Schift to resign, accusing him of putting out falsehoods about the Russia investigation.The Washington Times.Trump impeachmentLet's see exactly what the Democrats have done for America -By beginning October2019, 228 out of 435 representatives voted against impeaching president Donald Trump, at the impeachment enquiry - Only 207 Democrats had their arms twisted by Pelosi and her clique.Schiff's dirty tricks -Graham: Why he won't be watching the impeachment hearings -Andrew Bakaj and Mark Zaid, are Eric Ciaramella's lawyers.Ciaramella met with an intelligence panel aide seeking guidance before filing a complaint about Trump's Ukraine communications with the Intelligence Community inspector general, and Schiff knew about it but did not immediately inform his Republican colleagues on his panel.inform his Republican colleagues on his panel.Abigail Grace, who worked at the NSC (The White House National Security Council)until 2018, was hired in February, while Sean Misko, an NSC aide until 2017, joined Schiff's committee staff in August, the same month Eric Ciaramella submitted his complaint.Alexander Vindman, the Army lieutenant colonel and Ukraine director on the National Security Council who testified on Capitol Hill last month, works with Eric Ciaramella.Ciaramella is a career CIA analyst who was detailed to the NSC at the White House during the Obama administration and left during the first year of the Trump administration. During the Obama administration CiaramellaCiaramella worked on Ukraine issues with 2020 Democratic candidate Joe Biden, who was then vice president and designated as the point man on Ukraine.Ciaramella traveled on Air Force Two at least one of the six visits that Biden made to Ukraine.Biden's quid pro-quo is wide open for America and the world to see. No chance of sweeping that under the carpet …Remember this? …FLASHBACK, 2018: Joe Biden Brags At CFR Meeting About Withholding Aid To Ukraine To Force Firing Of ProsecutorThe best thing that ever happened to the Republican Party is this “Impeachment Enquiry”, because the truth always comes out, which means Biden’s and cadres are going to have a lot of egg on their faces - worldwide. Remember the entire world is watching this.Democrats can fool some of the people some of the time but not all of the people all of the time.Anyone that tried to stop the Biden's from committing crimes and corruptions was promptly demonised and fired. This was the Biden money power. Biden then enrolled Pelosi and the rest of the gang to back him up ‘for the sake of the Party’, knowing if he and Hunter look bad to the world, which they do, so would the Democratic Party, which it does. Of course the mob all jumped in to do damage control. But damage control did not involve any personal or Party clean up, and it has never involved trying to make America great, instead it involved demonising the legitimate, legal former president of Ukraine, then committing a physical coup in Kiev under the Obama administration, then it involved backing the illigitimate illegal new Neo-Nazi regime in the Kiev government, which turned on any “dissidents” wgo stood up to defend themselves valliantly in the streets and in their homes. Ordinary citizens and farmers became soldiers overnight to defend and protect their families, their country against Kiev forces who literally drove tanks over them and shot them in the streets.Being partly Russian, many citizens called on Russia for protection, anot overnight unanimous referendum succeeded and Crimeans saved themselves by seceeding themselves to Russia. Putin opened his wings for them. He did not join the war but he did help the pleading Russians in Ukraine politically. Thank God, or they would all have been massacred by the Obama/Biden/illigitimate Kiev forces too.Of course for that Putin and Russia were immediately demonised. Again by the extreme Leftist (Communist) CNN and the other Obama administration mouthpiece, Jen Psaki, who lied through her teeth to reporters at every press conference.Only RT and Fox reported that entire war as it actually happened. The truth. CNN being the Democratic Party misinformation and disinformation spokespersons, reported everything backwards, in reverse, even today making all exactly as it was/ is not.Obama/Kerry/Biden/illigitimate Kiev government, caused a civil war by US Democrat Party coup by proxy in Ukraine. Thousands of innocent civillians died fighting or not even able to fight for their lives. Untrained as soldiers yet took up arms against a forces too big for them. It was a total massacre of innocent human lives snuffed