Form 4 Request To Record Death: Fill & Download for Free

Source: Google IndiaRG has done a surgical strike on PM Modi.I am seriously impressed by the recent decisions taken by Rahul Gandhi. He is proving to be a leader that Congress was missing dearly. Not only has he singled-handedly took PM Modi head on, but also shown that he is ready for the top job.On 21 Feb 2019, Congress party announced that it is setting up a Task Force on National Security which will be headed by Retired Lt. Gen. Deependra Singh Hooda. The Task Force will prepare a vision paper for the country in consultation with experts.Who is Retired Lt. Gen. Deependra Singh Hooda?General Hooda, was the Northern Army Commander during the ‘surgical strike’ conducted in the wake of the Uri terrorist attack in 2016. He is a decorated war hero with several medals and 40 years of service in the Indian army. He has received several awards and recognition over the years:Param Vishisht Seva Medal, Uttam Yudh Seva Medal, Ati Vishist Seva Medal, Vishisht Seva Medal, Samanya Seva Medal, Special Service Medal, Operation Vijay Medal, Operation Parakram Medal, Sainya Seva Medal, High Altitude Service Medal, Videsh Seva Medal, 50th Independence Anniversary Medal, 30 Years Long Service Medal, 20 Years Long Service Medal, 9 Years Long Service Medal and UNMEE Medal.He has served in Kargil War, and headed many missions including surgical strike in URI. He has a stellar record and unparalleled experience. He is extremely modest and patriotic soldier.National Security Failure.PM Modi and his blue-eyed boy Doval have screwed up the national security situation royally. We lost 45 CRPF Jawans due to intelligence failure. Now the blame game has begun. Add to that the fact that PM Modi was shooting the film well after the terrorist attack in Pulwama. BJP’s Ravishankar Prasad says that Doval didn’t inform them in time. If PM cannot be reached for 4 hours and continues shooting a PR film for a private channel, then India's security is at the mercy some highly incompetent people.Anyway celebrated cowboys are already putting a spin on the story. Their only objective — save PM Modi from the blame at any cost. National security be damned. Why should Modi/ Doval be held accountable? Well, can they blame Nehru? Apparently, they can. Amit Shah already has. Never underestimate cowboys.These people are a national disaster. They have formed government with PDP (terrorist symapthisers), destabilized Kashmir, and are responsible for the death of 45 CRPF jawans. But there is no accountability.It is reassuring to see that INC is taking step in the right direction. Good Luck to General Hooda and his team. May you make us proud. God bless you.FYI: Modi Govt Opposed Salary Hikes to CRPF in SCCRPF officers are not “treated on par” with the army, even though they operate as first respondents in insurgent situations. The pay for a low-ranking army soldier is 50 percent higher than the pay of an equivalent soldier in the CRPF. Despite this, the Union Government opposed a request to upgrade the pay of CRPF and other Central Armed Police Forces (CAPF) officers, to ensure that all officers serving from a particular time were given an increase, regardless of rank.Fun fact:Safforn cell inmates busy googling ‘Gen VS Hooda Pakistan connection’ but failing miserably!

