Mc Rental Application: Fill & Download for Free

I think this is an excellent question and deserves some thought. I will give you two different answers because there are (at least) two different ways of looking at this question.First, from just a pure economic theory perspective, the answer sort of has to be no. Let me explain why.Fixed Costs (FC) are usually defined to be the costs that do not vary with output. This is in contrast to Variable Costs (VC), which do. Marginal Cost (MC) is defined as the extra cost required to produce one more/”that last” unit. Marginal Cost is therefore defined to be the change in Variable Cost as output increases:[math]MC=\frac{\Delta{}Cost}{\Delta{}Q}=\frac{\Delta{}(FC+VC)}{\Delta{}Q}=\frac{\Delta{}VC}{\Delta{}Q} \tag*{}[/math]because FC doesn’t change as output changes, only VC does.In this line of thinking then, MC and FC are unassociated with each other. If FC were higher or lower, it would not affect MC because, as we just showed, MC only depends on the costs that vary with output.But this doesn’t seem to match some of our intuition. While the definition of FC above is what is typically used, we sometimes define (or at least think of) FC as the cost of the fixed factors of production. A fixed factor is one that you cannot change in the short run — it takes time to increase or decrease its availability/application and so much of the output process has to happen in the meantime that we might as well view this as a long-term decision problem. That is, in the short run we are stuck with a fixed amount of it. For example: the amount of land used in the production of a crop — more or less land can be used next harvest season, but for the current season that factor is fixed.If you are confused as to why we use “fixed” in two different senses — fixed within a certain time span and fixed in relation to the scale of our output — you are not alone. It’s possible that your question is born out of this tricky discrepancy.Because the other way of thinking about your question is to consider a change in a fixed factor of production: suppose we acquire more land, or buy a new tractor combine, or to find a less-agricultural example, we buy a new computing/software system for the office. On one hand, these acquisitions would be considered changes to fixed cost: each of them represent purchases of assets that get “cemented” for a period of time, and thus as an increase to the costs of our fixed factors. Further, the cost of that new land/tractor/office equipment (be it rental contracts or payments) do not vary with output once we are paying them. On the other hand, each of these acquisitions is likely to change the productivity of our variable factors (e.g. make our labor more or less productive) thus changing the amount (and cost) of variable inputs needed to produce one more unit of output (i.e. changing our marginal cost).So we have an argument that suggests that changes in fixed cost can lead to changes in marginal cost because the cause of the change in fixed costs spills over into adjusted marginal costs.If we are to try and reconcile this apparent inconsistency, the way to do it is to come back to the time issue vs. scaling issue. As economists, we might argue that whenever we are talking about Fixed Costs and Variable Costs and Marginal Costs, we are talking about things in the short run. And within the short run, no changes in FC impact MC. In the longer run, a lot of things change and yes things can simultaneously impact both FC and MC.I hope this helps.

In the UK the providers are different from above.Names you'll often hear or read about in the property trade press are:CFP, Core, Vebra, VTUK, Eurolink, Aspasia, CML, Dezrez, ReapIT, Let MC.Firms seem to split into corporates and independents, and also into those that believe in server software vs. web-based applications.Changes in market share will behave a bit like a major ERP product since the barriers to switching for the customer are high: you have re-train all your staff; you may have to re-engineer key processes and most products don't let you transfer over historic financial data for rental portfolios.

Yes. My agent won't show my rental homes without an ap. She wants to pre qualify potential renters to avoid wasting their time and hers.