out (read online accounts of personal individual stories), and all based on Obama administration demonisation of the good guys in order to get national as well as international silence and cooperation. Your silence and cooperation.Mass murder for greed based on only lies is what that was.Trump and Shokin among others also had to be demonised and fed lies. The Democrat stance has always been ‘the best form of defense is attack’.Now you or I may miss that, but the world has not missed a beat. The entire international world is watching and getting it and all over the Internet are writers, authors and YouTubers telling it like it is. Hopefully Trump will stop listening to the wrong people and permanently stop sending military and financial aid to illegitimate Kiev.Joseph Biden’s quid pro quo is there for the world to see - This imbecile literally threw himself and the DP under the train -Biden withheld $1 billion in aid to Ukraine to pressure the government to remove Shokin from the Prosecutor General's Office because Shokin was busy investigating Burisma and Hunter Biden.Joseph Biden has boasted about his role in getting Shokin fired. Biden said he withheld $1 billion in loan guarantees for Ukraine in order to force the government to “address the problem with its top prosecutor”, Shokin."I looked at them and said: 'I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money. Well, son of a bitch. He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time," he said.Money always talks, especially to an illegal, illegitimate Kiev government /parliament, installed artificially by the Obama administration coup by proxy in Kiev (2014), after first using Jen Psaki and CNN to demonised all the legal legitimate good guys. War in the Ukraine was orchestrated deliberately to gain strategic access to Russian gas pipelines and for the Biden's and their cadres to commit corporate corruptions for the sake of beloved money. Thousands of innocent Ukrainian civilians lives were snuffed out.Democrats want to defend the Obama administration and their hired Neo-Nazi thugs who destroyed the Ukraine in only a year. Democrats want to defend Kerry, the Bidens, and their misinformation and disinformation spokespersons, CNN and Psaki, who helped them to demonise all who stood in their mass murderous way. Atrocities occurredoccurred during still continue with US militaryand financial aid in the Ukraine, because Trump inherited that mess which he needs to end now and which Russia tries to pick up the pieces and put together again - Too many innocent human lives and families who lost loved ones destroyed - over 3000 civilians murdered and family for survivors devastated forever. And the DP and CNN continue to demonise Putin for saving Crimeans from that too. It's about time Democrats start seeing things for what they actually are.This impeachment fiasco has been described as a “Paper or trial coup”, and that's exactly what it is. It seems the last resort for DP cadres to protect their careers and save face because they know Trump has beaten them. Now all Trump needs to do is fire all those who have been /are feeding him and the United States and the world, misinformation and disinformation about the Ukraine and stop sending military and financial aid to the illegitimate and illegal Kiev government which Obama placed there by proxy coup. Trump needs to open his eyes wider. Putin’s eyes have been open all along.

They can do so because the PEOPLE don’t report it. It can be considered a method of discrimination in that the Police hold themselves harmless from prosecution and yet hold the Citizenry accountable to the law. This activity is unconscionable. If no one is above the law, then the Officer ‘s Department Chief should receive your and other’s notices of Warning, or statement of Arrest for conduct unbecoming of a Police Officer. The PEOPLE also have the Power of Arrest for a Crime. If the Department fails to correct the Officers, then you can initiate a Deprivation of a Right under the Color of Law. That right is redress (the act or an instance of setting right a wrong; remedy or cure: to seek redress of grievances). That is a Constitutional Right (The right to petition government for redress of grievances is the right to make a complaint to, or seek the assistance of, one's government, without fear of punishment or reprisals, ensured by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution (1791).Now here is your Power Point: READ AND LEARN! STOP COMPLAINING TAKE BACK THE POWERS OF THE