Simple: Fill & Download for Free

5304–3900=Rs.1404 INTEREST FOR 4 MONTHS SO ONE YEAR INTEREST 4X3=12 MONTHS=ONE YEAR=1404X3 =Rs.4212 SO INTEREST RATE IS 4212X100/3900=108 %

I'll give you the some exchange of conversation with a single transit flight, and to keep it simple I am assuming that it is cleared to enter the airspace, the weather is fair, the flight is operating normally and aircraft has no conflicting traffic on its route:Aircraft calls our Area Control Unit on our frequency 10 minutes prior entring into our airspace to get entry clearance. The call may be as follows: “Lahore Control, Speedbird 256, estimating position SAMAR time 2100. Maintaining flight level 340. 5304 on the squawk. Requesting entry clearance.” Then the controller sees the aircraft's flight plan for its routing and responds with the clearance which may be as follows: “Speedbird 256, Lahore Control, cleared to position PAVLO from SAMAR on route A466 to DI thereafter N644 to PAVLO. Maintain flight level 340. Report position SAMAR.” The pilot is expected to readback the complete clearance correctly and the controller acknowledges if the readback is correct.When aircraft reaches the reporting point, the pilot calls “Speedbird 256 position SAMAR” and the controller acknowledges and may ask it to report at another fix point. The call will be like this: “Speedbird 256, identitied position SAMAR with squawk 5304. Next report position JHANG.” 'Identifying' the aircraft is a message which tells the pilot that they are in radar coverage of the ATC unit. The pilot readbacks again and the controller acknowledges if the readback is correct.If aircraft wishes to climb it will give a call like this: “Speedbird 256 request climb flight level 360.” If level is available then climb is given by the controller: “Speedbird 256 climb flight level 360.” If climb is not available, assuming due to traffic, then the controller replies and gives the reason for the unavailablity: “Speedbird 256, flight level 360 not available due succeeding traffic maintaining 360, 20 miles ahead.”Aircraft may also request frequency for the next ATC unit (if the pilot does not already know it) so that it can get an entry clearance from the next unit, just like it did with with our unit.Upon reaching the TCP, tranfer of control point, we ask the aircraft to changeover to the next FIR's frequncy thereby handing it over to the next unit. The call would be like this: “Speedbird 256, position PAVLO, Lahore radar services terminated, contact Kabul on 128.5.”

It’s not a simple effect. Additional decks change the game in a number of small ways, that just happen to work to the disadvantage of the player.One of the larger effects (but still small) is the probability of getting a blackjack. With one deck there are 4 aces, 16 tens and 52 cards. There are [math]4\times16=64[/math] ways to get a blackjack, and [math]\binom{52}{2}=\frac{52\times{51}}{2}=1326[/math] possible starting hands. [math]\frac{64}{1326}=0.04827[/math].With two decks, both numerator terms double. 8 aces and 32 tens give the player [math]8\times{32}=256[/math] ways to get blackjack. But while one term in the denominator (52) doubles to 104, the other term (51) more than doubles to 103. [math]\binom{104}{2}=\frac{104\times{103}}{2}=5356[/math]. That’s more than [math]4\times{1326}=5304[/math]. Therefore the ratio falls, [math]\frac{256}{5356}=0.04780<0.04827[/math].The difference, [math]0.00047[/math], multiplied by the 1.5 times blackjack pays in good casinos, represents a loss to the player of [math]0.00070[/math], or a reduction of 0.07% in edge. With infinite decks, the chance of a blackjack is [math]2\times\frac{1}{13}\times\frac{4}{13}=\frac{8}{169}=0.04734[/math], so slightly more than half the loss of going to infinite decks occurs when you go from 1 to 2 decks.But lots of other stuff changes as well. The dealer’s chance of a blackjack falls—but since the house doesn’t pay itself 1.5 times for blackjack there is still a net loss to the player.It’s a more complex computation, but if you work through all the numbers the dealer will bust with [math]0.28359[/math] probability using one deck falling to [math]0.28258[/math] with two decks, and [math]0.28182[/math] with infinite decks. There are advantages for the player as well, such as more chance of getting doubles to split with more decks. That helps because the player can sometimes improve her chances by splitting, while the dealer cannot split.The biggest single effect, although it’s complicated to calculate, is that with more decks it’s more common for both the dealer and the player to bust (assuming the dealer deals out his hand either because other players are in the hand, or in the interests of mathematics). The most common reason to bust is to hit and get a 10, with more decks the chance that both players get hit with a 10 is higher, because removing the player’s ten from the deck has less effect on the dealer’s chance of getting a 10. Since the casino wins when both player and dealer bust, and since this happens around 9% of the time, changes to this probability really matter. But not only do you have to compute all the possible card combinations, you have to account for the player’s choices (the dealer’s choices are fixed). This takes a computer, although the math is simple in principle.More decks are not bad for card counters in a direct sense, but they hurt because the house will deal less deeply into the shoe. The house doesn’t like to shuffle too often, because it slows down the game. With 8 decks it could shuffle halfway through, and still shuffle only about a quarter as often as with a single deck. The advantage to counting rises as you get deeper into the deck, and this is especially true for team counting.