Well, you can. It has to be one of the roughly 170,000 “machine guns” that were registered with the NFA prior to May 19, 1986, which also include serialized parts and components designed to enable automatic fire in weapons originally built for semi-only operation. You need to fill out and submit an ATF Form 4 along with a $200 tax, the current backlog on Form 4 processing is about 8 months, and because only 170,000 of these weapons are legal to own among over 70 million gun owners in the U.S., the going rate for just about anything you’d recognize as an automatic rifle or assault rifle is at least $10,000, with the best-kept examples of highly desirable models commanding six-figure price tags.So, maybe the question is really, “why can’t civilians purchase fully automatic rifles in the same way as any other?”.The answer to that stretches back more than a century, to the dark underbelly of the Gilded Age that followed Reconstruction. With the issues of the Civil War settled sufficiently for the rule of law to be re-established nationwide, the Industrial Revolution kicked into full gear in the U.S., with mechanization and standardization leading to a decline in artisanship in favor of unskilled labor. Basically, either you owned your means of production, or you were a cog in someone else’s machine, almost literally; if you broke down or failed for any reason, you were removed, replaced and discarded. The late 1800s through the Roaring 20s saw some of the most deplorable working conditions the country has ever seen.The natural response to that was to refuse to work in the deathtraps that were late-1800s factories and mines. Well, if one guy did that, the answer was easy. When 90%+ of your workers walked off the job, replacing them was a little harder. Factory owners and managers typically worked with the local police (who knew whose tax revenues were paying their wages - hint, it wasn’t the workers’) to literally beat the workers back into submission. That worked a few times, before the union organizers began supplying weapons to the laborers, allowing them to shoot back. That resulted in the Haymarket Riot of 1886, the Homestead Strike of 1892, and the Pressed Steel Car Strike of 1909, all involving the strikers resorting to deadly force in defense against police, private strikebreakers, and even the National Guard.These strikes prompted the first calls for gun control in the United States, leading to the first drafts of what would become the National Firearms Act. Machine guns, aka automatic weapons, were not common in these labor riots, but would find their way into the draft legislation as a restricted category in the 1920s. This was largely due to the influence of newsreels of the violence in Chicago between rival North Side and South Side gangs, including the infamous St Valentine’s Day Massacre masterminded by South Side gang leader Al Capone.The NFA overall found little support in Congress until FDR took office, mere months after having nearly been assassinated by Giuseppe Zangara. FDR escaped injury, but his friend and Chicago mayor Anton Cermak was mortally wounded in the attempt, and Roosevelt held him on the way to the hospital. Gun control would become a key issue for FDR alongside his economic New Deal, and his support got the National Firearms Act passed into law in 1934, highly restricting a number of easily concealable weapons (somewhat ironically not handguns; restricting pistols or revolvers would have lost popular support among northern Dems and would have guaranteed a legal challenge that could overturn the whole law) as well as silencers (the least racist reason commonly cited was that silencer use by hunters was allowing overhunting of threatened species like bison; much more common were allegations of the use of silencers by people who resorted to poaching to feed their families, with Italians in the North and blacks in the South singled out for rhetoric we simply would not tolerate today) and of highly destructive weapon classes like explosives (Haymarket), large-bore rifles and cannon, and fully automatic weapons.That was the status quo for about 50 years, and frankly, it worked; due to a combination of $200 being a pretty serious sum of money even into the 1970s (it was the median rent in New York City in the 60s, if you can believe that), and those who could afford this tax being highly unlikely to use the weapon in violent crime, only two homicides have been committed with a legally-owned automatic weapon since the NFA passed, both of them with police-issue weapons, not “transferrable” NFA-registered weapons.So why can’t we still buy new machine guns? Because in 1986, the NRA was championing a law designed to walk back some of the more abusive practices that the GCA of 1968 allowed the ATF to get away with. ATF agents were revoking licenses and throwing firearm dealers and owners in jail for a variety of innocent things, like selling a weapon without an FFL (a “private sale”), for little other reason than because they could and because they needed to be seen as doing something to stem the tide