PEOPLE.TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAWWhoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnaping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.This law further prohibits a person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation or custom to willfully subject or cause to be subjected any person to different punishments, pains, or penalties, than those prescribed for punishment of citizens on account of such person being an alien or by reason of his/her color or race.Acts under "color of any law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the bounds or limits of their lawful authority, but also acts done without and beyond the bounds of their lawful authority; provided that, in order for unlawful acts of any official to be done under "color of any law," the unlawful acts must be done while such official is purporting or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. This definition includes, in addition to law enforcement officials, individuals such as Mayors, Council persons, Judges, Nursing Home Proprietors, Security Guards, etc., persons who are bound by laws, statutes ordinances, or customs.Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141Pattern and PracticeTitle 42, U.S.C., Section 14141: makes it unlawful for state or local law enforcement agencies to allow officers to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives persons of rights protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. This law is commonly referred to as the Police Misconduct Statute. This law gives DOJ the authority to seek civil remedies in cases where it is determined that law enforcement agencies have policies or practices which foster a pattern of misconduct by employees. This action is directed against an agency, not against individual officers. The types of issues which may initiate a Pattern and Practice investigation include:1. Lack of supervision/monitoring of officers' actions.2. Officers not providing justification or reporting incidents involving the use of force.3. Lack of, or improper training of officers.4. A department having a citizen complaint process which treats complainants as adversaries.Whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that a violation has occurred, the Attorney General, for or in the name of the United States, may in a civil action obtain appropriate equitable and declaratory relief to eliminate the pattern or practice.Types of misconduct covered include, among other things:1. Excessive Force2. Discriminatory Harassment3. False Arrest4. Coercive Sexual Conduct5. Unlawful Stops, Searches, or ArrestsTitle 18, U.S.C., Section 241Conspiracy Against RightsThis statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same).It further makes it unlawful for two or more persons to go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another with the intent to prevent or hinder his/her free exercise or enjoyment of any rights so secured.Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to ten years, or both; and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years, or for life, or may be sentenced to death.It is a crime for one or more persons acting under color of law willfully to deprive or conspire to deprive another person of any right protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. "Color of law" simply means that the person doing the act is using power given to him or her by a governmental agency (local, state or federal). Criminal acts under color of law include acts not only done by local, state, or federal officials within the bounds or limits of their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of their lawful authority. Off-duty conduct may also be covered under color of law, if the perpetrator asserted their official status in some manner. Color of law may include public officials who are not law enforcement officers, for example, judges and prosecutors, as well as, in some circumstances, non governmental employees who are asserting state authority, such as private security guards. While the federal authority to investigate color of law type violations extends to any official acting under "color of law", the vast majority of the allegations are against the law enforcement community. The average number of all federal civil rights cases initiated by the FBI from 1997 -2000 was 3513. Of those cases initiated, about 73% were allegations of color of law violations. Within the color of law allegations, about 82% were allegations of abuse of force with violence (59% of the total number of civil rights cases initiated).Investigative AreasMost of the FBI's color of law investigations would fall into five broad areas:1. excessive force;2. sexual assaults;3. false arrest/fabrication of evidence;4. deprivation of property; and5. failure to keep from harm.In making arrests, maintaining order, and defending life, law enforcement officers are allowed to utilize whatever force is "reasonably" necessary. The breath and scope of the use of force is vast. The spectrum begins with the physical presence of the official through the utilization of deadly force. While some types of force used by law enforcement may be violent by their very nature, they may be considered "reasonable," based upon the circumstances. However, violations of federal law occur where it can be shown that the force used was willfully "unreasonable" or "excessive" against individuals.Sexual assaults by officials acting under "color of law" could happen in a variety of venues. They could occur in court scenarios, jails, and/or traffic stops to name just a few of the settings where an official might use their position of authority to coerce another individual into sexual compliance. The compliance is generally gained because of a threat of an official action against the other if they do not comply.The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees the right against unreasonable searches or seizures. A law enforcement official using his authority provided under the "color of law" is allowed to stop individuals and even if necessary to search them and retain their property under certain circumstances. It is in the abuse of that discretionary power that a violation of a person's civil rights might occur. An unlawful detention or an illegal confiscation of property would be examples of such an abuse of power.An official would violate the color of law statute by fabricating evidence against or conducting a false arrest of an individual. That person's rights of due process and unreasonable seizure have been violated. In the case of deprivation of property, the official would violate the color of law statute by unlawfully obtaining or maintaining the property of another. In that case, the official has overstepped or misapplied his authority.The Fourteenth Amendment secures the right to due process and the Eighth Amendment also prohibits the use of cruel and unusual punishment. In an arrest or detention context, these rights would prohibit the use of force amounting to punishment (summary judgment). The idea being that a person accused of a crime is to be allowed the opportunity to have a trial and not be subjected to punishment without having been afforded the opportunity of the legal process.The public entrusts its law enforcement officials with protecting the community. If it is shown that an official willfully failed to keep an individual from harm that official could be in violation of the color of law statute.The Supreme Court has had to interpret the United States Constitution to construct law regulating the actions of those in the law enforcement community. Enforcement of these provisions does not require that any racial, religious, or other discriminatory motive existed.Acting under color of [state] law is misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because the wrongdoer is clothed with the authority of state law Thompson v. Zirkle, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77654 (N.D. Ind. Oct. 17, 2007)“The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and the name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it; an unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed ... An unconstitutional law is void.”(16 Am. Jur. 2d, Sec. 178)“An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as it had never been passed.” Norton v. Shelby County.” 118 U.S. 425“If the State converts a liberty into a privilege, the citizen can engage in the right with impunity.” Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 373 US 262“No State legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.”Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 1401 (1958).“The Constitution of these United States is the supreme law of the land. Any law that is repugnant to the Constitution is null and void of law.” Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137“No state shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and attach a fee to it.” Murdock v. Penn., 319 US 105“If the state converts a liberty into a privilege, the citizen can engage in the right with impunity.” Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 373 US 262“Officers of the court have no immunity, when violating a Constitutional right, from liability. For they are deemed to know the law.” Owen v. Independence, 100 S.C.T. 1398, 445 US 622“The court is to protect against any encroachment of Constitutionally secured liberties.” Boyd v. U.S., 116 U.S. 616“State courts, like federal courts, have a “constitutional obligation” to safeguard personal liberties and to uphold federal law.” Stone v. Powell 428 US 465, 96 S. Ct. 3037, 49 L. Ed. 2d 1067.“The obligation of state courts to give full effect to federal law is the same as that of federal courts.” New York v. Eno. 155 US 89, 15 S. Ct. 30, 39 L. Ed. 80.“An administrative agency may not finally decide the limits of its statutory powers; this is a judicial function.” Social Security Board v. Nierotko. 327 US 358, 66 S. Ct. 637, 162 ALR 1445, 90 L. Ed. 719."State Police Power extends only to immediate threats to public safety, health, welfare, etc.," Michigan v. Duke 266 US, 476 Led. At 449: which driving and speeding are not. California v. Farley Ced. Rpt. 89, 20 CA3d 1032 (1971):"For a crime to exist, there must be an injured party (Corpus Delicti) There can be no sanction or penalty imposed on one because of this Constitutional right." Sherer v. Cullen 481 F. 945:"If any Tribunal (court) finds absence of proof of jurisdiction over a person and subject matter, the case must be dismissed." Louisville v. Motley 2111 US 149, 29S. CT 42. “The Accuser Bears the Burden of Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt”.Title 42 Penalties For Government OfficersThe AUTHORITY FOR FINES (DAMAGES) CAUSED BY CRIMES BY GOVERNMENT OFFICERS.These Damages were determined by GOVERNMENT itself for the violation listed.Breach Penalty AuthorityVIOLATION OF OATH OF OFFICE $250,000.00 18 USC 3571DENIED PROPER WARRANT(S) $250,000.00 18 USC 3571DENIED RIGHT OF REASONABLEDEFENSE ARGUMENTS $250,000.00 18 USC 3571DEFENSE EVIDENCE (RECORDS) $250,000.00 18 USC 357IDENIED RIGHT TO TRUTHIN EVIDENCE $250,000.00 18 USC 3571SLAVERY (Forced Complianceto contracts not held) $250,000.00 18 USC 3571DENIED PROVISIONS IN THECONSTITUTION $250,000.00 18 USC 3571TREASON (combined above actions). $250,000.00 18 USC 3571GENOCIDE $1,000,000.00 18 USC 1091MISPRISION OF FELONY $500.00 18 USC 4CONSPIRACY $10,000.00 18 USC 241EXTORTION $5,000.00 18 USC 872MAIL THREATS $5,000.00 18 USC 876FRAUD $10,000.00 18 USC 1001FALSIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS $10,000.00 18 USC 1001PERJURY $2,000.00 18 USC 1621SUBORNATION OF PERJURY $2,000.00 18 USC 1622GRAND THEFT (18 USC 2112) each $250,000.00To determine multiply no. of counts by damage 18 USC 3571RACKETEERING (Criminal) $25,000.00 18 USC 1963RACKETEERING (Civil)Wages Taken $x3 = 5? 18 USC 1964(Sustained Damages [total] x 3)Thirty-seven (37) Constitutional violations from Count 1: = $9,250,000.00 Damages Dealing with claims of "immunity."Any claim of " immunity" is a fraud because, if valid, it would prevent removal from office for crimes against the people, which removal is authorized or even mandated under U.S. Constitution Article 2, Section IV; as well as 18 USC 241, 42 USC 1983, 1985, 1986, and other state Constitutions.Precedents of Law established by COURT cases, which are in violation of law, render violations of law legally unassailable. Such a situation violates several specifically stated intents and purposes of the Constitution set forth in the Preamble; to establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, and secure the-blessings of liberty. This is for JUDGES, or anyone in any branch of government.SEVEN ELEMENTS OF JURISDICTIONSEVEN ELEMENTS OF JURISDICTION:1. The accused must be properly identified, identified in such a fashion there is no room for mistaken identity. The individual must be singled out from all others; otherwise, anyone could be subject to arrest and trial without benefit of "wrong party" defense. Almost always, the means of identification is a person's proper name, BUT ANY MEANS OF IDENTIFICATION IS EQUALLY VALID IF SAID MEANS DIFFERENTIATES THE ACCUSED WITHOUT DOUBT. (There is no constitutionally valid requirement you must identify yourself, see 4th Amendment; also see, Brown vs. Texas, 443 US 47 and Kolender v. Lawson 461 US 352.)2. The statute of offense must be identified by its proper or common name. A number is insufficient. Today, a citizen may stand in jeopardy of criminal sanctions for alleged violation of statutes, regulations, or even low-level bureaucratic orders (example: colorado National Monument Superintendent's Orders regarding an unleashed dog or a dog defecating on a trail). If a number were to be deemed sufficient, government could bring