of violence rising in the late 70s as the economy worsened. Additionally, local law enforcement were making life very difficult for firearm owners by criminalizing any presence of a firearm in a vehicle, even if the circumstances were very obviously that the firearm was being transported to somewhere it could be lawfully used (such as a shooting range or hunting grounds).The NRA’s answer was the Firearm Owner’s Protection Act. It specifically defined various terms and phrases of the GCA to clarify points of law that were being used to trap FFLs and gun owners (for instance, selling a firearm, even for a profit, does not necessarily mean you are “engaged in the business of selling firearms” for which an FFL is usually needed), as well as to define a means by which firearms can be legally transported between any two places where the firearm can be legally possessed, superceding state and local laws to the contrary.With the bill on the floor of the House on April 10, 1986, Rep. William Hughes, D-NJ, proposed Amendment 777, which added subsection (o) to 18 USC 922, stating that transfer or possession of a machine gun was illegal, except for agents of the U.S. or any State government, or weapons lawfully possessed as of the date the law takes effect. This amendment was agreed to by voice vote (with acting Chairman Charlie Rangel, D-NY, notably declining to entertain a request for a recorded vote), and the bill as amended also passed the full House and Senate and was signed into law on May 19, 1986. It is illegal to possess or to transfer possession of any machine gun not already registered before this date unless you are employed or contracted by a government agency, possessing the weapon in furtherance of that agency’s business and with its approval.Why this change? Well, first, Nixon in 1976 (shortly before leaving office) had suspended the gold-pegging agreement of the Bretton Woods treaty between the Allied powers of WWII. That allowed the dollar to float freely, and by the mid-1980s the “stagflation” of the energy crisis of the late 70s had significantly reduced the dollar’s value. The NFA’s $200 tax, while still painful, was no longer out of reach of the middle class, and registrations of machine guns and other devices had been on the rise in the early 80s. East Coast lawmakers feared that the NFA was about to have little practical effect on the supply of these weapons.In addition, 1983 in south Florida was a very bloody year in the War on Drugs. Smugglers had taken to shipping automatic firearms obtained from various communist rebel groups in Central and South America, to drug gangs in the U.S. alongside the product itself, totally bypassing any semblance of control under the NFA. Several notable drive-by shootings in Miami made national news, stoking fears of more widespread drug violence (even though the number of deaths due to these shootings was, as is typical, a very small percentage of Miami’s total homicide rate).Under pressure once again to “do something”, what was done was the Hughes Amendment; no new machine guns in the United States, ostensibly making it that much more likely that anyone in possession of a machine gun is breaking the law and thus allowing easier avenues of investigation and prosecution. However, it didn’t stop the Ruby Ridge or Waco standoffs, nor the North Hollywood Shootout, all involving illegally-transferred or illegally-modified rifles.

Yup.Turns out Mr. Pen and Phone wasn’t as effective as he thought.That’s what happens when your entire legacy is built on executive orders. Sandcastles swept away with the tide. That’s why presidents don’t make law. Congress does.That’s why DACA was rolled back.That’s why we pulled out of the Paris Climate Agreement.That’s why Obamacare is coming undone.That’s why a bleep-ton of Federal Regulations on businesses have been cancelled.That’s why the Iran deal is under siege.That’s why the Mexico City policy was rescinded.That’s why the Dear Colleague Memorandum on Title IX was repealed.That’s why we may now get to bring back elephants shot in Zimbabwe and the other place I’m too lazy to look up.All Executive Orders or EOs in a certain capacity.All sandcastles.And now all dead or on death’s doorstep.The good news for Democrats and anti-Republicans is that the same thing will happen when the next Dem comes into the White House.Goodbye Border Wall.Hello Obamacare 2.0.Welcome back to Paris, Mr. President.Not even The Wall can keep the tide away from his EO sandcastles, even if he tinted them with gold.You what lasts for the test of time?Law.Law passed by your congressmen in the House and the Senate, that have enough of a majority and public support to break past the deadlock, the gerrymandering, the scheming and plotting. Laws that go past petty partisanship that are vital for the security of the nation and her people.You can debate whether or not the laws you want should be above partisan politics, whether that be guns, abortion, climate change, illegals, or trigger warnings, but the fact remains that for each issue, neither side has the vast majority to sweep