new and different charges at any time by alleging clerical error. For any act to be triable as an offense, it must be declared to be a crime. Charges must negate any exception forming part of the statutory definition of an offense, by affirmative non-applicability. In other words, any charge must affirmatively negate any exception found in the law.3. The acts of alleged offense must be described in non-prejudicial language and detail so as to enable a person of average intelligence to understand nature of charge (to enable preparation of defense); the actual act or acts constituting the offense complained of. The charge must not be described by parroting the statute; not by the language of same. The naming of the acts of the offense describes a specific offense whereas the verbiage of a statute describes only a general class of offense. Facts must be stated. Conclusions cannot be considered in the determination of probable cause.4. The accuser must be named. He/she may be an officer or a third party, but some positively identifiable person (human being) must accuse; some certain person must take responsibility for the making of the accusation, not an agency or an institution. This is the only valid means by which a citizen may begin to face his accuser. Also, the injured party (corpus delicti) must make the accusation. Hearsay evidence may not be provided. Anyone else testifying that they heard that another party was injured does not qualify as direct evidence.5. The accusation must be made under penalty of perjury. If perjury cannot reach the accuser, there is no accusation. Otherwise, anyone may accuse another falsely without risk.6. To comply with the five elements above, that is for the accusation to be valid, the accused must be accorded due process. Accuser must have complied with law, procedure and form in bringing the charge. This includes court-determined probable cause, summons and notice procedure. If lawful process may be abrogated in placing a citizen in jeopardy, then any means may be utilized to deprive a man of his freedom, and all dissent may be stifled by utilization of defective process."The essential elements of due process are notice and an opportunity to defend. “Simon v. Craft, 182 US 427."one is not entitled to protection unless he has reasonable cause to apprehend danger from a direct answer. The mere assertion of a privilege does not immunize him; the court must determine whether his refusal is justified, and may require that he is mistaken in his refusal. “Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479 (1951)7. The court must be one of competent jurisdiction. To have valid process, the tribunal must be a creature of its constitution, in accord with the law of its creation, i.e., Article III judge.Lacking any of the seven elements or portions thereof, (unless waived, intentionally or unintentionally) all designed to ensure against further prosecution (double jeopardy); it is the defendant's duty to inform the court of facts alleged for determination of sufficiency to support conviction, should one be obtained. Otherwise, there is no lawful notice, and charge must be dismissed for failure to state an offense. Without lawful notice, there is no personal jurisdiction and all proceedings prior to filing of a proper trial document in compliance with the seven elements is void. A lawful act is always legal but many legal acts by government are often unlawful. Most bureaucrats lack elementary knowledge and incentive to comply with the mandates of constitutional due process. They will make mistakes. Numbers beyond count have been convicted without benefit of governmental adherence to these seven elements. Today, informations are being filed and prosecuted by "accepted practice" rather than due process of law.Jurisdiction, once challenged, is to be proven, not by the court, but by the party attempting to assert jurisdiction. The burden of proof of jurisdiction lies with the asserter. The court is only to rule on the sufficiency of the proof tendered. See, “McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp, 298 U.S. 178 (1936). The origins of this doctrine of law may be found in “MAXFIELD v. LEVY, 4 U.S. 330 (1797), 4 U.S. 330 (Dall.) 2 Dall. 381 2 U.S. 381 1 L.Ed. 424Supreme courts ruled "Without Corpus delicti there can be no crime"“In every prosecution for crime it is necessary to establish the “corpus delecti”, i.e., the body or elements of the crime.” People v. Lopez, 62 Ca.Rptr. 47, 254 C.A.2d 185."In every criminal trial, the prosecution must prove the corpus delecti, or the body of the crime itself-i.e., the fact of injury, loss or harm, and the existence of a criminal agency as its cause. " People v. Sapp, 73 P.3d 433, 467 (Cal. 2003) [quoting People v. Alvarez, (2002) 27 Cal.4th 1161, 1168-1169, 119 Cal.Rptr.2d 903, 46 P.3d 372.].“Elements of “corpus delecti,” injury or loss or harm and a criminal agency which causes such injury, loss or harm, need only be proven by a “reasonable probability,” i.e., by slight or prima facie proof… ” People v. Ramirez, 153 Cal.Rptr. 789, 791, 91 C.A. 132.““Corpus delecti” of crime consists of fact of injury, loss, or harm, and existence of criminal agency as cause. ” People v. Daly, 10 Cal.Rptr.2d 21, 28, 8 CA4th 47.“Generally, “corpus delecti” of crime is (1) the fact of the loss or harm, and (2) the existence of a criminal agency as its cause. ” People v. Dorsey, 118 Cal.Rptr. 362, 43 CA3d 953."There is no requirement of independent evidence 'of every physical act constituting an element of an offense,' so long as there is some slight or prima facie showing of injury, loss, or harm by a criminal agency. " In re I.M., 23 Cal.Rptr.3d 375, 381 (2005)."The corpus delecti of a crime consists of two elements[:] the fact of the injury or loss or harm, and the existence of a criminal agency as its cause. " People v. Jones, 949 P.2d 890, 902, 70 Cal.Rptr.2d 793, 17 Cal.4th 279.“The corpus delecti rule requires that the corpus delecti or the body or substance of the crime charged be proved independent from the accused’s extrajudicial confession or admissions. The corpus delecti of a crime consists of two elements: (1) the fact of the injury or loss or harm, and (2) the existence of a criminal agency as its cause. [citing] “People v Jennings, 53 Cal 3d 334, 279 Cal Rptr 780, 807 P2d 1009, 92 CDOS 2576, 91 Daily Journal DAR 4222, reh den. cert den (US) 116 L Ed 2d 464, 112 S Ct 443…People v Pensinger, 52 Cal 3d 1210, 278 Cal Rptr 640, 805 P2d 899, 91 CDOS 1514, 91 Daily Journal DAR 2504, mod 53 Cal 3d 729a, 91 Daily Journal DAR 4745 and stay gr (Cal) 1991 Cal LEXIS 3318 and reh den. cert den (US) 116 L Ed 2d 290, 112 S Ct 351, 91 Daily Journal DAR 12909, reh den (US) 116 L Ed 2d 821, 112 S Ct 923; State v Pullos, 76 Idaho 369, 283 P2d 590; People v Friedland (1st Dist) 202 Ill App 3d 1094, 148 Ill Dec 415, 560 NE2d 1012; Brown v State, 239 Ind 184, 154 NE2d 720, cert den 361 US 936, 4 L Ed 2d 360, 80 S Ct 375; Joseph v State, 236 Ind 529, 141 NE2d 109, 69 ALR2d 824, cert dism 359 US 117, 3 L Ed 2d 673, 79 S Ct 720; People v Aiken, 66 Mich 460, 33 NW 821; People v Gould, 156 Mich App 413, 402 NW2d 27; State v Simler, 350 Mo 646, 167 SW2d 376; State v Hill, 47 NJ 490, 221 A2d 725; State v Robinson (App. Scioto Co) 83 Ohio L Abs 259, 168 NE2d 328; State v Brown, 103 SC 437, 88 SE 21…there must be sufficient proof of both elements of the corpus delecti beyond a reasonable doubt.” 29A American Jurisprudence Second Ed., Evidence § 1476.“Without standing, there is no actual or justiciable controversy, and courts will not entertain such cases. (3 Witlen, Cal. Procedure (3rd ed. 1985) Actions § 44, pp 70-72.) “Typically, … the standing inquiry requires careful judicial examination of a complaint’s allegations to ascertain whether the particular plaintiff is entitled to an adjudication of the particular claims asserted. ” (Allen v. Wright, (1984) 468 U.S. 737, 752…Whether one has standing in a particular case generally revolved around the question whether that person has rights that may suffer some injury, actual or threatened. ” Clifford S. v. Superior Court, 45 Cal.Rptr.2d 333, 335."As a general principal, standing to invoke the judicial process requires an actual justiciable controversy as to which the complainant has a real interest in the ultimate adjudication because he or she has either suffered or is about to suffer an injury. " People v. Superior Court, 126 Cal.Rptr.2d 793."Judicial power generally is the power to adjudicate upon the legal rights of persons and property, with reference to transactions or occurrences existing or already had and closed...The judicial function is to 'declare the law and define the rights of the parties under it. “Frasher v. Rader, 124 Cal. 133, 56 P. 797...'A determination of the rights of an individual under the existing laws' is an exercise of judicial power...An essential element of judicial power, distinguishing it from legislative power, is that it requires "the ascertainment of existing rights." People v. Bird, 300 P. 22, 26-27., there are 2 elements to corpus delcti injury,loss(damage) redress ability of the court.Posted by Chris/Blue Collar Moto at 9:53 AM