in and inact those laws.Why?Because you’ve become convinced that only the president can change things. Only the president and his EOs can change the country.Trump has not only shattered that illusion, but he took “a big beautiful dump on it. Believe me.”Stop looking to the White House for your vision, and turn it back on your Congressman. They’re supposed to listen to you, to represent you, to be your voice under the Capitol Dome.Call them. Tweet them. Facebook them. Harass and harangue them until they listen to you, and if they refuse, then why the hell are you voting for them?Turn that House of Cards in on itself.The president is the chief executive. He doesn’t make the law. He enforces it.You’re barking up the wrong tree.Edit:So I just want to clarify a few things instead repeating myself in the comments:ACA:Obamacare was and is signed legislation. I apologize for not being clear.This is why Trump can’t do anything to remove it, at least without Republican support, but they’re completely split between repeal/replace or downright repeal.There are however, suspicious EOs applied to Obamacare that some would argue exceed the law.Now normally, Congress would take a look and try and edits the kinks.But by the time the problems of Obamacare arose, Obama’s lost the House and his super majority Senate. Which meant the kinks and majors issue could not be resolved through legislation. Hence EOs.Opinion | How the Obama administration’s executive actions sabotaged ObamacareKeep in mind, this is the Washington Post, the same Post that still has “Democracy Dies in Darkness” in the header after the election of Trump, so you know that this is serious, even for the Lefties.If Trump can’t get a repeal through Congress, he’s just going to take Obama’s EO bandaids off and watch it bleed to death until the budget itself requires a repeal.Title IX:This is the specific item that Betsy Devos wants to remove.Dear Colleague Letter from Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights Russlynn Ali. -- PrintableThis was sent out in 2011 by the Obama Administration that basically removed the “beyond reasonable doubt” part of rape accusations.Please pay special attention to page 2 on that bleeping 1 in 5 rape statistic that has been debunked so many times I’m wondering if Obama either had a brain fart when he wrote that or if he was just pandering to his feminist base.Refer to page 4 and 5 about the action taken: “if the school knows or reasonably knows… Title IX requires the school to take immediate action to eliminate the harassment, prevent its recurrence, and address its effects.”No proof required. After all a woman would never lie. I could have sworn I heard something called “…beyond a reasonable doubt…”And my favorite part: “if the complainant requests confidentially… the school should take all reasonable steps to investigate and respond to the complaint consistent with the request to confidentiality…”That’s right, whoever heard of the right to face your accuser? A sexist probably.Utterly disgusting.Which is why it would never pass in Congress.Title IX was in place since the 70s, which basically reiterates the 1964 Civil Rights Act in gendered form for institutions that take federal tax dollars. That is these institutions can’t discriminate nor prohibit based on sex and everything that goes into it.Here’s the law: Title IX and Sex Discrimination.No where in signed Law does it state that these institutions should “listen and believe?” Hence the EO (or really a Dear Colleague).Because apparently, one in five, sorry, now it’s one in four women in colleges are being sexually assaulted or worse… raped.And gosh darn it, we’re just not doing enough to stop it. And if it wasn’t for those evil sexist Republicans and their archaic principles of Innocent until Proven Guilty, we can start punishing these animals… I mean men… I mean rapists… I mean sexual assaulters… I mean…Oh wait, what’s this…Campus Sexual Assault Researchers: Setting the Record Straight on '1-in-5'And this…The Many Problems With Campus Sexual Assault SurveysYet another leftist site calling out the statistic when their base has so much to gain.Are 1 in 5 Women Raped at College?Yes, I know Prager is Conservative-leaning and this offers motive to dispute, but they present the facts clearly and cite sources as well as add on other consequences to this statistic that other outlets fail to mention.I’ll also add this video by a YouTuber named Sargon of Akkad who analyzes everything about Mattress Girl and how Obama’s memo regarding Title IX affected this:Its fifty minutes long, so I understand if ya’ll don’t have the time, but look at the like/dislike ratio. That amount of universal support shows that Sargon attempted to remain as objectionable as possible and present nothing but the facts regarding how Obama’s Title IX ruined a man’s life.This is what Trump and Devos want to remove, and I fully support it. An EO (pseudo-EO really) that can and is abused by opportunistic man-hating feminists.Thank you all again for you’re upvotes and comments. I really do appreciate the feedback.